Why do we need to use the builder design pattern when we can do the same thing with setters? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!On design patterns: When should I use the singleton?When would you use the Builder Pattern?What is the difference between Builder Design pattern and Factory Design pattern?Wrong ordering in generated table in jpaHow to deserialize a list using GSON or another JSON library in Java?org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateQueryException - HibernateTemplateOGNL setValue target is nullLombok javafx propertiesHibernate : Why FetchType.LAZY-annotated collection property eagerly loading?How to implement parcelable with my custom class containing Hashmap and SparseArray?

Should I follow up with an employee I believe overracted to a mistake I made?

Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?

How to write this math term? with cases it isn't working

Are all finite dimensional hilbert spaces isomorphic to spaces with Euclidean norms?

Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

How to write dimensions below a matrix

How would a mousetrap for use in space work?

How to write the following sign?

Is grep documentation about ignoring case wrong, since it doesn't ignore case in filenames?

Why do we need to use the builder design pattern when we can do the same thing with setters?

How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?

Chebyshev inequality in terms of RMS

SF book about people trapped in a series of worlds they imagine

Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?

Take 2! Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?

Most bit efficient text communication method?

Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items

How to install press fit bottom bracket into new frame

Source for Esri sample data from 911 Hot Spot Analysis

Export Xpubkey from Bitcoin Core

How does the math work when buying airline miles?

Multiple OR (||) Conditions in If Statement

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?



Why do we need to use the builder design pattern when we can do the same thing with setters?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!On design patterns: When should I use the singleton?When would you use the Builder Pattern?What is the difference between Builder Design pattern and Factory Design pattern?Wrong ordering in generated table in jpaHow to deserialize a list using GSON or another JSON library in Java?org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateQueryException - HibernateTemplateOGNL setValue target is nullLombok javafx propertiesHibernate : Why FetchType.LAZY-annotated collection property eagerly loading?How to implement parcelable with my custom class containing Hashmap and SparseArray?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








6















public class Employee 
private String name;
private String address;
private int id;

public Employee()
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub


@Override
public String toString()
return "Employee [name=" + name + ", address=" + address + ", id=" + id + "]";


public String getName()
return name;


public void setName(String name)
this.name = name;


public String getAddress()
return address;


public void setAddress(String address)
this.address = address;


public int getId()
return id;


public void setId(int id)
this.id = id;




public class Main
public static void main(String[] args)
Employee e = new Employee();
e.setName("Priyanka");
Employee e1 = new Employee();
e1.setName("Rahul");
e1.setAddress("Delhi");
System.out.println("Value of e :"+ e);
System.out.println("Value of e1:"+ e1);











share|improve this question






























    6















    public class Employee 
    private String name;
    private String address;
    private int id;

    public Employee()
    // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub


    @Override
    public String toString()
    return "Employee [name=" + name + ", address=" + address + ", id=" + id + "]";


    public String getName()
    return name;


    public void setName(String name)
    this.name = name;


    public String getAddress()
    return address;


    public void setAddress(String address)
    this.address = address;


    public int getId()
    return id;


    public void setId(int id)
    this.id = id;




    public class Main
    public static void main(String[] args)
    Employee e = new Employee();
    e.setName("Priyanka");
    Employee e1 = new Employee();
    e1.setName("Rahul");
    e1.setAddress("Delhi");
    System.out.println("Value of e :"+ e);
    System.out.println("Value of e1:"+ e1);











    share|improve this question


























      6












      6








      6


      2






      public class Employee 
      private String name;
      private String address;
      private int id;

      public Employee()
      // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub


      @Override
      public String toString()
      return "Employee [name=" + name + ", address=" + address + ", id=" + id + "]";


      public String getName()
      return name;


      public void setName(String name)
      this.name = name;


      public String getAddress()
      return address;


      public void setAddress(String address)
      this.address = address;


      public int getId()
      return id;


      public void setId(int id)
      this.id = id;




      public class Main
      public static void main(String[] args)
      Employee e = new Employee();
      e.setName("Priyanka");
      Employee e1 = new Employee();
      e1.setName("Rahul");
      e1.setAddress("Delhi");
      System.out.println("Value of e :"+ e);
      System.out.println("Value of e1:"+ e1);











      share|improve this question
















      public class Employee 
      private String name;
      private String address;
      private int id;

      public Employee()
      // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub


      @Override
      public String toString()
      return "Employee [name=" + name + ", address=" + address + ", id=" + id + "]";


      public String getName()
      return name;


      public void setName(String name)
      this.name = name;


      public String getAddress()
      return address;


      public void setAddress(String address)
      this.address = address;


      public int getId()
      return id;


      public void setId(int id)
      this.id = id;




      public class Main
      public static void main(String[] args)
      Employee e = new Employee();
      e.setName("Priyanka");
      Employee e1 = new Employee();
      e1.setName("Rahul");
      e1.setAddress("Delhi");
      System.out.println("Value of e :"+ e);
      System.out.println("Value of e1:"+ e1);








      java design-patterns






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      Boann

      37.5k1291123




      37.5k1291123










      asked 5 hours ago









      Priyanka TanejaPriyanka Taneja

      82119




      82119






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          The builder pattern can be useful to:



          • apply some check on the data used to initialize the object. For example if you need a double check between variables

          • create immutable objects. You can't change an object once initialized, so you can't use setters

          • add readability of code.

          • reduce the code used to initialize the object

          • have the instance in a valid state. Using setters the object instance can be in a not valid state before all the setters are called.


          Note on using the builder to create immutable objects.



          When you work in a multithread environment an immutable object can be shared between threads without explicit synchronization. Because the object can't change during the time is not possible to have a race condition accessing and modifying it by two threads at the same time.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Why we want to create immutable objects. If at some late point of time someone wants to change the object data???

            – Priyanka Taneja
            5 hours ago











          • @PriyankaTaneja I added my comments in the answer.

            – Davide Lorenzo MARINO
            5 hours ago











          • Thanks alot @Davide

            – Priyanka Taneja
            4 hours ago


















          9














          There is no need to use any pattern. You can even avoid setters with making the variables public. However,




          the intent of the Builder design pattern is to separate the
          construction of a complex object from its representation




          Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Builder_pattern






          share|improve this answer























          • ... and this is easier to use, as most Builder's methods return a reference to this to allow chaining of call. One could write: Employee jonSkeet = new Employee.Builder().withName("Jon").withLastname("Skeet").withSalary(1_000_000).build()

            – spi
            5 hours ago












          • @spi It makes code so much more easy to read and debug. Is this the only reason to use builder design pattern?

            – Priyanka Taneja
            5 hours ago











          • @PriyankaTaneja the only one no... You can also build several "Jon Skeet" just calling build() several times. Again, this may seem a minor advantage, but these little things put together makes a great difference between easy code and spaghetti code.

            – spi
            5 hours ago












          • Imagine that you had a main constructor with 10 arguments (a bad idea to start) and the fields were set with defaults. Instead of having multiple constructors for setting only certain values, you can use the Builder design pattern to set various values without confusion, while retaining the defaults for the other values.

            – jim829
            5 hours ago



















          4














          Using a builder pattern has a few advantages:



          1. Unlike with setters (which make your class mutable), a builder can be used to contruct immutable objects. In many cases immutable objects are preferred over mutable objects, because they are easier to understand and maintain, and because they avoid the need for locking in multithreaded environments.


          2. A builder can make sure that the object satisfies some invariants even directly after construction. For example, if your class has a name field which must never be null, the builder can check this condition and fail to construct the object when not satisfied.


          Both things you can also accomplish by using a constructor which takes all the class contents as parameters, but that will be quite unreadable when your class has more than a few fields to initialize.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55748815%2fwhy-do-we-need-to-use-the-builder-design-pattern-when-we-can-do-the-same-thing-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            The builder pattern can be useful to:



            • apply some check on the data used to initialize the object. For example if you need a double check between variables

            • create immutable objects. You can't change an object once initialized, so you can't use setters

            • add readability of code.

            • reduce the code used to initialize the object

            • have the instance in a valid state. Using setters the object instance can be in a not valid state before all the setters are called.


            Note on using the builder to create immutable objects.



            When you work in a multithread environment an immutable object can be shared between threads without explicit synchronization. Because the object can't change during the time is not possible to have a race condition accessing and modifying it by two threads at the same time.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Why we want to create immutable objects. If at some late point of time someone wants to change the object data???

              – Priyanka Taneja
              5 hours ago











            • @PriyankaTaneja I added my comments in the answer.

              – Davide Lorenzo MARINO
              5 hours ago











            • Thanks alot @Davide

              – Priyanka Taneja
              4 hours ago















            4














            The builder pattern can be useful to:



            • apply some check on the data used to initialize the object. For example if you need a double check between variables

            • create immutable objects. You can't change an object once initialized, so you can't use setters

            • add readability of code.

            • reduce the code used to initialize the object

            • have the instance in a valid state. Using setters the object instance can be in a not valid state before all the setters are called.


            Note on using the builder to create immutable objects.



            When you work in a multithread environment an immutable object can be shared between threads without explicit synchronization. Because the object can't change during the time is not possible to have a race condition accessing and modifying it by two threads at the same time.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Why we want to create immutable objects. If at some late point of time someone wants to change the object data???

              – Priyanka Taneja
              5 hours ago











            • @PriyankaTaneja I added my comments in the answer.

              – Davide Lorenzo MARINO
              5 hours ago











            • Thanks alot @Davide

              – Priyanka Taneja
              4 hours ago













            4












            4








            4







            The builder pattern can be useful to:



            • apply some check on the data used to initialize the object. For example if you need a double check between variables

            • create immutable objects. You can't change an object once initialized, so you can't use setters

            • add readability of code.

            • reduce the code used to initialize the object

            • have the instance in a valid state. Using setters the object instance can be in a not valid state before all the setters are called.


            Note on using the builder to create immutable objects.



            When you work in a multithread environment an immutable object can be shared between threads without explicit synchronization. Because the object can't change during the time is not possible to have a race condition accessing and modifying it by two threads at the same time.






            share|improve this answer















            The builder pattern can be useful to:



            • apply some check on the data used to initialize the object. For example if you need a double check between variables

            • create immutable objects. You can't change an object once initialized, so you can't use setters

            • add readability of code.

            • reduce the code used to initialize the object

            • have the instance in a valid state. Using setters the object instance can be in a not valid state before all the setters are called.


            Note on using the builder to create immutable objects.



            When you work in a multithread environment an immutable object can be shared between threads without explicit synchronization. Because the object can't change during the time is not possible to have a race condition accessing and modifying it by two threads at the same time.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago

























            answered 5 hours ago









            Davide Lorenzo MARINODavide Lorenzo MARINO

            19.4k22139




            19.4k22139












            • Why we want to create immutable objects. If at some late point of time someone wants to change the object data???

              – Priyanka Taneja
              5 hours ago











            • @PriyankaTaneja I added my comments in the answer.

              – Davide Lorenzo MARINO
              5 hours ago











            • Thanks alot @Davide

              – Priyanka Taneja
              4 hours ago

















            • Why we want to create immutable objects. If at some late point of time someone wants to change the object data???

              – Priyanka Taneja
              5 hours ago











            • @PriyankaTaneja I added my comments in the answer.

              – Davide Lorenzo MARINO
              5 hours ago











            • Thanks alot @Davide

              – Priyanka Taneja
              4 hours ago
















            Why we want to create immutable objects. If at some late point of time someone wants to change the object data???

            – Priyanka Taneja
            5 hours ago





            Why we want to create immutable objects. If at some late point of time someone wants to change the object data???

            – Priyanka Taneja
            5 hours ago













            @PriyankaTaneja I added my comments in the answer.

            – Davide Lorenzo MARINO
            5 hours ago





            @PriyankaTaneja I added my comments in the answer.

            – Davide Lorenzo MARINO
            5 hours ago













            Thanks alot @Davide

            – Priyanka Taneja
            4 hours ago





            Thanks alot @Davide

            – Priyanka Taneja
            4 hours ago













            9














            There is no need to use any pattern. You can even avoid setters with making the variables public. However,




            the intent of the Builder design pattern is to separate the
            construction of a complex object from its representation




            Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Builder_pattern






            share|improve this answer























            • ... and this is easier to use, as most Builder's methods return a reference to this to allow chaining of call. One could write: Employee jonSkeet = new Employee.Builder().withName("Jon").withLastname("Skeet").withSalary(1_000_000).build()

              – spi
              5 hours ago












            • @spi It makes code so much more easy to read and debug. Is this the only reason to use builder design pattern?

              – Priyanka Taneja
              5 hours ago











            • @PriyankaTaneja the only one no... You can also build several "Jon Skeet" just calling build() several times. Again, this may seem a minor advantage, but these little things put together makes a great difference between easy code and spaghetti code.

              – spi
              5 hours ago












            • Imagine that you had a main constructor with 10 arguments (a bad idea to start) and the fields were set with defaults. Instead of having multiple constructors for setting only certain values, you can use the Builder design pattern to set various values without confusion, while retaining the defaults for the other values.

              – jim829
              5 hours ago
















            9














            There is no need to use any pattern. You can even avoid setters with making the variables public. However,




            the intent of the Builder design pattern is to separate the
            construction of a complex object from its representation




            Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Builder_pattern






            share|improve this answer























            • ... and this is easier to use, as most Builder's methods return a reference to this to allow chaining of call. One could write: Employee jonSkeet = new Employee.Builder().withName("Jon").withLastname("Skeet").withSalary(1_000_000).build()

              – spi
              5 hours ago












            • @spi It makes code so much more easy to read and debug. Is this the only reason to use builder design pattern?

              – Priyanka Taneja
              5 hours ago











            • @PriyankaTaneja the only one no... You can also build several "Jon Skeet" just calling build() several times. Again, this may seem a minor advantage, but these little things put together makes a great difference between easy code and spaghetti code.

              – spi
              5 hours ago












            • Imagine that you had a main constructor with 10 arguments (a bad idea to start) and the fields were set with defaults. Instead of having multiple constructors for setting only certain values, you can use the Builder design pattern to set various values without confusion, while retaining the defaults for the other values.

              – jim829
              5 hours ago














            9












            9








            9







            There is no need to use any pattern. You can even avoid setters with making the variables public. However,




            the intent of the Builder design pattern is to separate the
            construction of a complex object from its representation




            Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Builder_pattern






            share|improve this answer













            There is no need to use any pattern. You can even avoid setters with making the variables public. However,




            the intent of the Builder design pattern is to separate the
            construction of a complex object from its representation




            Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Builder_pattern







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 5 hours ago









            maio290maio290

            2,222615




            2,222615












            • ... and this is easier to use, as most Builder's methods return a reference to this to allow chaining of call. One could write: Employee jonSkeet = new Employee.Builder().withName("Jon").withLastname("Skeet").withSalary(1_000_000).build()

              – spi
              5 hours ago












            • @spi It makes code so much more easy to read and debug. Is this the only reason to use builder design pattern?

              – Priyanka Taneja
              5 hours ago











            • @PriyankaTaneja the only one no... You can also build several "Jon Skeet" just calling build() several times. Again, this may seem a minor advantage, but these little things put together makes a great difference between easy code and spaghetti code.

              – spi
              5 hours ago












            • Imagine that you had a main constructor with 10 arguments (a bad idea to start) and the fields were set with defaults. Instead of having multiple constructors for setting only certain values, you can use the Builder design pattern to set various values without confusion, while retaining the defaults for the other values.

              – jim829
              5 hours ago


















            • ... and this is easier to use, as most Builder's methods return a reference to this to allow chaining of call. One could write: Employee jonSkeet = new Employee.Builder().withName("Jon").withLastname("Skeet").withSalary(1_000_000).build()

              – spi
              5 hours ago












            • @spi It makes code so much more easy to read and debug. Is this the only reason to use builder design pattern?

              – Priyanka Taneja
              5 hours ago











            • @PriyankaTaneja the only one no... You can also build several "Jon Skeet" just calling build() several times. Again, this may seem a minor advantage, but these little things put together makes a great difference between easy code and spaghetti code.

              – spi
              5 hours ago












            • Imagine that you had a main constructor with 10 arguments (a bad idea to start) and the fields were set with defaults. Instead of having multiple constructors for setting only certain values, you can use the Builder design pattern to set various values without confusion, while retaining the defaults for the other values.

              – jim829
              5 hours ago

















            ... and this is easier to use, as most Builder's methods return a reference to this to allow chaining of call. One could write: Employee jonSkeet = new Employee.Builder().withName("Jon").withLastname("Skeet").withSalary(1_000_000).build()

            – spi
            5 hours ago






            ... and this is easier to use, as most Builder's methods return a reference to this to allow chaining of call. One could write: Employee jonSkeet = new Employee.Builder().withName("Jon").withLastname("Skeet").withSalary(1_000_000).build()

            – spi
            5 hours ago














            @spi It makes code so much more easy to read and debug. Is this the only reason to use builder design pattern?

            – Priyanka Taneja
            5 hours ago





            @spi It makes code so much more easy to read and debug. Is this the only reason to use builder design pattern?

            – Priyanka Taneja
            5 hours ago













            @PriyankaTaneja the only one no... You can also build several "Jon Skeet" just calling build() several times. Again, this may seem a minor advantage, but these little things put together makes a great difference between easy code and spaghetti code.

            – spi
            5 hours ago






            @PriyankaTaneja the only one no... You can also build several "Jon Skeet" just calling build() several times. Again, this may seem a minor advantage, but these little things put together makes a great difference between easy code and spaghetti code.

            – spi
            5 hours ago














            Imagine that you had a main constructor with 10 arguments (a bad idea to start) and the fields were set with defaults. Instead of having multiple constructors for setting only certain values, you can use the Builder design pattern to set various values without confusion, while retaining the defaults for the other values.

            – jim829
            5 hours ago






            Imagine that you had a main constructor with 10 arguments (a bad idea to start) and the fields were set with defaults. Instead of having multiple constructors for setting only certain values, you can use the Builder design pattern to set various values without confusion, while retaining the defaults for the other values.

            – jim829
            5 hours ago












            4














            Using a builder pattern has a few advantages:



            1. Unlike with setters (which make your class mutable), a builder can be used to contruct immutable objects. In many cases immutable objects are preferred over mutable objects, because they are easier to understand and maintain, and because they avoid the need for locking in multithreaded environments.


            2. A builder can make sure that the object satisfies some invariants even directly after construction. For example, if your class has a name field which must never be null, the builder can check this condition and fail to construct the object when not satisfied.


            Both things you can also accomplish by using a constructor which takes all the class contents as parameters, but that will be quite unreadable when your class has more than a few fields to initialize.






            share|improve this answer



























              4














              Using a builder pattern has a few advantages:



              1. Unlike with setters (which make your class mutable), a builder can be used to contruct immutable objects. In many cases immutable objects are preferred over mutable objects, because they are easier to understand and maintain, and because they avoid the need for locking in multithreaded environments.


              2. A builder can make sure that the object satisfies some invariants even directly after construction. For example, if your class has a name field which must never be null, the builder can check this condition and fail to construct the object when not satisfied.


              Both things you can also accomplish by using a constructor which takes all the class contents as parameters, but that will be quite unreadable when your class has more than a few fields to initialize.






              share|improve this answer

























                4












                4








                4







                Using a builder pattern has a few advantages:



                1. Unlike with setters (which make your class mutable), a builder can be used to contruct immutable objects. In many cases immutable objects are preferred over mutable objects, because they are easier to understand and maintain, and because they avoid the need for locking in multithreaded environments.


                2. A builder can make sure that the object satisfies some invariants even directly after construction. For example, if your class has a name field which must never be null, the builder can check this condition and fail to construct the object when not satisfied.


                Both things you can also accomplish by using a constructor which takes all the class contents as parameters, but that will be quite unreadable when your class has more than a few fields to initialize.






                share|improve this answer













                Using a builder pattern has a few advantages:



                1. Unlike with setters (which make your class mutable), a builder can be used to contruct immutable objects. In many cases immutable objects are preferred over mutable objects, because they are easier to understand and maintain, and because they avoid the need for locking in multithreaded environments.


                2. A builder can make sure that the object satisfies some invariants even directly after construction. For example, if your class has a name field which must never be null, the builder can check this condition and fail to construct the object when not satisfied.


                Both things you can also accomplish by using a constructor which takes all the class contents as parameters, but that will be quite unreadable when your class has more than a few fields to initialize.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 5 hours ago









                HoopjeHoopje

                10.3k52644




                10.3k52644



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55748815%2fwhy-do-we-need-to-use-the-builder-design-pattern-when-we-can-do-the-same-thing-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

                    2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

                    Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?