Is this homebrew Wind Wave spell balanced?Is Thunderwave centered on the caster?Spell Area of Effect RangeDoes forced movement, as in Thunderwave, necessarily break a grapple?Does Thunderwave's push effect knock away incoming spells/projectiles?Is this homebrew sword of wind control based on “Grasscutter” overpowered?Is this Library-encounter balanced?Stampede: How does this custom spell compare to Cloudkill, another 5th level spell?Is there a reason this homebrew spell wouldn't work with the Attack action?Is this homebrew Spiritual Shield spell balanced?Is this homebrew Elementalist Fighter class balanced?

What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?

A Paper Record is What I Hamper

Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?

Implications of cigar-shaped bodies having rings?

Partitioning the Reals into two Locally Uncountable, Dense Sets

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Providing evidence of Consent of Parents for Marriage by minor in England in early 1800s?

Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?

What term is being referred to with "reflected-sound-of-underground-spirits"?

Aliens crash on Earth and go into stasis to wait for technology to fix their ship

Apply MapThread to all but one variable

Minor Revision with suggestion of an alternative proof by reviewer

Pre-plastic human skin alternative

How to limit Drive Letters Windows assigns to new removable USB drives

Does Gita support doctrine of eternal samsara?

A ​Note ​on ​N!

Re-entry to Germany after vacation using blue card

How to have a sharp product image?

Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?

Mistake in years of experience in resume?

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

What is causing the white spot to appear in some of my pictures

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?

Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?



Is this homebrew Wind Wave spell balanced?


Is Thunderwave centered on the caster?Spell Area of Effect RangeDoes forced movement, as in Thunderwave, necessarily break a grapple?Does Thunderwave's push effect knock away incoming spells/projectiles?Is this homebrew sword of wind control based on “Grasscutter” overpowered?Is this Library-encounter balanced?Stampede: How does this custom spell compare to Cloudkill, another 5th level spell?Is there a reason this homebrew spell wouldn't work with the Attack action?Is this homebrew Spiritual Shield spell balanced?Is this homebrew Elementalist Fighter class balanced?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


Is this homebrew spell balanced?




Wind Wave



1st-level evocation



Casting Time: 1 action
Range: Self (15-foot cone)
Components: V, S
Duration: Instantaneous



A wave of powerful air sweeps out from you. Each creature in a 15-foot cone originating from you must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 2d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away from you if a creature fails the save by 5 or more they are knocked prone.



On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn't pushed.



In addition, unsecured objects that are completely within the area of effect are automatically pushed 10 feet away from you by the spell's effect.



At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d8 for each slot level above 1st.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$


Is this homebrew spell balanced?




Wind Wave



1st-level evocation



Casting Time: 1 action
Range: Self (15-foot cone)
Components: V, S
Duration: Instantaneous



A wave of powerful air sweeps out from you. Each creature in a 15-foot cone originating from you must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 2d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away from you if a creature fails the save by 5 or more they are knocked prone.



On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn't pushed.



In addition, unsecured objects that are completely within the area of effect are automatically pushed 10 feet away from you by the spell's effect.



At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d8 for each slot level above 1st.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago














3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


Is this homebrew spell balanced?




Wind Wave



1st-level evocation



Casting Time: 1 action
Range: Self (15-foot cone)
Components: V, S
Duration: Instantaneous



A wave of powerful air sweeps out from you. Each creature in a 15-foot cone originating from you must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 2d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away from you if a creature fails the save by 5 or more they are knocked prone.



On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn't pushed.



In addition, unsecured objects that are completely within the area of effect are automatically pushed 10 feet away from you by the spell's effect.



At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d8 for each slot level above 1st.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is this homebrew spell balanced?




Wind Wave



1st-level evocation



Casting Time: 1 action
Range: Self (15-foot cone)
Components: V, S
Duration: Instantaneous



A wave of powerful air sweeps out from you. Each creature in a 15-foot cone originating from you must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 2d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away from you if a creature fails the save by 5 or more they are knocked prone.



On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn't pushed.



In addition, unsecured objects that are completely within the area of effect are automatically pushed 10 feet away from you by the spell's effect.



At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d8 for each slot level above 1st.








dnd-5e spells homebrew balance






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









V2Blast

28.1k5101171




28.1k5101171










asked 3 hours ago









Josiah RigganJosiah Riggan

1,064124




1,064124







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    3 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Pretty darn close!



First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.



The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."



I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$

This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.



  • The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.


  • The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.


  • This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.


  • The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146976%2fis-this-homebrew-wind-wave-spell-balanced%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Pretty darn close!



    First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.



    The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."



    I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Thompson
      1 hour ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    Pretty darn close!



    First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.



    The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."



    I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Thompson
      1 hour ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Pretty darn close!



    First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.



    The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."



    I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Pretty darn close!



    First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.



    The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."



    I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 hours ago

























    answered 2 hours ago









    GandalfmeansmeGandalfmeansme

    24.6k589143




    24.6k589143











    • $begingroup$
      I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Thompson
      1 hour ago
















    • $begingroup$
      I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Thompson
      1 hour ago















    $begingroup$
    I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    1 hour ago













    3












    $begingroup$

    This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.



    • The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.


    • The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.


    • This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.


    • The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.



      • The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.


      • The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.


      • This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.


      • The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.



        • The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.


        • The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.


        • This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.


        • The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.



        • The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.


        • The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.


        • This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.


        • The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        MinimanMiniman

        115k29525715




        115k29525715



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146976%2fis-this-homebrew-wind-wave-spell-balanced%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

            2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

            Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?