Terms of Contract changed during drafting of Written Contract Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is a contract and what is required for them to be valid?Can other party sneak in new contract terms via termination notice?If there was no written contract in the first place would a phone call be enough to terminate relationship with the other party?Should terms in a contract be written in present tense?Written evidence vs terms of serviceHow to reconcile waiver and liability terms of a contract?Business and Customer Responsibilities for Terms of ContractWhat if a lawyer steals my idea and doesn't do the work?Membership cancellation and poking the bearWritten document from meeting in spite of a contractIs a term stating the contract can only be changed in writing, valid?

Multi tool use
When was Kai Tak permanently closed to cargo service?
Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?
How to convince students of the implication truth values?
Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?
What does "lightly crushed" mean for cardamon pods?
Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation
How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?
Generate an RGB colour grid
Uniqueness of spanning tree on a grid.
How to Make a Beautiful Stacked 3D Plot
Delete nth line from bottom
Why are both D and D# fitting into my E minor key?
Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?
How to compare two different files line by line in unix?
Closed form of recurrent arithmetic series summation
What is homebrew?
What font is "z" in "z-score"?
What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in ITSV
What does the "x" in "x86" represent?
For a new assistant professor in CS, how to build/manage a publication pipeline
Is it cost-effective to upgrade an old-ish Giant Escape R3 commuter bike with entry-level branded parts (wheels, drivetrain)?
How would a mousetrap for use in space work?
Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?
Extracting terms with certain heads in a function
Terms of Contract changed during drafting of Written Contract
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What is a contract and what is required for them to be valid?Can other party sneak in new contract terms via termination notice?If there was no written contract in the first place would a phone call be enough to terminate relationship with the other party?Should terms in a contract be written in present tense?Written evidence vs terms of serviceHow to reconcile waiver and liability terms of a contract?Business and Customer Responsibilities for Terms of ContractWhat if a lawyer steals my idea and doesn't do the work?Membership cancellation and poking the bearWritten document from meeting in spite of a contractIs a term stating the contract can only be changed in writing, valid?
I entered into discussions with an owner to purchase his business. During the process I agreed verbally and via email to pay for the owners lawyer to draft the purchase and sale agreements.
The owner and I created a list of terms for the contract, not included on those terms was that I was to pay for the lawyer fees involved in the drafting of the contract although I fully intended to at closing. The owner was going to finance my purchase of the business.
Upon receipt of the drafted contract the owner had added two items not on the terms of agreement:
- mortgage on my home.
- The ability to approve salaries and wages for my employees.
I called off the deal in part because of the items above and in part because I felt he had failed to operate the business over the previous 4 months in a manner that would allow me to succeed. He is now taking me to small claims court to pay for the lawyer fees. Does he have a case?
contract business
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I entered into discussions with an owner to purchase his business. During the process I agreed verbally and via email to pay for the owners lawyer to draft the purchase and sale agreements.
The owner and I created a list of terms for the contract, not included on those terms was that I was to pay for the lawyer fees involved in the drafting of the contract although I fully intended to at closing. The owner was going to finance my purchase of the business.
Upon receipt of the drafted contract the owner had added two items not on the terms of agreement:
- mortgage on my home.
- The ability to approve salaries and wages for my employees.
I called off the deal in part because of the items above and in part because I felt he had failed to operate the business over the previous 4 months in a manner that would allow me to succeed. He is now taking me to small claims court to pay for the lawyer fees. Does he have a case?
contract business
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
This really depends on specifically what you agreed to... Did you agree to pay for the lawyer to draft the agreement, or did you say "I will pay for the lawyer who drafted the agreement at the time of closing"? One says you'll do it regardless of the outcome, the other suggests that the closing must take place for you to pay for the lawyer...
– Ron Beyer
Oct 19 '18 at 1:49
You are accurate in that I agreed to pay for the lawyer fees as a part of the closing costs of the loan when the contract was signed and I have that in an email to the seller. Thank you for the response.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:04
Was it understood that you would have your own lawyer review the contracts or was it expected that you would incur no further fees for the drafting of the contract because they would be fair as drafted? This is important to understanding whether his change of the terms prevented you from getting the benefit you expected to get from paying for the contract to be drafted.
– David Schwartz
Dec 19 '18 at 10:26
add a comment |
I entered into discussions with an owner to purchase his business. During the process I agreed verbally and via email to pay for the owners lawyer to draft the purchase and sale agreements.
The owner and I created a list of terms for the contract, not included on those terms was that I was to pay for the lawyer fees involved in the drafting of the contract although I fully intended to at closing. The owner was going to finance my purchase of the business.
Upon receipt of the drafted contract the owner had added two items not on the terms of agreement:
- mortgage on my home.
- The ability to approve salaries and wages for my employees.
I called off the deal in part because of the items above and in part because I felt he had failed to operate the business over the previous 4 months in a manner that would allow me to succeed. He is now taking me to small claims court to pay for the lawyer fees. Does he have a case?
contract business
I entered into discussions with an owner to purchase his business. During the process I agreed verbally and via email to pay for the owners lawyer to draft the purchase and sale agreements.
The owner and I created a list of terms for the contract, not included on those terms was that I was to pay for the lawyer fees involved in the drafting of the contract although I fully intended to at closing. The owner was going to finance my purchase of the business.
Upon receipt of the drafted contract the owner had added two items not on the terms of agreement:
- mortgage on my home.
- The ability to approve salaries and wages for my employees.
I called off the deal in part because of the items above and in part because I felt he had failed to operate the business over the previous 4 months in a manner that would allow me to succeed. He is now taking me to small claims court to pay for the lawyer fees. Does he have a case?
contract business
contract business
edited Oct 19 '18 at 1:46
A. K.
1,6531129
1,6531129
asked Oct 19 '18 at 0:35
KGuayKGuay
1
1
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 5 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
This really depends on specifically what you agreed to... Did you agree to pay for the lawyer to draft the agreement, or did you say "I will pay for the lawyer who drafted the agreement at the time of closing"? One says you'll do it regardless of the outcome, the other suggests that the closing must take place for you to pay for the lawyer...
– Ron Beyer
Oct 19 '18 at 1:49
You are accurate in that I agreed to pay for the lawyer fees as a part of the closing costs of the loan when the contract was signed and I have that in an email to the seller. Thank you for the response.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:04
Was it understood that you would have your own lawyer review the contracts or was it expected that you would incur no further fees for the drafting of the contract because they would be fair as drafted? This is important to understanding whether his change of the terms prevented you from getting the benefit you expected to get from paying for the contract to be drafted.
– David Schwartz
Dec 19 '18 at 10:26
add a comment |
1
This really depends on specifically what you agreed to... Did you agree to pay for the lawyer to draft the agreement, or did you say "I will pay for the lawyer who drafted the agreement at the time of closing"? One says you'll do it regardless of the outcome, the other suggests that the closing must take place for you to pay for the lawyer...
– Ron Beyer
Oct 19 '18 at 1:49
You are accurate in that I agreed to pay for the lawyer fees as a part of the closing costs of the loan when the contract was signed and I have that in an email to the seller. Thank you for the response.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:04
Was it understood that you would have your own lawyer review the contracts or was it expected that you would incur no further fees for the drafting of the contract because they would be fair as drafted? This is important to understanding whether his change of the terms prevented you from getting the benefit you expected to get from paying for the contract to be drafted.
– David Schwartz
Dec 19 '18 at 10:26
1
1
This really depends on specifically what you agreed to... Did you agree to pay for the lawyer to draft the agreement, or did you say "I will pay for the lawyer who drafted the agreement at the time of closing"? One says you'll do it regardless of the outcome, the other suggests that the closing must take place for you to pay for the lawyer...
– Ron Beyer
Oct 19 '18 at 1:49
This really depends on specifically what you agreed to... Did you agree to pay for the lawyer to draft the agreement, or did you say "I will pay for the lawyer who drafted the agreement at the time of closing"? One says you'll do it regardless of the outcome, the other suggests that the closing must take place for you to pay for the lawyer...
– Ron Beyer
Oct 19 '18 at 1:49
You are accurate in that I agreed to pay for the lawyer fees as a part of the closing costs of the loan when the contract was signed and I have that in an email to the seller. Thank you for the response.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:04
You are accurate in that I agreed to pay for the lawyer fees as a part of the closing costs of the loan when the contract was signed and I have that in an email to the seller. Thank you for the response.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:04
Was it understood that you would have your own lawyer review the contracts or was it expected that you would incur no further fees for the drafting of the contract because they would be fair as drafted? This is important to understanding whether his change of the terms prevented you from getting the benefit you expected to get from paying for the contract to be drafted.
– David Schwartz
Dec 19 '18 at 10:26
Was it understood that you would have your own lawyer review the contracts or was it expected that you would incur no further fees for the drafting of the contract because they would be fair as drafted? This is important to understanding whether his change of the terms prevented you from getting the benefit you expected to get from paying for the contract to be drafted.
– David Schwartz
Dec 19 '18 at 10:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
He definitely has a case and will probably win
Here's why:
- I agreed verbally and via email to pay for the owners lawyer to draft the purchase and sale agreements
- not included on those terms was that I was to pay for the lawyer fees involved in the drafting of the contract
Therefore your agreement to pay for it is not a term of the contract for the sale of the business.
What it is is a separate agreement? probably a contract in its own right as it appears to have all the necessary elements (see What is a contract and what is required for them to be valid?).
He has fulfilled his side of the contract by providing the draft agreement, you need to pay for it.
If the draft agreement is insufficient (i.e that it contained additional terms) that may mean that you don't owe the money yet but since all that has to be done to make it sufficient is to strike out those terms that does not amount to a "complete and utter failure of consideration" - you might be entitled to a reduction in the fee but it would be insignificant.
Thank you for the response Dale. Would you concur with the other comment that if I agreed to the cost of the lawyer as a closing cost then i would not be on the hook for these costs? I'm not looking for damages on my end my only incurred cost was setting up and LLC and website.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:06
This is wholly inaccurate. To take one small bit of it: the part about a reasonable expectation that lawyer would put additional things in the contract. No. Maybe signature lines and some boilerplate language, but it is by no means a reasonable expectation that a lawyer is going to materially change the substance of a contract and not notify the other party.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:05
Another thing: what in this scenario leads one to believe @KGuay would have to or only be allowed to claim damages? He’s not claiming anything, he’s apparently going to have to defend himself against a claim.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:07
1
@A.fm one way of deafening himself is to counterclaim that the contract was not fulfilled or was not fulfilled completely
– Dale M
Oct 20 '18 at 1:43
1
@KGuay I feel that you should ask your lawyer those questions
– Dale M
Oct 22 '18 at 5:59
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32746%2fterms-of-contract-changed-during-drafting-of-written-contract%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
He definitely has a case and will probably win
Here's why:
- I agreed verbally and via email to pay for the owners lawyer to draft the purchase and sale agreements
- not included on those terms was that I was to pay for the lawyer fees involved in the drafting of the contract
Therefore your agreement to pay for it is not a term of the contract for the sale of the business.
What it is is a separate agreement? probably a contract in its own right as it appears to have all the necessary elements (see What is a contract and what is required for them to be valid?).
He has fulfilled his side of the contract by providing the draft agreement, you need to pay for it.
If the draft agreement is insufficient (i.e that it contained additional terms) that may mean that you don't owe the money yet but since all that has to be done to make it sufficient is to strike out those terms that does not amount to a "complete and utter failure of consideration" - you might be entitled to a reduction in the fee but it would be insignificant.
Thank you for the response Dale. Would you concur with the other comment that if I agreed to the cost of the lawyer as a closing cost then i would not be on the hook for these costs? I'm not looking for damages on my end my only incurred cost was setting up and LLC and website.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:06
This is wholly inaccurate. To take one small bit of it: the part about a reasonable expectation that lawyer would put additional things in the contract. No. Maybe signature lines and some boilerplate language, but it is by no means a reasonable expectation that a lawyer is going to materially change the substance of a contract and not notify the other party.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:05
Another thing: what in this scenario leads one to believe @KGuay would have to or only be allowed to claim damages? He’s not claiming anything, he’s apparently going to have to defend himself against a claim.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:07
1
@A.fm one way of deafening himself is to counterclaim that the contract was not fulfilled or was not fulfilled completely
– Dale M
Oct 20 '18 at 1:43
1
@KGuay I feel that you should ask your lawyer those questions
– Dale M
Oct 22 '18 at 5:59
|
show 4 more comments
He definitely has a case and will probably win
Here's why:
- I agreed verbally and via email to pay for the owners lawyer to draft the purchase and sale agreements
- not included on those terms was that I was to pay for the lawyer fees involved in the drafting of the contract
Therefore your agreement to pay for it is not a term of the contract for the sale of the business.
What it is is a separate agreement? probably a contract in its own right as it appears to have all the necessary elements (see What is a contract and what is required for them to be valid?).
He has fulfilled his side of the contract by providing the draft agreement, you need to pay for it.
If the draft agreement is insufficient (i.e that it contained additional terms) that may mean that you don't owe the money yet but since all that has to be done to make it sufficient is to strike out those terms that does not amount to a "complete and utter failure of consideration" - you might be entitled to a reduction in the fee but it would be insignificant.
Thank you for the response Dale. Would you concur with the other comment that if I agreed to the cost of the lawyer as a closing cost then i would not be on the hook for these costs? I'm not looking for damages on my end my only incurred cost was setting up and LLC and website.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:06
This is wholly inaccurate. To take one small bit of it: the part about a reasonable expectation that lawyer would put additional things in the contract. No. Maybe signature lines and some boilerplate language, but it is by no means a reasonable expectation that a lawyer is going to materially change the substance of a contract and not notify the other party.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:05
Another thing: what in this scenario leads one to believe @KGuay would have to or only be allowed to claim damages? He’s not claiming anything, he’s apparently going to have to defend himself against a claim.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:07
1
@A.fm one way of deafening himself is to counterclaim that the contract was not fulfilled or was not fulfilled completely
– Dale M
Oct 20 '18 at 1:43
1
@KGuay I feel that you should ask your lawyer those questions
– Dale M
Oct 22 '18 at 5:59
|
show 4 more comments
He definitely has a case and will probably win
Here's why:
- I agreed verbally and via email to pay for the owners lawyer to draft the purchase and sale agreements
- not included on those terms was that I was to pay for the lawyer fees involved in the drafting of the contract
Therefore your agreement to pay for it is not a term of the contract for the sale of the business.
What it is is a separate agreement? probably a contract in its own right as it appears to have all the necessary elements (see What is a contract and what is required for them to be valid?).
He has fulfilled his side of the contract by providing the draft agreement, you need to pay for it.
If the draft agreement is insufficient (i.e that it contained additional terms) that may mean that you don't owe the money yet but since all that has to be done to make it sufficient is to strike out those terms that does not amount to a "complete and utter failure of consideration" - you might be entitled to a reduction in the fee but it would be insignificant.
He definitely has a case and will probably win
Here's why:
- I agreed verbally and via email to pay for the owners lawyer to draft the purchase and sale agreements
- not included on those terms was that I was to pay for the lawyer fees involved in the drafting of the contract
Therefore your agreement to pay for it is not a term of the contract for the sale of the business.
What it is is a separate agreement? probably a contract in its own right as it appears to have all the necessary elements (see What is a contract and what is required for them to be valid?).
He has fulfilled his side of the contract by providing the draft agreement, you need to pay for it.
If the draft agreement is insufficient (i.e that it contained additional terms) that may mean that you don't owe the money yet but since all that has to be done to make it sufficient is to strike out those terms that does not amount to a "complete and utter failure of consideration" - you might be entitled to a reduction in the fee but it would be insignificant.
edited Oct 20 '18 at 1:50
answered Oct 19 '18 at 6:46


Dale MDale M
56.9k23680
56.9k23680
Thank you for the response Dale. Would you concur with the other comment that if I agreed to the cost of the lawyer as a closing cost then i would not be on the hook for these costs? I'm not looking for damages on my end my only incurred cost was setting up and LLC and website.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:06
This is wholly inaccurate. To take one small bit of it: the part about a reasonable expectation that lawyer would put additional things in the contract. No. Maybe signature lines and some boilerplate language, but it is by no means a reasonable expectation that a lawyer is going to materially change the substance of a contract and not notify the other party.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:05
Another thing: what in this scenario leads one to believe @KGuay would have to or only be allowed to claim damages? He’s not claiming anything, he’s apparently going to have to defend himself against a claim.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:07
1
@A.fm one way of deafening himself is to counterclaim that the contract was not fulfilled or was not fulfilled completely
– Dale M
Oct 20 '18 at 1:43
1
@KGuay I feel that you should ask your lawyer those questions
– Dale M
Oct 22 '18 at 5:59
|
show 4 more comments
Thank you for the response Dale. Would you concur with the other comment that if I agreed to the cost of the lawyer as a closing cost then i would not be on the hook for these costs? I'm not looking for damages on my end my only incurred cost was setting up and LLC and website.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:06
This is wholly inaccurate. To take one small bit of it: the part about a reasonable expectation that lawyer would put additional things in the contract. No. Maybe signature lines and some boilerplate language, but it is by no means a reasonable expectation that a lawyer is going to materially change the substance of a contract and not notify the other party.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:05
Another thing: what in this scenario leads one to believe @KGuay would have to or only be allowed to claim damages? He’s not claiming anything, he’s apparently going to have to defend himself against a claim.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:07
1
@A.fm one way of deafening himself is to counterclaim that the contract was not fulfilled or was not fulfilled completely
– Dale M
Oct 20 '18 at 1:43
1
@KGuay I feel that you should ask your lawyer those questions
– Dale M
Oct 22 '18 at 5:59
Thank you for the response Dale. Would you concur with the other comment that if I agreed to the cost of the lawyer as a closing cost then i would not be on the hook for these costs? I'm not looking for damages on my end my only incurred cost was setting up and LLC and website.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:06
Thank you for the response Dale. Would you concur with the other comment that if I agreed to the cost of the lawyer as a closing cost then i would not be on the hook for these costs? I'm not looking for damages on my end my only incurred cost was setting up and LLC and website.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:06
This is wholly inaccurate. To take one small bit of it: the part about a reasonable expectation that lawyer would put additional things in the contract. No. Maybe signature lines and some boilerplate language, but it is by no means a reasonable expectation that a lawyer is going to materially change the substance of a contract and not notify the other party.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:05
This is wholly inaccurate. To take one small bit of it: the part about a reasonable expectation that lawyer would put additional things in the contract. No. Maybe signature lines and some boilerplate language, but it is by no means a reasonable expectation that a lawyer is going to materially change the substance of a contract and not notify the other party.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:05
Another thing: what in this scenario leads one to believe @KGuay would have to or only be allowed to claim damages? He’s not claiming anything, he’s apparently going to have to defend himself against a claim.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:07
Another thing: what in this scenario leads one to believe @KGuay would have to or only be allowed to claim damages? He’s not claiming anything, he’s apparently going to have to defend himself against a claim.
– A.fm.
Oct 19 '18 at 19:07
1
1
@A.fm one way of deafening himself is to counterclaim that the contract was not fulfilled or was not fulfilled completely
– Dale M
Oct 20 '18 at 1:43
@A.fm one way of deafening himself is to counterclaim that the contract was not fulfilled or was not fulfilled completely
– Dale M
Oct 20 '18 at 1:43
1
1
@KGuay I feel that you should ask your lawyer those questions
– Dale M
Oct 22 '18 at 5:59
@KGuay I feel that you should ask your lawyer those questions
– Dale M
Oct 22 '18 at 5:59
|
show 4 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32746%2fterms-of-contract-changed-during-drafting-of-written-contract%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
tyD9xQayBRh2jp
1
This really depends on specifically what you agreed to... Did you agree to pay for the lawyer to draft the agreement, or did you say "I will pay for the lawyer who drafted the agreement at the time of closing"? One says you'll do it regardless of the outcome, the other suggests that the closing must take place for you to pay for the lawyer...
– Ron Beyer
Oct 19 '18 at 1:49
You are accurate in that I agreed to pay for the lawyer fees as a part of the closing costs of the loan when the contract was signed and I have that in an email to the seller. Thank you for the response.
– KGuay
Oct 19 '18 at 15:04
Was it understood that you would have your own lawyer review the contracts or was it expected that you would incur no further fees for the drafting of the contract because they would be fair as drafted? This is important to understanding whether his change of the terms prevented you from getting the benefit you expected to get from paying for the contract to be drafted.
– David Schwartz
Dec 19 '18 at 10:26