Drawing without replacement: why is the order of draw irrelevant? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)A question regarding drawing balls of differing colors from an urn before a certain number of draws occur without replacement.3 balls drawn from 1 urn - probability all same color (with/without replacement)Probability without replacement questionsBalls with and without replacementPicking balls blindfolded without replacementProbability of drawing balls without replacement in first and last drawAre expectation of with replacement and without replacement same? When?Choosing one type of ball without replacement.Drawing 4 balls from an urn without replacement and a bonus ballDrawing Balls Without Replacement
Performance gap between bool std:vector and array
What is the topology associated with the algebras for the ultrafilter monad?
How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?
What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?
A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way
Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?
Did Deadpool rescue all of the X-Force?
How to tell that you are a giant?
Should I follow up with an employee I believe overracted to a mistake I made?
Drawing without replacement: why is the order of draw irrelevant?
Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?
Selecting user stories during sprint planning
What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?
What was the first language to use conditional keywords?
Can a new player join a group only when a new campaign starts?
Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items
Dating a Former Employee
Chebyshev inequality in terms of RMS
How to write the following sign?
AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network
How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?
Multiple OR (||) Conditions in If Statement
Localisation of Category
Why is Nikon 1.4g better when Nikon 1.8g is sharper?
Drawing without replacement: why is the order of draw irrelevant?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)A question regarding drawing balls of differing colors from an urn before a certain number of draws occur without replacement.3 balls drawn from 1 urn - probability all same color (with/without replacement)Probability without replacement questionsBalls with and without replacementPicking balls blindfolded without replacementProbability of drawing balls without replacement in first and last drawAre expectation of with replacement and without replacement same? When?Choosing one type of ball without replacement.Drawing 4 balls from an urn without replacement and a bonus ballDrawing Balls Without Replacement
$begingroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=fracbinom62binom43binom105=frac521$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac610$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac59$ for red and $frac49$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac69$ for red and $frac39$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=fracbinom62binom43binom105=frac521$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac610$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac59$ for red and $frac49$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac69$ for red and $frac39$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=fracbinom62binom43binom105=frac521$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac610$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac59$ for red and $frac49$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac69$ for red and $frac39$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
I am trying to wrap my head around this problem:
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $6$ red and $4$ green. What is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $3$ green if balls are drawn without replacement.
What I remember from my college days that the probability is found by this formula:
$$P(A)=fracbinom62binom43binom105=frac521$$
Is this correct? I am trying to understand why this works. Wouldn't probability depend on the order of balls drawn as the number of balls is changing after each draw? I get how we obtain numerator and denominator, I just feel that the probability should be dependent on the order. For example, the probability to pick red first is $frac610$ so the probability for the second draw becomes $frac59$ for red and $frac49$ for green. But if the first picked ball is green, the probability for the second draw becomes $frac69$ for red and $frac39$ for green. What am I missing?
probability probability-theory
probability probability-theory
edited 12 mins ago
JeffC
1053
1053
asked 10 hours ago
VasyaVasya
4,5441619
4,5441619
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
8 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $colorred2$ out of $colorred6$ red balls: $colorredbinom62$
- all possible selections of $colorgreen3$ out of $colorgreen4$ green balls: $colorgreenbinom43$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $colorred2+colorgreen3$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43 cdot 5!10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6 = fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43frac10!5!cdot 5!= frac521$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac610 cdot frac49 $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac410 cdot frac69 $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac4!2!cdot 2!=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$colorgreengcolorgreengcolorredrcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorgreengcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorgreengcolorgreengcolorredr, colorredrcolorgreengcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorredrcolorgreengcolorgreeng$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12 quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12=frac35=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $fracbinom32cdot binom22binom54=frac3cdot 15=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac610$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac610$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 10$
So the equation is $frac610 = frac5 9 frac610+frac 6 9 frac 4 10=frac30+249*10 = frac549*10=frac9*69*10=frac 6 10$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192310%2fdrawing-without-replacement-why-is-the-order-of-draw-irrelevant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $colorred2$ out of $colorred6$ red balls: $colorredbinom62$
- all possible selections of $colorgreen3$ out of $colorgreen4$ green balls: $colorgreenbinom43$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $colorred2+colorgreen3$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43 cdot 5!10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6 = fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43frac10!5!cdot 5!= frac521$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $colorred2$ out of $colorred6$ red balls: $colorredbinom62$
- all possible selections of $colorgreen3$ out of $colorgreen4$ green balls: $colorgreenbinom43$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $colorred2+colorgreen3$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43 cdot 5!10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6 = fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43frac10!5!cdot 5!= frac521$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $colorred2$ out of $colorred6$ red balls: $colorredbinom62$
- all possible selections of $colorgreen3$ out of $colorgreen4$ green balls: $colorgreenbinom43$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $colorred2+colorgreen3$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43 cdot 5!10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6 = fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43frac10!5!cdot 5!= frac521$$
$endgroup$
If you took into consideration the order, you would get the same result but the calculation would be a bit more difficult:
- all possible sequences of $5$ balls respecting order (as if they were distinguishable): $10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6$
- all possible selections of $colorred2$ out of $colorred6$ red balls: $colorredbinom62$
- all possible selections of $colorgreen3$ out of $colorgreen4$ green balls: $colorgreenbinom43$
- all possible arrangements of the selected $colorred2+colorgreen3$ balls: $5!$
All together
$$fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43 cdot 5!10cdot 9cdot 8cdot 7 cdot 6 = fraccolorredbinom62cdot colorgreenbinom43frac10!5!cdot 5!= frac521$$
answered 10 hours ago
trancelocationtrancelocation
14.5k1929
14.5k1929
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac610 cdot frac49 $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac410 cdot frac69 $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac610 cdot frac49 $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac410 cdot frac69 $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac610 cdot frac49 $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac410 cdot frac69 $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
$endgroup$
The probability of picking a red ball first and then a green ball is
$$ frac610 cdot frac49 $$
The probability of picking a green ball first and then a red ball is
$$ frac410 cdot frac69 $$
Notice that the numbers in the denominator are the same, while the numbers in
the numerator are the same but in reverse order? Multiplication is commutative.
Another way of looking at this: we don't care about the process you go through in picking the balls, as long as it is fair: each possible outcome (i.e. each possible subset of
$5$ of the $10$ balls, where we consider the balls as in principle distinguishable) has the same probability. If this is the case, you just need to count the number of
outcomes that belong to the event you're considering, and divide by the total number of
outcomes.
answered 10 hours ago
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
332k23222481
332k23222481
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you for the explanation, as I started writing it down I came to the same conclusion but it's very helpful to see the problem from a different perspective!
$endgroup$
– Vasya
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac4!2!cdot 2!=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$colorgreengcolorgreengcolorredrcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorgreengcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorgreengcolorgreengcolorredr, colorredrcolorgreengcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorredrcolorgreengcolorgreeng$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12 quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12=frac35=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $fracbinom32cdot binom22binom54=frac3cdot 15=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac4!2!cdot 2!=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$colorgreengcolorgreengcolorredrcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorgreengcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorgreengcolorgreengcolorredr, colorredrcolorgreengcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorredrcolorgreengcolorgreeng$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12 quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12=frac35=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $fracbinom32cdot binom22binom54=frac3cdot 15=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac4!2!cdot 2!=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$colorgreengcolorgreengcolorredrcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorgreengcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorgreengcolorgreengcolorredr, colorredrcolorgreengcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorredrcolorgreengcolorgreeng$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12 quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12=frac35=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $fracbinom32cdot binom22binom54=frac3cdot 15=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
$endgroup$
You can comprehend the calculation in a simpler way with smaller numbers.
Daniel randomly chooses balls from the group of $3$ red and $2$ green. What
is the probability that he picks $2$ red and $2$ green if balls are drawn
without replacement.
Indeed we have to regard the order. There are $frac4!2!cdot 2!=6$ ways to draw 2 red and 2 green balls:
$$colorgreengcolorgreengcolorredrcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorgreengcolorredr, colorgreengcolorredrcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorgreengcolorgreengcolorredr, colorredrcolorgreengcolorredrcolorgreeng, colorredrcolorredrcolorgreengcolorgreeng$$
Each way has the same probability: $frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12 quad (ggrr)$
Multiplying with 6 (ways) we get $6cdot frac35cdot frac24cdot frac23cdot frac12=frac35=0.6 $
Using binomial coefficients we get $fracbinom32cdot binom22binom54=frac3cdot 15=frac35=0.6$
And we get the same result.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
callculuscallculus
18.8k31528
18.8k31528
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac610$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac610$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 10$
So the equation is $frac610 = frac5 9 frac610+frac 6 9 frac 4 10=frac30+249*10 = frac549*10=frac9*69*10=frac 6 10$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac610$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac610$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 10$
So the equation is $frac610 = frac5 9 frac610+frac 6 9 frac 4 10=frac30+249*10 = frac549*10=frac9*69*10=frac 6 10$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac610$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac610$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 10$
So the equation is $frac610 = frac5 9 frac610+frac 6 9 frac 4 10=frac30+249*10 = frac549*10=frac9*69*10=frac 6 10$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
$endgroup$
There is a principle called "conservation of expected evidence" that says that if you have events A and B, then when you calculate the probability of A without knowing whether B happens, the result should be the same as the expected value of the probability over the possible results of B.
In this case, let A be the probability that the second ball is red, and B be the probability the first one is green. The principle says that P(A) = P(A|B)P(B)+P(A|~B)P(~B). That is, if you split A into two cases of A and B versus A and not B, the total probability should just be the probability of A. If you roll a die and flip a coin, the probability of getting a 1 one the die should change if you split it into P(die=1,coin=heads) plus P(die=1,coin=tails).
We have the following values for those probabilities:
P(A) = $frac610$
P(A|B) = $frac5 9 $
P(B) = $frac610$
P(A|~B) = $frac 6 9 $
P(~B) = $frac 4 10$
So the equation is $frac610 = frac5 9 frac610+frac 6 9 frac 4 10=frac30+249*10 = frac549*10=frac9*69*10=frac 6 10$
If you have ten cards, 6 red and 4 green, and you shuffle them, would the probability of the first one being red be any different from the probability of the second one being red?
answered 7 hours ago
AcccumulationAcccumulation
7,3232619
7,3232619
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192310%2fdrawing-without-replacement-why-is-the-order-of-draw-irrelevant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Usually the "nominator" is called numerator.
$endgroup$
– callculus
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@callculus: yes, of, course, I need coffee :)
$endgroup$
– Vasya
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The order doesn't matter because $P(A)$ is ultimately the sum of various conditional probabilities, and addition is both commutative and associative.
$endgroup$
– chepner
8 hours ago