Logic or reasons for DA not bringing felony charges after an arrest warrant is issuedIs it unethical for a prosecutor not to try his hardest to get an indictment?
Multi tool use
Capacitor electron flow
Reasons for having MCU pin-states default to pull-up/down out of reset
Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?
Can you describe someone as luxurious? As in someone who likes luxurious things?
Error in master's thesis, I do not know what to do
Reason why a kingside attack is not justified
Derivative of an interpolated function
Travelling in US for more than 90 days
Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?
What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?
Interpretation of rotating a quantum state
"Oh no!" in Latin
Can a Knock spell open the door to Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?
How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?
A seasonal riddle
Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?
Offset in split text content
Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?
1 John in Luther’s Bibel
What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?
Output visual diagram of picture
Why would five hundred and five same as one?
Friend wants my recommendation but I don't want to give it to him
Air travel with refrigerated insulin
Logic or reasons for DA not bringing felony charges after an arrest warrant is issued
Is it unethical for a prosecutor not to try his hardest to get an indictment?
What might lead a district attorney to decide not to bring felony charges after an arrest warrant is issued? Are decisions not to press charges influenced by pending, unrelated felony charges in other counties - on the logic that the person will be behind bars soon anyway? Or is the decision to bring charges always based on the likelihood of the prosecution prevailing in court? Or is the decision based on other factors? (This question pertains to several counties in the state of Georgia, USA.)
prosecutorial-discretion
asked Feb 17 at 16:02
user3270user3270
316215
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 24 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
What might lead a district attorney to decide not to bring felony charges after an arrest warrant is issued? Are decisions not to press charges influenced by pending, unrelated felony charges in other counties - on the logic that the person will be behind bars soon anyway? Or is the decision to bring charges always based on the likelihood of the prosecution prevailing in court? Or is the decision based on other factors? (This question pertains to several counties in the state of Georgia, USA.)
prosecutorial-discretion
asked Feb 17 at 16:02
user3270user3270
316215
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 24 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
You've pretty much answered your own question. The only better answer you'll get is by directly asking the DA.
– BlueDogRanch
Feb 17 at 16:42
@BlueDogRanch Thank you for confirming my hunch.
– user3270
Feb 17 at 19:48
add a comment |
What might lead a district attorney to decide not to bring felony charges after an arrest warrant is issued? Are decisions not to press charges influenced by pending, unrelated felony charges in other counties - on the logic that the person will be behind bars soon anyway? Or is the decision to bring charges always based on the likelihood of the prosecution prevailing in court? Or is the decision based on other factors? (This question pertains to several counties in the state of Georgia, USA.)
prosecutorial-discretion
asked Feb 17 at 16:02
user3270user3270
316215
What might lead a district attorney to decide not to bring felony charges after an arrest warrant is issued? Are decisions not to press charges influenced by pending, unrelated felony charges in other counties - on the logic that the person will be behind bars soon anyway? Or is the decision to bring charges always based on the likelihood of the prosecution prevailing in court? Or is the decision based on other factors? (This question pertains to several counties in the state of Georgia, USA.)
prosecutorial-discretion
prosecutorial-discretion
asked Feb 17 at 16:02
user3270user3270
316215
asked Feb 17 at 16:02
user3270user3270
316215
edited Feb 17 at 16:23
user3270
asked Feb 17 at 16:02
user3270user3270
316215
asked Feb 17 at 16:02
user3270user3270
316215
asked Feb 17 at 16:02
user3270user3270
316215
316215
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 24 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 24 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
1
You've pretty much answered your own question. The only better answer you'll get is by directly asking the DA.
– BlueDogRanch
Feb 17 at 16:42
@BlueDogRanch Thank you for confirming my hunch.
– user3270
Feb 17 at 19:48
add a comment |
1
You've pretty much answered your own question. The only better answer you'll get is by directly asking the DA.
– BlueDogRanch
Feb 17 at 16:42
@BlueDogRanch Thank you for confirming my hunch.
– user3270
Feb 17 at 19:48
1
1
You've pretty much answered your own question. The only better answer you'll get is by directly asking the DA.
– BlueDogRanch
Feb 17 at 16:42
You've pretty much answered your own question. The only better answer you'll get is by directly asking the DA.
– BlueDogRanch
Feb 17 at 16:42
@BlueDogRanch Thank you for confirming my hunch.
– user3270
Feb 17 at 19:48
@BlueDogRanch Thank you for confirming my hunch.
– user3270
Feb 17 at 19:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
People who are given discretion about the exercise of executive power (like DAs, police, Executive Officers, the President etc.) may exercise it in any manner they see fit subject to a very short list of constraints which include:
- the exercise of discretion must be within the limits of their legal power.
- the must consider the things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider. For example, if the law requires consideration of the prospect of success then they have to consider that and if it prohibits considering race or gender then they can't consider race or gender.
- they must (in common law jurisdictions) consider the merits of the particular case before them. That is, they cannot follow 'blanket' rules. Recent decisions in the Constitutional Court of Indonesia indicates that this may not be the case in civil law jurisdictions - the President had indicated that he would not commute death sentences of any drug offenders irrespective of the merits of the particular case and the court upheld this exercise of discretion. This would not be a proper exercise of discretion in the US or other common law jurisdictions - discretion must be exercised case by case.
- they must exercise discretion in an unbiased and impartial manner.
- they can't act corruptly.
If a court is approached for a Writ of Mandamus it will consider if discretion has been properly exercised and if so, it will refuse the application. If not, it will issue the writ which will require the official to properly exercise their discretion - it won't take that discretion away from them (unless they were corrupt etc. - even then, they will usually refer it to a different decision maker).
answered Feb 18 at 0:04
Dale MDale M
55.4k23579
What terms should I search on to find "things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider" in Georgia law? I little web search found just this: "Article 16 - Discretionary nature of criminal prosecution: When making a decision to initiate or terminate a criminal prosecution, a prosecutor shall exercise discretionary powers and take into consideration the public interests." (source: matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/download/90034/64/en/pdf )
– user3270
Feb 18 at 14:20
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37319%2flogic-or-reasons-for-da-not-bringing-felony-charges-after-an-arrest-warrant-is-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
People who are given discretion about the exercise of executive power (like DAs, police, Executive Officers, the President etc.) may exercise it in any manner they see fit subject to a very short list of constraints which include:
- the exercise of discretion must be within the limits of their legal power.
- the must consider the things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider. For example, if the law requires consideration of the prospect of success then they have to consider that and if it prohibits considering race or gender then they can't consider race or gender.
- they must (in common law jurisdictions) consider the merits of the particular case before them. That is, they cannot follow 'blanket' rules. Recent decisions in the Constitutional Court of Indonesia indicates that this may not be the case in civil law jurisdictions - the President had indicated that he would not commute death sentences of any drug offenders irrespective of the merits of the particular case and the court upheld this exercise of discretion. This would not be a proper exercise of discretion in the US or other common law jurisdictions - discretion must be exercised case by case.
- they must exercise discretion in an unbiased and impartial manner.
- they can't act corruptly.
If a court is approached for a Writ of Mandamus it will consider if discretion has been properly exercised and if so, it will refuse the application. If not, it will issue the writ which will require the official to properly exercise their discretion - it won't take that discretion away from them (unless they were corrupt etc. - even then, they will usually refer it to a different decision maker).
answered Feb 18 at 0:04
Dale MDale M
55.4k23579
What terms should I search on to find "things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider" in Georgia law? I little web search found just this: "Article 16 - Discretionary nature of criminal prosecution: When making a decision to initiate or terminate a criminal prosecution, a prosecutor shall exercise discretionary powers and take into consideration the public interests." (source: matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/download/90034/64/en/pdf )
– user3270
Feb 18 at 14:20
add a comment |
People who are given discretion about the exercise of executive power (like DAs, police, Executive Officers, the President etc.) may exercise it in any manner they see fit subject to a very short list of constraints which include:
- the exercise of discretion must be within the limits of their legal power.
- the must consider the things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider. For example, if the law requires consideration of the prospect of success then they have to consider that and if it prohibits considering race or gender then they can't consider race or gender.
- they must (in common law jurisdictions) consider the merits of the particular case before them. That is, they cannot follow 'blanket' rules. Recent decisions in the Constitutional Court of Indonesia indicates that this may not be the case in civil law jurisdictions - the President had indicated that he would not commute death sentences of any drug offenders irrespective of the merits of the particular case and the court upheld this exercise of discretion. This would not be a proper exercise of discretion in the US or other common law jurisdictions - discretion must be exercised case by case.
- they must exercise discretion in an unbiased and impartial manner.
- they can't act corruptly.
If a court is approached for a Writ of Mandamus it will consider if discretion has been properly exercised and if so, it will refuse the application. If not, it will issue the writ which will require the official to properly exercise their discretion - it won't take that discretion away from them (unless they were corrupt etc. - even then, they will usually refer it to a different decision maker).
answered Feb 18 at 0:04
Dale MDale M
55.4k23579
What terms should I search on to find "things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider" in Georgia law? I little web search found just this: "Article 16 - Discretionary nature of criminal prosecution: When making a decision to initiate or terminate a criminal prosecution, a prosecutor shall exercise discretionary powers and take into consideration the public interests." (source: matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/download/90034/64/en/pdf )
– user3270
Feb 18 at 14:20
add a comment |
People who are given discretion about the exercise of executive power (like DAs, police, Executive Officers, the President etc.) may exercise it in any manner they see fit subject to a very short list of constraints which include:
- the exercise of discretion must be within the limits of their legal power.
- the must consider the things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider. For example, if the law requires consideration of the prospect of success then they have to consider that and if it prohibits considering race or gender then they can't consider race or gender.
- they must (in common law jurisdictions) consider the merits of the particular case before them. That is, they cannot follow 'blanket' rules. Recent decisions in the Constitutional Court of Indonesia indicates that this may not be the case in civil law jurisdictions - the President had indicated that he would not commute death sentences of any drug offenders irrespective of the merits of the particular case and the court upheld this exercise of discretion. This would not be a proper exercise of discretion in the US or other common law jurisdictions - discretion must be exercised case by case.
- they must exercise discretion in an unbiased and impartial manner.
- they can't act corruptly.
If a court is approached for a Writ of Mandamus it will consider if discretion has been properly exercised and if so, it will refuse the application. If not, it will issue the writ which will require the official to properly exercise their discretion - it won't take that discretion away from them (unless they were corrupt etc. - even then, they will usually refer it to a different decision maker).
answered Feb 18 at 0:04
Dale MDale M
55.4k23579
People who are given discretion about the exercise of executive power (like DAs, police, Executive Officers, the President etc.) may exercise it in any manner they see fit subject to a very short list of constraints which include:
- the exercise of discretion must be within the limits of their legal power.
- the must consider the things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider. For example, if the law requires consideration of the prospect of success then they have to consider that and if it prohibits considering race or gender then they can't consider race or gender.
- they must (in common law jurisdictions) consider the merits of the particular case before them. That is, they cannot follow 'blanket' rules. Recent decisions in the Constitutional Court of Indonesia indicates that this may not be the case in civil law jurisdictions - the President had indicated that he would not commute death sentences of any drug offenders irrespective of the merits of the particular case and the court upheld this exercise of discretion. This would not be a proper exercise of discretion in the US or other common law jurisdictions - discretion must be exercised case by case.
- they must exercise discretion in an unbiased and impartial manner.
- they can't act corruptly.
If a court is approached for a Writ of Mandamus it will consider if discretion has been properly exercised and if so, it will refuse the application. If not, it will issue the writ which will require the official to properly exercise their discretion - it won't take that discretion away from them (unless they were corrupt etc. - even then, they will usually refer it to a different decision maker).
answered Feb 18 at 0:04
Dale MDale M
55.4k23579
answered Feb 18 at 0:04
Dale MDale M
55.4k23579
answered Feb 18 at 0:04
Dale MDale M
55.4k23579
answered Feb 18 at 0:04
Dale MDale M
55.4k23579
55.4k23579
What terms should I search on to find "things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider" in Georgia law? I little web search found just this: "Article 16 - Discretionary nature of criminal prosecution: When making a decision to initiate or terminate a criminal prosecution, a prosecutor shall exercise discretionary powers and take into consideration the public interests." (source: matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/download/90034/64/en/pdf )
– user3270
Feb 18 at 14:20
add a comment |
What terms should I search on to find "things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider" in Georgia law? I little web search found just this: "Article 16 - Discretionary nature of criminal prosecution: When making a decision to initiate or terminate a criminal prosecution, a prosecutor shall exercise discretionary powers and take into consideration the public interests." (source: matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/download/90034/64/en/pdf )
– user3270
Feb 18 at 14:20
What terms should I search on to find "things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider" in Georgia law? I little web search found just this: "Article 16 - Discretionary nature of criminal prosecution: When making a decision to initiate or terminate a criminal prosecution, a prosecutor shall exercise discretionary powers and take into consideration the public interests." (source: matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/download/90034/64/en/pdf )
– user3270
Feb 18 at 14:20
What terms should I search on to find "things they are required by law to consider and must not consider the things they are required by law not to consider" in Georgia law? I little web search found just this: "Article 16 - Discretionary nature of criminal prosecution: When making a decision to initiate or terminate a criminal prosecution, a prosecutor shall exercise discretionary powers and take into consideration the public interests." (source: matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/download/90034/64/en/pdf )
– user3270
Feb 18 at 14:20
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37319%2flogic-or-reasons-for-da-not-bringing-felony-charges-after-an-arrest-warrant-is-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Y0CWMoXDvXC2vb4EzF9dEqAaOrBrnBc9,fWFbv Z49FY5,mMHq7t9uDBuyWFfnf
1
You've pretty much answered your own question. The only better answer you'll get is by directly asking the DA.
– BlueDogRanch
Feb 17 at 16:42
@BlueDogRanch Thank you for confirming my hunch.
– user3270
Feb 17 at 19:48