Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?

Apart from "berlinern", do any other German dialects have a corresponding verb?

Horror movie/show or scene where a horse creature opens its mouth really wide and devours a man in a stables

I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin

How do I construct this japanese bowl?

How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?

If I blow insulation everywhere in my attic except the door trap, will heat escape through it?

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

Text adventure game code

Can a caster that cast Polymorph on themselves stop concentrating at any point even if their Int is low?

How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?

Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

What is the point of a new vote on May's deal when the indicative votes suggest she will not win?

What's the point of interval inversion?

Can the Reverse Gravity spell affect the Meteor Swarm spell?

How to safely derail a train during transit?

Grabbing quick drinks

If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?

Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python

How to use tikz in fbox?

Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords

What makes a siege story/plot interesting?

How can I quit an app using Terminal?



Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?










2















CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?










share|improve this question






















  • unicode.org

    – fefe
    1 hour ago











  • @fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

    – Zhang
    1 hour ago











  • Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

    – fefe
    1 hour ago











  • unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

    – Zhang
    1 hour ago
















2















CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?










share|improve this question






















  • unicode.org

    – fefe
    1 hour ago











  • @fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

    – Zhang
    1 hour ago











  • Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

    – fefe
    1 hour ago











  • unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

    – Zhang
    1 hour ago














2












2








2








CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?










share|improve this question














CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?







characters






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









AdministratorAdministrator

1675




1675












  • unicode.org

    – fefe
    1 hour ago











  • @fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

    – Zhang
    1 hour ago











  • Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

    – fefe
    1 hour ago











  • unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

    – Zhang
    1 hour ago


















  • unicode.org

    – fefe
    1 hour ago











  • @fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

    – Zhang
    1 hour ago











  • Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

    – fefe
    1 hour ago











  • unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

    – Zhang
    1 hour ago

















unicode.org

– fefe
1 hour ago





unicode.org

– fefe
1 hour ago













@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

– Zhang
1 hour ago





@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

– Zhang
1 hour ago













Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

– fefe
1 hour ago





Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

– fefe
1 hour ago













unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

– Zhang
1 hour ago






unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

– Zhang
1 hour ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:




Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?




The answer reads:




A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.



The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).




Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.




Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:




Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?




which is answered:




A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.




The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "371"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchinese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33433%2fwhich-organization-defines-cjk-unified-ideographs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:




    Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?




    The answer reads:




    A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.



    The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).




    Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.




    Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:




    Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?




    which is answered:




    A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.




    The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.






    share|improve this answer





























      4














      On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:




      Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?




      The answer reads:




      A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.



      The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).




      Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.




      Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:




      Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?




      which is answered:




      A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.




      The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.






      share|improve this answer



























        4












        4








        4







        On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:




        Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?




        The answer reads:




        A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.



        The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).




        Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.




        Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:




        Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?




        which is answered:




        A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.




        The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.






        share|improve this answer















        On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:




        Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?




        The answer reads:




        A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.



        The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).




        Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.




        Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:




        Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?




        which is answered:




        A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.




        The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 44 mins ago

























        answered 53 mins ago









        user3306356user3306356

        16.7k52972




        16.7k52972



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Chinese Language Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchinese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33433%2fwhich-organization-defines-cjk-unified-ideographs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

            2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

            Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?