Why does the resolve message appear first? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Why is using “for…in” with array iteration a bad idea?How does JavaScript .prototype work?How do I make the first letter of a string uppercase in JavaScript?What does “use strict” do in JavaScript, and what is the reasoning behind it?What is JSONP, and why was it created?Why does Google prepend while(1); to their JSON responses?Why does ++[[]][+[]]+[+[]] return the string “10”?How does data binding work in AngularJS?How does Facebook disable the browser's integrated Developer Tools?ECMAScript 6 Chaining Promises

What font is "z" in "z-score"?

Why are the trig functions versine, haversine, exsecant, etc, rarely used in modern mathematics?

How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?

What does "lightly crushed" mean for cardamon pods?

Is CEO the profession with the most psychopaths?

What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?

What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?

Why didn't Eitri join the fight?

Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?

Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?

Why are both D and D# fitting into my E minor key?

Is grep documentation wrong?

An adverb for when you're not exaggerating

Maximum summed powersets with non-adjacent items

Uniqueness of spanning tree on a grid.

Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?

Irreducible of finite Krull dimension implies quasi-compact?

Fantasy story; one type of magic grows in power with use, but the more powerful they are, they more they are drawn to travel to their source

Can a party unilaterally change candidates in preparation for a General election?

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

Can you use the Shield Master feat to shove someone before you make an attack by using a Readied action?

Do square wave exist?



Why does the resolve message appear first?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Why is using “for…in” with array iteration a bad idea?How does JavaScript .prototype work?How do I make the first letter of a string uppercase in JavaScript?What does “use strict” do in JavaScript, and what is the reasoning behind it?What is JSONP, and why was it created?Why does Google prepend while(1); to their JSON responses?Why does ++[[]][+[]]+[+[]] return the string “10”?How does data binding work in AngularJS?How does Facebook disable the browser's integrated Developer Tools?ECMAScript 6 Chaining Promises



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








11















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"









share|improve this question



















  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    7 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    7 hours ago






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    7 hours ago






  • 4





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    7 hours ago

















11















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"









share|improve this question



















  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    7 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    7 hours ago






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    7 hours ago






  • 4





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    7 hours ago













11












11








11


3






I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"









share|improve this question
















I'm trying to wrap my mind around promises in JavaScript. I was under the illusion that once a Promise was resolved it could never go back to rejected. To test that I wrote a little script. I see that the first messages that come back are the resolve messages "1 resolve 2" etc. I expected the first message to be "0 reject 1".



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



at the console:



[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 9 resolve 2
[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 8 reject 1
< Promise status: "pending"


thanks for you help....



After reading



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise/then



I got to this code. The catch is removed.



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)


)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)



at the console:



[Log] 0 reject 1
[Log] 1 resolve 2
[Log] 2 reject 1
[Log] 3 resolve 2
[Log] 4 reject 1
[Log] 5 resolve 2
[Log] 6 reject 1
[Log] 7 resolve 2
[Log] 8 reject 1
[Log] 9 resolve 2
< Promise status: "pending"






javascript es6-promise






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 45 mins ago









Boann

37.5k1291123




37.5k1291123










asked 7 hours ago









EdwinEdwin

614




614







  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    7 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    7 hours ago






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    7 hours ago






  • 4





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    7 hours ago












  • 3





    You are creating new promise on every iteration

    – brk
    7 hours ago











  • You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

    – Kev
    7 hours ago






  • 5





    Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

    – junvar
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    Yes Junvar. That is my question.

    – Edwin
    7 hours ago






  • 4





    99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

    – jhpratt
    7 hours ago







3




3





You are creating new promise on every iteration

– brk
7 hours ago





You are creating new promise on every iteration

– brk
7 hours ago













You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

– Kev
7 hours ago





You have 10 promises, they don't "go back to rejected" like you said.

– Kev
7 hours ago




5




5





Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

– junvar
7 hours ago





Is your question why you see the resolved promises before the rejected? I.e. why is the output [1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8] instead of [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...]?

– junvar
7 hours ago




2




2





Yes Junvar. That is my question.

– Edwin
7 hours ago





Yes Junvar. That is my question.

– Edwin
7 hours ago




4




4





99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

– jhpratt
7 hours ago





99% sure it's because the .then and .catch each take a tick on the event loop. So the rejections are all a single tick behind your resolves.

– jhpratt
7 hours ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    6 hours ago


















2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    6 hours ago


















0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    6 hours ago


















0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)






share|improve this answer

























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    6 hours ago











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55734046%2fwhy-does-the-resolve-message-appear-first%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    6 hours ago















4














You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    6 hours ago













4












4








4







You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer













You can see what's going on under the hood by using your the console of your browser's dev tools and, possibly, setting break points (this articles might be helpful if u're using Chrome or Firefox):



enter image description here



As you can see, all your 10 promises are created before any of them are executed (resolve/reject).



Interestingly, in your code the resolved promises are handled first.



If you define the handlers in two separate definitions, you'll get the expected results:



p.then((message) => 
console.log(message)
)
p.catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)


Output:



enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









ludovicoludovico

875




875












  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    6 hours ago

















  • i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

    – Yanis-git
    6 hours ago
















i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

– Yanis-git
6 hours ago





i am so surprize by the conclusion of your answer. I never imagined than chain vs multiple instruction can have this huge impact. Really good sharing

– Yanis-git
6 hours ago













2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    6 hours ago















2














The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    6 hours ago













2












2








2







The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here






share|improve this answer













The point is, Promises are made to be used as Asynchronous calls, so when you execute your loop and for each iteration you creates a new promise, you are creating new instances, and each one of those can be executed in their own time.



But what this even means? The explanation is, when you create 10 new Promises in a loop, each promise will be executed in his own time and probablly will mess up with your promise solving order.



What you can do to solve it? You can use await command to wait each promise to solve, like the code bellow:



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>

let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

await p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
)



Or you could try use Promise.all() which will basically solve the order for you, see the official docs here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









Esdras XavierEsdras Xavier

45017




45017







  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    6 hours ago












  • 1





    well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

    – pushkin
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

    – Edwin
    6 hours ago







1




1





well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

– pushkin
6 hours ago





well, you can remove the .then if you're using await

– pushkin
6 hours ago




1




1





Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

– Edwin
6 hours ago





Yes I could use async-await; and do prefer that. It's that I want to get to understand the promise.

– Edwin
6 hours ago











0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    6 hours ago















0














Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer























  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    6 hours ago













0












0








0







Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






share|improve this answer













Because JavaScript are mono thread :



  • promise

  • eventListener

  • setTimeout

  • setInterval

previous listed method are not part of javascript enterpreter (V8 Engine for example), it delegate to the event loop which are part of browser or nodejs. more information here



Basically this code are delegate to 3th party (node, browser) which will decide himself when and on which order this collection of microtasks will be executed and return to the main thread.



is Why Following code :






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





will print "main thread" then "micro task thread" but you don't have any obvious delayed code. Is because all main thread function call will be execute before doing task on eventLoop.



Most of the time, event loop will execute the collection as first come first rendered.






 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');





 let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) => 
resolve('micro task thread');
);

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
).catch((message) =>
console.log(message)
);
console.log('main thread');






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









Yanis-gitYanis-git

2,6291725




2,6291725












  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    6 hours ago

















  • @Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

    – Yanis-git
    6 hours ago
















@Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

– Yanis-git
6 hours ago





@Edwin i have not understand what you try to say. Ludovico post interesting answer. And my answer contain, i think, some tips to understand how async traitment work under the hood.

– Yanis-git
6 hours ago











0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)






share|improve this answer

























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    6 hours ago















0














I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)






share|improve this answer

























  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    6 hours ago













0












0








0







I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)






share|improve this answer















I did found a solution here:
MDN promise then



for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) 
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject) =>
let a = 1 + (i % 2)

if (a === 2)
resolve(i + ' resolve ' + a)
else
reject(i + ' reject ' + a)

)

p.then((message) =>
console.log(message)
, failed =>
console.log(failed)
)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago









pushkin

4,726113055




4,726113055










answered 6 hours ago









EdwinEdwin

614




614












  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    6 hours ago

















  • I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

    – jhpratt
    6 hours ago
















I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

– jhpratt
6 hours ago





I will note that though this is absolutely valid, most developers will never wrote code like that (and some would probably be confused as to it's behavior).

– jhpratt
6 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55734046%2fwhy-does-the-resolve-message-appear-first%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?