Must Apache 2.0, MIT and GPLv3 be attributed in a distributed binary?Using images from MIT licensed softwareIngesting source files from other open source project into mineDo I need to include the full text of the MIT license in the UI of my app?Mention of open source license in productMIT License for patented softwareQ about consequences of a software license amendment regarding patents: Facebook's open-source “react”Is taking influence from an Apache licensed software copyright infringment?Private license and Apache License Version 2.0 in one commercial product?Can I use my own Open Source code in commercial software I'm writing?Removing Developer Name From Software

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

Important Resources for Dark Age Civilizations?

What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?

Modeling an IP Address

Maximum likelihood parameters deviate from posterior distributions

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property Name

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Can a monk's single staff be considered dual wielded, as per the Dual Wielder feat?

expand `ifthenelse` immediately

Decision tree nodes overlapping with Tikz

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

How to regain access to running applications after accidentally zapping X.org?

Does detail obscure or enhance action?

Why doesn't a class having private constructor prevent inheriting from this class? How to control which classes can inherit from a certain base?

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

Roll the carpet

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

How to determine what difficulty is right for the game?

Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?

How to format long polynomial?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?



Must Apache 2.0, MIT and GPLv3 be attributed in a distributed binary?


Using images from MIT licensed softwareIngesting source files from other open source project into mineDo I need to include the full text of the MIT license in the UI of my app?Mention of open source license in productMIT License for patented softwareQ about consequences of a software license amendment regarding patents: Facebook's open-source “react”Is taking influence from an Apache licensed software copyright infringment?Private license and Apache License Version 2.0 in one commercial product?Can I use my own Open Source code in commercial software I'm writing?Removing Developer Name From Software













0















I need help interpreting the following 3 licenses in regards to distributing binaries (software/application not just the source code).



  • MIT https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT

  • Apache 2.0 https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0

  • GPLv3 https://opensource.org/licenses/GPL-3.0

MIT license




The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.




What exactly is the software here? The source code is obvious because that is where the copyright notice would be and it clearly cannot be touched. But does it also have to be added to the user interface and displayed to the end users of the finished software?



Apache 2.0 says




4.1 You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and




I interpret 4.1 as you must include the license but not the copyright notice?




4.3 You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and




I interpret 4.3 as you must include the copyright notice in the Source only. Not necessarily in the distributed Work like with the license in 4.1.



Which of these 3 if any, requires a copyright notice to be available in the user interface to the end user?



NOTE: I am asking because I need to pick a license for my project. I will of course attribute any library that I use. But I would like to force others to do the same which is why I am asking.









share


























    0















    I need help interpreting the following 3 licenses in regards to distributing binaries (software/application not just the source code).



    • MIT https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT

    • Apache 2.0 https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0

    • GPLv3 https://opensource.org/licenses/GPL-3.0

    MIT license




    The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.




    What exactly is the software here? The source code is obvious because that is where the copyright notice would be and it clearly cannot be touched. But does it also have to be added to the user interface and displayed to the end users of the finished software?



    Apache 2.0 says




    4.1 You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and




    I interpret 4.1 as you must include the license but not the copyright notice?




    4.3 You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and




    I interpret 4.3 as you must include the copyright notice in the Source only. Not necessarily in the distributed Work like with the license in 4.1.



    Which of these 3 if any, requires a copyright notice to be available in the user interface to the end user?



    NOTE: I am asking because I need to pick a license for my project. I will of course attribute any library that I use. But I would like to force others to do the same which is why I am asking.









    share
























      0












      0








      0








      I need help interpreting the following 3 licenses in regards to distributing binaries (software/application not just the source code).



      • MIT https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT

      • Apache 2.0 https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0

      • GPLv3 https://opensource.org/licenses/GPL-3.0

      MIT license




      The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.




      What exactly is the software here? The source code is obvious because that is where the copyright notice would be and it clearly cannot be touched. But does it also have to be added to the user interface and displayed to the end users of the finished software?



      Apache 2.0 says




      4.1 You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and




      I interpret 4.1 as you must include the license but not the copyright notice?




      4.3 You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and




      I interpret 4.3 as you must include the copyright notice in the Source only. Not necessarily in the distributed Work like with the license in 4.1.



      Which of these 3 if any, requires a copyright notice to be available in the user interface to the end user?



      NOTE: I am asking because I need to pick a license for my project. I will of course attribute any library that I use. But I would like to force others to do the same which is why I am asking.









      share














      I need help interpreting the following 3 licenses in regards to distributing binaries (software/application not just the source code).



      • MIT https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT

      • Apache 2.0 https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0

      • GPLv3 https://opensource.org/licenses/GPL-3.0

      MIT license




      The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.




      What exactly is the software here? The source code is obvious because that is where the copyright notice would be and it clearly cannot be touched. But does it also have to be added to the user interface and displayed to the end users of the finished software?



      Apache 2.0 says




      4.1 You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and




      I interpret 4.1 as you must include the license but not the copyright notice?




      4.3 You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and




      I interpret 4.3 as you must include the copyright notice in the Source only. Not necessarily in the distributed Work like with the license in 4.1.



      Which of these 3 if any, requires a copyright notice to be available in the user interface to the end user?



      NOTE: I am asking because I need to pick a license for my project. I will of course attribute any library that I use. But I would like to force others to do the same which is why I am asking.







      open-source-software





      share












      share










      share



      share










      asked 6 mins ago









      J.A.PJ.A.P

      1085




      1085




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "617"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38849%2fmust-apache-2-0-mit-and-gplv3-be-attributed-in-a-distributed-binary%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38849%2fmust-apache-2-0-mit-and-gplv3-be-attributed-in-a-distributed-binary%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

          2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

          Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?