Is “staff” singular or plural?I - plural or singular?Is “mathematics” singular or plural?Between + plural or singular?Plural or singular for 'hair'?Is it correct to say “spendings”?Singular or Plural matching?plural-singularThe majority: plural or singularsingular vs plural problem of “profile” in “We first build up a detailed profile of our customers and their requirements.”“The farthest reach” or “the farthest reaches”?

How do I color the graph in datavisualization?

The IT department bottlenecks progress. How should I handle this?

What is this called? Old film camera viewer?

Where does the bonus feat in the cleric starting package come from?

Problem with TransformedDistribution

Removing files under particular conditions (number of files, file age)

Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file

Creepy dinosaur pc game identification

How could a planet have erratic days?

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

Energy measurement from position eigenstate

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

The screen of my macbook suddenly broken down how can I do to recover

Loading commands from file

Intuition of generalized eigenvector.

Create all possible words using a set or letters

Longest common substring in linear time

Is it improper etiquette to ask your opponent what his/her rating is before the game?

Finding NDSolve method details

Is a bound state a stationary state?

Which one is correct as adjective “protruding” or “protruded”?

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?

Drawing ramified coverings with tikz



Is “staff” singular or plural?


I - plural or singular?Is “mathematics” singular or plural?Between + plural or singular?Plural or singular for 'hair'?Is it correct to say “spendings”?Singular or Plural matching?plural-singularThe majority: plural or singularsingular vs plural problem of “profile” in “We first build up a detailed profile of our customers and their requirements.”“The farthest reach” or “the farthest reaches”?













10















In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?










share|improve this question









New contributor




oscar tabarez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    15 hours ago











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    10 hours ago
















10















In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?










share|improve this question









New contributor




oscar tabarez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    15 hours ago











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    10 hours ago














10












10








10


2






In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?










share|improve this question









New contributor




oscar tabarez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












In the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary there is an example for "get by":




We can get by with four computers at the moment, but we'll need a couple more when the new staff arrive.




(Emphasis changed.)



Shouldn't this be "arrives"?







singular-vs-plural subject-verb-agreement grammatical-number






share|improve this question









New contributor




oscar tabarez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




oscar tabarez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 35 mins ago









Solomon Ucko

1094




1094






New contributor




oscar tabarez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 18 hours ago









oscar tabarezoscar tabarez

533




533




New contributor




oscar tabarez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





oscar tabarez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






oscar tabarez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    15 hours ago











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    10 hours ago













  • 3





    Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

    – David K
    15 hours ago











  • BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

    – chrylis
    10 hours ago








3




3





Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

– David K
15 hours ago





Reading the title, I thought the question was why we don't write "he's", "she's", or "it's" as the possessive pronouns.

– David K
15 hours ago













BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

– chrylis
10 hours ago






BrE has a practice of treating nouns for groups of people (even company or agency names) as plurals grammatically.

– chrylis
10 hours ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5














EDIT



I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



We can correctly say:



When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




Meaning of staff in English
Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
an organization:



There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



There are over a hundred staff in the company.



He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




[ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

    – Michael Harvey
    18 hours ago






  • 2





    @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

    – Michael Harvey
    17 hours ago






  • 1





    @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

    – Michael Harvey
    17 hours ago






  • 1





    As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

    – Mixolydian
    16 hours ago






  • 1





    I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

    – David K
    10 hours ago


















6














In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




The staff in this shop are very helpful.







share|improve this answer























  • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

    – chasly from UK
    18 hours ago











  • A staff of ten.

    – Kshitij Singh
    17 hours ago











  • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

    – chasly from UK
    17 hours ago


















1














In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    oscar tabarez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201939%2fis-staff-singular-or-plural%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      18 hours ago






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      17 hours ago






    • 1





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      17 hours ago






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      16 hours ago






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      10 hours ago















    5














    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      18 hours ago






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      17 hours ago






    • 1





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      17 hours ago






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      16 hours ago






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      10 hours ago













    5












    5








    5







    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff







    share|improve this answer















    EDIT



    I see from comments and from the answer by @Kshitij Singh that my answer does not cover all cases. I may have to rethink it.




    It is a very good question. You can think of staff as an irregular plural.



    We can correctly say:



    When the sheep arrives we will put it in the paddock.



    When the sheep arrive we can put them in the paddock.



    This is is because 'sheep' is the plural of 'sheep'.



    In the case of "staff", it acts as an irregular plural that has no singular form! The singular is "staff member".




    Here you can see the usage in a dictionary:




    Meaning of staff in English
    Contents staff noun UK ​ /stɑːf/ US ​ /stæf/ staff noun (PEOPLE) ​ A2 [ S, + sing/pl verb ] the group of people who work for
    an organization:



    There is a good relationship between staff and pupils at the school.



    The staff are not very happy about the latest pay increase.



    There are over a hundred staff in the company.



    He is on (= a member of) the editorial staff of the magazine.



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff





    Note that if you use 'staff' as a singular noun then you are indicating that it means a long substantial walking stick.




    [ C ] formal a long, strong stick held in the hand that is used as a
    support when walking, as a weapon, or as a symbol of authority



    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staff








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 16 hours ago

























    answered 18 hours ago









    chasly from UKchasly from UK

    2,742313




    2,742313







    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      18 hours ago






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      17 hours ago






    • 1





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      17 hours ago






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      16 hours ago






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      10 hours ago












    • 3





      Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

      – Michael Harvey
      18 hours ago






    • 2





      @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

      – Michael Harvey
      17 hours ago






    • 1





      @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

      – Michael Harvey
      17 hours ago






    • 1





      As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

      – Mixolydian
      16 hours ago






    • 1





      I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

      – David K
      10 hours ago







    3




    3





    Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

    – Michael Harvey
    18 hours ago





    Lots of US-centric style guides and grammar sites and blogs obstinately maintain that 'staff' is always singular. The issue also affects company names, teams, etc.

    – Michael Harvey
    18 hours ago




    2




    2





    @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

    – Michael Harvey
    17 hours ago





    @chasly - yes, exactly. Americans would say that.

    – Michael Harvey
    17 hours ago




    1




    1





    @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

    – Michael Harvey
    17 hours ago





    @chasly, you should address the OP's confusion by mentioning that staff is singular-only in American English, and may be singular or plural in British English. I am surprised you did not know this.

    – Michael Harvey
    17 hours ago




    1




    1





    As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

    – Mixolydian
    16 hours ago





    As an American, “staff” and “team” behave like singular nouns for me, so this is accurate.

    – Mixolydian
    16 hours ago




    1




    1





    I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

    – David K
    10 hours ago





    I didn't say there was anything wrong with "he is on the staff." I'm just saying that it would seem odd to me if "staff" were considered a plural noun in that usage. For example, would you write, "The staff are improved now that he is on them"? I would have written "is" and "it". Is that just an American thing?

    – David K
    10 hours ago













    6














    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.







    share|improve this answer























    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      18 hours ago











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      17 hours ago











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      17 hours ago















    6














    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.







    share|improve this answer























    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      18 hours ago











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      17 hours ago











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      17 hours ago













    6












    6








    6







    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.







    share|improve this answer













    In British English staff can be singular or plural. If it is the subject of a verb, this verb is plural.




    The staff in this shop are very helpful.








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 18 hours ago









    Kshitij SinghKshitij Singh

    1,254113




    1,254113












    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      18 hours ago











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      17 hours ago











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      17 hours ago

















    • Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

      – chasly from UK
      18 hours ago











    • A staff of ten.

      – Kshitij Singh
      17 hours ago











    • Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

      – chasly from UK
      17 hours ago
















    Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

    – chasly from UK
    18 hours ago





    Could you give an example where staff (meaning a number of workers) is singular?

    – chasly from UK
    18 hours ago













    A staff of ten.

    – Kshitij Singh
    17 hours ago





    A staff of ten.

    – Kshitij Singh
    17 hours ago













    Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

    – chasly from UK
    17 hours ago





    Hmm... You're right. I'll have to rethink.

    – chasly from UK
    17 hours ago











    1














    In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



    It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



      It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



        It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.






        share|improve this answer













        In American English, I think both would be acceptable. Either the sentence is treating "the staff" as one entity, which is fine, or "the staff" as multiple staff members (or "staffers").



        It reminds me of how the United States used to be plural until after the American Civil War ("The US are" vs "the US is"). A similar case would be "cast" (theatrical); "The cast is all college students" is acceptable, and "the cast put on the show once a night" is also perfectly fine, for example.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 13 hours ago









        user45266user45266

        1,269116




        1,269116




















            oscar tabarez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            oscar tabarez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            oscar tabarez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            oscar tabarez is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201939%2fis-staff-singular-or-plural%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

            2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

            Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?