Why does the integral domain “being trapped between a finite field extension” implies that it is a field?Linear map $f:Vrightarrow V$ injective $Longleftrightarrow$ surjectiveDoes this morphism necessarily give rise to a finite extension of residue fields?Points lying over a closed point in a separable extension of the base field are rationnalWhat kind of points are there in a finite type $k$-scheme?Quotient of ring is flat gives an identity of idealsWhen is the tensor product of a separable field extension with itself a domain?Why is the residue field of a $k$-scheme an extension of $k$?An example of normalization of schemeFinite fiber property and integral extension.Characterize integral extension of rings by maximal idealsMaximal ideal of $K[x_1,cdots,x_n]$ such that the quotient field equals to $K$

What does this horizontal bar at the first measure mean?

List of people who lose a child in תנ"ך

How to color a curve

What is this type of notehead called?

Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?

Why does Async/Await work properly when the loop is inside the async function and not the other way around?

Is it possible to use .desktop files to open local pdf files on specific pages with a browser?

Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents

Why do IPv6 unique local addresses have to have a /48 prefix?

Indicating multiple different modes of speech (fantasy language or telepathy)

Why does the integral domain "being trapped between a finite field extension" implies that it is a field?

Query about absorption line spectra

Confusion on Parallelogram

We have a love-hate relationship

Transformation of random variables and joint distributions

Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.

How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?

How do ground effect vehicles perform turns?

Reply 'no position' while the job posting is still there

Is XSS in canonical link possible?

If a character with the Alert feat rolls a crit fail on their Perception check, are they surprised?

What is the gram­mat­i­cal term for “‑ed” words like these?

Journal losing indexing services

Divine apple island



Why does the integral domain “being trapped between a finite field extension” implies that it is a field?


Linear map $f:Vrightarrow V$ injective $Longleftrightarrow$ surjectiveDoes this morphism necessarily give rise to a finite extension of residue fields?Points lying over a closed point in a separable extension of the base field are rationnalWhat kind of points are there in a finite type $k$-scheme?Quotient of ring is flat gives an identity of idealsWhen is the tensor product of a separable field extension with itself a domain?Why is the residue field of a $k$-scheme an extension of $k$?An example of normalization of schemeFinite fiber property and integral extension.Characterize integral extension of rings by maximal idealsMaximal ideal of $K[x_1,cdots,x_n]$ such that the quotient field equals to $K$













3












$begingroup$


The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.




Exercise 1.2.



Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.




The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.




Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatornameSpec B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatornameSpec(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^−1(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ−1(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.




In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.




    Exercise 1.2.



    Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.




    The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.




    Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatornameSpec B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatornameSpec(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^−1(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ−1(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.




    In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.




      Exercise 1.2.



      Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.




      The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.




      Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatornameSpec B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatornameSpec(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^−1(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ−1(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.




      In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      The following is an exercise from Qing Liu's Algebraic Geometry and Arithmetic Curves.




      Exercise 1.2.



      Let ϕ : A → B be a homomorphism of finitely generated algebras over a field. Show that the image of a closed point under Spec ϕ is a closed point.




      The following is the solution from Cihan Bahran. http://www-users.math.umn.edu/~bahra004/alg-geo/liu-soln.pdf.




      Write $k$ for the underlying field. Let’s parse the statement. A closed point in $operatornameSpec B$ means a maximal ideal $n$ of $B$. And $operatornameSpec(ϕ)(n) = ϕ^−1(n)$. So we want to show that $p := ϕ−1(n)$ is a maximal ideal in $A$. First of all, $p$ is definitely a prime ideal of $A$ and $ϕ$ descends to an injective $k$-algebra homomorphism $ψ : A/p to B/n$. But the map $k to B/n$ defines a finite field extension of $k$ by Corollary 1.12. So the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. Such domains are necessarily fields, thus $p$ is maximal in $A$.




      In the second last sentence, the writer says that the integral domain $A/p$ is trapped between a finite field extension. I don't exactly know what it means, but I think it means that there are two injective ring homomorphisms $f:kto A/p$ and $g:A/pto B/n$ such that $gcirc f$ makes $B/n$ a finite field extension of $k$. But why does it imply that $A/p$ is a field?







      abstract-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      zxcvzxcv

      1659




      1659




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$


          Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.




          Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).



          Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.



          We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$



          In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that



            $F subset D subset E; tag 1$



            since



            $[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$



            every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus



            $0 ne d in D tag 3$



            satisfies some



            $p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$



            that is,



            $p(d) = 0; tag 5$



            we may write



            $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$



            then



            $displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$



            furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have



            $p_0 ne 0; tag 8$



            if not, then



            $p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_jx^j = x sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1; tag 9$



            thus



            $d displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag10$



            and via (4) this forces



            $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag11$



            since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial



            $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_ x^j - 1 in F[x] tag12$



            of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write



            $displaystyle sum_1^deg pp_j d^j = -p_0, tag13$



            or



            $d left( -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 right ) = 1, tag14$



            which shows that



            $d^-1 = -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 in D; tag15$



            since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161381%2fwhy-does-the-integral-domain-being-trapped-between-a-finite-field-extension-im%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3












              $begingroup$


              Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.




              Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).



              Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.



              We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$



              In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$


                Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.




                Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).



                Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.



                We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$



                In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$


                  Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.




                  Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).



                  Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.



                  We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$



                  In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$




                  Theorem 1. Let $K$ be a field. Let $R$ and $L$ be two $K$-algebras such that $L$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space and $R$ is an integral domain. Let $g : R to L$ be an injective $K$-linear map. Then, $R$ is a field.




                  Proof of Theorem 1. Since the $K$-linear map $g : R to L$ is injective, we have $dim R leq dim L$, where "$dim$" refers to the dimension of a $K$-vector space. But $dim L < infty$, since $L$ is finite-dimensional. Hence, $dim R leq dim L < infty$; thus, $R$ is a finite-dimensional $K$-vector space. Therefore, any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (according to a well-known fact from linear algebra).



                  Now, let $a in R$ be nonzero. Let $M_a$ denote the map $R to R, r mapsto ar$. This map $M_a : R to R$ is $K$-linear and has kernel $0$ (because every $r in R$ satisfying $ar = 0$ must satisfy $r = 0$ (since $R$ is an integral domain and $a$ is nonzero)); thus, it is injective. Hence, it is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces (since any injective $K$-linear map $f : R to R$ is an isomorphism of $K$-vector spaces). Thus, it is surjective. Therefore, there exists some $s in R$ such that $M_aleft(sright) = 1$. Consider this $s$. Now, the definition of $M_a$ yields $M_aleft(sright) = as$, so that $as = M_aleft(sright) = 1$. In other words, $s$ is a (multiplicative) inverse of $a$. Hence, $a$ has an inverse.



                  We have thus proven that every nonzero $a in R$ has an inverse. In other words, the ring $R$ is an integral domain. This proves Theorem 1. $blacksquare$



                  In your situation, you should apply Theorem 1 to $K = k$, $R = A/p$, $L = B/n$ and $g = psi$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 53 mins ago









                  darij grinbergdarij grinberg

                  11.3k33167




                  11.3k33167





















                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that



                      $F subset D subset E; tag 1$



                      since



                      $[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$



                      every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus



                      $0 ne d in D tag 3$



                      satisfies some



                      $p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$



                      that is,



                      $p(d) = 0; tag 5$



                      we may write



                      $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$



                      then



                      $displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$



                      furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have



                      $p_0 ne 0; tag 8$



                      if not, then



                      $p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_jx^j = x sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1; tag 9$



                      thus



                      $d displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag10$



                      and via (4) this forces



                      $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag11$



                      since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial



                      $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_ x^j - 1 in F[x] tag12$



                      of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write



                      $displaystyle sum_1^deg pp_j d^j = -p_0, tag13$



                      or



                      $d left( -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 right ) = 1, tag14$



                      which shows that



                      $d^-1 = -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 in D; tag15$



                      since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that



                        $F subset D subset E; tag 1$



                        since



                        $[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$



                        every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus



                        $0 ne d in D tag 3$



                        satisfies some



                        $p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$



                        that is,



                        $p(d) = 0; tag 5$



                        we may write



                        $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$



                        then



                        $displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$



                        furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have



                        $p_0 ne 0; tag 8$



                        if not, then



                        $p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_jx^j = x sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1; tag 9$



                        thus



                        $d displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag10$



                        and via (4) this forces



                        $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag11$



                        since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial



                        $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_ x^j - 1 in F[x] tag12$



                        of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write



                        $displaystyle sum_1^deg pp_j d^j = -p_0, tag13$



                        or



                        $d left( -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 right ) = 1, tag14$



                        which shows that



                        $d^-1 = -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 in D; tag15$



                        since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that



                          $F subset D subset E; tag 1$



                          since



                          $[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$



                          every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus



                          $0 ne d in D tag 3$



                          satisfies some



                          $p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$



                          that is,



                          $p(d) = 0; tag 5$



                          we may write



                          $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$



                          then



                          $displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$



                          furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have



                          $p_0 ne 0; tag 8$



                          if not, then



                          $p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_jx^j = x sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1; tag 9$



                          thus



                          $d displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag10$



                          and via (4) this forces



                          $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag11$



                          since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial



                          $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_ x^j - 1 in F[x] tag12$



                          of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write



                          $displaystyle sum_1^deg pp_j d^j = -p_0, tag13$



                          or



                          $d left( -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 right ) = 1, tag14$



                          which shows that



                          $d^-1 = -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 in D; tag15$



                          since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Suppose $F$ is any field, $E$ is a finite extension field of $F$, and $D$ is an integral domain such that



                          $F subset D subset E; tag 1$



                          since



                          $[E:F] = n < infty, tag 2$



                          every element of $D$ is algebraic over $F$; thus



                          $0 ne d in D tag 3$



                          satisfies some



                          $p(x) in F[x]; tag 4$



                          that is,



                          $p(d) = 0; tag 5$



                          we may write



                          $p(x) = displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j x^j, ; p_j in F; tag 6$



                          then



                          $displaystyle sum_0^deg p p_j d^j = p(d) = 0; tag 7$



                          furthermore, we may assume $p(x)$ is of minimal degree of all polynomials in $F[x]$ satisfied by $d$. In this case, we must have



                          $p_0 ne 0; tag 8$



                          if not, then



                          $p(x) = displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_jx^j = x sum_1^deg p p_j x^j - 1; tag 9$



                          thus



                          $d displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag10$



                          and via (4) this forces



                          $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j - 1 = 0, tag11$



                          since $D$ is an integral domain; but this asserts that $d$ satisfies the polynomial



                          $displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_ x^j - 1 in F[x] tag12$



                          of degree $deg p - 1$, which contradicts the minimality of the degree of $p(x)$; therefore (8) binds and we may write



                          $displaystyle sum_1^deg pp_j d^j = -p_0, tag13$



                          or



                          $d left( -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 right ) = 1, tag14$



                          which shows that



                          $d^-1 = -p_0^-1displaystyle sum_1^deg p p_j d^j- 1 in D; tag15$



                          since every $0 ne d in D$ has in iverse in $D$ by (15), $D$ is indeed a field.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 49 mins ago









                          Robert LewisRobert Lewis

                          48.3k23167




                          48.3k23167



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161381%2fwhy-does-the-integral-domain-being-trapped-between-a-finite-field-extension-im%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

                              2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

                              Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?