Irreducibility of a simple polynomialShow $x^6 + 1.5x^5 + 3x - 4.5$ is irreducible in $mathbb Q[x]$.Determine whether the polynomial $x^2-12$ in $mathbb Z[x]$ satisfies an Eisenstein criterion for irreducibility over $mathbb Q$Proving Irreducibility of $x^4-16x^3+20x^2+12$ in $mathbb Q[x]$Constructibility of roots of a polynomialEisenstein's criterion for polynomials in Z mod pProving irreducibility; What is this method and what is the logic behind it?Irreducibility of special cyclotomic polynomial.Irreducibility of a Polynomial after a substitutionIrreducibility of Non-monic Quartic Polynomials in Q[x]Irreducible monic polynomial in $mathbbQ[x]$
Why did Kant, Hegel, and Adorno leave some words and phrases in the Greek alphabet?
Is exact Kanji stroke length important?
Displaying the order of the columns of a table
What will be the benefits of Brexit?
How can I replace every global instance of "x[2]" with "x_2"
Is a roofing delivery truck likely to crack my driveway slab?
Opposite of a diet
What is the oldest known work of fiction?
How do I rename a LINUX host without needing to reboot for the rename to take effect?
If a character can use a +X magic weapon as a spellcasting focus, does it add the bonus to spell attacks or spell save DCs?
How could Frankenstein get the parts for his _second_ creature?
Valid Badminton Score?
Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races
Unattended/Unattended to?
Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file
HashMap containsKey() returns false although hashCode() and equals() are true
Personal Teleportation as a Weapon
Modulo 2 binary long division in European notation
Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?
Print name if parameter passed to function
how to analyze "是其于主也至忠矣"
What are the ramifications of creating a homebrew world without an Astral Plane?
MaTeX, font size, and PlotLegends
Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?
Irreducibility of a simple polynomial
Show $x^6 + 1.5x^5 + 3x - 4.5$ is irreducible in $mathbb Q[x]$.Determine whether the polynomial $x^2-12$ in $mathbb Z[x]$ satisfies an Eisenstein criterion for irreducibility over $mathbb Q$Proving Irreducibility of $x^4-16x^3+20x^2+12$ in $mathbb Q[x]$Constructibility of roots of a polynomialEisenstein's criterion for polynomials in Z mod pProving irreducibility; What is this method and what is the logic behind it?Irreducibility of special cyclotomic polynomial.Irreducibility of a Polynomial after a substitutionIrreducibility of Non-monic Quartic Polynomials in Q[x]Irreducible monic polynomial in $mathbbQ[x]$
$begingroup$
For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbbQ$.
What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.
For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.
A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbbQ(sqrtai)$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.
abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbbQ$.
What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.
For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.
A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbbQ(sqrtai)$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.
abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbbQ$.
What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.
For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.
A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbbQ(sqrtai)$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.
abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials
$endgroup$
For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbbQ$.
What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.
For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.
A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbbQ(sqrtai)$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.
abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials
abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials
asked 1 hour ago
JonHalesJonHales
520311
520311
2
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:
$$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$
We need:
$$2a-b^2=0$$
$$b=sqrt2a$$
But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:
$$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$
Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
$$
x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt2ax)^2=
(x^2-sqrt2ax+a)(x^2+sqrt2ax+a)
$$
and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbbR$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbbQ[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbbQ$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163711%2firreducibility-of-a-simple-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:
$$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$
We need:
$$2a-b^2=0$$
$$b=sqrt2a$$
But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:
$$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$
Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:
$$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$
We need:
$$2a-b^2=0$$
$$b=sqrt2a$$
But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:
$$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$
Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:
$$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$
We need:
$$2a-b^2=0$$
$$b=sqrt2a$$
But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:
$$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$
Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:
$$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$
We need:
$$2a-b^2=0$$
$$b=sqrt2a$$
But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:
$$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$
Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
EurekaEureka
22611
22611
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
1 hour ago
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
$$
x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt2ax)^2=
(x^2-sqrt2ax+a)(x^2+sqrt2ax+a)
$$
and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbbR$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbbQ[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbbQ$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
$$
x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt2ax)^2=
(x^2-sqrt2ax+a)(x^2+sqrt2ax+a)
$$
and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbbR$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbbQ[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbbQ$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
$$
x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt2ax)^2=
(x^2-sqrt2ax+a)(x^2+sqrt2ax+a)
$$
and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbbR$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbbQ[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbbQ$.
$endgroup$
Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
$$
x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt2ax)^2=
(x^2-sqrt2ax+a)(x^2+sqrt2ax+a)
$$
and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbbR$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbbQ[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbbQ$.
answered 1 hour ago
egregegreg
185k1486206
185k1486206
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163711%2firreducibility-of-a-simple-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
1 hour ago