What is the topology associated with the algebras for the ultrafilter monad? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is the algebra map of the ultrafilter monad continuous?Is there a way to make tangent bundle a monad?Coproducts and pushouts of Boolean algebras and Heyting algebrasProof of theorems in the field of banach-and $c^*$-algebras in a categorial languageEpimorphisms of locally compact spacesThis is just the Eilenberg-Moore category, right?Which spaces can be used as “test spaces” for the Stone-Čech compactification?What is the opposite category of $operatornameTop$?Finitely presentable objects and the Kleisli categoryultrafilter convergence versus non-standard topologyMorita theory for algebras for a monad $T$
How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?
How does the math work when buying airline miles?
Do any jurisdictions seriously consider reclassifying social media websites as publishers?
Should I follow up with an employee I believe overracted to a mistake I made?
A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way
Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?
Is there a kind of relay only consumes power when switching?
Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours
Did Deadpool rescue all of the X-Force?
Most bit efficient text communication method?
Localisation of Category
Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items
Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?
Take 2! Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?
Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?
Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?
SF book about people trapped in a series of worlds they imagine
What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?
Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?
What is this clumpy 20-30cm high yellow-flowered plant?
How would a mousetrap for use in space work?
Why is my ESD wriststrap failing with nitrile gloves on?
How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?
Did Krishna say in Bhagavad Gita "I am in every living being"
What is the topology associated with the algebras for the ultrafilter monad?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is the algebra map of the ultrafilter monad continuous?Is there a way to make tangent bundle a monad?Coproducts and pushouts of Boolean algebras and Heyting algebrasProof of theorems in the field of banach-and $c^*$-algebras in a categorial languageEpimorphisms of locally compact spacesThis is just the Eilenberg-Moore category, right?Which spaces can be used as “test spaces” for the Stone-Čech compactification?What is the opposite category of $operatornameTop$?Finitely presentable objects and the Kleisli categoryultrafilter convergence versus non-standard topologyMorita theory for algebras for a monad $T$
$begingroup$
It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.
I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.
general-topology category-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.
I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.
general-topology category-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.
I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.
general-topology category-theory
$endgroup$
It is easy to find references stating that the category of compact Hausdorff spaces $mathbfCompHaus$ is equivalent to the category of algebras for the ultrafilter monad, $mathbfbeta Alg$. After doing some digging, the $mathbfCompHausto mathbfbeta Alg$ half of the equivalence is simple enough, but I haven't been able to find a description of the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of this equivalence. I have tried to work it out, but I have little experience with topological spaces and am not sure what the associated topology ought to look like.
I'm wondering if anyone has a good reference that describes the $mathbfbeta Algto mathbfCompHaus$ half of the equivalence, or can describe it here.
general-topology category-theory
general-topology category-theory
asked 3 hours ago
Malice VidrineMalice Vidrine
6,34121123
6,34121123
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.
Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Malice Vidrine
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.
Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.
It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.
In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.
So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)
Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$
Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.
Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192728%2fwhat-is-the-topology-associated-with-the-algebras-for-the-ultrafilter-monad%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.
Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Malice Vidrine
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.
Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Malice Vidrine
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.
Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.
$endgroup$
The other half of the equivalence is described on the nLab page on ultrafilters.
Given an algebra structure $xicolon beta X to X$, we define the topology on $X$ by declaring that a subset $Usubseteq X$ is open if and only if for every point $xin U$ and every ultrafilter $Fin beta X$ such that $xi(F) = x$, we have $Uin F$.
answered 3 hours ago
Alex KruckmanAlex Kruckman
28.8k32758
28.8k32758
$begingroup$
Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Malice Vidrine
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Malice Vidrine
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Malice Vidrine
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Of course I looked at precisely the wrong nLab pages to answer my question :P Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Malice Vidrine
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.
Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.
It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.
In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.
So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)
Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$
Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.
Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.
Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.
It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.
In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.
So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)
Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$
Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.
Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.
Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.
It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.
In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.
So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)
Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$
Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.
Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.
$endgroup$
The idea is simple: in a topological space $X$, a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters. That is, $A$ is closed iff for any ultrafilter $F$ supported on $A$ (i.e., $Ain F$), all limits of $F$ are in $A$.
Now suppose we are given a $beta$-algebra $L:beta Xto X$. The idea is that $L$ takes each ultrafilter to its limit. So, a subset $Asubseteq X$ should be closed iff it is closed under limits of ultrafilters according to $L$: that iff $L(F)in A$ for all $Finbeta X$ such that $Ain F$. Or, restating this contrapositively in terms of open sets, a set $U$ is open iff for all $Finbeta X$, $L(F)in U$ implies $Uin F$.
It is easy to verify that this does define a topology on $X$, and that every ultrafilter $F$ converges to $L(F)$ with respect to this topology (it is essentially by definition the finest topology such that this is true). Verifying that $L(F)$ is the unique limit of $F$ (and therefore the topology is compact Hausdorff since each ultrafilter has a unique limit) is trickier and requires you to use the associativity and unit properties of $L$ as a $beta$-algebra.
In detail, first let $Asubseteq X$ and define $$C(A)=L(F):Finbeta X,Ain F.$$ I claim that $C(A)$ is closed. Suppose $Finbeta X$ and $C(A)in F$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $L^-1(B)$ for $Bin F$ together with $Ginbeta X:Ain G$; these have the finite intersection property since every $Bin F$ has nonempty intersection with $C(A)$. Let $mathcalG$ be an ultrafilter on $beta X$ extending $mathcalF$ (so $mathcalGinbetabeta X$). We now use the associativity property of $L$, which says that $$L(lim mathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))$$ where $lim:betabeta Xto beta X$ is the structure map of the monad $beta$ at $X$. Explicitly, $limmathcalG$ is defined as the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $Ginbeta X:Bin Gin mathcalG$. In particular, by our choice of $mathcalG$, we have $AinlimmathcalG$. On the other hand, $beta L(mathcalG)$ is by definition the set of $Bsubseteq X$ such that $L^-1(B)inmathcalG$, and so $Fsubseteq beta L(mathcalG)$. Since $F$ is an ultrafilter, this means $beta L(mathcalG)=F$. We thus conclude that $$L(limmathcalG)=L(F)$$ where $AinlimmathcalG$, and thus $L(F)in C(A)$.
So, for any $Asubseteq X$, $C(A)$ is closed. Note also that $Asubseteq C(A)$ by the unit property of $beta$: $L$ sends each principal ultrafilter to the corresponding point. (It follows easily that in fact $C(A)$ is the closure of $A$, though we will not use this.)
Now let $Finbeta X$ and $xin X$ and suppose $F$ converges to $x$ in our topology; we will show that $x=L(F)$. Since $F$ converges to $x$, every closed set in $F$ contains $x$. Thus for all $Ain F$, $xin C(A)$, since $C(A)$ is a closed set and $C(A)in F$ since $Asubseteq C(A)$. Let $mathcalF$ be the filter on $beta X$ generated by the sets $T_A=Ginbeta X:L(G)=x,Ain G$ for $Ain F$; they have the finite intersection property since $T_Acap T_B=T_Acap B$ and $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$. Extend $mathcalF$ to an ultrafilter $mathcalG$ on $beta X$. Similar to the argument above, we then have $F=limmathcalG$ and $xin beta L(mathcalG)$ so $beta L(mathcalG)$ is the principal ultrafilter at $x$. By the associativity and unit properties of $L$, we thus have $$L(F)=L(limmathcalG)=L(beta L(mathcalG))=x.$$
Morally, what is going on in these arguments is that the associativity property of $L$ says that $L$ is "continuous" from the standard topology on $beta X$ to $X$ (see this answer of mine for some elaboration on that idea). So, to prove that $C(A)$ is closed, if we have a net in $C(A)$ converging to a point $x$, we can choose ultrafilters supported on $A$ which $L$ maps to each point of this net. Then if we take an appropriate accumulation point of these ultrafilters as points of $beta X$, $L$ will map this accumulation point to $x$ by continuity. This will then give an ultrafilter which is supported on $A$ (because it is a limit of ultrafilters supported on $A$) which $L$ maps to $x$, to prove that $xin C(A)$.
Then, if $F$ converges to $x$, we have $xin C(A)$ for all $Ain F$, so we can pick ultrafilters $G$ with $L(G)=x$ which are supported on arbitrarily small elements of $F$. These ultrafilters then converge in $beta X$ too $F$, and so continuity of $L$ says $L(F)=x$ as well.
edited 45 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Eric WofseyEric Wofsey
193k14221352
193k14221352
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3192728%2fwhat-is-the-topology-associated-with-the-algebras-for-the-ultrafilter-monad%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown