How can you use ICE tables to solve multiple coupled equilibria?How to calculate the concentration of all relevant species in a buffer of a given pH?Determining equilibrium concentrations from initial conditions and equilibrium constantDetermining solubility of silver sulfate in its saturated solutionIs LiOH a weaker base than NaOH?What's the Kp value?Equilibrium Bond Dissociationice tables equilibirium qConfusion about the ICE tableHow do I find the theoretical pH of a buffer solution after HCl and NaOH were added, separately?Q. 36 2018 molar solubility of CaF2 at pH3 given molar solubility at pH7 and pKa of HF

Hacking a Safe Lock after 3 tries

If I can solve Sudoku can I solve Travelling Salesman Problem(TSP)? If yes, how?

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

Are there verbs that are neither telic, or atelic?

Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?

Does Mathematica reuse previous computations?

Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?

How to create the Curved texte?

What do Xenomorphs eat in the Alien series?

Why doesn't using two cd commands in bash script execute the second command?

Why does Bach not break the rules here?

Can I use USB data pins as power source

How to use of "the" before known matrices

A link redirect to http instead of https: how critical is it?

Did Ender ever learn that he killed Stilson and/or Bonzo?

Define, (actually define) the "stability" and "energy" of a compound

How to read the value of this capacitor?

Interplanetary conflict, some disease destroys the ability to understand or appreciate music

Who is flying the vertibirds?

Co-worker team leader wants to inject his friend's awful software into our development. What should I say to our common boss?

How to make healing in an exploration game interesting

How big is a MODIS 250m pixel in reality?

It's a yearly task, alright

How Could an Airship Be Repaired Mid-Flight



How can you use ICE tables to solve multiple coupled equilibria?


How to calculate the concentration of all relevant species in a buffer of a given pH?Determining equilibrium concentrations from initial conditions and equilibrium constantDetermining solubility of silver sulfate in its saturated solutionIs LiOH a weaker base than NaOH?What's the Kp value?Equilibrium Bond Dissociationice tables equilibirium qConfusion about the ICE tableHow do I find the theoretical pH of a buffer solution after HCl and NaOH were added, separately?Q. 36 2018 molar solubility of CaF2 at pH3 given molar solubility at pH7 and pKa of HF













3












$begingroup$


If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




Calcium fluoride, $ceCaF2$, has a molar solubility of $pu2.1e−4 mol L−1$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_mathrma$ of $ceHF$ is 3.17.




The relevant reactions are:



$$ceCaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)$$ and
$$ceHF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)$$



They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ceH+$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



$$
beginarray
hline
&[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] \
hline
I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 \
hline
C & +x & +2x \
hline
E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x \
hline
endarray
$$



and



$$
beginarray
hline
&[ceHF] & [ceH+] & [ceF-] \
hline
I & 0 & textN/A & pu4.2e−4 \
hline
C & +x &textN/A & -x \
hline
E & +x & 10^-3.00 & pu4.2e−4 - x\
hline
endarray
$$



However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




    Calcium fluoride, $ceCaF2$, has a molar solubility of $pu2.1e−4 mol L−1$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_mathrma$ of $ceHF$ is 3.17.




    The relevant reactions are:



    $$ceCaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)$$ and
    $$ceHF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)$$



    They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



    Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



    For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ceH+$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



    $$
    beginarray
    hline
    &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] \
    hline
    I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 \
    hline
    C & +x & +2x \
    hline
    E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x \
    hline
    endarray
    $$



    and



    $$
    beginarray
    hline
    &[ceHF] & [ceH+] & [ceF-] \
    hline
    I & 0 & textN/A & pu4.2e−4 \
    hline
    C & +x &textN/A & -x \
    hline
    E & +x & 10^-3.00 & pu4.2e−4 - x\
    hline
    endarray
    $$



    However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




      Calcium fluoride, $ceCaF2$, has a molar solubility of $pu2.1e−4 mol L−1$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_mathrma$ of $ceHF$ is 3.17.




      The relevant reactions are:



      $$ceCaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)$$ and
      $$ceHF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)$$



      They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



      Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



      For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ceH+$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



      $$
      beginarray
      hline
      &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] \
      hline
      I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 \
      hline
      C & +x & +2x \
      hline
      E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x \
      hline
      endarray
      $$



      and



      $$
      beginarray
      hline
      &[ceHF] & [ceH+] & [ceF-] \
      hline
      I & 0 & textN/A & pu4.2e−4 \
      hline
      C & +x &textN/A & -x \
      hline
      E & +x & 10^-3.00 & pu4.2e−4 - x\
      hline
      endarray
      $$



      However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      If I have a problem involving multiple coupled equilibrium reactions, such as




      Calcium fluoride, $ceCaF2$, has a molar solubility of $pu2.1e−4 mol L−1$ at pH = 7.00. By what factor does its molar solubility increase in a solution with pH = 3.00? The p$K_mathrma$ of $ceHF$ is 3.17.




      The relevant reactions are:



      $$ceCaF2(s) <=> Ca^2+(aq) + 2 F-(aq)$$ and
      $$ceHF(aq) <=> H+(aq) + F-(aq)$$



      They are coupled because fluoride occurs in both of them.



      Is there a way to use ICE tables to organize the information (stoichiometry, initial concentrations, mass balance) as a way to solve the problem?



      For example, I could try to set up one ICE table for each reaction (the column for $ceH+$ is strange because in the problem, the pH is set to a value through an unspecified mechanism):



      $$
      beginarray
      hline
      &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] \
      hline
      I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 \
      hline
      C & +x & +2x \
      hline
      E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x \
      hline
      endarray
      $$



      and



      $$
      beginarray
      hline
      &[ceHF] & [ceH+] & [ceF-] \
      hline
      I & 0 & textN/A & pu4.2e−4 \
      hline
      C & +x &textN/A & -x \
      hline
      E & +x & 10^-3.00 & pu4.2e−4 - x\
      hline
      endarray
      $$



      However, how do the fluoride concentrations "talk to each other" in the two tables? Is the $x$ in one table the same as the $x$ in the other table?







      equilibrium






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 3 hours ago









      Mathew Mahindaratne

      3,870318




      3,870318










      asked 5 hours ago









      Karsten TheisKarsten Theis

      2,700434




      2,700434




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



          Here is the combined ICE table:



          $$
          beginarrayc
          hline
          &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
          hline
          I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 & textN/A & 0 \
          hline
          C & +x & +2x-y & textN/A & +y \
          hline
          E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x-y & 10^-3.00 & +y \
          hline
          endarray
          $$



          Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



          What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



          Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



          $$
          beginarrayc
          hline
          &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
          hline
          I & 0 & 0 & textN/A & 0 \
          hline
          C & +p & +2p-q & textN/A & +q \
          hline
          E & +p & +2p-q & 10^-3.00 & +q \
          hline
          endarray
          $$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "431"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111041%2fhow-can-you-use-ice-tables-to-solve-multiple-coupled-equilibria%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



            Here is the combined ICE table:



            $$
            beginarrayc
            hline
            &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
            hline
            I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 & textN/A & 0 \
            hline
            C & +x & +2x-y & textN/A & +y \
            hline
            E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x-y & 10^-3.00 & +y \
            hline
            endarray
            $$



            Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



            What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



            Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



            $$
            beginarrayc
            hline
            &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
            hline
            I & 0 & 0 & textN/A & 0 \
            hline
            C & +p & +2p-q & textN/A & +q \
            hline
            E & +p & +2p-q & 10^-3.00 & +q \
            hline
            endarray
            $$






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              5












              $begingroup$

              The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



              Here is the combined ICE table:



              $$
              beginarrayc
              hline
              &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
              hline
              I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 & textN/A & 0 \
              hline
              C & +x & +2x-y & textN/A & +y \
              hline
              E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x-y & 10^-3.00 & +y \
              hline
              endarray
              $$



              Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



              What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



              Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



              $$
              beginarrayc
              hline
              &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
              hline
              I & 0 & 0 & textN/A & 0 \
              hline
              C & +p & +2p-q & textN/A & +q \
              hline
              E & +p & +2p-q & 10^-3.00 & +q \
              hline
              endarray
              $$






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                5












                5








                5





                $begingroup$

                The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



                Here is the combined ICE table:



                $$
                beginarrayc
                hline
                &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
                hline
                I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 & textN/A & 0 \
                hline
                C & +x & +2x-y & textN/A & +y \
                hline
                E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x-y & 10^-3.00 & +y \
                hline
                endarray
                $$



                Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



                What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



                Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



                $$
                beginarrayc
                hline
                &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
                hline
                I & 0 & 0 & textN/A & 0 \
                hline
                C & +p & +2p-q & textN/A & +q \
                hline
                E & +p & +2p-q & 10^-3.00 & +q \
                hline
                endarray
                $$






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The way to use ICE tables in this case would be to combine the ICE tables, and use "$x$" for the changes due to one reaction and "$y$" for the changes due to the other. For each reaction, you have one unknown (how far it reacted, i.e. $x$ and $y$), so you need two pieces of information to solve it, in this case the two equilibrium constants.



                Here is the combined ICE table:



                $$
                beginarrayc
                hline
                &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
                hline
                I & pu2.1e−4 & pu4.2e−4 & textN/A & 0 \
                hline
                C & +x & +2x-y & textN/A & +y \
                hline
                E & pu2.1e−4+x & pu4.2e−4+2x-y & 10^-3.00 & +y \
                hline
                endarray
                $$



                Now, you can use the equilibrium constants for the two reactions to solve for $x$ and $y$, giving you the equilibrium concentrations.



                What the combined table shows is that the fluoride concentration depends on both reactions, so you can't first deal with one equilibrium and then with the other but have to solve a system of two equations with two unknowns.



                Once you combine the tables, you could also have initial conditions where nothing is dissolved yet, to get easier expressions (I'm using $p$ and $q$ because they will be different from $x$ and $y$):



                $$
                beginarrayc
                hline
                &[ceCa^2+] & [ceF-] & [ceH+]&[ceHF] \
                hline
                I & 0 & 0 & textN/A & 0 \
                hline
                C & +p & +2p-q & textN/A & +q \
                hline
                E & +p & +2p-q & 10^-3.00 & +q \
                hline
                endarray
                $$







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 3 hours ago









                Mathew Mahindaratne

                3,870318




                3,870318










                answered 5 hours ago









                Karsten TheisKarsten Theis

                2,700434




                2,700434



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111041%2fhow-can-you-use-ice-tables-to-solve-multiple-coupled-equilibria%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

                    2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

                    Metrô de Los Teques Índice Linhas | Estações | Ver também | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegação«INSTITUCIÓN»«Mapa de rutas»originalMetrô de Los TequesC.A. Metro Los Teques |Alcaldía de Guaicaipuro – Sitio OficialGobernacion de Mirandaeeeeeee