Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”
How could a planet have erratic days?
Closed-form expression for certain product
lightning-datatable row number error
C++ debug of nlohmann json using GDB
What does chmod -u do?
Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?
A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?
Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file
How do I color the graph in datavisualization?
250 Floor Tower
Are paving bricks differently sized for sand bedding vs mortar bedding?
Not using 's' for he/she/it
Why can Carol Danvers change her suit colours in the first place?
Pre-modern battle - command it, or fight in it?
Rising and falling intonation
If infinitesimal transformations commute why dont the generators of the Lorentz group commute?
Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?
How did Rebekah know that Esau was planning to kill his brother in Genesis 27:42?
Freedom of speech and where it applies
What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?
Non-trope happy ending?
Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?
What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?
On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?
Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]
Combining two 32-bit integers into one 64-bit integerDetermine if an int is within rangeLossy packing 32 bit integer to 16 bitComputing the square root of a 64-bit integerKeeping integer addition within boundsSafe multiplication of two 64-bit signed integersLeetcode 10: Regular Expression MatchingSigned integer-to-ascii x86_64 assembler macroReverse the digits of an Integer“Add two numbers given in reverse order from a linked list”
$begingroup$
Problem
Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.
Feedback
Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const
correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?
Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n)
and space complexity is O(n)
? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.
#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>
class Solution
public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;
auto i_string = std::to_string(i);
std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();
try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;
if(is_signed) i *= -1;
return i;
;
int main()
Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);
c++ c++11 interview-questions integer
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem
Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.
Feedback
Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const
correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?
Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n)
and space complexity is O(n)
? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.
#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>
class Solution
public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;
auto i_string = std::to_string(i);
std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();
try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;
if(is_signed) i *= -1;
return i;
;
int main()
Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);
c++ c++11 interview-questions integer
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem
Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.
Feedback
Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const
correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?
Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n)
and space complexity is O(n)
? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.
#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>
class Solution
public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;
auto i_string = std::to_string(i);
std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();
try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;
if(is_signed) i *= -1;
return i;
;
int main()
Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);
c++ c++11 interview-questions integer
$endgroup$
Problem
Reverse digits of a 32-bit signed integer. When the reversed integer overflows return 0.
Feedback
Looking for any ways I can optimize this with modern c++ features overall. I hope my use of const
correctness, exception handling, and assertions is implemented well here, please let me know. Is there any way I can use byte operations to reverse the int and keep track of the sign possibly?
Based on the submission feedback from LeetCode, is it safe to say that the time complexity is O(n)
and space complexity is O(n)
? If I can reduce the complexity in anyway would love to know! Thanks for the feedback in advance.
#include <cassert>
#include <climits>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <string>
class Solution
public:
int reverse(int i)
bool is_signed = false;
if(i < 0) is_signed = true;
auto i_string = std::to_string(i);
std::string reversed = "";
while(!i_string.empty())
reversed.push_back(i_string.back());
i_string.pop_back();
try
i = std::stoi(reversed);
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;
if(is_signed) i *= -1;
return i;
;
int main()
Solution s;
assert(s.reverse(1) == 1);
assert(s.reverse(0) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(123) == 321);
assert(s.reverse(120) == 21);
assert(s.reverse(-123) == -321);
assert(s.reverse(1207) == 7021);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MAX) == 0);
assert(s.reverse(INT_MIN) == 0);
c++ c++11 interview-questions integer
c++ c++11 interview-questions integer
edited 3 hours ago
Martin R
16.2k12366
16.2k12366
asked 3 hours ago
greggreg
37018
37018
$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
General comments
There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.
Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.
Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.
I would simplify your function to just:
int reverse(int i)
try
auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());
const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;
Further comments
If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid
std::string
altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (usingstd::string
to only show you what is happening):int x = 1234;
std::string s;
while (x > 0)
s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
x /= 10;
std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.
Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216068%2freverse-int-within-the-32-bit-signed-integer-range-%25e2%2588%2592231-231-%25e2%2588%2592-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
General comments
There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.
Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.
Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.
I would simplify your function to just:
int reverse(int i)
try
auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());
const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;
Further comments
If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid
std::string
altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (usingstd::string
to only show you what is happening):int x = 1234;
std::string s;
while (x > 0)
s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
x /= 10;
std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.
Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
General comments
There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.
Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.
Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.
I would simplify your function to just:
int reverse(int i)
try
auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());
const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;
Further comments
If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid
std::string
altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (usingstd::string
to only show you what is happening):int x = 1234;
std::string s;
while (x > 0)
s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
x /= 10;
std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.
Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
General comments
There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.
Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.
Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.
I would simplify your function to just:
int reverse(int i)
try
auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());
const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;
Further comments
If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid
std::string
altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (usingstd::string
to only show you what is happening):int x = 1234;
std::string s;
while (x > 0)
s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
x /= 10;
std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.
Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.
$endgroup$
General comments
There is no reason to use a class. Instead, the functionality should be made into a free function.
Your code is overly complicated. There is no reason to make new string from which you erase characters one-by-one. Instead, you can convert the input integer to a string and use a standard function to reverse that.
Also, pay attention to const correctness. This protects from unintended mistakes and helps the compiler optimize more.
I would simplify your function to just:
int reverse(int i)
try
auto reversed std::to_string(i) ;
std::reverse(reversed.begin(), reversed.end());
const auto result std::stoi(reversed) ;
return i < 0 ? -1 * result : result;
catch (const std::out_of_range& e)
return 0;
Further comments
If you want to have a fast solution, you should avoid
std::string
altogether. This you can do by "iterating" through the digits using arithmetic operations (division and modulus), as in (usingstd::string
to only show you what is happening):int x = 1234;
std::string s;
while (x > 0)
s.push_back('0' + (x % 10));
x /= 10;
std::cout << s << "n"; // Prints 4321I will let you take it from here to use these ideas to make your program even faster.
Regarding your theoretical question concerning complexity, if we assume that the input is treated as a string of n characters, there is Omega(n) lower bound by a trivial adversary argument. Basically, if you don't spend at least n time, you can't read the whole of the input, and then you cannot guarantee correct output on every instance.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
JuhoJuho
1,461612
1,461612
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216068%2freverse-int-within-the-32-bit-signed-integer-range-%25e2%2588%2592231-231-%25e2%2588%2592-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This leetcode.com/problems/reverse-integer ?
$endgroup$
– Martin R
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes that's the one
$endgroup$
– greg
3 hours ago