What does the Rambam mean when he says that the planets have souls?Parashat Shemini + ParaDoes Rambam take the 6 days of creation literally?What does the Rambam mean by בשרו חם?How does Rambam explain the use of magic in Tanakh?What does the Rambam say about ghosts?If G-d does not lack anything what is meant when it says that he desires prayers of the righteous?What does Hashem Echad mean?Rambam on the relationship between oneness and incorporealityWhat are some of the more 'controversial' statements that are found in Moreh Nevuchim (Rambam)?What does the Rambam mean by “velo yishtomem”?The Tanya says that a tzaddik is one that got rid of his "animal soul? This seemingly contradicts the Rambam

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.

Difference between -| and |- in TikZ

How to align and center standalone amsmath equations?

Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

List of people who lose a child in תנ"ך

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

Java - What do constructor type arguments mean when placed *before* the type?

We have a love-hate relationship

When quoting, must I also copy hyphens used to divide words that continue on the next line?

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

How do I repair my stair bannister?

If a character with the Alert feat rolls a crit fail on their Perception check, are they surprised?

Do Legal Documents Require Signing In Standard Pen Colors?

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

Fly on a jet pack vs fly with a jet pack?

In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?

Can a significant change in incentives void an employment contract?

Flux received by a negative charge

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?



What does the Rambam mean when he says that the planets have souls?



Parashat Shemini + ParaDoes Rambam take the 6 days of creation literally?What does the Rambam mean by בשרו חם?How does Rambam explain the use of magic in Tanakh?What does the Rambam say about ghosts?If G-d does not lack anything what is meant when it says that he desires prayers of the righteous?What does Hashem Echad mean?Rambam on the relationship between oneness and incorporealityWhat are some of the more 'controversial' statements that are found in Moreh Nevuchim (Rambam)?What does the Rambam mean by “velo yishtomem”?The Tanya says that a tzaddik is one that got rid of his "animal soul? This seemingly contradicts the Rambam










3















Rambam states in Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah, Chapter 3, Section 9 that each of the planets have a soul, knowledge, and intellect.




כל הכוכבים והגלגלים כולן בעלי נפש ודעה והשכל הם והם חיים ועומדים ומכירין את מי שאמר והיה העולם



All of the stars and spheres possess a soul, knowledge, and intellect. They are alive and stand in recognition of the One who spoke and [thus brought] the world into being.




What are we to understand from this? It's a rather strange concept indeed when you get to thinking about it.










share|improve this question






















  • I'm not sure what you find confusing

    – Double AA
    1 hour ago











  • @DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

    – ezra
    42 mins ago















3















Rambam states in Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah, Chapter 3, Section 9 that each of the planets have a soul, knowledge, and intellect.




כל הכוכבים והגלגלים כולן בעלי נפש ודעה והשכל הם והם חיים ועומדים ומכירין את מי שאמר והיה העולם



All of the stars and spheres possess a soul, knowledge, and intellect. They are alive and stand in recognition of the One who spoke and [thus brought] the world into being.




What are we to understand from this? It's a rather strange concept indeed when you get to thinking about it.










share|improve this question






















  • I'm not sure what you find confusing

    – Double AA
    1 hour ago











  • @DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

    – ezra
    42 mins ago













3












3








3








Rambam states in Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah, Chapter 3, Section 9 that each of the planets have a soul, knowledge, and intellect.




כל הכוכבים והגלגלים כולן בעלי נפש ודעה והשכל הם והם חיים ועומדים ומכירין את מי שאמר והיה העולם



All of the stars and spheres possess a soul, knowledge, and intellect. They are alive and stand in recognition of the One who spoke and [thus brought] the world into being.




What are we to understand from this? It's a rather strange concept indeed when you get to thinking about it.










share|improve this question














Rambam states in Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah, Chapter 3, Section 9 that each of the planets have a soul, knowledge, and intellect.




כל הכוכבים והגלגלים כולן בעלי נפש ודעה והשכל הם והם חיים ועומדים ומכירין את מי שאמר והיה העולם



All of the stars and spheres possess a soul, knowledge, and intellect. They are alive and stand in recognition of the One who spoke and [thus brought] the world into being.




What are we to understand from this? It's a rather strange concept indeed when you get to thinking about it.







hashkafah-philosophy rambam anthropomorphism






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









ezraezra

11.4k21356




11.4k21356












  • I'm not sure what you find confusing

    – Double AA
    1 hour ago











  • @DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

    – ezra
    42 mins ago

















  • I'm not sure what you find confusing

    – Double AA
    1 hour ago











  • @DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

    – ezra
    42 mins ago
















I'm not sure what you find confusing

– Double AA
1 hour ago





I'm not sure what you find confusing

– Double AA
1 hour ago













@DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

– ezra
42 mins ago





@DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

– ezra
42 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














Rambam discusses this at length in Book II of Guide for the Perplexed. Particularly chapters 4-5 would be informative on this topic. You can read them online in the Friendlander English translation here. Chapter Four in fact opens by noting that you might find it strange at first:




THE enunciation that the heavenly sphere is endowed with a soul will appear reasonable to all who sufficiently reflect on it; but at first thought they may find it unintelligible or even objectionable; because they wrongly assume that when we ascribe a soul to the heavenly spheres we mean something like the soul of man, or that of an ass, or ox. We merely intend to say that the locomotion of the sphere undoubtedly leads us to assume some inherent principle by which it moves; and this principle is certainly a soul.




A little later he states:




The circular motion of the sphere is consequently due to the action of some idea which produces this particular kind of motion; but as ideas are only possible in intellectual beings, the heavenly sphere is an intellectual being.




And a little later:




It follows that the heavenly sphere must have a desire for the ideal which it has comprehended, and that ideal, for which it has a desire, is God, exalted be His name! When we say that God moves the spheres, we mean it in the following sense: the spheres have a desire to become similar to the ideal comprehended by them. This ideal, however, is simple in the strictest sense of the word, and not subject to any change or alteration, but constant in producing everything good, whilst the spheres are corporeal: the latter can therefore not be like this ideal in any other way, except in the production of circular motion: for this is the only action of corporeal beings that can be perpetual; it is the most simple motion of a body; there is no change in the essence of the sphere, nor in the beneficial results of its motion.




These quotes should give you a taste of the general idea, but again you may want to read the chapters at length for the full experience.






share|improve this answer






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    Rambam discusses this at length in Book II of Guide for the Perplexed. Particularly chapters 4-5 would be informative on this topic. You can read them online in the Friendlander English translation here. Chapter Four in fact opens by noting that you might find it strange at first:




    THE enunciation that the heavenly sphere is endowed with a soul will appear reasonable to all who sufficiently reflect on it; but at first thought they may find it unintelligible or even objectionable; because they wrongly assume that when we ascribe a soul to the heavenly spheres we mean something like the soul of man, or that of an ass, or ox. We merely intend to say that the locomotion of the sphere undoubtedly leads us to assume some inherent principle by which it moves; and this principle is certainly a soul.




    A little later he states:




    The circular motion of the sphere is consequently due to the action of some idea which produces this particular kind of motion; but as ideas are only possible in intellectual beings, the heavenly sphere is an intellectual being.




    And a little later:




    It follows that the heavenly sphere must have a desire for the ideal which it has comprehended, and that ideal, for which it has a desire, is God, exalted be His name! When we say that God moves the spheres, we mean it in the following sense: the spheres have a desire to become similar to the ideal comprehended by them. This ideal, however, is simple in the strictest sense of the word, and not subject to any change or alteration, but constant in producing everything good, whilst the spheres are corporeal: the latter can therefore not be like this ideal in any other way, except in the production of circular motion: for this is the only action of corporeal beings that can be perpetual; it is the most simple motion of a body; there is no change in the essence of the sphere, nor in the beneficial results of its motion.




    These quotes should give you a taste of the general idea, but again you may want to read the chapters at length for the full experience.






    share|improve this answer



























      3














      Rambam discusses this at length in Book II of Guide for the Perplexed. Particularly chapters 4-5 would be informative on this topic. You can read them online in the Friendlander English translation here. Chapter Four in fact opens by noting that you might find it strange at first:




      THE enunciation that the heavenly sphere is endowed with a soul will appear reasonable to all who sufficiently reflect on it; but at first thought they may find it unintelligible or even objectionable; because they wrongly assume that when we ascribe a soul to the heavenly spheres we mean something like the soul of man, or that of an ass, or ox. We merely intend to say that the locomotion of the sphere undoubtedly leads us to assume some inherent principle by which it moves; and this principle is certainly a soul.




      A little later he states:




      The circular motion of the sphere is consequently due to the action of some idea which produces this particular kind of motion; but as ideas are only possible in intellectual beings, the heavenly sphere is an intellectual being.




      And a little later:




      It follows that the heavenly sphere must have a desire for the ideal which it has comprehended, and that ideal, for which it has a desire, is God, exalted be His name! When we say that God moves the spheres, we mean it in the following sense: the spheres have a desire to become similar to the ideal comprehended by them. This ideal, however, is simple in the strictest sense of the word, and not subject to any change or alteration, but constant in producing everything good, whilst the spheres are corporeal: the latter can therefore not be like this ideal in any other way, except in the production of circular motion: for this is the only action of corporeal beings that can be perpetual; it is the most simple motion of a body; there is no change in the essence of the sphere, nor in the beneficial results of its motion.




      These quotes should give you a taste of the general idea, but again you may want to read the chapters at length for the full experience.






      share|improve this answer

























        3












        3








        3







        Rambam discusses this at length in Book II of Guide for the Perplexed. Particularly chapters 4-5 would be informative on this topic. You can read them online in the Friendlander English translation here. Chapter Four in fact opens by noting that you might find it strange at first:




        THE enunciation that the heavenly sphere is endowed with a soul will appear reasonable to all who sufficiently reflect on it; but at first thought they may find it unintelligible or even objectionable; because they wrongly assume that when we ascribe a soul to the heavenly spheres we mean something like the soul of man, or that of an ass, or ox. We merely intend to say that the locomotion of the sphere undoubtedly leads us to assume some inherent principle by which it moves; and this principle is certainly a soul.




        A little later he states:




        The circular motion of the sphere is consequently due to the action of some idea which produces this particular kind of motion; but as ideas are only possible in intellectual beings, the heavenly sphere is an intellectual being.




        And a little later:




        It follows that the heavenly sphere must have a desire for the ideal which it has comprehended, and that ideal, for which it has a desire, is God, exalted be His name! When we say that God moves the spheres, we mean it in the following sense: the spheres have a desire to become similar to the ideal comprehended by them. This ideal, however, is simple in the strictest sense of the word, and not subject to any change or alteration, but constant in producing everything good, whilst the spheres are corporeal: the latter can therefore not be like this ideal in any other way, except in the production of circular motion: for this is the only action of corporeal beings that can be perpetual; it is the most simple motion of a body; there is no change in the essence of the sphere, nor in the beneficial results of its motion.




        These quotes should give you a taste of the general idea, but again you may want to read the chapters at length for the full experience.






        share|improve this answer













        Rambam discusses this at length in Book II of Guide for the Perplexed. Particularly chapters 4-5 would be informative on this topic. You can read them online in the Friendlander English translation here. Chapter Four in fact opens by noting that you might find it strange at first:




        THE enunciation that the heavenly sphere is endowed with a soul will appear reasonable to all who sufficiently reflect on it; but at first thought they may find it unintelligible or even objectionable; because they wrongly assume that when we ascribe a soul to the heavenly spheres we mean something like the soul of man, or that of an ass, or ox. We merely intend to say that the locomotion of the sphere undoubtedly leads us to assume some inherent principle by which it moves; and this principle is certainly a soul.




        A little later he states:




        The circular motion of the sphere is consequently due to the action of some idea which produces this particular kind of motion; but as ideas are only possible in intellectual beings, the heavenly sphere is an intellectual being.




        And a little later:




        It follows that the heavenly sphere must have a desire for the ideal which it has comprehended, and that ideal, for which it has a desire, is God, exalted be His name! When we say that God moves the spheres, we mean it in the following sense: the spheres have a desire to become similar to the ideal comprehended by them. This ideal, however, is simple in the strictest sense of the word, and not subject to any change or alteration, but constant in producing everything good, whilst the spheres are corporeal: the latter can therefore not be like this ideal in any other way, except in the production of circular motion: for this is the only action of corporeal beings that can be perpetual; it is the most simple motion of a body; there is no change in the essence of the sphere, nor in the beneficial results of its motion.




        These quotes should give you a taste of the general idea, but again you may want to read the chapters at length for the full experience.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        AlexAlex

        22.7k155130




        22.7k155130













            Popular posts from this blog

            Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

            2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

            Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?