Does the UK provide 50% of EU's waters? And does this imply anything about fishing rights?Are media reports about squatters' rights accurate?Does pumping gas when the tank is half full and on the low flow setting provide an economic benefit?Did Tony Benn say this about “the establishment”?Are these human rights in the UK derived from the ECHR?Does the UK send the EU £350 million a week?Has freedom of movement of people lead to a reduction in wages and worsening of working conditions in the UK?Are the claims in this infographic about the UK Prime Minister accurate?Is this graphic about female executives accurate?How true are the claims about the dairy industry in this poster?Did the former prime minister of UK say this about the Koran?

With a Canadian student visa, can I spend a night at Vancouver before continuing to Toronto?

Examples of non trivial equivalence relations , I mean equivalence relations without the expression " same ... as" in their definition?

How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?

French for 'It must be my imagination'?

What does KSP mean?

How to creep the reader out with what seems like a normal person?

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

How can I place the product on a social media post better?

How do Bards prepare spells?

How to pronounce 'C++' in Spanish

How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?

How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?

Sci-fi novel series with instant travel between planets through gates. A river runs through the gates

How to interact with ERC20 interface?

Any examples of headwear for races with animal ears?

How to figure out whether the data is sample data or population data apart from the client's information?

Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?

Is it possible to dynamically set properties of an `Object` using Apex?

Does the UK provide 50% of EU's waters? And does this imply anything about fishing rights?

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?

Why the difference in metal between 銀行 and お金?

Is thermodynamics only applicable to systems in equilibrium?

Disable screen dimming in Ubuntu Mate 18.04.2 LTS



Does the UK provide 50% of EU's waters? And does this imply anything about fishing rights?


Are media reports about squatters' rights accurate?Does pumping gas when the tank is half full and on the low flow setting provide an economic benefit?Did Tony Benn say this about “the establishment”?Are these human rights in the UK derived from the ECHR?Does the UK send the EU £350 million a week?Has freedom of movement of people lead to a reduction in wages and worsening of working conditions in the UK?Are the claims in this infographic about the UK Prime Minister accurate?Is this graphic about female executives accurate?How true are the claims about the dairy industry in this poster?Did the former prime minister of UK say this about the Koran?













2















Leading Brexiteer Owen Paterson wrote in an article in the Telegraph about fisheries:




At present, the UK provides 50 per cent of the EU’s waters but receives only a 25 per cent share of the Total Allowable Catch.




Is this assessment correct in both the facts and their implication? I.e. are the two parts separately true and are they also supposed to be connected that way, e.g. is the water area considered a principal factor in assigning fishing quotas in international law?



The whole point of that article seems to me is to claim that (when it comes to fisheries) the UK is getting taken advantage of (to borrow an expression common in foreign policy on the other side of the Atlantic nowadays)... and that this could all change after Brexit. It's hard not to read that as "we have 50% of the water, therefore we should also have 50% of the fish." Cue in mention of winning trade fishing wars, which is actually present in the title of the article: "After Iceland won the cod wars, their independent fisheries thrived. Britain can do the same".










share|improve this question
























  • Could I ask what you mean by "are the two parts true and are they also supposed to be connected that way?"

    – Barry Harrison
    2 hours ago











  • @BarryHarrison: see edit.

    – Fizz
    2 hours ago











  • Is the answer answering your new edit?

    – Barry Harrison
    1 hour ago
















2















Leading Brexiteer Owen Paterson wrote in an article in the Telegraph about fisheries:




At present, the UK provides 50 per cent of the EU’s waters but receives only a 25 per cent share of the Total Allowable Catch.




Is this assessment correct in both the facts and their implication? I.e. are the two parts separately true and are they also supposed to be connected that way, e.g. is the water area considered a principal factor in assigning fishing quotas in international law?



The whole point of that article seems to me is to claim that (when it comes to fisheries) the UK is getting taken advantage of (to borrow an expression common in foreign policy on the other side of the Atlantic nowadays)... and that this could all change after Brexit. It's hard not to read that as "we have 50% of the water, therefore we should also have 50% of the fish." Cue in mention of winning trade fishing wars, which is actually present in the title of the article: "After Iceland won the cod wars, their independent fisheries thrived. Britain can do the same".










share|improve this question
























  • Could I ask what you mean by "are the two parts true and are they also supposed to be connected that way?"

    – Barry Harrison
    2 hours ago











  • @BarryHarrison: see edit.

    – Fizz
    2 hours ago











  • Is the answer answering your new edit?

    – Barry Harrison
    1 hour ago














2












2








2








Leading Brexiteer Owen Paterson wrote in an article in the Telegraph about fisheries:




At present, the UK provides 50 per cent of the EU’s waters but receives only a 25 per cent share of the Total Allowable Catch.




Is this assessment correct in both the facts and their implication? I.e. are the two parts separately true and are they also supposed to be connected that way, e.g. is the water area considered a principal factor in assigning fishing quotas in international law?



The whole point of that article seems to me is to claim that (when it comes to fisheries) the UK is getting taken advantage of (to borrow an expression common in foreign policy on the other side of the Atlantic nowadays)... and that this could all change after Brexit. It's hard not to read that as "we have 50% of the water, therefore we should also have 50% of the fish." Cue in mention of winning trade fishing wars, which is actually present in the title of the article: "After Iceland won the cod wars, their independent fisheries thrived. Britain can do the same".










share|improve this question
















Leading Brexiteer Owen Paterson wrote in an article in the Telegraph about fisheries:




At present, the UK provides 50 per cent of the EU’s waters but receives only a 25 per cent share of the Total Allowable Catch.




Is this assessment correct in both the facts and their implication? I.e. are the two parts separately true and are they also supposed to be connected that way, e.g. is the water area considered a principal factor in assigning fishing quotas in international law?



The whole point of that article seems to me is to claim that (when it comes to fisheries) the UK is getting taken advantage of (to borrow an expression common in foreign policy on the other side of the Atlantic nowadays)... and that this could all change after Brexit. It's hard not to read that as "we have 50% of the water, therefore we should also have 50% of the fish." Cue in mention of winning trade fishing wars, which is actually present in the title of the article: "After Iceland won the cod wars, their independent fisheries thrived. Britain can do the same".







economics united-kingdom europe brexit






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







Fizz

















asked 6 hours ago









FizzFizz

10.5k23984




10.5k23984












  • Could I ask what you mean by "are the two parts true and are they also supposed to be connected that way?"

    – Barry Harrison
    2 hours ago











  • @BarryHarrison: see edit.

    – Fizz
    2 hours ago











  • Is the answer answering your new edit?

    – Barry Harrison
    1 hour ago


















  • Could I ask what you mean by "are the two parts true and are they also supposed to be connected that way?"

    – Barry Harrison
    2 hours ago











  • @BarryHarrison: see edit.

    – Fizz
    2 hours ago











  • Is the answer answering your new edit?

    – Barry Harrison
    1 hour ago

















Could I ask what you mean by "are the two parts true and are they also supposed to be connected that way?"

– Barry Harrison
2 hours ago





Could I ask what you mean by "are the two parts true and are they also supposed to be connected that way?"

– Barry Harrison
2 hours ago













@BarryHarrison: see edit.

– Fizz
2 hours ago





@BarryHarrison: see edit.

– Fizz
2 hours ago













Is the answer answering your new edit?

– Barry Harrison
1 hour ago






Is the answer answering your new edit?

– Barry Harrison
1 hour ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














From the European Environment Agency (an agency of the EU),




Combined EEZ of >15 million km2, the largest marine domain in the world




From the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, the UK's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is 6,805,586 sq km. Thus, the UK's waters are, at best, 45.4% of the EU's.



Regarding the Total Allowable Catch, The Conversation says




In 2015, the CFP allocated the United Kingdom a total of 612,612 tonnes of quota from more than 100 different fish and shellfish stocks. The total EU quota for these stocks was 2,069,202 tonnes, so the UK was allocated 30% of these fish (and shellfish) quotas.




As such, the UK was allocated 29.6% of the total allowable catch in 2015.




At present, the UK provides 50 per cent of the EU’s waters but receives only a 25 per cent share of the Total Allowable Catch.




The UK provides less than 50 percent of the EU's waters and received greater than 25 percent of the total allowable catch (in 2015). The claim is incorrect.




Note (per Fizz):



The total allowable catch is, according to Full Fact, set




based largely on how much [member states] fished in those areas in the 1970s, before the Common Fisheries Policy came into effect.




Thus, water area is not considered a principal factor in assigning fishing quotas. The fishing quotas are not assigned by "international law", but by the EU itself.




Interesting note:



From the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, between 2011 and 2015:




Non-UK European Union fishing boats landed about 700,000 tonnes of fish and shellfish, worth almost £530 million, from the UK EEZ each year on average.



UK fishing boats landed 92,000 tonnes of fish and shellfish, worth about £110 million, from other areas of the EU EEZ each year on average.





Note: The total allowable catch for 2019 can be calculated by adding all the numbers here, here, here, and here for 1) the UK and 2) all countries. I have not done this yet (it's a lot of numbers).






share|improve this answer
































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    From the European Environment Agency (an agency of the EU),




    Combined EEZ of >15 million km2, the largest marine domain in the world




    From the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, the UK's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is 6,805,586 sq km. Thus, the UK's waters are, at best, 45.4% of the EU's.



    Regarding the Total Allowable Catch, The Conversation says




    In 2015, the CFP allocated the United Kingdom a total of 612,612 tonnes of quota from more than 100 different fish and shellfish stocks. The total EU quota for these stocks was 2,069,202 tonnes, so the UK was allocated 30% of these fish (and shellfish) quotas.




    As such, the UK was allocated 29.6% of the total allowable catch in 2015.




    At present, the UK provides 50 per cent of the EU’s waters but receives only a 25 per cent share of the Total Allowable Catch.




    The UK provides less than 50 percent of the EU's waters and received greater than 25 percent of the total allowable catch (in 2015). The claim is incorrect.




    Note (per Fizz):



    The total allowable catch is, according to Full Fact, set




    based largely on how much [member states] fished in those areas in the 1970s, before the Common Fisheries Policy came into effect.




    Thus, water area is not considered a principal factor in assigning fishing quotas. The fishing quotas are not assigned by "international law", but by the EU itself.




    Interesting note:



    From the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, between 2011 and 2015:




    Non-UK European Union fishing boats landed about 700,000 tonnes of fish and shellfish, worth almost £530 million, from the UK EEZ each year on average.



    UK fishing boats landed 92,000 tonnes of fish and shellfish, worth about £110 million, from other areas of the EU EEZ each year on average.





    Note: The total allowable catch for 2019 can be calculated by adding all the numbers here, here, here, and here for 1) the UK and 2) all countries. I have not done this yet (it's a lot of numbers).






    share|improve this answer





























      2














      From the European Environment Agency (an agency of the EU),




      Combined EEZ of >15 million km2, the largest marine domain in the world




      From the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, the UK's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is 6,805,586 sq km. Thus, the UK's waters are, at best, 45.4% of the EU's.



      Regarding the Total Allowable Catch, The Conversation says




      In 2015, the CFP allocated the United Kingdom a total of 612,612 tonnes of quota from more than 100 different fish and shellfish stocks. The total EU quota for these stocks was 2,069,202 tonnes, so the UK was allocated 30% of these fish (and shellfish) quotas.




      As such, the UK was allocated 29.6% of the total allowable catch in 2015.




      At present, the UK provides 50 per cent of the EU’s waters but receives only a 25 per cent share of the Total Allowable Catch.




      The UK provides less than 50 percent of the EU's waters and received greater than 25 percent of the total allowable catch (in 2015). The claim is incorrect.




      Note (per Fizz):



      The total allowable catch is, according to Full Fact, set




      based largely on how much [member states] fished in those areas in the 1970s, before the Common Fisheries Policy came into effect.




      Thus, water area is not considered a principal factor in assigning fishing quotas. The fishing quotas are not assigned by "international law", but by the EU itself.




      Interesting note:



      From the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, between 2011 and 2015:




      Non-UK European Union fishing boats landed about 700,000 tonnes of fish and shellfish, worth almost £530 million, from the UK EEZ each year on average.



      UK fishing boats landed 92,000 tonnes of fish and shellfish, worth about £110 million, from other areas of the EU EEZ each year on average.





      Note: The total allowable catch for 2019 can be calculated by adding all the numbers here, here, here, and here for 1) the UK and 2) all countries. I have not done this yet (it's a lot of numbers).






      share|improve this answer



























        2












        2








        2







        From the European Environment Agency (an agency of the EU),




        Combined EEZ of >15 million km2, the largest marine domain in the world




        From the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, the UK's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is 6,805,586 sq km. Thus, the UK's waters are, at best, 45.4% of the EU's.



        Regarding the Total Allowable Catch, The Conversation says




        In 2015, the CFP allocated the United Kingdom a total of 612,612 tonnes of quota from more than 100 different fish and shellfish stocks. The total EU quota for these stocks was 2,069,202 tonnes, so the UK was allocated 30% of these fish (and shellfish) quotas.




        As such, the UK was allocated 29.6% of the total allowable catch in 2015.




        At present, the UK provides 50 per cent of the EU’s waters but receives only a 25 per cent share of the Total Allowable Catch.




        The UK provides less than 50 percent of the EU's waters and received greater than 25 percent of the total allowable catch (in 2015). The claim is incorrect.




        Note (per Fizz):



        The total allowable catch is, according to Full Fact, set




        based largely on how much [member states] fished in those areas in the 1970s, before the Common Fisheries Policy came into effect.




        Thus, water area is not considered a principal factor in assigning fishing quotas. The fishing quotas are not assigned by "international law", but by the EU itself.




        Interesting note:



        From the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, between 2011 and 2015:




        Non-UK European Union fishing boats landed about 700,000 tonnes of fish and shellfish, worth almost £530 million, from the UK EEZ each year on average.



        UK fishing boats landed 92,000 tonnes of fish and shellfish, worth about £110 million, from other areas of the EU EEZ each year on average.





        Note: The total allowable catch for 2019 can be calculated by adding all the numbers here, here, here, and here for 1) the UK and 2) all countries. I have not done this yet (it's a lot of numbers).






        share|improve this answer















        From the European Environment Agency (an agency of the EU),




        Combined EEZ of >15 million km2, the largest marine domain in the world




        From the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association, the UK's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is 6,805,586 sq km. Thus, the UK's waters are, at best, 45.4% of the EU's.



        Regarding the Total Allowable Catch, The Conversation says




        In 2015, the CFP allocated the United Kingdom a total of 612,612 tonnes of quota from more than 100 different fish and shellfish stocks. The total EU quota for these stocks was 2,069,202 tonnes, so the UK was allocated 30% of these fish (and shellfish) quotas.




        As such, the UK was allocated 29.6% of the total allowable catch in 2015.




        At present, the UK provides 50 per cent of the EU’s waters but receives only a 25 per cent share of the Total Allowable Catch.




        The UK provides less than 50 percent of the EU's waters and received greater than 25 percent of the total allowable catch (in 2015). The claim is incorrect.




        Note (per Fizz):



        The total allowable catch is, according to Full Fact, set




        based largely on how much [member states] fished in those areas in the 1970s, before the Common Fisheries Policy came into effect.




        Thus, water area is not considered a principal factor in assigning fishing quotas. The fishing quotas are not assigned by "international law", but by the EU itself.




        Interesting note:



        From the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, between 2011 and 2015:




        Non-UK European Union fishing boats landed about 700,000 tonnes of fish and shellfish, worth almost £530 million, from the UK EEZ each year on average.



        UK fishing boats landed 92,000 tonnes of fish and shellfish, worth about £110 million, from other areas of the EU EEZ each year on average.





        Note: The total allowable catch for 2019 can be calculated by adding all the numbers here, here, here, and here for 1) the UK and 2) all countries. I have not done this yet (it's a lot of numbers).







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 2 hours ago









        Barry HarrisonBarry Harrison

        3,40411354




        3,40411354













            Popular posts from this blog

            Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

            2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

            Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?