Extracting Dirichlet series coefficientsIs the maximum domain to which a Dirichlet series can be continued always a halfplane?Dirichlet series expansion of an analytic functionMultiplicative functions whose Dirichlet series have essential singularitiesWhat is known about the polynomial factorization of power series?Smoothing Dirichlet Series partial sums by means of Pontifex Path Bending FunctionsDirichlet series decomposition of arbitrary functionFormal theory of (some) generating functions in $t$ and $t^-1$?Reaching Hecke eigenvalues from a trace formulaAsymptotic growth of the of Taylor coefficients of the inverse of a functionDirichlet series associated with polynomials

Extracting Dirichlet series coefficients


Is the maximum domain to which a Dirichlet series can be continued always a halfplane?Dirichlet series expansion of an analytic functionMultiplicative functions whose Dirichlet series have essential singularitiesWhat is known about the polynomial factorization of power series?Smoothing Dirichlet Series partial sums by means of Pontifex Path Bending FunctionsDirichlet series decomposition of arbitrary functionFormal theory of (some) generating functions in $t$ and $t^-1$?Reaching Hecke eigenvalues from a trace formulaAsymptotic growth of the of Taylor coefficients of the inverse of a functionDirichlet series associated with polynomials













1












$begingroup$


Cauchy's integral formula is a powerful method to extract the $n$'th power series coefficient of an analytic function by evaluating a single complex integral. Is there any such analytic method to extract (ordinary) Dirichlet series coefficients? That is, assuming that a given function $f(s)$ admits a Dirichlet series expansion $$sum_n a_n n^-s,$$ is there any known method to compute a desired coefficient $a_n$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Otherwise you can find the $a_n$ one by one from the asymptotic as $s to +infty$. I wonder if there is an analog of $c_n = fracF^(n)(0)n! = lim_z to 0 fracsum_k=0^n k choose n (-1)^k-n F(nz)z^n n!$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    1 hour ago
















1












$begingroup$


Cauchy's integral formula is a powerful method to extract the $n$'th power series coefficient of an analytic function by evaluating a single complex integral. Is there any such analytic method to extract (ordinary) Dirichlet series coefficients? That is, assuming that a given function $f(s)$ admits a Dirichlet series expansion $$sum_n a_n n^-s,$$ is there any known method to compute a desired coefficient $a_n$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Otherwise you can find the $a_n$ one by one from the asymptotic as $s to +infty$. I wonder if there is an analog of $c_n = fracF^(n)(0)n! = lim_z to 0 fracsum_k=0^n k choose n (-1)^k-n F(nz)z^n n!$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    1 hour ago














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Cauchy's integral formula is a powerful method to extract the $n$'th power series coefficient of an analytic function by evaluating a single complex integral. Is there any such analytic method to extract (ordinary) Dirichlet series coefficients? That is, assuming that a given function $f(s)$ admits a Dirichlet series expansion $$sum_n a_n n^-s,$$ is there any known method to compute a desired coefficient $a_n$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Cauchy's integral formula is a powerful method to extract the $n$'th power series coefficient of an analytic function by evaluating a single complex integral. Is there any such analytic method to extract (ordinary) Dirichlet series coefficients? That is, assuming that a given function $f(s)$ admits a Dirichlet series expansion $$sum_n a_n n^-s,$$ is there any known method to compute a desired coefficient $a_n$?







analytic-number-theory power-series dirichlet-series






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









MCHMCH

29819




29819







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Otherwise you can find the $a_n$ one by one from the asymptotic as $s to +infty$. I wonder if there is an analog of $c_n = fracF^(n)(0)n! = lim_z to 0 fracsum_k=0^n k choose n (-1)^k-n F(nz)z^n n!$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    1 hour ago













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Otherwise you can find the $a_n$ one by one from the asymptotic as $s to +infty$. I wonder if there is an analog of $c_n = fracF^(n)(0)n! = lim_z to 0 fracsum_k=0^n k choose n (-1)^k-n F(nz)z^n n!$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    1 hour ago








2




2




$begingroup$
Otherwise you can find the $a_n$ one by one from the asymptotic as $s to +infty$. I wonder if there is an analog of $c_n = fracF^(n)(0)n! = lim_z to 0 fracsum_k=0^n k choose n (-1)^k-n F(nz)z^n n!$
$endgroup$
– reuns
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
Otherwise you can find the $a_n$ one by one from the asymptotic as $s to +infty$. I wonder if there is an analog of $c_n = fracF^(n)(0)n! = lim_z to 0 fracsum_k=0^n k choose n (-1)^k-n F(nz)z^n n!$
$endgroup$
– reuns
1 hour ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Yes. If $f(s)$ has a finite abscissa of absolute convergence $sigma_a$, then $forall sigma > sigma_a$:
$$
lim_Ttoinfty frac12T int_-T^T f(sigma+ it)n^it mathrmdt = fraca_nn^sigma.
$$

IIRC, the proof can be found in Apostol's book on Analytic Number Theory.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it holds for $sigma > sigma_c$ the absicssa of simple convergence because $f(s) = (s-s_0)int_1^infty (sum_m le x a_m m^-s_0) x^-s+s_0-1dx = O(s)$ so we can replace $f(sigma+it)$ by $f(sigma+i.) ast frac ksqrt2pi e^-t^2 k^2/2 = sum_m a_m m^-sigma-it e^- fracln^2m2 k^2$ to make it absolutely convergent
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    1 hour ago


















3












$begingroup$

Even for more general Dirichlet series
$$f(z)=sum_0^infty a_n e^-lambda_nz$$
there is the formula
$$a_ne^-lambda_nsigma=lim_Ttoinftyfrac1Tint_t_0^Tf(sigma+it)e^lambda_n itdt,$$
where $t_0$ is arbitrary (real) and $sigma>sigma_u$, the abscissa of uniform convergence.



Ref. S. Mandelbrojt, Series de Dirichlet, Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1969.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f329980%2fextracting-dirichlet-series-coefficients%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    Yes. If $f(s)$ has a finite abscissa of absolute convergence $sigma_a$, then $forall sigma > sigma_a$:
    $$
    lim_Ttoinfty frac12T int_-T^T f(sigma+ it)n^it mathrmdt = fraca_nn^sigma.
    $$

    IIRC, the proof can be found in Apostol's book on Analytic Number Theory.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think it holds for $sigma > sigma_c$ the absicssa of simple convergence because $f(s) = (s-s_0)int_1^infty (sum_m le x a_m m^-s_0) x^-s+s_0-1dx = O(s)$ so we can replace $f(sigma+it)$ by $f(sigma+i.) ast frac ksqrt2pi e^-t^2 k^2/2 = sum_m a_m m^-sigma-it e^- fracln^2m2 k^2$ to make it absolutely convergent
      $endgroup$
      – reuns
      1 hour ago















    4












    $begingroup$

    Yes. If $f(s)$ has a finite abscissa of absolute convergence $sigma_a$, then $forall sigma > sigma_a$:
    $$
    lim_Ttoinfty frac12T int_-T^T f(sigma+ it)n^it mathrmdt = fraca_nn^sigma.
    $$

    IIRC, the proof can be found in Apostol's book on Analytic Number Theory.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think it holds for $sigma > sigma_c$ the absicssa of simple convergence because $f(s) = (s-s_0)int_1^infty (sum_m le x a_m m^-s_0) x^-s+s_0-1dx = O(s)$ so we can replace $f(sigma+it)$ by $f(sigma+i.) ast frac ksqrt2pi e^-t^2 k^2/2 = sum_m a_m m^-sigma-it e^- fracln^2m2 k^2$ to make it absolutely convergent
      $endgroup$
      – reuns
      1 hour ago













    4












    4








    4





    $begingroup$

    Yes. If $f(s)$ has a finite abscissa of absolute convergence $sigma_a$, then $forall sigma > sigma_a$:
    $$
    lim_Ttoinfty frac12T int_-T^T f(sigma+ it)n^it mathrmdt = fraca_nn^sigma.
    $$

    IIRC, the proof can be found in Apostol's book on Analytic Number Theory.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Yes. If $f(s)$ has a finite abscissa of absolute convergence $sigma_a$, then $forall sigma > sigma_a$:
    $$
    lim_Ttoinfty frac12T int_-T^T f(sigma+ it)n^it mathrmdt = fraca_nn^sigma.
    $$

    IIRC, the proof can be found in Apostol's book on Analytic Number Theory.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 2 hours ago









    M.G.M.G.

    3,01022740




    3,01022740







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think it holds for $sigma > sigma_c$ the absicssa of simple convergence because $f(s) = (s-s_0)int_1^infty (sum_m le x a_m m^-s_0) x^-s+s_0-1dx = O(s)$ so we can replace $f(sigma+it)$ by $f(sigma+i.) ast frac ksqrt2pi e^-t^2 k^2/2 = sum_m a_m m^-sigma-it e^- fracln^2m2 k^2$ to make it absolutely convergent
      $endgroup$
      – reuns
      1 hour ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think it holds for $sigma > sigma_c$ the absicssa of simple convergence because $f(s) = (s-s_0)int_1^infty (sum_m le x a_m m^-s_0) x^-s+s_0-1dx = O(s)$ so we can replace $f(sigma+it)$ by $f(sigma+i.) ast frac ksqrt2pi e^-t^2 k^2/2 = sum_m a_m m^-sigma-it e^- fracln^2m2 k^2$ to make it absolutely convergent
      $endgroup$
      – reuns
      1 hour ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I think it holds for $sigma > sigma_c$ the absicssa of simple convergence because $f(s) = (s-s_0)int_1^infty (sum_m le x a_m m^-s_0) x^-s+s_0-1dx = O(s)$ so we can replace $f(sigma+it)$ by $f(sigma+i.) ast frac ksqrt2pi e^-t^2 k^2/2 = sum_m a_m m^-sigma-it e^- fracln^2m2 k^2$ to make it absolutely convergent
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    1 hour ago




    $begingroup$
    I think it holds for $sigma > sigma_c$ the absicssa of simple convergence because $f(s) = (s-s_0)int_1^infty (sum_m le x a_m m^-s_0) x^-s+s_0-1dx = O(s)$ so we can replace $f(sigma+it)$ by $f(sigma+i.) ast frac ksqrt2pi e^-t^2 k^2/2 = sum_m a_m m^-sigma-it e^- fracln^2m2 k^2$ to make it absolutely convergent
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    1 hour ago











    3












    $begingroup$

    Even for more general Dirichlet series
    $$f(z)=sum_0^infty a_n e^-lambda_nz$$
    there is the formula
    $$a_ne^-lambda_nsigma=lim_Ttoinftyfrac1Tint_t_0^Tf(sigma+it)e^lambda_n itdt,$$
    where $t_0$ is arbitrary (real) and $sigma>sigma_u$, the abscissa of uniform convergence.



    Ref. S. Mandelbrojt, Series de Dirichlet, Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1969.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      Even for more general Dirichlet series
      $$f(z)=sum_0^infty a_n e^-lambda_nz$$
      there is the formula
      $$a_ne^-lambda_nsigma=lim_Ttoinftyfrac1Tint_t_0^Tf(sigma+it)e^lambda_n itdt,$$
      where $t_0$ is arbitrary (real) and $sigma>sigma_u$, the abscissa of uniform convergence.



      Ref. S. Mandelbrojt, Series de Dirichlet, Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1969.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        Even for more general Dirichlet series
        $$f(z)=sum_0^infty a_n e^-lambda_nz$$
        there is the formula
        $$a_ne^-lambda_nsigma=lim_Ttoinftyfrac1Tint_t_0^Tf(sigma+it)e^lambda_n itdt,$$
        where $t_0$ is arbitrary (real) and $sigma>sigma_u$, the abscissa of uniform convergence.



        Ref. S. Mandelbrojt, Series de Dirichlet, Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1969.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Even for more general Dirichlet series
        $$f(z)=sum_0^infty a_n e^-lambda_nz$$
        there is the formula
        $$a_ne^-lambda_nsigma=lim_Ttoinftyfrac1Tint_t_0^Tf(sigma+it)e^lambda_n itdt,$$
        where $t_0$ is arbitrary (real) and $sigma>sigma_u$, the abscissa of uniform convergence.



        Ref. S. Mandelbrojt, Series de Dirichlet, Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1969.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        Alexandre EremenkoAlexandre Eremenko

        51.9k6145265




        51.9k6145265



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f329980%2fextracting-dirichlet-series-coefficients%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

            2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

            Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?