How can I get rid of an unhelpful parallel branch when unpivoting a single row?NUMA Nodes - MAXDOP - PLESQL Server thread statuswhy sql server has high Worker threads?SQL Server Threads and Degree Of ParallelismIs it possible to see which SPID uses which scheduler (worker thread)?Who is using my worker threads? SQL Server 2014 - HADRMeasure Agent Job failure and running jobs with 'execution_status'SQL Server instance running out of worker threadsWhat's the easiest and most accurate way to visualize parallel thread usage in SQL Server?MAX worker thread in SQL server 2012/14/16

How long after the last departure shall the airport stay open for an emergency return?

Island of Knights, Knaves and Spies

Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?

A Paper Record is What I Hamper

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

Find a stone which is not the lightest one

Should the Product Owner dictate what info the UI needs to display?

Why do real positive eigenvalues result in an unstable system? What about eigenvalues between 0 and 1? or 1?

Von Neumann Extractor - Which bit is retained?

Does a large simulator bay have standard public address announcements?

How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?

Co-worker works way more than he should

Older movie/show about humans on derelict alien warship which refuels by passing through a star

Unknown code in script

Restricting the options of a lookup field, based on the value of another lookup field?

A ​Note ​on ​N!

What does "function" actually mean in music?

Why do games have consumables?

What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?

std::unique_ptr of base class holding reference of derived class does not show warning in gcc compiler while naked pointer shows it. Why?

Are there moral objections to a life motivated purely by money? How to sway a person from this lifestyle?

My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?

Can a stored procedure reference the database in which it is stored?



How can I get rid of an unhelpful parallel branch when unpivoting a single row?


NUMA Nodes - MAXDOP - PLESQL Server thread statuswhy sql server has high Worker threads?SQL Server Threads and Degree Of ParallelismIs it possible to see which SPID uses which scheduler (worker thread)?Who is using my worker threads? SQL Server 2014 - HADRMeasure Agent Job failure and running jobs with 'execution_status'SQL Server instance running out of worker threadsWhat's the easiest and most accurate way to visualize parallel thread usage in SQL Server?MAX worker thread in SQL server 2012/14/16






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















Consider the following query that unpivots a few handfuls of scalar aggregates:



SELECT A, B
FROM (
SELECT
MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
, MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
) q
UNPIVOT(B FOR A IN (
VAL1
,VAL2
,VAL3
,VAL4
,VAL5
,VAL6
,VAL7
,VAL16
)) U
OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


On SQL Server 2017, I get a plan with two parallel branches. The left parallel branch feels out of place to me. The optimizer has a guarantee that there will be only a single row output from the global scalar aggregate, yet the parent operator of it is a Distribute Streams with round robin partitioning:



round robin



When I execute the query all of the rows go to a single thread as expected. There's no performance problem with this query, but the query reserves 8 parallel threads with MAXDOP set to 4. Again, I feel that this is out of place. It's impossible for both parallel branches to execute at the same time. I want to avoid unnecessary worker thread reservation because I have TF 2467 enabled which changes the scheduling algorithm to look at the number of worker threads per scheduler.



Is it possible to rewrite the query to have exactly one parallel branch that contains the table scan and local aggregate? For example, I would be fine with the general shape below except that I want the nested loop to execute in a serial zone:



enter image description here



For Application Reasons™ I strongly prefer to avoid splitting this query up into parts. If desired, you can view the actual query plan here. If you'd like to play along at home, here is T-SQL to create the table used in the query:



DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO;

CREATE TABLE dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO (
ID BIGINT,
FILLER VARCHAR(100)
);

INSERT INTO dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO WITH (TABLOCK)
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) % 15
, REPLICATE('Z', 100)
FROM master..spt_values t1
CROSS JOIN master..spt_values t2;









share|improve this question




























    3















    Consider the following query that unpivots a few handfuls of scalar aggregates:



    SELECT A, B
    FROM (
    SELECT
    MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
    , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
    FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
    ) q
    UNPIVOT(B FOR A IN (
    VAL1
    ,VAL2
    ,VAL3
    ,VAL4
    ,VAL5
    ,VAL6
    ,VAL7
    ,VAL16
    )) U
    OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


    On SQL Server 2017, I get a plan with two parallel branches. The left parallel branch feels out of place to me. The optimizer has a guarantee that there will be only a single row output from the global scalar aggregate, yet the parent operator of it is a Distribute Streams with round robin partitioning:



    round robin



    When I execute the query all of the rows go to a single thread as expected. There's no performance problem with this query, but the query reserves 8 parallel threads with MAXDOP set to 4. Again, I feel that this is out of place. It's impossible for both parallel branches to execute at the same time. I want to avoid unnecessary worker thread reservation because I have TF 2467 enabled which changes the scheduling algorithm to look at the number of worker threads per scheduler.



    Is it possible to rewrite the query to have exactly one parallel branch that contains the table scan and local aggregate? For example, I would be fine with the general shape below except that I want the nested loop to execute in a serial zone:



    enter image description here



    For Application Reasons™ I strongly prefer to avoid splitting this query up into parts. If desired, you can view the actual query plan here. If you'd like to play along at home, here is T-SQL to create the table used in the query:



    DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO;

    CREATE TABLE dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO (
    ID BIGINT,
    FILLER VARCHAR(100)
    );

    INSERT INTO dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO WITH (TABLOCK)
    SELECT
    ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) % 15
    , REPLICATE('Z', 100)
    FROM master..spt_values t1
    CROSS JOIN master..spt_values t2;









    share|improve this question
























      3












      3








      3








      Consider the following query that unpivots a few handfuls of scalar aggregates:



      SELECT A, B
      FROM (
      SELECT
      MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
      FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
      ) q
      UNPIVOT(B FOR A IN (
      VAL1
      ,VAL2
      ,VAL3
      ,VAL4
      ,VAL5
      ,VAL6
      ,VAL7
      ,VAL16
      )) U
      OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


      On SQL Server 2017, I get a plan with two parallel branches. The left parallel branch feels out of place to me. The optimizer has a guarantee that there will be only a single row output from the global scalar aggregate, yet the parent operator of it is a Distribute Streams with round robin partitioning:



      round robin



      When I execute the query all of the rows go to a single thread as expected. There's no performance problem with this query, but the query reserves 8 parallel threads with MAXDOP set to 4. Again, I feel that this is out of place. It's impossible for both parallel branches to execute at the same time. I want to avoid unnecessary worker thread reservation because I have TF 2467 enabled which changes the scheduling algorithm to look at the number of worker threads per scheduler.



      Is it possible to rewrite the query to have exactly one parallel branch that contains the table scan and local aggregate? For example, I would be fine with the general shape below except that I want the nested loop to execute in a serial zone:



      enter image description here



      For Application Reasons™ I strongly prefer to avoid splitting this query up into parts. If desired, you can view the actual query plan here. If you'd like to play along at home, here is T-SQL to create the table used in the query:



      DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO;

      CREATE TABLE dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO (
      ID BIGINT,
      FILLER VARCHAR(100)
      );

      INSERT INTO dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO WITH (TABLOCK)
      SELECT
      ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) % 15
      , REPLICATE('Z', 100)
      FROM master..spt_values t1
      CROSS JOIN master..spt_values t2;









      share|improve this question














      Consider the following query that unpivots a few handfuls of scalar aggregates:



      SELECT A, B
      FROM (
      SELECT
      MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
      , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
      FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
      ) q
      UNPIVOT(B FOR A IN (
      VAL1
      ,VAL2
      ,VAL3
      ,VAL4
      ,VAL5
      ,VAL6
      ,VAL7
      ,VAL16
      )) U
      OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


      On SQL Server 2017, I get a plan with two parallel branches. The left parallel branch feels out of place to me. The optimizer has a guarantee that there will be only a single row output from the global scalar aggregate, yet the parent operator of it is a Distribute Streams with round robin partitioning:



      round robin



      When I execute the query all of the rows go to a single thread as expected. There's no performance problem with this query, but the query reserves 8 parallel threads with MAXDOP set to 4. Again, I feel that this is out of place. It's impossible for both parallel branches to execute at the same time. I want to avoid unnecessary worker thread reservation because I have TF 2467 enabled which changes the scheduling algorithm to look at the number of worker threads per scheduler.



      Is it possible to rewrite the query to have exactly one parallel branch that contains the table scan and local aggregate? For example, I would be fine with the general shape below except that I want the nested loop to execute in a serial zone:



      enter image description here



      For Application Reasons™ I strongly prefer to avoid splitting this query up into parts. If desired, you can view the actual query plan here. If you'd like to play along at home, here is T-SQL to create the table used in the query:



      DROP TABLE IF EXISTS dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO;

      CREATE TABLE dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO (
      ID BIGINT,
      FILLER VARCHAR(100)
      );

      INSERT INTO dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO WITH (TABLOCK)
      SELECT
      ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY (SELECT NULL)) % 15
      , REPLICATE('Z', 100)
      FROM master..spt_values t1
      CROSS JOIN master..spt_values t2;






      sql-server sql-server-2017






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      Joe ObbishJoe Obbish

      22.3k43493




      22.3k43493




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          I am able to get the desired plan shape with a serial loop join when all of the following are true:



          • An APPLY or CROSS JOIN is used instead of UNPIVOT

          • The APPLY contains no outer references

          • The source of rows in the APPLY is a table value constructor as opposed to a table

          For example, here is one way to do it:



          SELECT A, B
          FROM
          (
          SELECT A
          , MAX(
          CASE
          WHEN A = 'VAL1' THEN VAL1
          WHEN A = 'VAL2' THEN VAL2
          WHEN A = 'VAL3' THEN VAL3
          WHEN A = 'VAL4' THEN VAL4
          WHEN A = 'VAL5' THEN VAL5
          WHEN A = 'VAL6' THEN VAL6
          WHEN A = 'VAL7' THEN VAL7
          WHEN A = 'VAL16' THEN VAL16
          ELSE NULL
          END
          ) B
          FROM (
          SELECT
          MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
          FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
          ) q
          CROSS APPLY (
          VALUES ('VAL1'), ('VAL2'), ('VAL3'), ('VAL4'),
          ('VAL5'), ('VAL6'), ('VAL7'), ('VAL16')
          ) ca (A)
          GROUP BY A
          ) q
          WHERE q.B IS NOT NULL
          OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


          I get the desired plan plan shape as claimed with just one parallel branch:



          enter image description here



          I tried many other things that did not work. This answer is unsatisfactory in that I don't know why it works and it may not work in a future version of SQL Server, but it did solve my problem.






          share|improve this answer























          • I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

            – Max Vernon
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f236732%2fhow-can-i-get-rid-of-an-unhelpful-parallel-branch-when-unpivoting-a-single-row%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          I am able to get the desired plan shape with a serial loop join when all of the following are true:



          • An APPLY or CROSS JOIN is used instead of UNPIVOT

          • The APPLY contains no outer references

          • The source of rows in the APPLY is a table value constructor as opposed to a table

          For example, here is one way to do it:



          SELECT A, B
          FROM
          (
          SELECT A
          , MAX(
          CASE
          WHEN A = 'VAL1' THEN VAL1
          WHEN A = 'VAL2' THEN VAL2
          WHEN A = 'VAL3' THEN VAL3
          WHEN A = 'VAL4' THEN VAL4
          WHEN A = 'VAL5' THEN VAL5
          WHEN A = 'VAL6' THEN VAL6
          WHEN A = 'VAL7' THEN VAL7
          WHEN A = 'VAL16' THEN VAL16
          ELSE NULL
          END
          ) B
          FROM (
          SELECT
          MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
          FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
          ) q
          CROSS APPLY (
          VALUES ('VAL1'), ('VAL2'), ('VAL3'), ('VAL4'),
          ('VAL5'), ('VAL6'), ('VAL7'), ('VAL16')
          ) ca (A)
          GROUP BY A
          ) q
          WHERE q.B IS NOT NULL
          OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


          I get the desired plan plan shape as claimed with just one parallel branch:



          enter image description here



          I tried many other things that did not work. This answer is unsatisfactory in that I don't know why it works and it may not work in a future version of SQL Server, but it did solve my problem.






          share|improve this answer























          • I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

            – Max Vernon
            1 hour ago















          3














          I am able to get the desired plan shape with a serial loop join when all of the following are true:



          • An APPLY or CROSS JOIN is used instead of UNPIVOT

          • The APPLY contains no outer references

          • The source of rows in the APPLY is a table value constructor as opposed to a table

          For example, here is one way to do it:



          SELECT A, B
          FROM
          (
          SELECT A
          , MAX(
          CASE
          WHEN A = 'VAL1' THEN VAL1
          WHEN A = 'VAL2' THEN VAL2
          WHEN A = 'VAL3' THEN VAL3
          WHEN A = 'VAL4' THEN VAL4
          WHEN A = 'VAL5' THEN VAL5
          WHEN A = 'VAL6' THEN VAL6
          WHEN A = 'VAL7' THEN VAL7
          WHEN A = 'VAL16' THEN VAL16
          ELSE NULL
          END
          ) B
          FROM (
          SELECT
          MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
          FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
          ) q
          CROSS APPLY (
          VALUES ('VAL1'), ('VAL2'), ('VAL3'), ('VAL4'),
          ('VAL5'), ('VAL6'), ('VAL7'), ('VAL16')
          ) ca (A)
          GROUP BY A
          ) q
          WHERE q.B IS NOT NULL
          OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


          I get the desired plan plan shape as claimed with just one parallel branch:



          enter image description here



          I tried many other things that did not work. This answer is unsatisfactory in that I don't know why it works and it may not work in a future version of SQL Server, but it did solve my problem.






          share|improve this answer























          • I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

            – Max Vernon
            1 hour ago













          3












          3








          3







          I am able to get the desired plan shape with a serial loop join when all of the following are true:



          • An APPLY or CROSS JOIN is used instead of UNPIVOT

          • The APPLY contains no outer references

          • The source of rows in the APPLY is a table value constructor as opposed to a table

          For example, here is one way to do it:



          SELECT A, B
          FROM
          (
          SELECT A
          , MAX(
          CASE
          WHEN A = 'VAL1' THEN VAL1
          WHEN A = 'VAL2' THEN VAL2
          WHEN A = 'VAL3' THEN VAL3
          WHEN A = 'VAL4' THEN VAL4
          WHEN A = 'VAL5' THEN VAL5
          WHEN A = 'VAL6' THEN VAL6
          WHEN A = 'VAL7' THEN VAL7
          WHEN A = 'VAL16' THEN VAL16
          ELSE NULL
          END
          ) B
          FROM (
          SELECT
          MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
          FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
          ) q
          CROSS APPLY (
          VALUES ('VAL1'), ('VAL2'), ('VAL3'), ('VAL4'),
          ('VAL5'), ('VAL6'), ('VAL7'), ('VAL16')
          ) ca (A)
          GROUP BY A
          ) q
          WHERE q.B IS NOT NULL
          OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


          I get the desired plan plan shape as claimed with just one parallel branch:



          enter image description here



          I tried many other things that did not work. This answer is unsatisfactory in that I don't know why it works and it may not work in a future version of SQL Server, but it did solve my problem.






          share|improve this answer













          I am able to get the desired plan shape with a serial loop join when all of the following are true:



          • An APPLY or CROSS JOIN is used instead of UNPIVOT

          • The APPLY contains no outer references

          • The source of rows in the APPLY is a table value constructor as opposed to a table

          For example, here is one way to do it:



          SELECT A, B
          FROM
          (
          SELECT A
          , MAX(
          CASE
          WHEN A = 'VAL1' THEN VAL1
          WHEN A = 'VAL2' THEN VAL2
          WHEN A = 'VAL3' THEN VAL3
          WHEN A = 'VAL4' THEN VAL4
          WHEN A = 'VAL5' THEN VAL5
          WHEN A = 'VAL6' THEN VAL6
          WHEN A = 'VAL7' THEN VAL7
          WHEN A = 'VAL16' THEN VAL16
          ELSE NULL
          END
          ) B
          FROM (
          SELECT
          MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL1
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 2 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL2
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 3 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL3
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL4
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL5
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 6 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL6
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 7 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL7
          , MAX(CASE WHEN ID = 16 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) VAL16
          FROM dbo.PARALLEL_ZONE_REPRO
          ) q
          CROSS APPLY (
          VALUES ('VAL1'), ('VAL2'), ('VAL3'), ('VAL4'),
          ('VAL5'), ('VAL6'), ('VAL7'), ('VAL16')
          ) ca (A)
          GROUP BY A
          ) q
          WHERE q.B IS NOT NULL
          OPTION (MAXDOP 4);


          I get the desired plan plan shape as claimed with just one parallel branch:



          enter image description here



          I tried many other things that did not work. This answer is unsatisfactory in that I don't know why it works and it may not work in a future version of SQL Server, but it did solve my problem.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          Joe ObbishJoe Obbish

          22.3k43493




          22.3k43493












          • I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

            – Max Vernon
            1 hour ago

















          • I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

            – Max Vernon
            1 hour ago
















          I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

          – Max Vernon
          1 hour ago





          I love APPLY versus UNPIVOT, but one would expect the declarative nature of T-SQL to result in the same plan shape for both variants. It'll be interesting to see what happens with this.

          – Max Vernon
          1 hour ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f236732%2fhow-can-i-get-rid-of-an-unhelpful-parallel-branch-when-unpivoting-a-single-row%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

          2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

          Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?