Can I make YouTube videos where I read parts of a book aloud Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Is downloading YouTube videos legal?Can i download and edit youtube videos and use them to make another video?Can others simply repost my Creative Commons YouTube video?Can I use Youtube Free Audio Library music in my online video editor?Copyright question: citing publications in Youtube videosHow can NaxosofAmerica claim copyright for classical music in Youtube?Is downloading YouTube videos legal for personal use?Youtube, downloading videos and local temporary filesCan copyright of a book be extended by the authors relatives?Are “Social Media Reacts”-videos on youtube legal?

A Dictionary or Encyclopedia of Fantasy or Fairy Tales from the 1960s

How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?

How to open locks without disable device?

finding a tangent line to a parabola

My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?

What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?

How to get even lighting when using flash for group photos near wall?

Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?

What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

What is this word supposed to be?

How to avoid introduction cliches

Rolling Stones Sway guitar solo chord function

Seek and ye shall find

Prove the alternating sum of a decreasing sequence converging to 0 is Cauchy.

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

What is it called when you ride around on your front wheel?

What’s with the clanks in Endgame?

"Rubric" as meaning "signature" or "personal mark" -- is this accepted usage?

Israeli soda type drink

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?

What is the least dense liquid under normal conditions?

Is Electric Central Heating worth it if using Solar Panels?



Can I make YouTube videos where I read parts of a book aloud



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Is downloading YouTube videos legal?Can i download and edit youtube videos and use them to make another video?Can others simply repost my Creative Commons YouTube video?Can I use Youtube Free Audio Library music in my online video editor?Copyright question: citing publications in Youtube videosHow can NaxosofAmerica claim copyright for classical music in Youtube?Is downloading YouTube videos legal for personal use?Youtube, downloading videos and local temporary filesCan copyright of a book be extended by the authors relatives?Are “Social Media Reacts”-videos on youtube legal?










0















I'm learning languages and in my opinion, one way to improve my skills is to read books aloud. Making it a habit would help me with my vocabulary, pronunciation, grammar, etc.



I also think there might be some people online who would be interested in listening to books that I read aloud.



Therefore, I wonder, can I read parts of a book aloud online? Could I publish these videos on YouTube? Is that legal? I don't mind reading from older books, as I read those books might be public domain










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 10 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Vince, for help with your vocabulary and grammar, you may find the English Language Learner Stack Exchange helpful (ell.stackexchange.com), as well as possibly the English Stack Exchange (english.stackexchange.com); though for learning English, I would recommend the former.

    – sharur
    Aug 27 '18 at 21:43















0















I'm learning languages and in my opinion, one way to improve my skills is to read books aloud. Making it a habit would help me with my vocabulary, pronunciation, grammar, etc.



I also think there might be some people online who would be interested in listening to books that I read aloud.



Therefore, I wonder, can I read parts of a book aloud online? Could I publish these videos on YouTube? Is that legal? I don't mind reading from older books, as I read those books might be public domain










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 10 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Vince, for help with your vocabulary and grammar, you may find the English Language Learner Stack Exchange helpful (ell.stackexchange.com), as well as possibly the English Stack Exchange (english.stackexchange.com); though for learning English, I would recommend the former.

    – sharur
    Aug 27 '18 at 21:43













0












0








0








I'm learning languages and in my opinion, one way to improve my skills is to read books aloud. Making it a habit would help me with my vocabulary, pronunciation, grammar, etc.



I also think there might be some people online who would be interested in listening to books that I read aloud.



Therefore, I wonder, can I read parts of a book aloud online? Could I publish these videos on YouTube? Is that legal? I don't mind reading from older books, as I read those books might be public domain










share|improve this question














I'm learning languages and in my opinion, one way to improve my skills is to read books aloud. Making it a habit would help me with my vocabulary, pronunciation, grammar, etc.



I also think there might be some people online who would be interested in listening to books that I read aloud.



Therefore, I wonder, can I read parts of a book aloud online? Could I publish these videos on YouTube? Is that legal? I don't mind reading from older books, as I read those books might be public domain







intellectual-property public-domain youtube authorship






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 27 '18 at 21:00









Vince VargaVince Varga

1361




1361





bumped to the homepage by Community 10 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 10 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.














  • Vince, for help with your vocabulary and grammar, you may find the English Language Learner Stack Exchange helpful (ell.stackexchange.com), as well as possibly the English Stack Exchange (english.stackexchange.com); though for learning English, I would recommend the former.

    – sharur
    Aug 27 '18 at 21:43

















  • Vince, for help with your vocabulary and grammar, you may find the English Language Learner Stack Exchange helpful (ell.stackexchange.com), as well as possibly the English Stack Exchange (english.stackexchange.com); though for learning English, I would recommend the former.

    – sharur
    Aug 27 '18 at 21:43
















Vince, for help with your vocabulary and grammar, you may find the English Language Learner Stack Exchange helpful (ell.stackexchange.com), as well as possibly the English Stack Exchange (english.stackexchange.com); though for learning English, I would recommend the former.

– sharur
Aug 27 '18 at 21:43





Vince, for help with your vocabulary and grammar, you may find the English Language Learner Stack Exchange helpful (ell.stackexchange.com), as well as possibly the English Stack Exchange (english.stackexchange.com); though for learning English, I would recommend the former.

– sharur
Aug 27 '18 at 21:43










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














If the book you read is in the public domain* you should be fine. Otherwise what you are doing is copyright infringement and probably not protected by fair use**.



One of the rights granted to copyright holders is to control derivative works, and transference to different mediums, which is what your recordings would be.



Under US law, whether an instance of copyright infringement is fair use is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, weighing four points:



  1. the purpose and character of one's use


  2. the nature of the copyrighted work


  3. what amount and proportion of the whole work was taken


  4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of the copyrighted work


In my non-lawyer evaluation, point 1 depends on what you do in your video (unless you monetize your Youtube video, in which case it is likely to be decided against you), but if you are merely reading the book out aloud, it is unlikely to be in your favor (although it may not be against you as an "educational tool").



Point 2 depends on what is being read, with a informative work (e.g. a textbook) being more likely to be fair use than a creative work (e.g. a novel).



Point 3 depends on how much and what proportion of a work you use; since you are presumably reading a whole book, this would most likely be ruled against you.



Point 4 would almost certainly be decided against you, as you are essentially creating an unauthorized audiobook.



In summary, you can read a book aloud. You can record your reading of it for your personal use. You should NOT upload it to Youtube, or other sharing sites.



*Note that different countries have differing rules on when a book enters the public domain, and since the internet crosses borders, multiple rule sets may apply.



**Technically, even if you had fair use protection, it would still be infringing on the copyright, it would however be legal, as fair use is an affirmative defense.






share|improve this answer

























  • "You can record your reading of it for your personal use." On what legal basis is this allowed, even if the other three factors (1-3) are against your use? Presumably recording it for personal use has no impact on the market, so factor 4 seems to be in your favour.

    – Brandin
    Aug 28 '18 at 9:46












  • @Brandin: Copyright is decided on a case by case basis, as is what weight should be given; It is possible that a single factor can outweigh the other three. Also, Factor 1 would also be in the OP's favor if it the purpose and character of their use was "personal", but the OP mentions sharing it on youtube, which would not be personal use.

    – sharur
    Nov 26 '18 at 17:13











  • Recording the reading for your own purposes is infringement, since you're making another copy. It's very likely that the copyright owner won't find about it, very likely that the owner won't care about it, and it's exceedingly unlikely that the owner will pursue the case legally, but it's still unlawful.

    – David Thornley
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:25











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31298%2fcan-i-make-youtube-videos-where-i-read-parts-of-a-book-aloud%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














If the book you read is in the public domain* you should be fine. Otherwise what you are doing is copyright infringement and probably not protected by fair use**.



One of the rights granted to copyright holders is to control derivative works, and transference to different mediums, which is what your recordings would be.



Under US law, whether an instance of copyright infringement is fair use is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, weighing four points:



  1. the purpose and character of one's use


  2. the nature of the copyrighted work


  3. what amount and proportion of the whole work was taken


  4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of the copyrighted work


In my non-lawyer evaluation, point 1 depends on what you do in your video (unless you monetize your Youtube video, in which case it is likely to be decided against you), but if you are merely reading the book out aloud, it is unlikely to be in your favor (although it may not be against you as an "educational tool").



Point 2 depends on what is being read, with a informative work (e.g. a textbook) being more likely to be fair use than a creative work (e.g. a novel).



Point 3 depends on how much and what proportion of a work you use; since you are presumably reading a whole book, this would most likely be ruled against you.



Point 4 would almost certainly be decided against you, as you are essentially creating an unauthorized audiobook.



In summary, you can read a book aloud. You can record your reading of it for your personal use. You should NOT upload it to Youtube, or other sharing sites.



*Note that different countries have differing rules on when a book enters the public domain, and since the internet crosses borders, multiple rule sets may apply.



**Technically, even if you had fair use protection, it would still be infringing on the copyright, it would however be legal, as fair use is an affirmative defense.






share|improve this answer

























  • "You can record your reading of it for your personal use." On what legal basis is this allowed, even if the other three factors (1-3) are against your use? Presumably recording it for personal use has no impact on the market, so factor 4 seems to be in your favour.

    – Brandin
    Aug 28 '18 at 9:46












  • @Brandin: Copyright is decided on a case by case basis, as is what weight should be given; It is possible that a single factor can outweigh the other three. Also, Factor 1 would also be in the OP's favor if it the purpose and character of their use was "personal", but the OP mentions sharing it on youtube, which would not be personal use.

    – sharur
    Nov 26 '18 at 17:13











  • Recording the reading for your own purposes is infringement, since you're making another copy. It's very likely that the copyright owner won't find about it, very likely that the owner won't care about it, and it's exceedingly unlikely that the owner will pursue the case legally, but it's still unlawful.

    – David Thornley
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:25















0














If the book you read is in the public domain* you should be fine. Otherwise what you are doing is copyright infringement and probably not protected by fair use**.



One of the rights granted to copyright holders is to control derivative works, and transference to different mediums, which is what your recordings would be.



Under US law, whether an instance of copyright infringement is fair use is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, weighing four points:



  1. the purpose and character of one's use


  2. the nature of the copyrighted work


  3. what amount and proportion of the whole work was taken


  4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of the copyrighted work


In my non-lawyer evaluation, point 1 depends on what you do in your video (unless you monetize your Youtube video, in which case it is likely to be decided against you), but if you are merely reading the book out aloud, it is unlikely to be in your favor (although it may not be against you as an "educational tool").



Point 2 depends on what is being read, with a informative work (e.g. a textbook) being more likely to be fair use than a creative work (e.g. a novel).



Point 3 depends on how much and what proportion of a work you use; since you are presumably reading a whole book, this would most likely be ruled against you.



Point 4 would almost certainly be decided against you, as you are essentially creating an unauthorized audiobook.



In summary, you can read a book aloud. You can record your reading of it for your personal use. You should NOT upload it to Youtube, or other sharing sites.



*Note that different countries have differing rules on when a book enters the public domain, and since the internet crosses borders, multiple rule sets may apply.



**Technically, even if you had fair use protection, it would still be infringing on the copyright, it would however be legal, as fair use is an affirmative defense.






share|improve this answer

























  • "You can record your reading of it for your personal use." On what legal basis is this allowed, even if the other three factors (1-3) are against your use? Presumably recording it for personal use has no impact on the market, so factor 4 seems to be in your favour.

    – Brandin
    Aug 28 '18 at 9:46












  • @Brandin: Copyright is decided on a case by case basis, as is what weight should be given; It is possible that a single factor can outweigh the other three. Also, Factor 1 would also be in the OP's favor if it the purpose and character of their use was "personal", but the OP mentions sharing it on youtube, which would not be personal use.

    – sharur
    Nov 26 '18 at 17:13











  • Recording the reading for your own purposes is infringement, since you're making another copy. It's very likely that the copyright owner won't find about it, very likely that the owner won't care about it, and it's exceedingly unlikely that the owner will pursue the case legally, but it's still unlawful.

    – David Thornley
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:25













0












0








0







If the book you read is in the public domain* you should be fine. Otherwise what you are doing is copyright infringement and probably not protected by fair use**.



One of the rights granted to copyright holders is to control derivative works, and transference to different mediums, which is what your recordings would be.



Under US law, whether an instance of copyright infringement is fair use is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, weighing four points:



  1. the purpose and character of one's use


  2. the nature of the copyrighted work


  3. what amount and proportion of the whole work was taken


  4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of the copyrighted work


In my non-lawyer evaluation, point 1 depends on what you do in your video (unless you monetize your Youtube video, in which case it is likely to be decided against you), but if you are merely reading the book out aloud, it is unlikely to be in your favor (although it may not be against you as an "educational tool").



Point 2 depends on what is being read, with a informative work (e.g. a textbook) being more likely to be fair use than a creative work (e.g. a novel).



Point 3 depends on how much and what proportion of a work you use; since you are presumably reading a whole book, this would most likely be ruled against you.



Point 4 would almost certainly be decided against you, as you are essentially creating an unauthorized audiobook.



In summary, you can read a book aloud. You can record your reading of it for your personal use. You should NOT upload it to Youtube, or other sharing sites.



*Note that different countries have differing rules on when a book enters the public domain, and since the internet crosses borders, multiple rule sets may apply.



**Technically, even if you had fair use protection, it would still be infringing on the copyright, it would however be legal, as fair use is an affirmative defense.






share|improve this answer















If the book you read is in the public domain* you should be fine. Otherwise what you are doing is copyright infringement and probably not protected by fair use**.



One of the rights granted to copyright holders is to control derivative works, and transference to different mediums, which is what your recordings would be.



Under US law, whether an instance of copyright infringement is fair use is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, weighing four points:



  1. the purpose and character of one's use


  2. the nature of the copyrighted work


  3. what amount and proportion of the whole work was taken


  4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of the copyrighted work


In my non-lawyer evaluation, point 1 depends on what you do in your video (unless you monetize your Youtube video, in which case it is likely to be decided against you), but if you are merely reading the book out aloud, it is unlikely to be in your favor (although it may not be against you as an "educational tool").



Point 2 depends on what is being read, with a informative work (e.g. a textbook) being more likely to be fair use than a creative work (e.g. a novel).



Point 3 depends on how much and what proportion of a work you use; since you are presumably reading a whole book, this would most likely be ruled against you.



Point 4 would almost certainly be decided against you, as you are essentially creating an unauthorized audiobook.



In summary, you can read a book aloud. You can record your reading of it for your personal use. You should NOT upload it to Youtube, or other sharing sites.



*Note that different countries have differing rules on when a book enters the public domain, and since the internet crosses borders, multiple rule sets may apply.



**Technically, even if you had fair use protection, it would still be infringing on the copyright, it would however be legal, as fair use is an affirmative defense.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Aug 28 '18 at 4:58









Nij

2,08931326




2,08931326










answered Aug 27 '18 at 21:40









sharursharur

2,137618




2,137618












  • "You can record your reading of it for your personal use." On what legal basis is this allowed, even if the other three factors (1-3) are against your use? Presumably recording it for personal use has no impact on the market, so factor 4 seems to be in your favour.

    – Brandin
    Aug 28 '18 at 9:46












  • @Brandin: Copyright is decided on a case by case basis, as is what weight should be given; It is possible that a single factor can outweigh the other three. Also, Factor 1 would also be in the OP's favor if it the purpose and character of their use was "personal", but the OP mentions sharing it on youtube, which would not be personal use.

    – sharur
    Nov 26 '18 at 17:13











  • Recording the reading for your own purposes is infringement, since you're making another copy. It's very likely that the copyright owner won't find about it, very likely that the owner won't care about it, and it's exceedingly unlikely that the owner will pursue the case legally, but it's still unlawful.

    – David Thornley
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:25

















  • "You can record your reading of it for your personal use." On what legal basis is this allowed, even if the other three factors (1-3) are against your use? Presumably recording it for personal use has no impact on the market, so factor 4 seems to be in your favour.

    – Brandin
    Aug 28 '18 at 9:46












  • @Brandin: Copyright is decided on a case by case basis, as is what weight should be given; It is possible that a single factor can outweigh the other three. Also, Factor 1 would also be in the OP's favor if it the purpose and character of their use was "personal", but the OP mentions sharing it on youtube, which would not be personal use.

    – sharur
    Nov 26 '18 at 17:13











  • Recording the reading for your own purposes is infringement, since you're making another copy. It's very likely that the copyright owner won't find about it, very likely that the owner won't care about it, and it's exceedingly unlikely that the owner will pursue the case legally, but it's still unlawful.

    – David Thornley
    Dec 26 '18 at 18:25
















"You can record your reading of it for your personal use." On what legal basis is this allowed, even if the other three factors (1-3) are against your use? Presumably recording it for personal use has no impact on the market, so factor 4 seems to be in your favour.

– Brandin
Aug 28 '18 at 9:46






"You can record your reading of it for your personal use." On what legal basis is this allowed, even if the other three factors (1-3) are against your use? Presumably recording it for personal use has no impact on the market, so factor 4 seems to be in your favour.

– Brandin
Aug 28 '18 at 9:46














@Brandin: Copyright is decided on a case by case basis, as is what weight should be given; It is possible that a single factor can outweigh the other three. Also, Factor 1 would also be in the OP's favor if it the purpose and character of their use was "personal", but the OP mentions sharing it on youtube, which would not be personal use.

– sharur
Nov 26 '18 at 17:13





@Brandin: Copyright is decided on a case by case basis, as is what weight should be given; It is possible that a single factor can outweigh the other three. Also, Factor 1 would also be in the OP's favor if it the purpose and character of their use was "personal", but the OP mentions sharing it on youtube, which would not be personal use.

– sharur
Nov 26 '18 at 17:13













Recording the reading for your own purposes is infringement, since you're making another copy. It's very likely that the copyright owner won't find about it, very likely that the owner won't care about it, and it's exceedingly unlikely that the owner will pursue the case legally, but it's still unlawful.

– David Thornley
Dec 26 '18 at 18:25





Recording the reading for your own purposes is infringement, since you're making another copy. It's very likely that the copyright owner won't find about it, very likely that the owner won't care about it, and it's exceedingly unlikely that the owner will pursue the case legally, but it's still unlawful.

– David Thornley
Dec 26 '18 at 18:25

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31298%2fcan-i-make-youtube-videos-where-i-read-parts-of-a-book-aloud%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?