Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?Why circle an airport after takeoff? (SLC particularly)Why are airport firetrucks painted yellow green?Why is Denver International Airport runway 16R/34L rarely used?What does it mean “the airport has the code A 129” (Nida airport, Europe)?What is the busiest airport?In the US, what can be done at an airport when volunteering hours?How to get a home base airport in the UAE?What is this airport video?Why are follow-me cars used in Gran Canaria Airport in good visibility for incoming aircraft?Why so much ground time at Frankfurt Airport?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Is this homebrew feat, Beast of Burden, balanced?

Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Copycat chess is back

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Lied on resume at previous job

How do you conduct xenoanthropology after first contact?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

Check if two datetimes are between two others

Latin words with no plurals in English

Is Social Media Science Fiction?

Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?

Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?

Finding files for which a command fails

Information to fellow intern about hiring?

Is repealing the EU Withdrawal Act a precondition of revoking Article 50?

Patience, young "Padovan"

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

Prime joint compound before latex paint?

Why is making salt water prohibited on Shabbat?

Is it true that "The augmented fourth (A4) and the diminished fifth (d5) are the only aug and dim intervals that appear in diatonic scales"



Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?


Why circle an airport after takeoff? (SLC particularly)Why are airport firetrucks painted yellow green?Why is Denver International Airport runway 16R/34L rarely used?What does it mean “the airport has the code A 129” (Nida airport, Europe)?What is the busiest airport?In the US, what can be done at an airport when volunteering hours?How to get a home base airport in the UAE?What is this airport video?Why are follow-me cars used in Gran Canaria Airport in good visibility for incoming aircraft?Why so much ground time at Frankfurt Airport?













3












$begingroup$


Recently IST relocation happened over 2 days. MUC was also moved overnight. Doesn't it cause chaos, since most employees are new to the place and equipment, work procedures are not well established? e.g. some people do not have badges with correct security clearance. Why not to do it gradually over longer time. Move airline by airline. Smaller first, bigger later.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    If you move an airport gradually you actually need more staff, second it is also very confusing for everybody, third you also have to consider the airspace around the airport. When opening a new airport, certain section of the airspace have to be redesigned. It is more common to move gradually to a new terminal as it is less complex on the airspace side of the problem. For example the new Terminal 3 at CGK was taken into service over a longer period of time
    $endgroup$
    – Brilsmurfffje
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Kamil Aliyev, what are you talking about? What moved?
    $endgroup$
    – CrossRoads
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @CrossRoads Munich-Riem Airport closed on 16 May 1992 and the current Munich Airport opened the next day. Istanbul Atatürk Airport ceased commercial passenger flights on 6 April this year and they moved to Istanbul Airport.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It would greatly help if you would use recognizable geographic names for the airports, instead of 3-letter codes.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    4 hours ago















3












$begingroup$


Recently IST relocation happened over 2 days. MUC was also moved overnight. Doesn't it cause chaos, since most employees are new to the place and equipment, work procedures are not well established? e.g. some people do not have badges with correct security clearance. Why not to do it gradually over longer time. Move airline by airline. Smaller first, bigger later.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    If you move an airport gradually you actually need more staff, second it is also very confusing for everybody, third you also have to consider the airspace around the airport. When opening a new airport, certain section of the airspace have to be redesigned. It is more common to move gradually to a new terminal as it is less complex on the airspace side of the problem. For example the new Terminal 3 at CGK was taken into service over a longer period of time
    $endgroup$
    – Brilsmurfffje
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Kamil Aliyev, what are you talking about? What moved?
    $endgroup$
    – CrossRoads
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @CrossRoads Munich-Riem Airport closed on 16 May 1992 and the current Munich Airport opened the next day. Istanbul Atatürk Airport ceased commercial passenger flights on 6 April this year and they moved to Istanbul Airport.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It would greatly help if you would use recognizable geographic names for the airports, instead of 3-letter codes.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    4 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


Recently IST relocation happened over 2 days. MUC was also moved overnight. Doesn't it cause chaos, since most employees are new to the place and equipment, work procedures are not well established? e.g. some people do not have badges with correct security clearance. Why not to do it gradually over longer time. Move airline by airline. Smaller first, bigger later.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Recently IST relocation happened over 2 days. MUC was also moved overnight. Doesn't it cause chaos, since most employees are new to the place and equipment, work procedures are not well established? e.g. some people do not have badges with correct security clearance. Why not to do it gradually over longer time. Move airline by airline. Smaller first, bigger later.







airport airport-operations






share|improve this question







New contributor




Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 8 hours ago









Kamil AliyevKamil Aliyev

211




211




New contributor




Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    If you move an airport gradually you actually need more staff, second it is also very confusing for everybody, third you also have to consider the airspace around the airport. When opening a new airport, certain section of the airspace have to be redesigned. It is more common to move gradually to a new terminal as it is less complex on the airspace side of the problem. For example the new Terminal 3 at CGK was taken into service over a longer period of time
    $endgroup$
    – Brilsmurfffje
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Kamil Aliyev, what are you talking about? What moved?
    $endgroup$
    – CrossRoads
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @CrossRoads Munich-Riem Airport closed on 16 May 1992 and the current Munich Airport opened the next day. Istanbul Atatürk Airport ceased commercial passenger flights on 6 April this year and they moved to Istanbul Airport.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It would greatly help if you would use recognizable geographic names for the airports, instead of 3-letter codes.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    4 hours ago












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    If you move an airport gradually you actually need more staff, second it is also very confusing for everybody, third you also have to consider the airspace around the airport. When opening a new airport, certain section of the airspace have to be redesigned. It is more common to move gradually to a new terminal as it is less complex on the airspace side of the problem. For example the new Terminal 3 at CGK was taken into service over a longer period of time
    $endgroup$
    – Brilsmurfffje
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Kamil Aliyev, what are you talking about? What moved?
    $endgroup$
    – CrossRoads
    7 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @CrossRoads Munich-Riem Airport closed on 16 May 1992 and the current Munich Airport opened the next day. Istanbul Atatürk Airport ceased commercial passenger flights on 6 April this year and they moved to Istanbul Airport.
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    It would greatly help if you would use recognizable geographic names for the airports, instead of 3-letter codes.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    4 hours ago







4




4




$begingroup$
If you move an airport gradually you actually need more staff, second it is also very confusing for everybody, third you also have to consider the airspace around the airport. When opening a new airport, certain section of the airspace have to be redesigned. It is more common to move gradually to a new terminal as it is less complex on the airspace side of the problem. For example the new Terminal 3 at CGK was taken into service over a longer period of time
$endgroup$
– Brilsmurfffje
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
If you move an airport gradually you actually need more staff, second it is also very confusing for everybody, third you also have to consider the airspace around the airport. When opening a new airport, certain section of the airspace have to be redesigned. It is more common to move gradually to a new terminal as it is less complex on the airspace side of the problem. For example the new Terminal 3 at CGK was taken into service over a longer period of time
$endgroup$
– Brilsmurfffje
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Kamil Aliyev, what are you talking about? What moved?
$endgroup$
– CrossRoads
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Kamil Aliyev, what are you talking about? What moved?
$endgroup$
– CrossRoads
7 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@CrossRoads Munich-Riem Airport closed on 16 May 1992 and the current Munich Airport opened the next day. Istanbul Atatürk Airport ceased commercial passenger flights on 6 April this year and they moved to Istanbul Airport.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@CrossRoads Munich-Riem Airport closed on 16 May 1992 and the current Munich Airport opened the next day. Istanbul Atatürk Airport ceased commercial passenger flights on 6 April this year and they moved to Istanbul Airport.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
It would greatly help if you would use recognizable geographic names for the airports, instead of 3-letter codes.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
It would greatly help if you would use recognizable geographic names for the airports, instead of 3-letter codes.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
4 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

Gradual relocation essentially mean having to staff and equip nearly two full airports during the transition period. It is also annoying for the travelers that want to transfer planes and need to relocate to the other airport. They would then need to get transported to or from the new location and through security again unless a small short hop flight is established during the transition. In IST's case it's 35 km distance between the old and new location.



Having two busy airports close to each other is also a bigger challenge for air traffic control than a really busy one and a calm one.



The solution to the issues you mention can be solved by thorough preparation. Like making sure all the old badges work (or having the new ones passed out as they come in for their first day at the new location), make sure everyone knows where they need to report for work in the new location. Perhaps having some extra trouble shooters on hand to fix teething issues.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    6












    $begingroup$

    Moving airline by airline doesn't help that much:



    • You still have the same chaos, just on a per-airline basis.

    • The airports you mention are dominated by large carriers that have turned them into hubs (Turkish Airlines and Lufthansa). Even if you move all the other airlines one by one, you still have much of the pain of the big move when you move the largest airline.

    And it has disadvantages:



    • Connections: A large percentage of traffic through these hub airports are connecting passengers, and thanks to airline alliances and partnerships, many are connecting between flights from different airlines. Very few passengers (and even fewer high-paying business travelers) will willingly break their journey to go for a drive across a famously traffic-congested city to change airports. Customers will abandon your airport and fly other routes while this is going on.

    • Equipment: When Denver International Airport moved, there was a massive overnight caravan "of more than 10,000 baggage carts, plane tugs, fire engines, catering trucks, de-icing machines and untold truckloads of tickets, tags and gift shop sundries" to the new airport. A similar operation occurred in Istanbul. If both airports must operate simultaneously, a fleet of equipment must be maintained at both airports during the overlap period. Much of this equipment is expensive, long-lasting, and will be difficult to sell or dispose of after the old airport is closed down.

    • Staff: There's not an exact linear relationship of airport staffing to the number of flights. Many staff may work for contracted ground handling companies and serve flights from more than one airline. They can't be in two places at once.

    This is still done to a limited extent though. Turkish Airlines operated a few flights out of New Istanbul Airport for several months prior to the big move, which allowed them to test systems and familiarize staff with the new airport. Some of these disadvantages can be mitigated by limiting the number of flights and choosing them strategically.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      4












      $begingroup$

      It's a living nightmare for connecting travelers.



      Exactly that was done at Montreal Mirabel airport, a fabulous, spacious new replacement airport for Montreal Dorval (Trudeau). Montreal used to be Canada's main international hub. International flights were banned from the old airport, as incentive for airlines to move all operations to Mirabel. But they lacked the political strength to fully close the old airport. This was so irksome that instead of consolidating at Mirabel, operators simply sent their international flights to Toronto instead, making it Canada's main hub.



      This reduced flight counts so much at both airports that they simply didn't need two airports, and the international ban was dropped and international flights returned to Trudeau. Mirabel's main terminal was scrapped and it's a race track. A few cargo operations remain.




      Then you have the case of Kai Tak, where they "threw the switch" properly, but due to teething pains, threw the cargo operations back to Kai Tak for a short while.



      Then there is Berlin.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "528"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62154%2fwhy-airport-relocation-isnt-done-gradually%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        12












        $begingroup$

        Gradual relocation essentially mean having to staff and equip nearly two full airports during the transition period. It is also annoying for the travelers that want to transfer planes and need to relocate to the other airport. They would then need to get transported to or from the new location and through security again unless a small short hop flight is established during the transition. In IST's case it's 35 km distance between the old and new location.



        Having two busy airports close to each other is also a bigger challenge for air traffic control than a really busy one and a calm one.



        The solution to the issues you mention can be solved by thorough preparation. Like making sure all the old badges work (or having the new ones passed out as they come in for their first day at the new location), make sure everyone knows where they need to report for work in the new location. Perhaps having some extra trouble shooters on hand to fix teething issues.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$

















          12












          $begingroup$

          Gradual relocation essentially mean having to staff and equip nearly two full airports during the transition period. It is also annoying for the travelers that want to transfer planes and need to relocate to the other airport. They would then need to get transported to or from the new location and through security again unless a small short hop flight is established during the transition. In IST's case it's 35 km distance between the old and new location.



          Having two busy airports close to each other is also a bigger challenge for air traffic control than a really busy one and a calm one.



          The solution to the issues you mention can be solved by thorough preparation. Like making sure all the old badges work (or having the new ones passed out as they come in for their first day at the new location), make sure everyone knows where they need to report for work in the new location. Perhaps having some extra trouble shooters on hand to fix teething issues.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















            12












            12








            12





            $begingroup$

            Gradual relocation essentially mean having to staff and equip nearly two full airports during the transition period. It is also annoying for the travelers that want to transfer planes and need to relocate to the other airport. They would then need to get transported to or from the new location and through security again unless a small short hop flight is established during the transition. In IST's case it's 35 km distance between the old and new location.



            Having two busy airports close to each other is also a bigger challenge for air traffic control than a really busy one and a calm one.



            The solution to the issues you mention can be solved by thorough preparation. Like making sure all the old badges work (or having the new ones passed out as they come in for their first day at the new location), make sure everyone knows where they need to report for work in the new location. Perhaps having some extra trouble shooters on hand to fix teething issues.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Gradual relocation essentially mean having to staff and equip nearly two full airports during the transition period. It is also annoying for the travelers that want to transfer planes and need to relocate to the other airport. They would then need to get transported to or from the new location and through security again unless a small short hop flight is established during the transition. In IST's case it's 35 km distance between the old and new location.



            Having two busy airports close to each other is also a bigger challenge for air traffic control than a really busy one and a calm one.



            The solution to the issues you mention can be solved by thorough preparation. Like making sure all the old badges work (or having the new ones passed out as they come in for their first day at the new location), make sure everyone knows where they need to report for work in the new location. Perhaps having some extra trouble shooters on hand to fix teething issues.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 23 mins ago









            Loong

            267214




            267214










            answered 7 hours ago









            ratchet freakratchet freak

            24.2k467131




            24.2k467131





















                6












                $begingroup$

                Moving airline by airline doesn't help that much:



                • You still have the same chaos, just on a per-airline basis.

                • The airports you mention are dominated by large carriers that have turned them into hubs (Turkish Airlines and Lufthansa). Even if you move all the other airlines one by one, you still have much of the pain of the big move when you move the largest airline.

                And it has disadvantages:



                • Connections: A large percentage of traffic through these hub airports are connecting passengers, and thanks to airline alliances and partnerships, many are connecting between flights from different airlines. Very few passengers (and even fewer high-paying business travelers) will willingly break their journey to go for a drive across a famously traffic-congested city to change airports. Customers will abandon your airport and fly other routes while this is going on.

                • Equipment: When Denver International Airport moved, there was a massive overnight caravan "of more than 10,000 baggage carts, plane tugs, fire engines, catering trucks, de-icing machines and untold truckloads of tickets, tags and gift shop sundries" to the new airport. A similar operation occurred in Istanbul. If both airports must operate simultaneously, a fleet of equipment must be maintained at both airports during the overlap period. Much of this equipment is expensive, long-lasting, and will be difficult to sell or dispose of after the old airport is closed down.

                • Staff: There's not an exact linear relationship of airport staffing to the number of flights. Many staff may work for contracted ground handling companies and serve flights from more than one airline. They can't be in two places at once.

                This is still done to a limited extent though. Turkish Airlines operated a few flights out of New Istanbul Airport for several months prior to the big move, which allowed them to test systems and familiarize staff with the new airport. Some of these disadvantages can be mitigated by limiting the number of flights and choosing them strategically.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  6












                  $begingroup$

                  Moving airline by airline doesn't help that much:



                  • You still have the same chaos, just on a per-airline basis.

                  • The airports you mention are dominated by large carriers that have turned them into hubs (Turkish Airlines and Lufthansa). Even if you move all the other airlines one by one, you still have much of the pain of the big move when you move the largest airline.

                  And it has disadvantages:



                  • Connections: A large percentage of traffic through these hub airports are connecting passengers, and thanks to airline alliances and partnerships, many are connecting between flights from different airlines. Very few passengers (and even fewer high-paying business travelers) will willingly break their journey to go for a drive across a famously traffic-congested city to change airports. Customers will abandon your airport and fly other routes while this is going on.

                  • Equipment: When Denver International Airport moved, there was a massive overnight caravan "of more than 10,000 baggage carts, plane tugs, fire engines, catering trucks, de-icing machines and untold truckloads of tickets, tags and gift shop sundries" to the new airport. A similar operation occurred in Istanbul. If both airports must operate simultaneously, a fleet of equipment must be maintained at both airports during the overlap period. Much of this equipment is expensive, long-lasting, and will be difficult to sell or dispose of after the old airport is closed down.

                  • Staff: There's not an exact linear relationship of airport staffing to the number of flights. Many staff may work for contracted ground handling companies and serve flights from more than one airline. They can't be in two places at once.

                  This is still done to a limited extent though. Turkish Airlines operated a few flights out of New Istanbul Airport for several months prior to the big move, which allowed them to test systems and familiarize staff with the new airport. Some of these disadvantages can be mitigated by limiting the number of flights and choosing them strategically.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    6












                    6








                    6





                    $begingroup$

                    Moving airline by airline doesn't help that much:



                    • You still have the same chaos, just on a per-airline basis.

                    • The airports you mention are dominated by large carriers that have turned them into hubs (Turkish Airlines and Lufthansa). Even if you move all the other airlines one by one, you still have much of the pain of the big move when you move the largest airline.

                    And it has disadvantages:



                    • Connections: A large percentage of traffic through these hub airports are connecting passengers, and thanks to airline alliances and partnerships, many are connecting between flights from different airlines. Very few passengers (and even fewer high-paying business travelers) will willingly break their journey to go for a drive across a famously traffic-congested city to change airports. Customers will abandon your airport and fly other routes while this is going on.

                    • Equipment: When Denver International Airport moved, there was a massive overnight caravan "of more than 10,000 baggage carts, plane tugs, fire engines, catering trucks, de-icing machines and untold truckloads of tickets, tags and gift shop sundries" to the new airport. A similar operation occurred in Istanbul. If both airports must operate simultaneously, a fleet of equipment must be maintained at both airports during the overlap period. Much of this equipment is expensive, long-lasting, and will be difficult to sell or dispose of after the old airport is closed down.

                    • Staff: There's not an exact linear relationship of airport staffing to the number of flights. Many staff may work for contracted ground handling companies and serve flights from more than one airline. They can't be in two places at once.

                    This is still done to a limited extent though. Turkish Airlines operated a few flights out of New Istanbul Airport for several months prior to the big move, which allowed them to test systems and familiarize staff with the new airport. Some of these disadvantages can be mitigated by limiting the number of flights and choosing them strategically.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Moving airline by airline doesn't help that much:



                    • You still have the same chaos, just on a per-airline basis.

                    • The airports you mention are dominated by large carriers that have turned them into hubs (Turkish Airlines and Lufthansa). Even if you move all the other airlines one by one, you still have much of the pain of the big move when you move the largest airline.

                    And it has disadvantages:



                    • Connections: A large percentage of traffic through these hub airports are connecting passengers, and thanks to airline alliances and partnerships, many are connecting between flights from different airlines. Very few passengers (and even fewer high-paying business travelers) will willingly break their journey to go for a drive across a famously traffic-congested city to change airports. Customers will abandon your airport and fly other routes while this is going on.

                    • Equipment: When Denver International Airport moved, there was a massive overnight caravan "of more than 10,000 baggage carts, plane tugs, fire engines, catering trucks, de-icing machines and untold truckloads of tickets, tags and gift shop sundries" to the new airport. A similar operation occurred in Istanbul. If both airports must operate simultaneously, a fleet of equipment must be maintained at both airports during the overlap period. Much of this equipment is expensive, long-lasting, and will be difficult to sell or dispose of after the old airport is closed down.

                    • Staff: There's not an exact linear relationship of airport staffing to the number of flights. Many staff may work for contracted ground handling companies and serve flights from more than one airline. They can't be in two places at once.

                    This is still done to a limited extent though. Turkish Airlines operated a few flights out of New Istanbul Airport for several months prior to the big move, which allowed them to test systems and familiarize staff with the new airport. Some of these disadvantages can be mitigated by limiting the number of flights and choosing them strategically.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    Zach LiptonZach Lipton

                    6,50412642




                    6,50412642





















                        4












                        $begingroup$

                        It's a living nightmare for connecting travelers.



                        Exactly that was done at Montreal Mirabel airport, a fabulous, spacious new replacement airport for Montreal Dorval (Trudeau). Montreal used to be Canada's main international hub. International flights were banned from the old airport, as incentive for airlines to move all operations to Mirabel. But they lacked the political strength to fully close the old airport. This was so irksome that instead of consolidating at Mirabel, operators simply sent their international flights to Toronto instead, making it Canada's main hub.



                        This reduced flight counts so much at both airports that they simply didn't need two airports, and the international ban was dropped and international flights returned to Trudeau. Mirabel's main terminal was scrapped and it's a race track. A few cargo operations remain.




                        Then you have the case of Kai Tak, where they "threw the switch" properly, but due to teething pains, threw the cargo operations back to Kai Tak for a short while.



                        Then there is Berlin.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          4












                          $begingroup$

                          It's a living nightmare for connecting travelers.



                          Exactly that was done at Montreal Mirabel airport, a fabulous, spacious new replacement airport for Montreal Dorval (Trudeau). Montreal used to be Canada's main international hub. International flights were banned from the old airport, as incentive for airlines to move all operations to Mirabel. But they lacked the political strength to fully close the old airport. This was so irksome that instead of consolidating at Mirabel, operators simply sent their international flights to Toronto instead, making it Canada's main hub.



                          This reduced flight counts so much at both airports that they simply didn't need two airports, and the international ban was dropped and international flights returned to Trudeau. Mirabel's main terminal was scrapped and it's a race track. A few cargo operations remain.




                          Then you have the case of Kai Tak, where they "threw the switch" properly, but due to teething pains, threw the cargo operations back to Kai Tak for a short while.



                          Then there is Berlin.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            4












                            4








                            4





                            $begingroup$

                            It's a living nightmare for connecting travelers.



                            Exactly that was done at Montreal Mirabel airport, a fabulous, spacious new replacement airport for Montreal Dorval (Trudeau). Montreal used to be Canada's main international hub. International flights were banned from the old airport, as incentive for airlines to move all operations to Mirabel. But they lacked the political strength to fully close the old airport. This was so irksome that instead of consolidating at Mirabel, operators simply sent their international flights to Toronto instead, making it Canada's main hub.



                            This reduced flight counts so much at both airports that they simply didn't need two airports, and the international ban was dropped and international flights returned to Trudeau. Mirabel's main terminal was scrapped and it's a race track. A few cargo operations remain.




                            Then you have the case of Kai Tak, where they "threw the switch" properly, but due to teething pains, threw the cargo operations back to Kai Tak for a short while.



                            Then there is Berlin.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            It's a living nightmare for connecting travelers.



                            Exactly that was done at Montreal Mirabel airport, a fabulous, spacious new replacement airport for Montreal Dorval (Trudeau). Montreal used to be Canada's main international hub. International flights were banned from the old airport, as incentive for airlines to move all operations to Mirabel. But they lacked the political strength to fully close the old airport. This was so irksome that instead of consolidating at Mirabel, operators simply sent their international flights to Toronto instead, making it Canada's main hub.



                            This reduced flight counts so much at both airports that they simply didn't need two airports, and the international ban was dropped and international flights returned to Trudeau. Mirabel's main terminal was scrapped and it's a race track. A few cargo operations remain.




                            Then you have the case of Kai Tak, where they "threw the switch" properly, but due to teething pains, threw the cargo operations back to Kai Tak for a short while.



                            Then there is Berlin.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 2 hours ago









                            HarperHarper

                            4,474725




                            4,474725




















                                Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Kamil Aliyev is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62154%2fwhy-airport-relocation-isnt-done-gradually%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

                                2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

                                Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?