Easy to Read Palindrome Checker The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMilliseconds to Time string & Time string to MillisecondsPalindrome Checker Algorithm“ACM ICPC Team” challenge on Hackerrank… Easy?Largest palindrome in a stringTest if a string is a palindromeFinding an equilibrium index in an int arrayEasy Deep Copy of Array JavascriptPalindrome checker in JavaScriptCode Chef RAINBOW PalindromeJavaScript Anagram checker

Inappropriate reference requests from Journal reviewers

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Does increasing your ability score affect your main stat?

Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?

What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?

Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?

Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D

No sign flipping while figuring out the emf of voltaic cell?

Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?

Math-accent symbol over parentheses enclosing accented symbol (amsmath)

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?

Does soap repel water?

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

How to place nodes around a circle from some initial angle?

WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?

is it ok to reduce charging current for li ion 18650 battery?

RigExpert AA-35 - Interpreting The Information

Why doesn't UK go for the same deal Japan has with EU to resolve Brexit?

Why is information "lost" when it got into a black hole?

Are police here, aren't itthey?

Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?

Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?



Easy to Read Palindrome Checker



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowMilliseconds to Time string & Time string to MillisecondsPalindrome Checker Algorithm“ACM ICPC Team” challenge on Hackerrank… Easy?Largest palindrome in a stringTest if a string is a palindromeFinding an equilibrium index in an int arrayEasy Deep Copy of Array JavascriptPalindrome checker in JavaScriptCode Chef RAINBOW PalindromeJavaScript Anagram checker










4












$begingroup$


I made a palindrome checker that's supposed to be designed to be simple and easy to read. Please let me know what you think. I believe the time complexity is O(n) but I'm not too sure about that:



Challenge: You'll need to remove all non-alphanumeric characters (punctuation, spaces and symbols) and turn everything into the same case (lower or upper case) in order to check for palindromes.



function reverseString(str)

str = str.replace(/[^ws]


reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym.");

function palindrome(str) _/g, "").toLowerCase().split(" ").join("");
if(str === reverseString(str))

return true;

else

return false;











share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure this is working as intended?
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The test reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."); should at least be something like console.log(palindrome(reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym.")));, and does your challenge ignore spaces? Because if they don't, your example string should return false while it doesn't. Please clarify the exact challenge.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sorry I updated it
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Much better, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Np, let me know if there's anything else that needs to be changed
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    2 hours ago















4












$begingroup$


I made a palindrome checker that's supposed to be designed to be simple and easy to read. Please let me know what you think. I believe the time complexity is O(n) but I'm not too sure about that:



Challenge: You'll need to remove all non-alphanumeric characters (punctuation, spaces and symbols) and turn everything into the same case (lower or upper case) in order to check for palindromes.



function reverseString(str)

str = str.replace(/[^ws]


reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym.");

function palindrome(str) _/g, "").toLowerCase().split(" ").join("");
if(str === reverseString(str))

return true;

else

return false;











share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure this is working as intended?
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The test reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."); should at least be something like console.log(palindrome(reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym.")));, and does your challenge ignore spaces? Because if they don't, your example string should return false while it doesn't. Please clarify the exact challenge.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sorry I updated it
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Much better, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Np, let me know if there's anything else that needs to be changed
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    2 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


I made a palindrome checker that's supposed to be designed to be simple and easy to read. Please let me know what you think. I believe the time complexity is O(n) but I'm not too sure about that:



Challenge: You'll need to remove all non-alphanumeric characters (punctuation, spaces and symbols) and turn everything into the same case (lower or upper case) in order to check for palindromes.



function reverseString(str)

str = str.replace(/[^ws]


reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym.");

function palindrome(str) _/g, "").toLowerCase().split(" ").join("");
if(str === reverseString(str))

return true;

else

return false;











share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I made a palindrome checker that's supposed to be designed to be simple and easy to read. Please let me know what you think. I believe the time complexity is O(n) but I'm not too sure about that:



Challenge: You'll need to remove all non-alphanumeric characters (punctuation, spaces and symbols) and turn everything into the same case (lower or upper case) in order to check for palindromes.



function reverseString(str)

str = str.replace(/[^ws]


reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym.");

function palindrome(str) _/g, "").toLowerCase().split(" ").join("");
if(str === reverseString(str))

return true;

else

return false;








javascript algorithm programming-challenge array






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago







DreamVision2017

















asked 3 hours ago









DreamVision2017DreamVision2017

464




464











  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure this is working as intended?
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The test reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."); should at least be something like console.log(palindrome(reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym.")));, and does your challenge ignore spaces? Because if they don't, your example string should return false while it doesn't. Please clarify the exact challenge.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sorry I updated it
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Much better, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Np, let me know if there's anything else that needs to be changed
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    2 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure this is working as intended?
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The test reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."); should at least be something like console.log(palindrome(reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym.")));, and does your challenge ignore spaces? Because if they don't, your example string should return false while it doesn't. Please clarify the exact challenge.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sorry I updated it
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Much better, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Mast
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Np, let me know if there's anything else that needs to be changed
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    2 hours ago















$begingroup$
Are you sure this is working as intended?
$endgroup$
– Mast
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are you sure this is working as intended?
$endgroup$
– Mast
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
The test reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."); should at least be something like console.log(palindrome(reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym.")));, and does your challenge ignore spaces? Because if they don't, your example string should return false while it doesn't. Please clarify the exact challenge.
$endgroup$
– Mast
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
The test reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."); should at least be something like console.log(palindrome(reverseString("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym.")));, and does your challenge ignore spaces? Because if they don't, your example string should return false while it doesn't. Please clarify the exact challenge.
$endgroup$
– Mast
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Sorry I updated it
$endgroup$
– DreamVision2017
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Sorry I updated it
$endgroup$
– DreamVision2017
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Much better, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Mast
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Much better, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Mast
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Np, let me know if there's anything else that needs to be changed
$endgroup$
– DreamVision2017
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Np, let me know if there's anything else that needs to be changed
$endgroup$
– DreamVision2017
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Time complexity



Your time complexity is linear, although you can save a few traversals over the string and lower the constant factor.



Repeated code



Repeated code harms maintainability and readability. Notice that the line



str.replace(/[^ws]|_/g, "").toLowerCase().split(" ").join("");


appears in two places in the code. If you decide to change one to accept a different regex but forget to change the other one, you've introduced a potentially subtle bug into your program. Move this to its own function to avoid duplication.



Use accurate function names and use builtins



reverseString is a confusing function: it does more than reversing a string as advertised: it also strips whitespace and punctuation, which would be very surprising if I called this function as a user of your library without knowing its internals. All functions should operate as black boxes that perform the task they claim to, nothing more or less.



The array prototype already has a reverse() function, so there's no need to write this out by hand.



Avoid unnecessary verbosity



The code:



 if(str === reverseString(str))

return true;

else

return false;



is clearer written as return str === reverseString(str);, which says "return the logical result of comparing str and its reversal".



Improve the regex to match your specification



Including spaces in your regex substitution to "" is easier than .split(" ").join(""). If you wish to remove all non-alphanumeric characters, a regex like /[^a-zd]/gi reflects your written specification accurately (or use W if you don't mind including underscores).



Style remarks



  • JS uses K&R braces instead of Allman by convention.

  • Add a blank line above for and if blocks to ease vertical congestion.

  • Add a space around keywords and operators like for( and >=0, which are clearer as for ( and >= 0.

  • No need for parentheses around a return value.


  • array.push(str[i]) is missing a semicolon.

  • CodeReview's snippet autoformatter will automatically do most of this for you.

A rewrite






const palindrome = str => 
str = str.replace(/[^a-zd]/gi, "").toLowerCase();
return str === str.split("").reverse().join("");
;

console.log(palindrome("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."));








share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Good points, just to make sure is the time complexity O(n) because the reverse function traverses through each element of the array?
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    16 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    Your code makes ~11 trips over the n-sized input, which is why I mention the high constant factor. If you do the replacement and lowercasing one time, you can get away with about 6 trips through the input. I count any array function, loop or === as one trip over the input. This is a pretty minor concern relative to the other points, though, and addressing the style points accidentally improves your performance along the way.
    $endgroup$
    – ggorlen
    5 mins ago


















1












$begingroup$

Too much code.



  • You can return a boolean

Note that the positions of and



 if(str === reverseString(str)) 
return true;
else
return false;



Becomes



 return str === reverseString(str);


  • You can remove whites spaces and commas etc with regExp /W/g


  • Array has a reverse function which you can use rather than do it manually.


  • You should reverse the string in the function.


  • Strings are iterate-able so you can convert a string to an array with [...str]


Example



function isPalindrome(str) 
str = str.replace(/W/g,"").toLowerCase();
return str === [...str].reverse().join("");






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ah I see, btw I tried to code from scratch as much as possible to get better at problem solving/ programming. Although you are right that there are many JS methods that would make it easier to implement a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    5 mins ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216534%2feasy-to-read-palindrome-checker%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Time complexity



Your time complexity is linear, although you can save a few traversals over the string and lower the constant factor.



Repeated code



Repeated code harms maintainability and readability. Notice that the line



str.replace(/[^ws]|_/g, "").toLowerCase().split(" ").join("");


appears in two places in the code. If you decide to change one to accept a different regex but forget to change the other one, you've introduced a potentially subtle bug into your program. Move this to its own function to avoid duplication.



Use accurate function names and use builtins



reverseString is a confusing function: it does more than reversing a string as advertised: it also strips whitespace and punctuation, which would be very surprising if I called this function as a user of your library without knowing its internals. All functions should operate as black boxes that perform the task they claim to, nothing more or less.



The array prototype already has a reverse() function, so there's no need to write this out by hand.



Avoid unnecessary verbosity



The code:



 if(str === reverseString(str))

return true;

else

return false;



is clearer written as return str === reverseString(str);, which says "return the logical result of comparing str and its reversal".



Improve the regex to match your specification



Including spaces in your regex substitution to "" is easier than .split(" ").join(""). If you wish to remove all non-alphanumeric characters, a regex like /[^a-zd]/gi reflects your written specification accurately (or use W if you don't mind including underscores).



Style remarks



  • JS uses K&R braces instead of Allman by convention.

  • Add a blank line above for and if blocks to ease vertical congestion.

  • Add a space around keywords and operators like for( and >=0, which are clearer as for ( and >= 0.

  • No need for parentheses around a return value.


  • array.push(str[i]) is missing a semicolon.

  • CodeReview's snippet autoformatter will automatically do most of this for you.

A rewrite






const palindrome = str => 
str = str.replace(/[^a-zd]/gi, "").toLowerCase();
return str === str.split("").reverse().join("");
;

console.log(palindrome("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."));








share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Good points, just to make sure is the time complexity O(n) because the reverse function traverses through each element of the array?
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    16 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    Your code makes ~11 trips over the n-sized input, which is why I mention the high constant factor. If you do the replacement and lowercasing one time, you can get away with about 6 trips through the input. I count any array function, loop or === as one trip over the input. This is a pretty minor concern relative to the other points, though, and addressing the style points accidentally improves your performance along the way.
    $endgroup$
    – ggorlen
    5 mins ago















2












$begingroup$

Time complexity



Your time complexity is linear, although you can save a few traversals over the string and lower the constant factor.



Repeated code



Repeated code harms maintainability and readability. Notice that the line



str.replace(/[^ws]|_/g, "").toLowerCase().split(" ").join("");


appears in two places in the code. If you decide to change one to accept a different regex but forget to change the other one, you've introduced a potentially subtle bug into your program. Move this to its own function to avoid duplication.



Use accurate function names and use builtins



reverseString is a confusing function: it does more than reversing a string as advertised: it also strips whitespace and punctuation, which would be very surprising if I called this function as a user of your library without knowing its internals. All functions should operate as black boxes that perform the task they claim to, nothing more or less.



The array prototype already has a reverse() function, so there's no need to write this out by hand.



Avoid unnecessary verbosity



The code:



 if(str === reverseString(str))

return true;

else

return false;



is clearer written as return str === reverseString(str);, which says "return the logical result of comparing str and its reversal".



Improve the regex to match your specification



Including spaces in your regex substitution to "" is easier than .split(" ").join(""). If you wish to remove all non-alphanumeric characters, a regex like /[^a-zd]/gi reflects your written specification accurately (or use W if you don't mind including underscores).



Style remarks



  • JS uses K&R braces instead of Allman by convention.

  • Add a blank line above for and if blocks to ease vertical congestion.

  • Add a space around keywords and operators like for( and >=0, which are clearer as for ( and >= 0.

  • No need for parentheses around a return value.


  • array.push(str[i]) is missing a semicolon.

  • CodeReview's snippet autoformatter will automatically do most of this for you.

A rewrite






const palindrome = str => 
str = str.replace(/[^a-zd]/gi, "").toLowerCase();
return str === str.split("").reverse().join("");
;

console.log(palindrome("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."));








share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Good points, just to make sure is the time complexity O(n) because the reverse function traverses through each element of the array?
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    16 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    Your code makes ~11 trips over the n-sized input, which is why I mention the high constant factor. If you do the replacement and lowercasing one time, you can get away with about 6 trips through the input. I count any array function, loop or === as one trip over the input. This is a pretty minor concern relative to the other points, though, and addressing the style points accidentally improves your performance along the way.
    $endgroup$
    – ggorlen
    5 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

Time complexity



Your time complexity is linear, although you can save a few traversals over the string and lower the constant factor.



Repeated code



Repeated code harms maintainability and readability. Notice that the line



str.replace(/[^ws]|_/g, "").toLowerCase().split(" ").join("");


appears in two places in the code. If you decide to change one to accept a different regex but forget to change the other one, you've introduced a potentially subtle bug into your program. Move this to its own function to avoid duplication.



Use accurate function names and use builtins



reverseString is a confusing function: it does more than reversing a string as advertised: it also strips whitespace and punctuation, which would be very surprising if I called this function as a user of your library without knowing its internals. All functions should operate as black boxes that perform the task they claim to, nothing more or less.



The array prototype already has a reverse() function, so there's no need to write this out by hand.



Avoid unnecessary verbosity



The code:



 if(str === reverseString(str))

return true;

else

return false;



is clearer written as return str === reverseString(str);, which says "return the logical result of comparing str and its reversal".



Improve the regex to match your specification



Including spaces in your regex substitution to "" is easier than .split(" ").join(""). If you wish to remove all non-alphanumeric characters, a regex like /[^a-zd]/gi reflects your written specification accurately (or use W if you don't mind including underscores).



Style remarks



  • JS uses K&R braces instead of Allman by convention.

  • Add a blank line above for and if blocks to ease vertical congestion.

  • Add a space around keywords and operators like for( and >=0, which are clearer as for ( and >= 0.

  • No need for parentheses around a return value.


  • array.push(str[i]) is missing a semicolon.

  • CodeReview's snippet autoformatter will automatically do most of this for you.

A rewrite






const palindrome = str => 
str = str.replace(/[^a-zd]/gi, "").toLowerCase();
return str === str.split("").reverse().join("");
;

console.log(palindrome("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."));








share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Time complexity



Your time complexity is linear, although you can save a few traversals over the string and lower the constant factor.



Repeated code



Repeated code harms maintainability and readability. Notice that the line



str.replace(/[^ws]|_/g, "").toLowerCase().split(" ").join("");


appears in two places in the code. If you decide to change one to accept a different regex but forget to change the other one, you've introduced a potentially subtle bug into your program. Move this to its own function to avoid duplication.



Use accurate function names and use builtins



reverseString is a confusing function: it does more than reversing a string as advertised: it also strips whitespace and punctuation, which would be very surprising if I called this function as a user of your library without knowing its internals. All functions should operate as black boxes that perform the task they claim to, nothing more or less.



The array prototype already has a reverse() function, so there's no need to write this out by hand.



Avoid unnecessary verbosity



The code:



 if(str === reverseString(str))

return true;

else

return false;



is clearer written as return str === reverseString(str);, which says "return the logical result of comparing str and its reversal".



Improve the regex to match your specification



Including spaces in your regex substitution to "" is easier than .split(" ").join(""). If you wish to remove all non-alphanumeric characters, a regex like /[^a-zd]/gi reflects your written specification accurately (or use W if you don't mind including underscores).



Style remarks



  • JS uses K&R braces instead of Allman by convention.

  • Add a blank line above for and if blocks to ease vertical congestion.

  • Add a space around keywords and operators like for( and >=0, which are clearer as for ( and >= 0.

  • No need for parentheses around a return value.


  • array.push(str[i]) is missing a semicolon.

  • CodeReview's snippet autoformatter will automatically do most of this for you.

A rewrite






const palindrome = str => 
str = str.replace(/[^a-zd]/gi, "").toLowerCase();
return str === str.split("").reverse().join("");
;

console.log(palindrome("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."));








const palindrome = str => 
str = str.replace(/[^a-zd]/gi, "").toLowerCase();
return str === str.split("").reverse().join("");
;

console.log(palindrome("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."));





const palindrome = str => 
str = str.replace(/[^a-zd]/gi, "").toLowerCase();
return str === str.split("").reverse().join("");
;

console.log(palindrome("My age is 0, 0 si ega ym."));






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 29 mins ago

























answered 1 hour ago









ggorlenggorlen

403111




403111











  • $begingroup$
    Good points, just to make sure is the time complexity O(n) because the reverse function traverses through each element of the array?
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    16 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    Your code makes ~11 trips over the n-sized input, which is why I mention the high constant factor. If you do the replacement and lowercasing one time, you can get away with about 6 trips through the input. I count any array function, loop or === as one trip over the input. This is a pretty minor concern relative to the other points, though, and addressing the style points accidentally improves your performance along the way.
    $endgroup$
    – ggorlen
    5 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Good points, just to make sure is the time complexity O(n) because the reverse function traverses through each element of the array?
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    16 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    Your code makes ~11 trips over the n-sized input, which is why I mention the high constant factor. If you do the replacement and lowercasing one time, you can get away with about 6 trips through the input. I count any array function, loop or === as one trip over the input. This is a pretty minor concern relative to the other points, though, and addressing the style points accidentally improves your performance along the way.
    $endgroup$
    – ggorlen
    5 mins ago















$begingroup$
Good points, just to make sure is the time complexity O(n) because the reverse function traverses through each element of the array?
$endgroup$
– DreamVision2017
16 mins ago





$begingroup$
Good points, just to make sure is the time complexity O(n) because the reverse function traverses through each element of the array?
$endgroup$
– DreamVision2017
16 mins ago













$begingroup$
Your code makes ~11 trips over the n-sized input, which is why I mention the high constant factor. If you do the replacement and lowercasing one time, you can get away with about 6 trips through the input. I count any array function, loop or === as one trip over the input. This is a pretty minor concern relative to the other points, though, and addressing the style points accidentally improves your performance along the way.
$endgroup$
– ggorlen
5 mins ago




$begingroup$
Your code makes ~11 trips over the n-sized input, which is why I mention the high constant factor. If you do the replacement and lowercasing one time, you can get away with about 6 trips through the input. I count any array function, loop or === as one trip over the input. This is a pretty minor concern relative to the other points, though, and addressing the style points accidentally improves your performance along the way.
$endgroup$
– ggorlen
5 mins ago













1












$begingroup$

Too much code.



  • You can return a boolean

Note that the positions of and



 if(str === reverseString(str)) 
return true;
else
return false;



Becomes



 return str === reverseString(str);


  • You can remove whites spaces and commas etc with regExp /W/g


  • Array has a reverse function which you can use rather than do it manually.


  • You should reverse the string in the function.


  • Strings are iterate-able so you can convert a string to an array with [...str]


Example



function isPalindrome(str) 
str = str.replace(/W/g,"").toLowerCase();
return str === [...str].reverse().join("");






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ah I see, btw I tried to code from scratch as much as possible to get better at problem solving/ programming. Although you are right that there are many JS methods that would make it easier to implement a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    5 mins ago















1












$begingroup$

Too much code.



  • You can return a boolean

Note that the positions of and



 if(str === reverseString(str)) 
return true;
else
return false;



Becomes



 return str === reverseString(str);


  • You can remove whites spaces and commas etc with regExp /W/g


  • Array has a reverse function which you can use rather than do it manually.


  • You should reverse the string in the function.


  • Strings are iterate-able so you can convert a string to an array with [...str]


Example



function isPalindrome(str) 
str = str.replace(/W/g,"").toLowerCase();
return str === [...str].reverse().join("");






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Ah I see, btw I tried to code from scratch as much as possible to get better at problem solving/ programming. Although you are right that there are many JS methods that would make it easier to implement a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    5 mins ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$

Too much code.



  • You can return a boolean

Note that the positions of and



 if(str === reverseString(str)) 
return true;
else
return false;



Becomes



 return str === reverseString(str);


  • You can remove whites spaces and commas etc with regExp /W/g


  • Array has a reverse function which you can use rather than do it manually.


  • You should reverse the string in the function.


  • Strings are iterate-able so you can convert a string to an array with [...str]


Example



function isPalindrome(str) 
str = str.replace(/W/g,"").toLowerCase();
return str === [...str].reverse().join("");






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Too much code.



  • You can return a boolean

Note that the positions of and



 if(str === reverseString(str)) 
return true;
else
return false;



Becomes



 return str === reverseString(str);


  • You can remove whites spaces and commas etc with regExp /W/g


  • Array has a reverse function which you can use rather than do it manually.


  • You should reverse the string in the function.


  • Strings are iterate-able so you can convert a string to an array with [...str]


Example



function isPalindrome(str) 
str = str.replace(/W/g,"").toLowerCase();
return str === [...str].reverse().join("");







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









Blindman67Blindman67

9,0811621




9,0811621











  • $begingroup$
    Ah I see, btw I tried to code from scratch as much as possible to get better at problem solving/ programming. Although you are right that there are many JS methods that would make it easier to implement a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    5 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Ah I see, btw I tried to code from scratch as much as possible to get better at problem solving/ programming. Although you are right that there are many JS methods that would make it easier to implement a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – DreamVision2017
    5 mins ago















$begingroup$
Ah I see, btw I tried to code from scratch as much as possible to get better at problem solving/ programming. Although you are right that there are many JS methods that would make it easier to implement a solution.
$endgroup$
– DreamVision2017
5 mins ago




$begingroup$
Ah I see, btw I tried to code from scratch as much as possible to get better at problem solving/ programming. Although you are right that there are many JS methods that would make it easier to implement a solution.
$endgroup$
– DreamVision2017
5 mins ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216534%2feasy-to-read-palindrome-checker%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?

When We Were Young (canção de Adele) Índice Antecedentes e lançamento | Faixas e formatos | Performances e covers | Desempenho nas tabelas musicais | Créditos | Histórico de lançamento | Referências Menu de navegação«Best albums of 2015»«Adele - When We Were Young (Radio Date: 22-01-2016)»«When We Were Young - Single by Adele»«Adele: Inside Her Private Life and Triumphant Return»«adele interview: world exclusive first interview in three years»«Tobias Jesso Jr: since Adele tweeted his song, he's even bigger than his dad»«Adele interviews Tobias Jesso Jr: 'I think that a couple of the ideas we had could be rap songs'»«Adele on Her Return: 'I Was So Frightened That No One Cared'»«Tobias Jesso Jr. on working with Adele: 'I was as nervous as shit'»«How Ariel Rechtshaid Pushed Adele To Her Limit»«Adele Previews 'When We Were Young' on '60 Minutes' Teaser, Tops Trending 140»«Adele Performs New '25' Ballad, "When We Were Young" Live: Watch»«Which '25' Song Should Be Adele's Next Single?»«Adele's 'When We Were Young' Confirmed As Second Single From '25'»«Adele's new single artwork for 'When We Were Young' is perfectly adorable»«Adele at the BBC review: honest, funny and spectacular – Celebrity News News»«'Saturday Night Live': Adele Sings 'Hello' and 'When We Were Young'»«'Adele: Live in New York City' NBC Special – Set List Revealed!»«Adele Closes Out the 2016 Brit Awards With 'When We Were Young'»«What Is The Adele Live Tour Set List? There's No Way She'd Leave Out These 8 Songs»«See Demi Lovato's Soaring Cover of Adele's 'When We Were Young'»«'The Voice': 5 Best Moments From Week 1 Blind Auditions»«Adele – When We Were Young (Media Control Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Entertainment Monitoring Africa)»«Adele – When We Were Young (ARIA Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ö3 Austria Top 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 50)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Canadian Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Tracklisten)»«Adele – When We Were Young (The Official Charts Company)»«Adele – Hello (IFPI Slovenská Republika)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Productores de Música de España)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Billboard Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Adult Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Adult Contemporary Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Dance Club Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Rock Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (IFPI Finlândia)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Syndicat National de l'Éditon Phonographique)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Magyar Hanglemezkiadók Szövetsége)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Irish Recorded Music Association)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Mexico Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (VG-lista)»«Adele – When We Were Young (NZ Top 40 Singles)»«Adele – When We Were Young (MegaCharts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Związek Producentów Audio Video)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Indie Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Sverigetopplistan)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Schweizer Hitparade)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Music Canada – Gold/Platinum – When We Were Young»«NZ Top 40 Singles Chart»«Certified Awards»e

Shenzhen Football Club Índice Elenco atual | Títulos | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegaçãoGooglenotíciaslivrosacadêmicoeditar«"Elenco"»Site oficialexpandindo-oeee