Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”

How could a planet have erratic days?

Closed-form expression for certain product

lightning-datatable row number error

C++ debug of nlohmann json using GDB

What does chmod -u do?

Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file

How do I color the graph in datavisualization?

250 Floor Tower

Are paving bricks differently sized for sand bedding vs mortar bedding?

Not using 's' for he/she/it

Why can Carol Danvers change her suit colours in the first place?

Pre-modern battle - command it, or fight in it?

Rising and falling intonation

If infinitesimal transformations commute why dont the generators of the Lorentz group commute?

Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?

How did Rebekah know that Esau was planning to kill his brother in Genesis 27:42?

Freedom of speech and where it applies

What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?

Non-trope happy ending?

Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?



Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]


Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”













1












$begingroup$


Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    3 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    3 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Problem



Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.



Feedback



Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?



Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n)? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.



enter image description here



#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>

class Solution

public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;

auto i_string = std::to_string(i);

std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();


try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;


if(is_signed) i *= -1;

return i;

;

int main()

Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);







c++ c++11 interview-questions integer






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Martin R

16.2k12366




16.2k12366










asked 3 hours ago









greggreg

37018




37018











  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    3 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that's the one
    $endgroup$
    – greg
    3 hours ago















$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

General comments



  • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


  • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


  • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


I would simplify your function to just:



int reverse(int i) 

try

auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

return 0;




Further comments




  • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



    int x = 1234;
    std::string s;

    while (x > 0)

    s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
    x /= 10;


    std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


    I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



  • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "196"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216068%2freverse-int-within-the-32-bit-signed-integer-range-%25e2%2588%2592231-231-%25e2%2588%2592-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    General comments



    • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


    • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


    • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


    I would simplify your function to just:



    int reverse(int i) 

    try

    auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
    std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

    const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
    return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

    catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

    return 0;




    Further comments




    • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



      int x = 1234;
      std::string s;

      while (x > 0)

      s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
      x /= 10;


      std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


      I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



    • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      General comments



      • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


      • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


      • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


      I would simplify your function to just:



      int reverse(int i) 

      try

      auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
      std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

      const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
      return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

      catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

      return 0;




      Further comments




      • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



        int x = 1234;
        std::string s;

        while (x > 0)

        s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
        x /= 10;


        std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


        I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



      • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        General comments



        • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


        • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


        • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


        I would simplify your function to just:



        int reverse(int i) 

        try

        auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
        std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

        const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
        return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

        catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

        return 0;




        Further comments




        • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



          int x = 1234;
          std::string s;

          while (x > 0)

          s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
          x /= 10;


          std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


          I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



        • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        General comments



        • There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.


        • Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.


        • Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.


        I would simplify your function to just:



        int reverse(int i) 

        try

        auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
        std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());

        const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
        return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;

        catch (const std::out_of_range& e)

        return 0;




        Further comments




        • If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid std::string altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (using std::string to only show you what is happening):



          int x = 1234;
          std::string s;

          while (x > 0)

          s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
          x /= 10;


          std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321


          I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.



        • Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 hours ago

























        answered 3 hours ago









        JuhoJuho

        1,461612




        1,461612



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216068%2freverse-int-within-the-32-bit-signed-integer-range-%25e2%2588%2592231-231-%25e2%2588%2592-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?

            Shenzhen Football Club Índice Elenco atual | Títulos | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegaçãoGooglenotíciaslivrosacadêmicoeditar«"Elenco"»Site oficialexpandindo-oeee

            When We Were Young (canção de Adele) Índice Antecedentes e lançamento | Faixas e formatos | Performances e covers | Desempenho nas tabelas musicais | Créditos | Histórico de lançamento | Referências Menu de navegação«Best albums of 2015»«Adele - When We Were Young (Radio Date: 22-01-2016)»«When We Were Young - Single by Adele»«Adele: Inside Her Private Life and Triumphant Return»«adele interview: world exclusive first interview in three years»«Tobias Jesso Jr: since Adele tweeted his song, he's even bigger than his dad»«Adele interviews Tobias Jesso Jr: 'I think that a couple of the ideas we had could be rap songs'»«Adele on Her Return: 'I Was So Frightened That No One Cared'»«Tobias Jesso Jr. on working with Adele: 'I was as nervous as shit'»«How Ariel Rechtshaid Pushed Adele To Her Limit»«Adele Previews 'When We Were Young' on '60 Minutes' Teaser, Tops Trending 140»«Adele Performs New '25' Ballad, "When We Were Young" Live: Watch»«Which '25' Song Should Be Adele's Next Single?»«Adele's 'When We Were Young' Confirmed As Second Single From '25'»«Adele's new single artwork for 'When We Were Young' is perfectly adorable»«Adele at the BBC review: honest, funny and spectacular – Celebrity News News»«'Saturday Night Live': Adele Sings 'Hello' and 'When We Were Young'»«'Adele: Live in New York City' NBC Special – Set List Revealed!»«Adele Closes Out the 2016 Brit Awards With 'When We Were Young'»«What Is The Adele Live Tour Set List? There's No Way She'd Leave Out These 8 Songs»«See Demi Lovato's Soaring Cover of Adele's 'When We Were Young'»«'The Voice': 5 Best Moments From Week 1 Blind Auditions»«Adele – When We Were Young (Media Control Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Entertainment Monitoring Africa)»«Adele – When We Were Young (ARIA Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ö3 Austria Top 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 50)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Canadian Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Tracklisten)»«Adele – When We Were Young (The Official Charts Company)»«Adele – Hello (IFPI Slovenská Republika)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Productores de Música de España)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Billboard Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Adult Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Adult Contemporary Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Dance Club Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Rock Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (IFPI Finlândia)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Syndicat National de l'Éditon Phonographique)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Magyar Hanglemezkiadók Szövetsége)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Irish Recorded Music Association)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Mexico Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (VG-lista)»«Adele – When We Were Young (NZ Top 40 Singles)»«Adele – When We Were Young (MegaCharts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Związek Producentów Audio Video)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Indie Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Sverigetopplistan)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Schweizer Hitparade)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Music Canada – Gold/Platinum – When We Were Young»«NZ Top 40 Singles Chart»«Certified Awards»e