Kerning for subscripts of sigma? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSubscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeXMargin kerning in Xe(La)TeX for TeXlive 2010: how to enable?Fix math mode kerning of “C”Turning off TeXnical enhancementsKerning of subscriptsPair kerning strategies in (pdf)LaTeXKerning super- and subscripts “semantically”Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeXMicrotype kerning won't work with quotationmarksKerning of HyphensIs there a LuaLaTeX solution to adjust superscript kerning on large delimiters?

Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

How to type a long/em dash `—`

What is this sharp, curved notch on my knife for?

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Can there be female White Walkers?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

How do PCB vias affect signal quality?

Match Roman Numerals

Geography at the pixel level

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

Is bread bad for ducks?

How come people say “Would of”?

Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?

Computing the expectation of the number of balls in a box



Kerning for subscripts of sigma?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSubscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeXMargin kerning in Xe(La)TeX for TeXlive 2010: how to enable?Fix math mode kerning of “C”Turning off TeXnical enhancementsKerning of subscriptsPair kerning strategies in (pdf)LaTeXKerning super- and subscripts “semantically”Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeXMicrotype kerning won't work with quotationmarksKerning of HyphensIs there a LuaLaTeX solution to adjust superscript kerning on large delimiters?










2















Is there any way to reduce the distance inside σ₀ and between sigma and its subscript in general in the following setup automatically? That is, each time you type in sigma_0 (or sigma_1 etc.), you wish the actual output to be more consistent with sigma_!0 (or sigma_!1 etc.).



Input:



documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0]
[sigma_!0 sigma_!0]
enddocument


Output so far:



enter image description here



As you see, in the upper line the left zero seems to be more close to the right σ (which doesn't make any sense) than to the left one (which would make sense). The kerning in the lower line makes more sense.



I guess, this would be easier than Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeX, since we already have sigma as a macro and can redefine it.



For which letters in the subscript position the kerning should be improved is intentionally left unspecified; improving the kerning in sigma_<any single arabic digit or any single Latin small letter> would suffice as a start. Of course, for σ_T we might need less kerning (e.g., only -1mu rather than -3mu), and that's why capital Latin letters would need more work (and are not asked for in the first step).










share|improve this question
























  • Do you want to change the behaviour for sigma_<any single number>, or for sigma_<any single character>, or sigma_<anything>, or somthing else?

    – Phelype Oleinik
    1 hour ago











  • @PhelypeOleinik Question updated.

    – user49915
    1 hour ago















2















Is there any way to reduce the distance inside σ₀ and between sigma and its subscript in general in the following setup automatically? That is, each time you type in sigma_0 (or sigma_1 etc.), you wish the actual output to be more consistent with sigma_!0 (or sigma_!1 etc.).



Input:



documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0]
[sigma_!0 sigma_!0]
enddocument


Output so far:



enter image description here



As you see, in the upper line the left zero seems to be more close to the right σ (which doesn't make any sense) than to the left one (which would make sense). The kerning in the lower line makes more sense.



I guess, this would be easier than Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeX, since we already have sigma as a macro and can redefine it.



For which letters in the subscript position the kerning should be improved is intentionally left unspecified; improving the kerning in sigma_<any single arabic digit or any single Latin small letter> would suffice as a start. Of course, for σ_T we might need less kerning (e.g., only -1mu rather than -3mu), and that's why capital Latin letters would need more work (and are not asked for in the first step).










share|improve this question
























  • Do you want to change the behaviour for sigma_<any single number>, or for sigma_<any single character>, or sigma_<anything>, or somthing else?

    – Phelype Oleinik
    1 hour ago











  • @PhelypeOleinik Question updated.

    – user49915
    1 hour ago













2












2








2








Is there any way to reduce the distance inside σ₀ and between sigma and its subscript in general in the following setup automatically? That is, each time you type in sigma_0 (or sigma_1 etc.), you wish the actual output to be more consistent with sigma_!0 (or sigma_!1 etc.).



Input:



documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0]
[sigma_!0 sigma_!0]
enddocument


Output so far:



enter image description here



As you see, in the upper line the left zero seems to be more close to the right σ (which doesn't make any sense) than to the left one (which would make sense). The kerning in the lower line makes more sense.



I guess, this would be easier than Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeX, since we already have sigma as a macro and can redefine it.



For which letters in the subscript position the kerning should be improved is intentionally left unspecified; improving the kerning in sigma_<any single arabic digit or any single Latin small letter> would suffice as a start. Of course, for σ_T we might need less kerning (e.g., only -1mu rather than -3mu), and that's why capital Latin letters would need more work (and are not asked for in the first step).










share|improve this question
















Is there any way to reduce the distance inside σ₀ and between sigma and its subscript in general in the following setup automatically? That is, each time you type in sigma_0 (or sigma_1 etc.), you wish the actual output to be more consistent with sigma_!0 (or sigma_!1 etc.).



Input:



documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0]
[sigma_!0 sigma_!0]
enddocument


Output so far:



enter image description here



As you see, in the upper line the left zero seems to be more close to the right σ (which doesn't make any sense) than to the left one (which would make sense). The kerning in the lower line makes more sense.



I guess, this would be easier than Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeX, since we already have sigma as a macro and can redefine it.



For which letters in the subscript position the kerning should be improved is intentionally left unspecified; improving the kerning in sigma_<any single arabic digit or any single Latin small letter> would suffice as a start. Of course, for σ_T we might need less kerning (e.g., only -1mu rather than -3mu), and that's why capital Latin letters would need more work (and are not asked for in the first step).







xetex microtype kerning






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 35 mins ago







user49915

















asked 1 hour ago









user49915user49915

756122




756122












  • Do you want to change the behaviour for sigma_<any single number>, or for sigma_<any single character>, or sigma_<anything>, or somthing else?

    – Phelype Oleinik
    1 hour ago











  • @PhelypeOleinik Question updated.

    – user49915
    1 hour ago

















  • Do you want to change the behaviour for sigma_<any single number>, or for sigma_<any single character>, or sigma_<anything>, or somthing else?

    – Phelype Oleinik
    1 hour ago











  • @PhelypeOleinik Question updated.

    – user49915
    1 hour ago
















Do you want to change the behaviour for sigma_<any single number>, or for sigma_<any single character>, or sigma_<anything>, or somthing else?

– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago





Do you want to change the behaviour for sigma_<any single number>, or for sigma_<any single character>, or sigma_<anything>, or somthing else?

– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago













@PhelypeOleinik Question updated.

– user49915
1 hour ago





@PhelypeOleinik Question updated.

– user49915
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














The following definition does it:



ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:

peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:

cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1

tl_if_single_token:nTF #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token ! #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token #1

ExplSyntaxOff


I save the definition of sigma in __userxlixk_actual_sigma: then redefine sigma to check:



  1. if it is followed by a c_math_subscript_token: if it is not, then just print __userxlixk_actual_sigma: otherwise;


  2. grab what follows the subscript token as argument and check if the argument consists of a single token: if it does, apply a !, otherwise print normally.


Here's the output before and after the redefinition (I used LuaTeX and lua-visual-debug to show the negative kern):




enter image description here




Code:



documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackagelua-visual-debug
usepackageluatexbase
usepackageunravel
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
$sigma_abc sigma_0 sigma_0$

ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:

peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:

cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1

tl_if_single_token:nTF #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token ! #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token #1

ExplSyntaxOff

$sigma_abc sigma_0 sigma_0$
enddocument


Note, however, that this code will work if you use sigma_a^b but not if you use sigma^b_a.






share|improve this answer























  • To make it work for both sigma_a^b and sigma^b_a you could use an e-type argument (“embellishments”).

    – Henri Menke
    27 mins ago











  • First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?

    – user49915
    17 mins ago



















2














I'd use the e argument type of xparse.



documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype

setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
Extension=.otf,
range="2A3E,
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]

%mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/

AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma


NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
standardsigma
IfValueT#1_!#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%


begindocument

[sigma_0 sigma_0^2 sigma^2_0]
[standardsigma_!0 standardsigma_!0^2 standardsigma^2_!0]

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?

    – user49915
    6 mins ago












  • @user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.

    – egreg
    57 secs ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484404%2fkerning-for-subscripts-of-sigma%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














The following definition does it:



ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:

peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:

cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1

tl_if_single_token:nTF #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token ! #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token #1

ExplSyntaxOff


I save the definition of sigma in __userxlixk_actual_sigma: then redefine sigma to check:



  1. if it is followed by a c_math_subscript_token: if it is not, then just print __userxlixk_actual_sigma: otherwise;


  2. grab what follows the subscript token as argument and check if the argument consists of a single token: if it does, apply a !, otherwise print normally.


Here's the output before and after the redefinition (I used LuaTeX and lua-visual-debug to show the negative kern):




enter image description here




Code:



documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackagelua-visual-debug
usepackageluatexbase
usepackageunravel
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
$sigma_abc sigma_0 sigma_0$

ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:

peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:

cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1

tl_if_single_token:nTF #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token ! #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token #1

ExplSyntaxOff

$sigma_abc sigma_0 sigma_0$
enddocument


Note, however, that this code will work if you use sigma_a^b but not if you use sigma^b_a.






share|improve this answer























  • To make it work for both sigma_a^b and sigma^b_a you could use an e-type argument (“embellishments”).

    – Henri Menke
    27 mins ago











  • First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?

    – user49915
    17 mins ago
















2














The following definition does it:



ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:

peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:

cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1

tl_if_single_token:nTF #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token ! #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token #1

ExplSyntaxOff


I save the definition of sigma in __userxlixk_actual_sigma: then redefine sigma to check:



  1. if it is followed by a c_math_subscript_token: if it is not, then just print __userxlixk_actual_sigma: otherwise;


  2. grab what follows the subscript token as argument and check if the argument consists of a single token: if it does, apply a !, otherwise print normally.


Here's the output before and after the redefinition (I used LuaTeX and lua-visual-debug to show the negative kern):




enter image description here




Code:



documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackagelua-visual-debug
usepackageluatexbase
usepackageunravel
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
$sigma_abc sigma_0 sigma_0$

ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:

peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:

cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1

tl_if_single_token:nTF #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token ! #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token #1

ExplSyntaxOff

$sigma_abc sigma_0 sigma_0$
enddocument


Note, however, that this code will work if you use sigma_a^b but not if you use sigma^b_a.






share|improve this answer























  • To make it work for both sigma_a^b and sigma^b_a you could use an e-type argument (“embellishments”).

    – Henri Menke
    27 mins ago











  • First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?

    – user49915
    17 mins ago














2












2








2







The following definition does it:



ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:

peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:

cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1

tl_if_single_token:nTF #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token ! #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token #1

ExplSyntaxOff


I save the definition of sigma in __userxlixk_actual_sigma: then redefine sigma to check:



  1. if it is followed by a c_math_subscript_token: if it is not, then just print __userxlixk_actual_sigma: otherwise;


  2. grab what follows the subscript token as argument and check if the argument consists of a single token: if it does, apply a !, otherwise print normally.


Here's the output before and after the redefinition (I used LuaTeX and lua-visual-debug to show the negative kern):




enter image description here




Code:



documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackagelua-visual-debug
usepackageluatexbase
usepackageunravel
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
$sigma_abc sigma_0 sigma_0$

ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:

peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:

cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1

tl_if_single_token:nTF #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token ! #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token #1

ExplSyntaxOff

$sigma_abc sigma_0 sigma_0$
enddocument


Note, however, that this code will work if you use sigma_a^b but not if you use sigma^b_a.






share|improve this answer













The following definition does it:



ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:

peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:

cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1

tl_if_single_token:nTF #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token ! #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token #1

ExplSyntaxOff


I save the definition of sigma in __userxlixk_actual_sigma: then redefine sigma to check:



  1. if it is followed by a c_math_subscript_token: if it is not, then just print __userxlixk_actual_sigma: otherwise;


  2. grab what follows the subscript token as argument and check if the argument consists of a single token: if it does, apply a !, otherwise print normally.


Here's the output before and after the redefinition (I used LuaTeX and lua-visual-debug to show the negative kern):




enter image description here




Code:



documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackagelua-visual-debug
usepackageluatexbase
usepackageunravel
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
$sigma_abc sigma_0 sigma_0$

ExplSyntaxOn
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:

peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:

cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1

tl_if_single_token:nTF #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token ! #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token #1

ExplSyntaxOff

$sigma_abc sigma_0 sigma_0$
enddocument


Note, however, that this code will work if you use sigma_a^b but not if you use sigma^b_a.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 28 mins ago









Phelype OleinikPhelype Oleinik

25k54690




25k54690












  • To make it work for both sigma_a^b and sigma^b_a you could use an e-type argument (“embellishments”).

    – Henri Menke
    27 mins ago











  • First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?

    – user49915
    17 mins ago


















  • To make it work for both sigma_a^b and sigma^b_a you could use an e-type argument (“embellishments”).

    – Henri Menke
    27 mins ago











  • First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?

    – user49915
    17 mins ago

















To make it work for both sigma_a^b and sigma^b_a you could use an e-type argument (“embellishments”).

– Henri Menke
27 mins ago





To make it work for both sigma_a^b and sigma^b_a you could use an e-type argument (“embellishments”).

– Henri Menke
27 mins ago













First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?

– user49915
17 mins ago






First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?

– user49915
17 mins ago












2














I'd use the e argument type of xparse.



documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype

setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
Extension=.otf,
range="2A3E,
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]

%mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/

AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma


NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
standardsigma
IfValueT#1_!#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%


begindocument

[sigma_0 sigma_0^2 sigma^2_0]
[standardsigma_!0 standardsigma_!0^2 standardsigma^2_!0]

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?

    – user49915
    6 mins ago












  • @user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.

    – egreg
    57 secs ago















2














I'd use the e argument type of xparse.



documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype

setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
Extension=.otf,
range="2A3E,
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]

%mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/

AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma


NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
standardsigma
IfValueT#1_!#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%


begindocument

[sigma_0 sigma_0^2 sigma^2_0]
[standardsigma_!0 standardsigma_!0^2 standardsigma^2_!0]

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?

    – user49915
    6 mins ago












  • @user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.

    – egreg
    57 secs ago













2












2








2







I'd use the e argument type of xparse.



documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype

setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
Extension=.otf,
range="2A3E,
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]

%mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/

AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma


NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
standardsigma
IfValueT#1_!#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%


begindocument

[sigma_0 sigma_0^2 sigma^2_0]
[standardsigma_!0 standardsigma_!0^2 standardsigma^2_!0]

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer













I'd use the e argument type of xparse.



documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype

setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
Extension=.otf,
range="2A3E,
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]

%mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/

AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma


NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
standardsigma
IfValueT#1_!#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%


begindocument

[sigma_0 sigma_0^2 sigma^2_0]
[standardsigma_!0 standardsigma_!0^2 standardsigma^2_!0]

enddocument


enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 11 mins ago









egregegreg

733k8919313254




733k8919313254












  • First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?

    – user49915
    6 mins ago












  • @user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.

    – egreg
    57 secs ago

















  • First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?

    – user49915
    6 mins ago












  • @user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.

    – egreg
    57 secs ago
















First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?

– user49915
6 mins ago






First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?

– user49915
6 mins ago














@user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.

– egreg
57 secs ago





@user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.

– egreg
57 secs ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484404%2fkerning-for-subscripts-of-sigma%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?

Shenzhen Football Club Índice Elenco atual | Títulos | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegaçãoGooglenotíciaslivrosacadêmicoeditar«"Elenco"»Site oficialexpandindo-oeee

When We Were Young (canção de Adele) Índice Antecedentes e lançamento | Faixas e formatos | Performances e covers | Desempenho nas tabelas musicais | Créditos | Histórico de lançamento | Referências Menu de navegação«Best albums of 2015»«Adele - When We Were Young (Radio Date: 22-01-2016)»«When We Were Young - Single by Adele»«Adele: Inside Her Private Life and Triumphant Return»«adele interview: world exclusive first interview in three years»«Tobias Jesso Jr: since Adele tweeted his song, he's even bigger than his dad»«Adele interviews Tobias Jesso Jr: 'I think that a couple of the ideas we had could be rap songs'»«Adele on Her Return: 'I Was So Frightened That No One Cared'»«Tobias Jesso Jr. on working with Adele: 'I was as nervous as shit'»«How Ariel Rechtshaid Pushed Adele To Her Limit»«Adele Previews 'When We Were Young' on '60 Minutes' Teaser, Tops Trending 140»«Adele Performs New '25' Ballad, "When We Were Young" Live: Watch»«Which '25' Song Should Be Adele's Next Single?»«Adele's 'When We Were Young' Confirmed As Second Single From '25'»«Adele's new single artwork for 'When We Were Young' is perfectly adorable»«Adele at the BBC review: honest, funny and spectacular – Celebrity News News»«'Saturday Night Live': Adele Sings 'Hello' and 'When We Were Young'»«'Adele: Live in New York City' NBC Special – Set List Revealed!»«Adele Closes Out the 2016 Brit Awards With 'When We Were Young'»«What Is The Adele Live Tour Set List? There's No Way She'd Leave Out These 8 Songs»«See Demi Lovato's Soaring Cover of Adele's 'When We Were Young'»«'The Voice': 5 Best Moments From Week 1 Blind Auditions»«Adele – When We Were Young (Media Control Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Entertainment Monitoring Africa)»«Adele – When We Were Young (ARIA Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ö3 Austria Top 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 50)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Canadian Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Tracklisten)»«Adele – When We Were Young (The Official Charts Company)»«Adele – Hello (IFPI Slovenská Republika)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Productores de Música de España)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Billboard Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Adult Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Adult Contemporary Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Dance Club Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Rock Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (IFPI Finlândia)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Syndicat National de l'Éditon Phonographique)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Magyar Hanglemezkiadók Szövetsége)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Irish Recorded Music Association)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Mexico Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (VG-lista)»«Adele – When We Were Young (NZ Top 40 Singles)»«Adele – When We Were Young (MegaCharts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Związek Producentów Audio Video)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Indie Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Sverigetopplistan)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Schweizer Hitparade)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Music Canada – Gold/Platinum – When We Were Young»«NZ Top 40 Singles Chart»«Certified Awards»e