Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?Conditions for diagonalizability of $ntimes n$ anti-diagonal matricesFinding eigenvalues/vectors of a matrix and proving it is not diagonalisable.Finding if a linear transformation is diagonalisableThe diagonalisation of the two matricesIf $A in K^n times n$ is diagonalisable, the dimension of the subspace of its commuting matrices is $geq n$ nCalculating the eigenvalues of a diagonalisable linear operator $L$.How to find eigenvalues for mod 2 field?Find for which real parameter a matrix is diagonalisableSquare Roots of a Matrix: Diagonalisable Solutions.eigenvalues and eigenvectors of Diagonalisable matrices

How was Lagrange appointed professor of mathematics so early?

Why aren't road bicycle wheels tiny?

Test if all elements of a Foldable are the same

France's Public Holidays' Puzzle

Could a cockatrice have parasitic embryos?

What is the purpose of the side handle on a hand ("eggbeater") drill?

Will I lose my paid in full property

Determinant of a matrix with 2 equal rows

What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

How did Elite on the NES work?

Where to find documentation for `whois` command options?

How to compute a Jacobian using polar coordinates?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

When speaking, how do you change your mind mid-sentence?

RIP Packet Format

What is a 'Key' in computer science?

SQL Server placement of master database files vs resource database files

Eigenvalues of the Laplacian of the directed De Bruijn graph

Why is arima in R one time step off?

Why do people think Winterfell crypts is the safest place for women, children & old people?

Co-worker works way more than he should

Bright yellow or light yellow?

Is a self contained air-bullet cartridge feasible?



Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?


Conditions for diagonalizability of $ntimes n$ anti-diagonal matricesFinding eigenvalues/vectors of a matrix and proving it is not diagonalisable.Finding if a linear transformation is diagonalisableThe diagonalisation of the two matricesIf $A in K^n times n$ is diagonalisable, the dimension of the subspace of its commuting matrices is $geq n$ nCalculating the eigenvalues of a diagonalisable linear operator $L$.How to find eigenvalues for mod 2 field?Find for which real parameter a matrix is diagonalisableSquare Roots of a Matrix: Diagonalisable Solutions.eigenvalues and eigenvectors of Diagonalisable matrices













1












$begingroup$


When trying to solve a physics problem on decoupling a system of ODEs, I found myself needing to address the following problem:




Let $A_nin M_n(mathbb R)$ be the matrix with all $1$s above its main diagonal, all $-1$s below its diagonal, and $0$s everywhere else. Is $A_n$ always diagonalisable? If so, what is its diagonalisation (equivalently: what are its eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors)?




For example,
$$A_3=beginbmatrix0&1&0\-1&0&1\0&-1&0endbmatrix,quad A_5beginbmatrix0&1&0&0&0\-1&0&1&0&0\0&-1&0&1&0\0&0&-1&0&1\0&0&0&-1&0endbmatrix.$$




Assuming my code is correct, Mathematica has been able to verify that $A_n$ is always diagonalisable up to $n=1000$. If we use $chi_n(t)inmathbb Z[t]$ to denote the characteristic polynomial of $A_n$, a straightforward evaluation also shows that
$$chi_n(t)=-tchi_n-1(t)+chi_n-2(t)tag1$$
for all $ngeq4$. Furthermore, note that $A_n=-A_n^t$ so that, in the case where the dimension is even,
$$det(A_2n-lambda I)=det(A_2n^t-lambda I)=det(-A_2n-lambda I)=det(A_2n+lambda I).$$
This implies that whenever $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A_2n$, so is $-lambda$. In other words, $chi_2n(t)$ is always of the form $(t^2-lambda _1^2)(t^2-lambda_2^2)dotsm(t^2-lambda_n^2)$ for some $lambda_i$.



And this is where I am stuck. In order for $A_n$ to be diagonalisable, we must have that all the eigenvalues are distinct, but trying to use the recurrence $(1)$ and strong induction, or trying to use the formula for the even case have not helped at all. It seems like the most probable line of attack would be to somehow show that
$$chi_2n'(t)=2tsum_k=1^nfracchi_2n(t)t^2-lambda_k^2$$
never shares a common zero with $chi_2n$ (which would resolve the even case), though I don't see how to make this work.




Note: I do not have any clue how to actually find the eigenvalues/eigenvectors even in the case where the $A_n$ are diagonalisable. As such even if someone cannot answer the second part of the question, but can prove that the $A_n$ are diagonalisable, I would appreciate that as an answer as well. Above I tried to look at the special case where the dimension is even, though of course the proof for all odd and even $n$ is more valuable. Even if this is not possible, for my purposes I just need an unbounded subset $Ssubseteqmathbb Z$ for which the conclusion is proven for $nin S$, so any such approach is welcome too.



Thank you in advance!










share|cite









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    All eigenvalues distinct is a sufficient but not necessary condition for a matrix to be diagonalizable.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    20 mins ago















1












$begingroup$


When trying to solve a physics problem on decoupling a system of ODEs, I found myself needing to address the following problem:




Let $A_nin M_n(mathbb R)$ be the matrix with all $1$s above its main diagonal, all $-1$s below its diagonal, and $0$s everywhere else. Is $A_n$ always diagonalisable? If so, what is its diagonalisation (equivalently: what are its eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors)?




For example,
$$A_3=beginbmatrix0&1&0\-1&0&1\0&-1&0endbmatrix,quad A_5beginbmatrix0&1&0&0&0\-1&0&1&0&0\0&-1&0&1&0\0&0&-1&0&1\0&0&0&-1&0endbmatrix.$$




Assuming my code is correct, Mathematica has been able to verify that $A_n$ is always diagonalisable up to $n=1000$. If we use $chi_n(t)inmathbb Z[t]$ to denote the characteristic polynomial of $A_n$, a straightforward evaluation also shows that
$$chi_n(t)=-tchi_n-1(t)+chi_n-2(t)tag1$$
for all $ngeq4$. Furthermore, note that $A_n=-A_n^t$ so that, in the case where the dimension is even,
$$det(A_2n-lambda I)=det(A_2n^t-lambda I)=det(-A_2n-lambda I)=det(A_2n+lambda I).$$
This implies that whenever $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A_2n$, so is $-lambda$. In other words, $chi_2n(t)$ is always of the form $(t^2-lambda _1^2)(t^2-lambda_2^2)dotsm(t^2-lambda_n^2)$ for some $lambda_i$.



And this is where I am stuck. In order for $A_n$ to be diagonalisable, we must have that all the eigenvalues are distinct, but trying to use the recurrence $(1)$ and strong induction, or trying to use the formula for the even case have not helped at all. It seems like the most probable line of attack would be to somehow show that
$$chi_2n'(t)=2tsum_k=1^nfracchi_2n(t)t^2-lambda_k^2$$
never shares a common zero with $chi_2n$ (which would resolve the even case), though I don't see how to make this work.




Note: I do not have any clue how to actually find the eigenvalues/eigenvectors even in the case where the $A_n$ are diagonalisable. As such even if someone cannot answer the second part of the question, but can prove that the $A_n$ are diagonalisable, I would appreciate that as an answer as well. Above I tried to look at the special case where the dimension is even, though of course the proof for all odd and even $n$ is more valuable. Even if this is not possible, for my purposes I just need an unbounded subset $Ssubseteqmathbb Z$ for which the conclusion is proven for $nin S$, so any such approach is welcome too.



Thank you in advance!










share|cite









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    All eigenvalues distinct is a sufficient but not necessary condition for a matrix to be diagonalizable.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    20 mins ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


When trying to solve a physics problem on decoupling a system of ODEs, I found myself needing to address the following problem:




Let $A_nin M_n(mathbb R)$ be the matrix with all $1$s above its main diagonal, all $-1$s below its diagonal, and $0$s everywhere else. Is $A_n$ always diagonalisable? If so, what is its diagonalisation (equivalently: what are its eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors)?




For example,
$$A_3=beginbmatrix0&1&0\-1&0&1\0&-1&0endbmatrix,quad A_5beginbmatrix0&1&0&0&0\-1&0&1&0&0\0&-1&0&1&0\0&0&-1&0&1\0&0&0&-1&0endbmatrix.$$




Assuming my code is correct, Mathematica has been able to verify that $A_n$ is always diagonalisable up to $n=1000$. If we use $chi_n(t)inmathbb Z[t]$ to denote the characteristic polynomial of $A_n$, a straightforward evaluation also shows that
$$chi_n(t)=-tchi_n-1(t)+chi_n-2(t)tag1$$
for all $ngeq4$. Furthermore, note that $A_n=-A_n^t$ so that, in the case where the dimension is even,
$$det(A_2n-lambda I)=det(A_2n^t-lambda I)=det(-A_2n-lambda I)=det(A_2n+lambda I).$$
This implies that whenever $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A_2n$, so is $-lambda$. In other words, $chi_2n(t)$ is always of the form $(t^2-lambda _1^2)(t^2-lambda_2^2)dotsm(t^2-lambda_n^2)$ for some $lambda_i$.



And this is where I am stuck. In order for $A_n$ to be diagonalisable, we must have that all the eigenvalues are distinct, but trying to use the recurrence $(1)$ and strong induction, or trying to use the formula for the even case have not helped at all. It seems like the most probable line of attack would be to somehow show that
$$chi_2n'(t)=2tsum_k=1^nfracchi_2n(t)t^2-lambda_k^2$$
never shares a common zero with $chi_2n$ (which would resolve the even case), though I don't see how to make this work.




Note: I do not have any clue how to actually find the eigenvalues/eigenvectors even in the case where the $A_n$ are diagonalisable. As such even if someone cannot answer the second part of the question, but can prove that the $A_n$ are diagonalisable, I would appreciate that as an answer as well. Above I tried to look at the special case where the dimension is even, though of course the proof for all odd and even $n$ is more valuable. Even if this is not possible, for my purposes I just need an unbounded subset $Ssubseteqmathbb Z$ for which the conclusion is proven for $nin S$, so any such approach is welcome too.



Thank you in advance!










share|cite









$endgroup$




When trying to solve a physics problem on decoupling a system of ODEs, I found myself needing to address the following problem:




Let $A_nin M_n(mathbb R)$ be the matrix with all $1$s above its main diagonal, all $-1$s below its diagonal, and $0$s everywhere else. Is $A_n$ always diagonalisable? If so, what is its diagonalisation (equivalently: what are its eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors)?




For example,
$$A_3=beginbmatrix0&1&0\-1&0&1\0&-1&0endbmatrix,quad A_5beginbmatrix0&1&0&0&0\-1&0&1&0&0\0&-1&0&1&0\0&0&-1&0&1\0&0&0&-1&0endbmatrix.$$




Assuming my code is correct, Mathematica has been able to verify that $A_n$ is always diagonalisable up to $n=1000$. If we use $chi_n(t)inmathbb Z[t]$ to denote the characteristic polynomial of $A_n$, a straightforward evaluation also shows that
$$chi_n(t)=-tchi_n-1(t)+chi_n-2(t)tag1$$
for all $ngeq4$. Furthermore, note that $A_n=-A_n^t$ so that, in the case where the dimension is even,
$$det(A_2n-lambda I)=det(A_2n^t-lambda I)=det(-A_2n-lambda I)=det(A_2n+lambda I).$$
This implies that whenever $lambda$ is an eigenvalue of $A_2n$, so is $-lambda$. In other words, $chi_2n(t)$ is always of the form $(t^2-lambda _1^2)(t^2-lambda_2^2)dotsm(t^2-lambda_n^2)$ for some $lambda_i$.



And this is where I am stuck. In order for $A_n$ to be diagonalisable, we must have that all the eigenvalues are distinct, but trying to use the recurrence $(1)$ and strong induction, or trying to use the formula for the even case have not helped at all. It seems like the most probable line of attack would be to somehow show that
$$chi_2n'(t)=2tsum_k=1^nfracchi_2n(t)t^2-lambda_k^2$$
never shares a common zero with $chi_2n$ (which would resolve the even case), though I don't see how to make this work.




Note: I do not have any clue how to actually find the eigenvalues/eigenvectors even in the case where the $A_n$ are diagonalisable. As such even if someone cannot answer the second part of the question, but can prove that the $A_n$ are diagonalisable, I would appreciate that as an answer as well. Above I tried to look at the special case where the dimension is even, though of course the proof for all odd and even $n$ is more valuable. Even if this is not possible, for my purposes I just need an unbounded subset $Ssubseteqmathbb Z$ for which the conclusion is proven for $nin S$, so any such approach is welcome too.



Thank you in advance!







linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors determinant diagonalization






share|cite













share|cite











share|cite




share|cite










asked 1 hour ago









YiFanYiFan

5,6152829




5,6152829











  • $begingroup$
    All eigenvalues distinct is a sufficient but not necessary condition for a matrix to be diagonalizable.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    20 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    All eigenvalues distinct is a sufficient but not necessary condition for a matrix to be diagonalizable.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    20 mins ago















$begingroup$
All eigenvalues distinct is a sufficient but not necessary condition for a matrix to be diagonalizable.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
20 mins ago




$begingroup$
All eigenvalues distinct is a sufficient but not necessary condition for a matrix to be diagonalizable.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
20 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

The matrix $A_n$ is a tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix with diagonal entries $delta = 0$ and off-diagonal entries $tau = 1$ and $sigma = -1$. Hence, we can use the formula in this paper to show that the eigenvalues are $$lambda_k = 2icosleft(dfrackpin+1right),$$ for $k = 1,ldots,n$, and the corresponding eigenvectors $v_1,ldots,v_n$ have entries $$v_k[m] = i^msinleft(dfracmkpin+1right).$$






share|cite











$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    Using that your matrices are skew symmetric, you get that these matrices are diagonalizable. See the section spectral theory on this Wikipedia article.






    share|cite








    New contributor




    gcousin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
      $endgroup$
      – YiFan
      1 hour ago


















    3












    $begingroup$

    All those matrices are anti-symmetric and therefore they are normal matrices. And every normal matrix is diagonalizable over $mathbb C$, by the spectral theorem.






    share|cite









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
      $endgroup$
      – YiFan
      1 hour ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      1 hour ago


















    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    The matrix $A_n$ is a tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix with diagonal entries $delta = 0$ and off-diagonal entries $tau = 1$ and $sigma = -1$. Hence, we can use the formula in this paper to show that the eigenvalues are $$lambda_k = 2icosleft(dfrackpin+1right),$$ for $k = 1,ldots,n$, and the corresponding eigenvectors $v_1,ldots,v_n$ have entries $$v_k[m] = i^msinleft(dfracmkpin+1right).$$






    share|cite











    $endgroup$

















      5












      $begingroup$

      The matrix $A_n$ is a tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix with diagonal entries $delta = 0$ and off-diagonal entries $tau = 1$ and $sigma = -1$. Hence, we can use the formula in this paper to show that the eigenvalues are $$lambda_k = 2icosleft(dfrackpin+1right),$$ for $k = 1,ldots,n$, and the corresponding eigenvectors $v_1,ldots,v_n$ have entries $$v_k[m] = i^msinleft(dfracmkpin+1right).$$






      share|cite











      $endgroup$















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        The matrix $A_n$ is a tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix with diagonal entries $delta = 0$ and off-diagonal entries $tau = 1$ and $sigma = -1$. Hence, we can use the formula in this paper to show that the eigenvalues are $$lambda_k = 2icosleft(dfrackpin+1right),$$ for $k = 1,ldots,n$, and the corresponding eigenvectors $v_1,ldots,v_n$ have entries $$v_k[m] = i^msinleft(dfracmkpin+1right).$$






        share|cite











        $endgroup$



        The matrix $A_n$ is a tridiagonal Toeplitz matrix with diagonal entries $delta = 0$ and off-diagonal entries $tau = 1$ and $sigma = -1$. Hence, we can use the formula in this paper to show that the eigenvalues are $$lambda_k = 2icosleft(dfrackpin+1right),$$ for $k = 1,ldots,n$, and the corresponding eigenvectors $v_1,ldots,v_n$ have entries $$v_k[m] = i^msinleft(dfracmkpin+1right).$$







        share|cite














        share|cite



        share|cite








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        JimmyK4542JimmyK4542

        41.5k246108




        41.5k246108





















            4












            $begingroup$

            Using that your matrices are skew symmetric, you get that these matrices are diagonalizable. See the section spectral theory on this Wikipedia article.






            share|cite








            New contributor




            gcousin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
              $endgroup$
              – YiFan
              1 hour ago















            4












            $begingroup$

            Using that your matrices are skew symmetric, you get that these matrices are diagonalizable. See the section spectral theory on this Wikipedia article.






            share|cite








            New contributor




            gcousin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
              $endgroup$
              – YiFan
              1 hour ago













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Using that your matrices are skew symmetric, you get that these matrices are diagonalizable. See the section spectral theory on this Wikipedia article.






            share|cite








            New contributor




            gcousin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$



            Using that your matrices are skew symmetric, you get that these matrices are diagonalizable. See the section spectral theory on this Wikipedia article.







            share|cite








            New contributor




            gcousin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|cite



            share|cite






            New contributor




            gcousin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 1 hour ago









            gcousingcousin

            1212




            1212




            New contributor




            gcousin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            gcousin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            gcousin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.











            • $begingroup$
              Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
              $endgroup$
              – YiFan
              1 hour ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
              $endgroup$
              – YiFan
              1 hour ago















            $begingroup$
            Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
            $endgroup$
            – YiFan
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
            $endgroup$
            – YiFan
            1 hour ago











            3












            $begingroup$

            All those matrices are anti-symmetric and therefore they are normal matrices. And every normal matrix is diagonalizable over $mathbb C$, by the spectral theorem.






            share|cite









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
              $endgroup$
              – YiFan
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              1 hour ago















            3












            $begingroup$

            All those matrices are anti-symmetric and therefore they are normal matrices. And every normal matrix is diagonalizable over $mathbb C$, by the spectral theorem.






            share|cite









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
              $endgroup$
              – YiFan
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              1 hour ago













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            All those matrices are anti-symmetric and therefore they are normal matrices. And every normal matrix is diagonalizable over $mathbb C$, by the spectral theorem.






            share|cite









            $endgroup$



            All those matrices are anti-symmetric and therefore they are normal matrices. And every normal matrix is diagonalizable over $mathbb C$, by the spectral theorem.







            share|cite












            share|cite



            share|cite










            answered 1 hour ago









            José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

            177k24138250




            177k24138250











            • $begingroup$
              Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
              $endgroup$
              – YiFan
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              1 hour ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
              $endgroup$
              – YiFan
              1 hour ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
              $endgroup$
              – José Carlos Santos
              1 hour ago















            $begingroup$
            Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
            $endgroup$
            – YiFan
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            Thank you very much for the quick response! I hope you don't mind that I accepted JimmyK4542's answer, since it also gives explicitly the eigenvectors and eigenvalues.
            $endgroup$
            – YiFan
            1 hour ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            I would have been surprised if you had not accepted that answer, since it provides more information than mine.
            $endgroup$
            – José Carlos Santos
            1 hour ago



            Popular posts from this blog

            Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

            2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

            Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?