What is the topology associated with the algebras for the ultrafilter monad? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is the algebra map of the ultrafilter monad continuous?Is there a way to make tangent bundle a monad?Coproducts and pushouts of Boolean algebras and Heyting algebrasProof of theorems in the field of banach-and $c^*$-algebras in a categorial languageEpimorphisms of locally compact spacesThis is just the Eilenberg-Moore category, right?Which spaces can be used as “test spaces” for the Stone-Čech compactification?What is the opposite category of $operatornameTop$?Finitely presentable objects and the Kleisli categoryultrafilter convergence versus non-standard topologyMorita theory for algebras for a monad $T$

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

How does the math work when buying airline miles?

Do any jurisdictions seriously consider reclassifying social media websites as publishers?

Should I follow up with an employee I believe overracted to a mistake I made?

A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

Is there a kind of relay only consumes power when switching?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

Did Deadpool rescue all of the X-Force?

Most bit efficient text communication method?

Localisation of Category

Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items

Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?

Take 2! Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?

SF book about people trapped in a series of worlds they imagine

What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?

Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?

What is this clumpy 20-30cm high yellow-flowered plant?

How would a mousetrap for use in space work?

Why is my ESD wriststrap failing with nitrile gloves on?

How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?

Did Krishna say in Bhagavad Gita "I am in every living being"



What is the topology associated with the algebras for the ultrafilter monad?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is the algebra map of the ultrafilter monad continuous?Is there a way to make tangent bundle a monad?Coproducts and pushouts of Boolean algebras and Heyting algebrasProof of theorems in the field of banach-and $c^*$-algebras in a categorial languageEpimorphisms of locally compact spacesThis is just the Eilenberg-Moore category, right?Which spaces can be used as “test spaces” for the Stone-Čech compactification?What is the opposite category of $operatornameTop$?Finitely presentable objects and the Kleisli categoryultrafilter convergence versus non-standard topologyMorita theory for algebras for a monad $T$










7












$begingroup$


It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.



I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    7












    $begingroup$


    It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.



    I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      7












      7








      7





      $begingroup$


      It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.



      I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.



      I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.







      general-topology category-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      Malice VidrineMalice Vidrine

      6,34121123




      6,34121123




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.



          Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Malice Vidrine
            2 hours ago


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.



          Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.



          It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.



          In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.



          So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)



          Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$




          Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.



          Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192728%2fwhat-is-the-topology-associated-with-the-algebras-for-the-ultrafilter-monad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.



            Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Malice Vidrine
              2 hours ago















            5












            $begingroup$

            The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.



            Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Malice Vidrine
              2 hours ago













            5












            5








            5





            $begingroup$

            The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.



            Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.



            Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 3 hours ago









            Alex KruckmanAlex Kruckman

            28.8k32758




            28.8k32758











            • $begingroup$
              Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Malice Vidrine
              2 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
              $endgroup$
              – Malice Vidrine
              2 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Malice Vidrine
            2 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Malice Vidrine
            2 hours ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.



            Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.



            It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.



            In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.



            So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)



            Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$




            Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.



            Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.



              Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.



              It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.



              In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.



              So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)



              Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$




              Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.



              Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.



                Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.



                It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.



                In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.



                So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)



                Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$




                Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.



                Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.



                Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.



                It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.



                In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.



                So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)



                Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$




                Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.



                Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 45 mins ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

                193k14221352




                193k14221352



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192728%2fwhat-is-the-topology-associated-with-the-algebras-for-the-ultrafilter-monad%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

                    2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

                    Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?