Can a person “agarrar” something? ¿Puede una persona “agarrar” algo? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow should I ask someone to repeat something they've said?I forgot how to say “I forgot”Usage of fea and ricoAnalogous-sounding spanish words from english to avoid using?Is it OK to end a sentence with an object pronoun (e.g. “He aprendido mucho de los”)What is the meaning of 'esperar' in “No espero que él me vaya a esperar, pero espero que lo haga”?Is “remolonear” a better translation for “to procrastinate” than “procrastinar”? If not, what other word would be?“Should” (not must)“le”, “lo”, “la” - leísmo and loísmo in SpainA “random” question: usage of “random” as adjective in Spanish

Find the majority element, which appears more than half the time

What does it mean 'exit 1' for a job status after rclone sync

How does a dynamic QR code work?

Does int main() need a declaration on C++?

Compensation for working overtime on Saturdays

What does this strange code stamp on my passport mean?

What happens if you break a law in another country outside of that country?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

How can a day be of 24 hours?

Direct Implications Between USA and UK in Event of No-Deal Brexit

How to implement Comparable so it is consistent with identity-equality

Shortening a title without changing its meaning

A hang glider, sudden unexpected lift to 25,000 feet altitude, what could do this?

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

How to pronounce fünf in 45

Car headlights in a world without electricity

pgfplots: How to draw a tangent graph below two others?

How can I prove that a state of equilibrium is unstable?

The sum of any ten consecutive numbers from a fibonacci sequence is divisible by 11

Upgrading From a 9 Speed Sora Derailleur?

Masking layers by a vector polygon layer in QGIS

How to unfasten electrical subpanel attached with ramset

Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact

Can Sri Krishna be called 'a person'?



Can a person “agarrar” something? ¿Puede una persona “agarrar” algo?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow should I ask someone to repeat something they've said?I forgot how to say “I forgot”Usage of fea and ricoAnalogous-sounding spanish words from english to avoid using?Is it OK to end a sentence with an object pronoun (e.g. “He aprendido mucho de los”)What is the meaning of 'esperar' in “No espero que él me vaya a esperar, pero espero que lo haga”?Is “remolonear” a better translation for “to procrastinate” than “procrastinar”? If not, what other word would be?“Should” (not must)“le”, “lo”, “la” - leísmo and loísmo in SpainA “random” question: usage of “random” as adjective in Spanish










2















I was recently helping some Spanish-speaking students with something, in which they had to translate "take". The translation I've learned in classes is "tomar", but that was interpreted as "to drink", so "agarrar" was used as a synonym to ease understanding. I learned it was not technically correct, because it was related to the word for "garras", which means claws, so only an animal can "agarrar" something (although, I may have misunderstood). I have researched the issue, and according to various sites I trust for Spanish (see Spanish Dict's article here: https://www.spanishdict.com/translate/agarrar), example sentences are given with people "agarrando" things. Did I misunderstand- is agarrar technically correct for people? If not, can you clarify why a person can't "agarrar" something (I was a bit confused with the "claws" argument)? If it is not technically correct, is it so widely accepted I'd be understood anywhere I used it, and would it still be correct, even in more formal writing? Is it a country-specific thing? Is there another word for "take" I could use other than "tomar" that would be better understood? Thank you!










share|improve this question


























    2















    I was recently helping some Spanish-speaking students with something, in which they had to translate "take". The translation I've learned in classes is "tomar", but that was interpreted as "to drink", so "agarrar" was used as a synonym to ease understanding. I learned it was not technically correct, because it was related to the word for "garras", which means claws, so only an animal can "agarrar" something (although, I may have misunderstood). I have researched the issue, and according to various sites I trust for Spanish (see Spanish Dict's article here: https://www.spanishdict.com/translate/agarrar), example sentences are given with people "agarrando" things. Did I misunderstand- is agarrar technically correct for people? If not, can you clarify why a person can't "agarrar" something (I was a bit confused with the "claws" argument)? If it is not technically correct, is it so widely accepted I'd be understood anywhere I used it, and would it still be correct, even in more formal writing? Is it a country-specific thing? Is there another word for "take" I could use other than "tomar" that would be better understood? Thank you!










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2








      I was recently helping some Spanish-speaking students with something, in which they had to translate "take". The translation I've learned in classes is "tomar", but that was interpreted as "to drink", so "agarrar" was used as a synonym to ease understanding. I learned it was not technically correct, because it was related to the word for "garras", which means claws, so only an animal can "agarrar" something (although, I may have misunderstood). I have researched the issue, and according to various sites I trust for Spanish (see Spanish Dict's article here: https://www.spanishdict.com/translate/agarrar), example sentences are given with people "agarrando" things. Did I misunderstand- is agarrar technically correct for people? If not, can you clarify why a person can't "agarrar" something (I was a bit confused with the "claws" argument)? If it is not technically correct, is it so widely accepted I'd be understood anywhere I used it, and would it still be correct, even in more formal writing? Is it a country-specific thing? Is there another word for "take" I could use other than "tomar" that would be better understood? Thank you!










      share|improve this question














      I was recently helping some Spanish-speaking students with something, in which they had to translate "take". The translation I've learned in classes is "tomar", but that was interpreted as "to drink", so "agarrar" was used as a synonym to ease understanding. I learned it was not technically correct, because it was related to the word for "garras", which means claws, so only an animal can "agarrar" something (although, I may have misunderstood). I have researched the issue, and according to various sites I trust for Spanish (see Spanish Dict's article here: https://www.spanishdict.com/translate/agarrar), example sentences are given with people "agarrando" things. Did I misunderstand- is agarrar technically correct for people? If not, can you clarify why a person can't "agarrar" something (I was a bit confused with the "claws" argument)? If it is not technically correct, is it so widely accepted I'd be understood anywhere I used it, and would it still be correct, even in more formal writing? Is it a country-specific thing? Is there another word for "take" I could use other than "tomar" that would be better understood? Thank you!







      uso-de-palabras selección-de-palabras diferencias-regionales






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      米凯乐米凯乐

      353210




      353210




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Agarrar is a perfectly good word for English "take" in the sense of physically getting hold of something or someone (and also, depending on context, also "grab" and "grasp"). There are a few synonyms but this is probably the most common word for that meaning, though tomar is also correct (it also means "beber", but again context makes it obvious when it doesn't).



          Agarrar is etymologically related to garra "claw", but its current meaning doesn't have anything to do with claws. You can very well say things like




          • agarrar con ambas manos "to take/grab with both hands"


          • agarrar del brazo "to take/grab from the arm"

          There's another related verb, desgarrar "tear, rend, rip" where the relation is clearer, but still you can use it without reference to claws.



          In some regions tomar may be more common than agarrar; in others it's less common. In more formal situations tomar is actually better. Another difference is that when you motion someone to take something as an offering, a gift, a refreshment, etc., you mostly use tomar, because agarrar is more concrete in the sense of "taking hold" of things.



          Coger refers to having sexual intercourse in some parts of Latin America, notably Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay, and it's not as common as agarrar elsewhere in the Americas in any case, so it's best to stick with agarrar or tomar.






          share|improve this answer






























            2














            I'm assuming that you heard this from Mexicans because "agarrar" is the correct and standard word in Mexico for "To get" or "to take." The reason for that is coger, which is the formal Spanish word from Spain, has a meaning that refers to a sexual encounter.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "353"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspanish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29024%2fcan-a-person-agarrar-something-puede-una-persona-agarrar-algo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3














              Agarrar is a perfectly good word for English "take" in the sense of physically getting hold of something or someone (and also, depending on context, also "grab" and "grasp"). There are a few synonyms but this is probably the most common word for that meaning, though tomar is also correct (it also means "beber", but again context makes it obvious when it doesn't).



              Agarrar is etymologically related to garra "claw", but its current meaning doesn't have anything to do with claws. You can very well say things like




              • agarrar con ambas manos "to take/grab with both hands"


              • agarrar del brazo "to take/grab from the arm"

              There's another related verb, desgarrar "tear, rend, rip" where the relation is clearer, but still you can use it without reference to claws.



              In some regions tomar may be more common than agarrar; in others it's less common. In more formal situations tomar is actually better. Another difference is that when you motion someone to take something as an offering, a gift, a refreshment, etc., you mostly use tomar, because agarrar is more concrete in the sense of "taking hold" of things.



              Coger refers to having sexual intercourse in some parts of Latin America, notably Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay, and it's not as common as agarrar elsewhere in the Americas in any case, so it's best to stick with agarrar or tomar.






              share|improve this answer



























                3














                Agarrar is a perfectly good word for English "take" in the sense of physically getting hold of something or someone (and also, depending on context, also "grab" and "grasp"). There are a few synonyms but this is probably the most common word for that meaning, though tomar is also correct (it also means "beber", but again context makes it obvious when it doesn't).



                Agarrar is etymologically related to garra "claw", but its current meaning doesn't have anything to do with claws. You can very well say things like




                • agarrar con ambas manos "to take/grab with both hands"


                • agarrar del brazo "to take/grab from the arm"

                There's another related verb, desgarrar "tear, rend, rip" where the relation is clearer, but still you can use it without reference to claws.



                In some regions tomar may be more common than agarrar; in others it's less common. In more formal situations tomar is actually better. Another difference is that when you motion someone to take something as an offering, a gift, a refreshment, etc., you mostly use tomar, because agarrar is more concrete in the sense of "taking hold" of things.



                Coger refers to having sexual intercourse in some parts of Latin America, notably Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay, and it's not as common as agarrar elsewhere in the Americas in any case, so it's best to stick with agarrar or tomar.






                share|improve this answer

























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  Agarrar is a perfectly good word for English "take" in the sense of physically getting hold of something or someone (and also, depending on context, also "grab" and "grasp"). There are a few synonyms but this is probably the most common word for that meaning, though tomar is also correct (it also means "beber", but again context makes it obvious when it doesn't).



                  Agarrar is etymologically related to garra "claw", but its current meaning doesn't have anything to do with claws. You can very well say things like




                  • agarrar con ambas manos "to take/grab with both hands"


                  • agarrar del brazo "to take/grab from the arm"

                  There's another related verb, desgarrar "tear, rend, rip" where the relation is clearer, but still you can use it without reference to claws.



                  In some regions tomar may be more common than agarrar; in others it's less common. In more formal situations tomar is actually better. Another difference is that when you motion someone to take something as an offering, a gift, a refreshment, etc., you mostly use tomar, because agarrar is more concrete in the sense of "taking hold" of things.



                  Coger refers to having sexual intercourse in some parts of Latin America, notably Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay, and it's not as common as agarrar elsewhere in the Americas in any case, so it's best to stick with agarrar or tomar.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Agarrar is a perfectly good word for English "take" in the sense of physically getting hold of something or someone (and also, depending on context, also "grab" and "grasp"). There are a few synonyms but this is probably the most common word for that meaning, though tomar is also correct (it also means "beber", but again context makes it obvious when it doesn't).



                  Agarrar is etymologically related to garra "claw", but its current meaning doesn't have anything to do with claws. You can very well say things like




                  • agarrar con ambas manos "to take/grab with both hands"


                  • agarrar del brazo "to take/grab from the arm"

                  There's another related verb, desgarrar "tear, rend, rip" where the relation is clearer, but still you can use it without reference to claws.



                  In some regions tomar may be more common than agarrar; in others it's less common. In more formal situations tomar is actually better. Another difference is that when you motion someone to take something as an offering, a gift, a refreshment, etc., you mostly use tomar, because agarrar is more concrete in the sense of "taking hold" of things.



                  Coger refers to having sexual intercourse in some parts of Latin America, notably Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay, and it's not as common as agarrar elsewhere in the Americas in any case, so it's best to stick with agarrar or tomar.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  pablodf76pablodf76

                  22.2k11467




                  22.2k11467





















                      2














                      I'm assuming that you heard this from Mexicans because "agarrar" is the correct and standard word in Mexico for "To get" or "to take." The reason for that is coger, which is the formal Spanish word from Spain, has a meaning that refers to a sexual encounter.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        2














                        I'm assuming that you heard this from Mexicans because "agarrar" is the correct and standard word in Mexico for "To get" or "to take." The reason for that is coger, which is the formal Spanish word from Spain, has a meaning that refers to a sexual encounter.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          2












                          2








                          2







                          I'm assuming that you heard this from Mexicans because "agarrar" is the correct and standard word in Mexico for "To get" or "to take." The reason for that is coger, which is the formal Spanish word from Spain, has a meaning that refers to a sexual encounter.






                          share|improve this answer













                          I'm assuming that you heard this from Mexicans because "agarrar" is the correct and standard word in Mexico for "To get" or "to take." The reason for that is coger, which is the formal Spanish word from Spain, has a meaning that refers to a sexual encounter.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 2 hours ago









                          KarlomanioKarlomanio

                          43529




                          43529



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Spanish Language Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspanish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29024%2fcan-a-person-agarrar-something-puede-una-persona-agarrar-algo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

                              2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

                              Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?