“to be prejudice towards/against someone” vs “to be prejudiced against/towards someone”As a “someone” usage“I am most interested in X.” vs “I am mostly interested in X.”Past participle of “let <object> <verb>”What “have gone to someone” really mean?Pony up, did I knowStep to it, to it“Twenty-four hour” or "twenty-four-hour?Which expression is correct in purpose or on purpose?More often than not, can we use it in different contexts, changing the fixed expression a bit?“for someone to” verb phrases

Font hinting is lost in Chrome-like browsers (for some languages )

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Theorems that impeded progress

Method of fabrication patents, Is it okay to import from abroad?

To string or not to string

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

Roll the carpet

How to draw a waving flag in TikZ

Is a conference paper whose proceedings will be published in IEEE Xplore counted as a publication?

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

Why is this basic language not a regular language?

What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Why is Minecraft giving an OpenGL error?

Unknown notation: What do three bars mean?

a relationship between local compactness and closure

How can I make a cone from a cube and view the cube with different angles?

Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?



“to be prejudice towards/against someone” vs “to be prejudiced against/towards someone”


As a “someone” usage“I am most interested in X.” vs “I am mostly interested in X.”Past participle of “let <object> <verb>”What “have gone to someone” really mean?Pony up, did I knowStep to it, to it“Twenty-four hour” or "twenty-four-hour?Which expression is correct in purpose or on purpose?More often than not, can we use it in different contexts, changing the fixed expression a bit?“for someone to” verb phrases






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















Which one is the correct form?




He's prejudice against/towards women.



He's prejudiced towards/against women.











share|improve this question






























    1















    Which one is the correct form?




    He's prejudice against/towards women.



    He's prejudiced towards/against women.











    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1








      Which one is the correct form?




      He's prejudice against/towards women.



      He's prejudiced towards/against women.











      share|improve this question
















      Which one is the correct form?




      He's prejudice against/towards women.



      He's prejudiced towards/against women.








      phrase-usage






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 3 hours ago









      Andrew

      71.3k679156




      71.3k679156










      asked 3 hours ago









      KaiqueKaique

      1,448420




      1,448420




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          "Prejudice" is a noun. You can't be prejudice -- instead you have a prejudice.




          He has a prejudice against eating what he considers "foreign" food.




          Or you can say the same thing with "prejudice" as a verb, in this case expressed as a past participle adjective:




          He is prejudiced against eating what he considers "foreign" food.




          Both are fine, as both say the same thing in different ways.




          He has a prejudice against women



          He is prejudiced against women.




          Side note: Because "prejudice" is generally a negative condition, you have to be careful when using "prejudice towards" something. This usually indicates a prejudice in the direction of some negative outcome:




          The judge ruled the evidence would unlawfully prejudice the jury toward convicting the defendant.




          This means that when you say something like, "He is prejudiced toward women," it implies you disapprove of this attitude. If you want to make a more neutral statement, you can instead use terms like "prefer", "incline toward", or "partial to".






          share|improve this answer
































            1














            In the first usage "prejudice" is a noun, and in the second usage "prejudiced" is an adjective.



            The first one might rarely be used at a stretch




            He's prejudice personified




            but the usual use is with "prejudiced".



            About the choice of against and toward, these two examples show the difference.




            He's prejudiced against women.



            He's friendly towards beggars.







            share|improve this answer























            • You can't be something negative towards someone?

              – Kaique
              3 hours ago






            • 1





              You can be prejudiced towards someone or something, but usually it is against. "He is prejudiced towards members of his club". To put it another way, you can't be attracted against someone, or be repelled towards them.

              – Weather Vane
              3 hours ago



















            0














            Prejudice is a noun, and prejudiced is an adjective. Let's say you were to say:




            He is prejudice against women.




            Then you would be claiming that he, himself, is "prejudice against women", a concept or feeling or state of mind. That's a noun phrase. Being generous, we could assume you were describing him as the personification of such prejudice.



            But then there's:




            He is prejudiced against women.




            This is a much more sensible thing to say. In that case, prejudiced is an adjective, and against women is a complement of that adjective, as it completes the meaning of prejudiced. Actually, the against women bit is a complement in the other case as well.



            Now, a quick exploration of that against/towards thing. There's an argument that prejudice is an inherently negative concept, and philosophically it might be. As a word, though, it means to pre-judge, to judge in absence of evidence based on some characteristic. There's a school of thought that says that prejudice toward(s)1 something is prejudice in that thing's favour, and prejudice against something is to that thing's detriment.



            In my experience, some people have that assumption, and others don't. Personally, I see prejudice against as to the detriment, and prejudice towards as neutral. The expression for prejudice in favour would be prejudice in favour of. NGram suggests that against is used more than the other forms put together, though in favour used to be much more common than toward(s).




            1: Let's not get into the toward/towards debate here, though. It's rather tangential to the question.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "481"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204197%2fto-be-prejudice-towards-against-someone-vs-to-be-prejudiced-against-towards-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2














              "Prejudice" is a noun. You can't be prejudice -- instead you have a prejudice.




              He has a prejudice against eating what he considers "foreign" food.




              Or you can say the same thing with "prejudice" as a verb, in this case expressed as a past participle adjective:




              He is prejudiced against eating what he considers "foreign" food.




              Both are fine, as both say the same thing in different ways.




              He has a prejudice against women



              He is prejudiced against women.




              Side note: Because "prejudice" is generally a negative condition, you have to be careful when using "prejudice towards" something. This usually indicates a prejudice in the direction of some negative outcome:




              The judge ruled the evidence would unlawfully prejudice the jury toward convicting the defendant.




              This means that when you say something like, "He is prejudiced toward women," it implies you disapprove of this attitude. If you want to make a more neutral statement, you can instead use terms like "prefer", "incline toward", or "partial to".






              share|improve this answer





























                2














                "Prejudice" is a noun. You can't be prejudice -- instead you have a prejudice.




                He has a prejudice against eating what he considers "foreign" food.




                Or you can say the same thing with "prejudice" as a verb, in this case expressed as a past participle adjective:




                He is prejudiced against eating what he considers "foreign" food.




                Both are fine, as both say the same thing in different ways.




                He has a prejudice against women



                He is prejudiced against women.




                Side note: Because "prejudice" is generally a negative condition, you have to be careful when using "prejudice towards" something. This usually indicates a prejudice in the direction of some negative outcome:




                The judge ruled the evidence would unlawfully prejudice the jury toward convicting the defendant.




                This means that when you say something like, "He is prejudiced toward women," it implies you disapprove of this attitude. If you want to make a more neutral statement, you can instead use terms like "prefer", "incline toward", or "partial to".






                share|improve this answer



























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  "Prejudice" is a noun. You can't be prejudice -- instead you have a prejudice.




                  He has a prejudice against eating what he considers "foreign" food.




                  Or you can say the same thing with "prejudice" as a verb, in this case expressed as a past participle adjective:




                  He is prejudiced against eating what he considers "foreign" food.




                  Both are fine, as both say the same thing in different ways.




                  He has a prejudice against women



                  He is prejudiced against women.




                  Side note: Because "prejudice" is generally a negative condition, you have to be careful when using "prejudice towards" something. This usually indicates a prejudice in the direction of some negative outcome:




                  The judge ruled the evidence would unlawfully prejudice the jury toward convicting the defendant.




                  This means that when you say something like, "He is prejudiced toward women," it implies you disapprove of this attitude. If you want to make a more neutral statement, you can instead use terms like "prefer", "incline toward", or "partial to".






                  share|improve this answer















                  "Prejudice" is a noun. You can't be prejudice -- instead you have a prejudice.




                  He has a prejudice against eating what he considers "foreign" food.




                  Or you can say the same thing with "prejudice" as a verb, in this case expressed as a past participle adjective:




                  He is prejudiced against eating what he considers "foreign" food.




                  Both are fine, as both say the same thing in different ways.




                  He has a prejudice against women



                  He is prejudiced against women.




                  Side note: Because "prejudice" is generally a negative condition, you have to be careful when using "prejudice towards" something. This usually indicates a prejudice in the direction of some negative outcome:




                  The judge ruled the evidence would unlawfully prejudice the jury toward convicting the defendant.




                  This means that when you say something like, "He is prejudiced toward women," it implies you disapprove of this attitude. If you want to make a more neutral statement, you can instead use terms like "prefer", "incline toward", or "partial to".







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 3 hours ago

























                  answered 3 hours ago









                  AndrewAndrew

                  71.3k679156




                  71.3k679156























                      1














                      In the first usage "prejudice" is a noun, and in the second usage "prejudiced" is an adjective.



                      The first one might rarely be used at a stretch




                      He's prejudice personified




                      but the usual use is with "prejudiced".



                      About the choice of against and toward, these two examples show the difference.




                      He's prejudiced against women.



                      He's friendly towards beggars.







                      share|improve this answer























                      • You can't be something negative towards someone?

                        – Kaique
                        3 hours ago






                      • 1





                        You can be prejudiced towards someone or something, but usually it is against. "He is prejudiced towards members of his club". To put it another way, you can't be attracted against someone, or be repelled towards them.

                        – Weather Vane
                        3 hours ago
















                      1














                      In the first usage "prejudice" is a noun, and in the second usage "prejudiced" is an adjective.



                      The first one might rarely be used at a stretch




                      He's prejudice personified




                      but the usual use is with "prejudiced".



                      About the choice of against and toward, these two examples show the difference.




                      He's prejudiced against women.



                      He's friendly towards beggars.







                      share|improve this answer























                      • You can't be something negative towards someone?

                        – Kaique
                        3 hours ago






                      • 1





                        You can be prejudiced towards someone or something, but usually it is against. "He is prejudiced towards members of his club". To put it another way, you can't be attracted against someone, or be repelled towards them.

                        – Weather Vane
                        3 hours ago














                      1












                      1








                      1







                      In the first usage "prejudice" is a noun, and in the second usage "prejudiced" is an adjective.



                      The first one might rarely be used at a stretch




                      He's prejudice personified




                      but the usual use is with "prejudiced".



                      About the choice of against and toward, these two examples show the difference.




                      He's prejudiced against women.



                      He's friendly towards beggars.







                      share|improve this answer













                      In the first usage "prejudice" is a noun, and in the second usage "prejudiced" is an adjective.



                      The first one might rarely be used at a stretch




                      He's prejudice personified




                      but the usual use is with "prejudiced".



                      About the choice of against and toward, these two examples show the difference.




                      He's prejudiced against women.



                      He's friendly towards beggars.








                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 3 hours ago









                      Weather VaneWeather Vane

                      4,5351417




                      4,5351417












                      • You can't be something negative towards someone?

                        – Kaique
                        3 hours ago






                      • 1





                        You can be prejudiced towards someone or something, but usually it is against. "He is prejudiced towards members of his club". To put it another way, you can't be attracted against someone, or be repelled towards them.

                        – Weather Vane
                        3 hours ago


















                      • You can't be something negative towards someone?

                        – Kaique
                        3 hours ago






                      • 1





                        You can be prejudiced towards someone or something, but usually it is against. "He is prejudiced towards members of his club". To put it another way, you can't be attracted against someone, or be repelled towards them.

                        – Weather Vane
                        3 hours ago

















                      You can't be something negative towards someone?

                      – Kaique
                      3 hours ago





                      You can't be something negative towards someone?

                      – Kaique
                      3 hours ago




                      1




                      1





                      You can be prejudiced towards someone or something, but usually it is against. "He is prejudiced towards members of his club". To put it another way, you can't be attracted against someone, or be repelled towards them.

                      – Weather Vane
                      3 hours ago






                      You can be prejudiced towards someone or something, but usually it is against. "He is prejudiced towards members of his club". To put it another way, you can't be attracted against someone, or be repelled towards them.

                      – Weather Vane
                      3 hours ago












                      0














                      Prejudice is a noun, and prejudiced is an adjective. Let's say you were to say:




                      He is prejudice against women.




                      Then you would be claiming that he, himself, is "prejudice against women", a concept or feeling or state of mind. That's a noun phrase. Being generous, we could assume you were describing him as the personification of such prejudice.



                      But then there's:




                      He is prejudiced against women.




                      This is a much more sensible thing to say. In that case, prejudiced is an adjective, and against women is a complement of that adjective, as it completes the meaning of prejudiced. Actually, the against women bit is a complement in the other case as well.



                      Now, a quick exploration of that against/towards thing. There's an argument that prejudice is an inherently negative concept, and philosophically it might be. As a word, though, it means to pre-judge, to judge in absence of evidence based on some characteristic. There's a school of thought that says that prejudice toward(s)1 something is prejudice in that thing's favour, and prejudice against something is to that thing's detriment.



                      In my experience, some people have that assumption, and others don't. Personally, I see prejudice against as to the detriment, and prejudice towards as neutral. The expression for prejudice in favour would be prejudice in favour of. NGram suggests that against is used more than the other forms put together, though in favour used to be much more common than toward(s).




                      1: Let's not get into the toward/towards debate here, though. It's rather tangential to the question.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        0














                        Prejudice is a noun, and prejudiced is an adjective. Let's say you were to say:




                        He is prejudice against women.




                        Then you would be claiming that he, himself, is "prejudice against women", a concept or feeling or state of mind. That's a noun phrase. Being generous, we could assume you were describing him as the personification of such prejudice.



                        But then there's:




                        He is prejudiced against women.




                        This is a much more sensible thing to say. In that case, prejudiced is an adjective, and against women is a complement of that adjective, as it completes the meaning of prejudiced. Actually, the against women bit is a complement in the other case as well.



                        Now, a quick exploration of that against/towards thing. There's an argument that prejudice is an inherently negative concept, and philosophically it might be. As a word, though, it means to pre-judge, to judge in absence of evidence based on some characteristic. There's a school of thought that says that prejudice toward(s)1 something is prejudice in that thing's favour, and prejudice against something is to that thing's detriment.



                        In my experience, some people have that assumption, and others don't. Personally, I see prejudice against as to the detriment, and prejudice towards as neutral. The expression for prejudice in favour would be prejudice in favour of. NGram suggests that against is used more than the other forms put together, though in favour used to be much more common than toward(s).




                        1: Let's not get into the toward/towards debate here, though. It's rather tangential to the question.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          Prejudice is a noun, and prejudiced is an adjective. Let's say you were to say:




                          He is prejudice against women.




                          Then you would be claiming that he, himself, is "prejudice against women", a concept or feeling or state of mind. That's a noun phrase. Being generous, we could assume you were describing him as the personification of such prejudice.



                          But then there's:




                          He is prejudiced against women.




                          This is a much more sensible thing to say. In that case, prejudiced is an adjective, and against women is a complement of that adjective, as it completes the meaning of prejudiced. Actually, the against women bit is a complement in the other case as well.



                          Now, a quick exploration of that against/towards thing. There's an argument that prejudice is an inherently negative concept, and philosophically it might be. As a word, though, it means to pre-judge, to judge in absence of evidence based on some characteristic. There's a school of thought that says that prejudice toward(s)1 something is prejudice in that thing's favour, and prejudice against something is to that thing's detriment.



                          In my experience, some people have that assumption, and others don't. Personally, I see prejudice against as to the detriment, and prejudice towards as neutral. The expression for prejudice in favour would be prejudice in favour of. NGram suggests that against is used more than the other forms put together, though in favour used to be much more common than toward(s).




                          1: Let's not get into the toward/towards debate here, though. It's rather tangential to the question.






                          share|improve this answer













                          Prejudice is a noun, and prejudiced is an adjective. Let's say you were to say:




                          He is prejudice against women.




                          Then you would be claiming that he, himself, is "prejudice against women", a concept or feeling or state of mind. That's a noun phrase. Being generous, we could assume you were describing him as the personification of such prejudice.



                          But then there's:




                          He is prejudiced against women.




                          This is a much more sensible thing to say. In that case, prejudiced is an adjective, and against women is a complement of that adjective, as it completes the meaning of prejudiced. Actually, the against women bit is a complement in the other case as well.



                          Now, a quick exploration of that against/towards thing. There's an argument that prejudice is an inherently negative concept, and philosophically it might be. As a word, though, it means to pre-judge, to judge in absence of evidence based on some characteristic. There's a school of thought that says that prejudice toward(s)1 something is prejudice in that thing's favour, and prejudice against something is to that thing's detriment.



                          In my experience, some people have that assumption, and others don't. Personally, I see prejudice against as to the detriment, and prejudice towards as neutral. The expression for prejudice in favour would be prejudice in favour of. NGram suggests that against is used more than the other forms put together, though in favour used to be much more common than toward(s).




                          1: Let's not get into the toward/towards debate here, though. It's rather tangential to the question.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 2 hours ago









                          SamBCSamBC

                          17.1k2464




                          17.1k2464



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204197%2fto-be-prejudice-towards-against-someone-vs-to-be-prejudiced-against-towards-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Era Viking Índice Início da Era Viquingue | Cotidiano | Sociedade | Língua | Religião | A arte | As primeiras cidades | As viagens dos viquingues | Viquingues do Oeste e Leste | Fim da Era Viquingue | Fontes históricas | Referências Bibliografia | Ligações externas | Menu de navegação«Sverige då!»«Handel I vikingetid»«O que é Nórdico Antigo»Mito, magia e religião na volsunga saga Um olhar sobre a trajetória mítica do herói sigurd«Bonden var den verklige vikingen»«Vikingatiden»«Vikingatiden»«Vinland»«Guerreiras de Óðinn: As Valkyrjor na Mitologia Viking»1519-9053«Esculpindo símbolos e seres: A arte viking em pedras rúnicas»1679-9313Historia - Tema: VikingarnaAventura e Magia no Mundo das Sagas IslandesasEra Vikinge

                              What's the metal clinking sound at the end of credits in Avengers: Endgame?What makes Thanos so strong in Avengers: Endgame?Who is the character that appears at the end of Endgame?What happens to Mjolnir (Thor's hammer) at the end of Endgame?The People's Ages in Avengers: EndgameWhat did Nebula do in Avengers: Endgame?Messing with time in the Avengers: Endgame climaxAvengers: Endgame timelineWhat are the time-travel rules in Avengers Endgame?Why use this song in Avengers: Endgame Opening Logo Sequence?Peggy's age in Avengers Endgame

                              Are there legal definitions of ethnicities/races? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Legal definitions in the United StatesAre there truly legal limits on US interest rates?Are gender identity and sexual orientation federally protected?Why is there an apparent legal bias against digital services?What limits are there to the powers of individual judges in the United States legal system?Are women only scholarships legal under Irish / EU law?Is the term “race” defined by Public Law enacted by Congress of the United StatesIs there a legal definition of race in the US?Neighbors are spying for landlord on Renters is it legal?Are Protected Classes Bi-directional?