How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How to address an Oxford/Cambridge full-time lecurer who is not a Ph.D.?Job applications reviewed “until the position is filled” (i.e. soft deadline): What does that really mean?Would it be acceptable to report a professor for poor teaching / attitude in a Masters graduate course?How to screen out candidates for faculty jobs who don't know the subjectIs it possible to get a PhD position in the USA without applying to a PhD program?I'm 2 months into my PhD. When can I ask my supervisor about the rejected candidates?How should one proceed when they receive no job offers after a considerable amount of applications?Addressing a faculty member I interviewedHow to respond when rejected with encouragement to apply again, when hiring committee says position is always open?
Is it dangerous to install hacking tools on my private linux machine?
What does Turing mean by this statement?
How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?
Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines
Tannaka duality for semisimple groups
If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?
Monty Hall Problem-Probability Paradox
Moving a wrapfig vertically to encroach partially on a subsection title
Project Euler #1 in C++
Why not send Voyager 3 and 4 following up the paths taken by Voyager 1 and 2 to re-transmit signals of later as they fly away from Earth?
License to disallow distribution in closed source software, but allow exceptions made by owner?
Are the endpoints of the domain of a function counted as critical points?
How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?
Test print coming out spongy
Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?
How can I save and copy a screenhot at the same time?
Can you force honesty by using the Speak with Dead and Zone of Truth spells together?
Co-worker has annoying ringtone
Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?
RSA find public exponent
How many time has Arya actually used Needle?
Getting out of while loop on console
How to write capital alpha?
AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network
How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How to address an Oxford/Cambridge full-time lecurer who is not a Ph.D.?Job applications reviewed “until the position is filled” (i.e. soft deadline): What does that really mean?Would it be acceptable to report a professor for poor teaching / attitude in a Masters graduate course?How to screen out candidates for faculty jobs who don't know the subjectIs it possible to get a PhD position in the USA without applying to a PhD program?I'm 2 months into my PhD. When can I ask my supervisor about the rejected candidates?How should one proceed when they receive no job offers after a considerable amount of applications?Addressing a faculty member I interviewedHow to respond when rejected with encouragement to apply again, when hiring committee says position is always open?
My department has a number of courses we need covered by adjuncts in the next academic year. We were given permission to hire one (and only one) salaried adjunct and to cover the rest of the courses with per-course adjuncts. Salaried adjuncts receive benefits and are better paid than per-course adjuncts.
We received excellent candidates for the salaried position, only one of whom we can hire. After we close the search, (how) can I approach rejected candidates about teaching individual courses at the lower rate? Some career adjuncts have told me it would be offensive to offer a lower-paying and lower-status position to someone who applied for a better one, and I do not wish to offend anyone.
While the salaried position was publicly advertised, our institution does not advertise single courses. Furthermore, most of the candidates who applied for our salaried position were invited to by committee members or by our contacts, not because they were looking at ads.
How can I get the best outcome for our students and for teachers who would be willing to teach individual courses? I will continue to ask the administration for permission to hire a second salaried adjunct but do not expect to receive it. There is not much time to wait before starting our per-course search, as the current academic year is nearing its end (and our administration moves very slowly).
etiquette job-search adjunct-faculty
add a comment |
My department has a number of courses we need covered by adjuncts in the next academic year. We were given permission to hire one (and only one) salaried adjunct and to cover the rest of the courses with per-course adjuncts. Salaried adjuncts receive benefits and are better paid than per-course adjuncts.
We received excellent candidates for the salaried position, only one of whom we can hire. After we close the search, (how) can I approach rejected candidates about teaching individual courses at the lower rate? Some career adjuncts have told me it would be offensive to offer a lower-paying and lower-status position to someone who applied for a better one, and I do not wish to offend anyone.
While the salaried position was publicly advertised, our institution does not advertise single courses. Furthermore, most of the candidates who applied for our salaried position were invited to by committee members or by our contacts, not because they were looking at ads.
How can I get the best outcome for our students and for teachers who would be willing to teach individual courses? I will continue to ask the administration for permission to hire a second salaried adjunct but do not expect to receive it. There is not much time to wait before starting our per-course search, as the current academic year is nearing its end (and our administration moves very slowly).
etiquette job-search adjunct-faculty
2
Just confirming what you apparently already know: this is a somewhat ugly situation... If that's any comfort. That is, your perceptions are not "off"... and, yes, it's an exploitative situation. Sorry...
– paul garrett
2 hours ago
add a comment |
My department has a number of courses we need covered by adjuncts in the next academic year. We were given permission to hire one (and only one) salaried adjunct and to cover the rest of the courses with per-course adjuncts. Salaried adjuncts receive benefits and are better paid than per-course adjuncts.
We received excellent candidates for the salaried position, only one of whom we can hire. After we close the search, (how) can I approach rejected candidates about teaching individual courses at the lower rate? Some career adjuncts have told me it would be offensive to offer a lower-paying and lower-status position to someone who applied for a better one, and I do not wish to offend anyone.
While the salaried position was publicly advertised, our institution does not advertise single courses. Furthermore, most of the candidates who applied for our salaried position were invited to by committee members or by our contacts, not because they were looking at ads.
How can I get the best outcome for our students and for teachers who would be willing to teach individual courses? I will continue to ask the administration for permission to hire a second salaried adjunct but do not expect to receive it. There is not much time to wait before starting our per-course search, as the current academic year is nearing its end (and our administration moves very slowly).
etiquette job-search adjunct-faculty
My department has a number of courses we need covered by adjuncts in the next academic year. We were given permission to hire one (and only one) salaried adjunct and to cover the rest of the courses with per-course adjuncts. Salaried adjuncts receive benefits and are better paid than per-course adjuncts.
We received excellent candidates for the salaried position, only one of whom we can hire. After we close the search, (how) can I approach rejected candidates about teaching individual courses at the lower rate? Some career adjuncts have told me it would be offensive to offer a lower-paying and lower-status position to someone who applied for a better one, and I do not wish to offend anyone.
While the salaried position was publicly advertised, our institution does not advertise single courses. Furthermore, most of the candidates who applied for our salaried position were invited to by committee members or by our contacts, not because they were looking at ads.
How can I get the best outcome for our students and for teachers who would be willing to teach individual courses? I will continue to ask the administration for permission to hire a second salaried adjunct but do not expect to receive it. There is not much time to wait before starting our per-course search, as the current academic year is nearing its end (and our administration moves very slowly).
etiquette job-search adjunct-faculty
etiquette job-search adjunct-faculty
asked 3 hours ago
Embarrassed tenured professorEmbarrassed tenured professor
32317
32317
2
Just confirming what you apparently already know: this is a somewhat ugly situation... If that's any comfort. That is, your perceptions are not "off"... and, yes, it's an exploitative situation. Sorry...
– paul garrett
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Just confirming what you apparently already know: this is a somewhat ugly situation... If that's any comfort. That is, your perceptions are not "off"... and, yes, it's an exploitative situation. Sorry...
– paul garrett
2 hours ago
2
2
Just confirming what you apparently already know: this is a somewhat ugly situation... If that's any comfort. That is, your perceptions are not "off"... and, yes, it's an exploitative situation. Sorry...
– paul garrett
2 hours ago
Just confirming what you apparently already know: this is a somewhat ugly situation... If that's any comfort. That is, your perceptions are not "off"... and, yes, it's an exploitative situation. Sorry...
– paul garrett
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Don't ask them. It's a smack in the face. Advertise the position in the same place you advertised the salaried one; they will see it if they are still looking, and apply if they feel they need to.
2
Agree. Please don't ask me to do the job for less money and no security. Ugh.
– Buffy
1 hour ago
2
The question specifically says that unsalaried courses are not advertised, and that most of the applicants for the salaried ones were personally invited to apply.
– cag51
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Ask them. What other option do you have? Not asking them I guess, but then you're making the decision for them. Personally, I can't imagine being offended if you explain it the way you did above. That said, I do agree that most candidates will react the same way other answerers have ("no freaking way!") -- all the more so because they were personally recruited for a permanent, salaried position.
The only caveat I can think of is to have a firm offer for a specific course rather than just "inviting them to apply" for the lesser position. If possible, personalized mails or phone calls tend to be better received than form letters.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128439%2fhow-to-ask-rejected-full-time-candidates-to-apply-to-teach-individual-courses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Don't ask them. It's a smack in the face. Advertise the position in the same place you advertised the salaried one; they will see it if they are still looking, and apply if they feel they need to.
2
Agree. Please don't ask me to do the job for less money and no security. Ugh.
– Buffy
1 hour ago
2
The question specifically says that unsalaried courses are not advertised, and that most of the applicants for the salaried ones were personally invited to apply.
– cag51
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Don't ask them. It's a smack in the face. Advertise the position in the same place you advertised the salaried one; they will see it if they are still looking, and apply if they feel they need to.
2
Agree. Please don't ask me to do the job for less money and no security. Ugh.
– Buffy
1 hour ago
2
The question specifically says that unsalaried courses are not advertised, and that most of the applicants for the salaried ones were personally invited to apply.
– cag51
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Don't ask them. It's a smack in the face. Advertise the position in the same place you advertised the salaried one; they will see it if they are still looking, and apply if they feel they need to.
Don't ask them. It's a smack in the face. Advertise the position in the same place you advertised the salaried one; they will see it if they are still looking, and apply if they feel they need to.
answered 1 hour ago
Morgan RodgersMorgan Rodgers
3,97211629
3,97211629
2
Agree. Please don't ask me to do the job for less money and no security. Ugh.
– Buffy
1 hour ago
2
The question specifically says that unsalaried courses are not advertised, and that most of the applicants for the salaried ones were personally invited to apply.
– cag51
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2
Agree. Please don't ask me to do the job for less money and no security. Ugh.
– Buffy
1 hour ago
2
The question specifically says that unsalaried courses are not advertised, and that most of the applicants for the salaried ones were personally invited to apply.
– cag51
1 hour ago
2
2
Agree. Please don't ask me to do the job for less money and no security. Ugh.
– Buffy
1 hour ago
Agree. Please don't ask me to do the job for less money and no security. Ugh.
– Buffy
1 hour ago
2
2
The question specifically says that unsalaried courses are not advertised, and that most of the applicants for the salaried ones were personally invited to apply.
– cag51
1 hour ago
The question specifically says that unsalaried courses are not advertised, and that most of the applicants for the salaried ones were personally invited to apply.
– cag51
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Ask them. What other option do you have? Not asking them I guess, but then you're making the decision for them. Personally, I can't imagine being offended if you explain it the way you did above. That said, I do agree that most candidates will react the same way other answerers have ("no freaking way!") -- all the more so because they were personally recruited for a permanent, salaried position.
The only caveat I can think of is to have a firm offer for a specific course rather than just "inviting them to apply" for the lesser position. If possible, personalized mails or phone calls tend to be better received than form letters.
add a comment |
Ask them. What other option do you have? Not asking them I guess, but then you're making the decision for them. Personally, I can't imagine being offended if you explain it the way you did above. That said, I do agree that most candidates will react the same way other answerers have ("no freaking way!") -- all the more so because they were personally recruited for a permanent, salaried position.
The only caveat I can think of is to have a firm offer for a specific course rather than just "inviting them to apply" for the lesser position. If possible, personalized mails or phone calls tend to be better received than form letters.
add a comment |
Ask them. What other option do you have? Not asking them I guess, but then you're making the decision for them. Personally, I can't imagine being offended if you explain it the way you did above. That said, I do agree that most candidates will react the same way other answerers have ("no freaking way!") -- all the more so because they were personally recruited for a permanent, salaried position.
The only caveat I can think of is to have a firm offer for a specific course rather than just "inviting them to apply" for the lesser position. If possible, personalized mails or phone calls tend to be better received than form letters.
Ask them. What other option do you have? Not asking them I guess, but then you're making the decision for them. Personally, I can't imagine being offended if you explain it the way you did above. That said, I do agree that most candidates will react the same way other answerers have ("no freaking way!") -- all the more so because they were personally recruited for a permanent, salaried position.
The only caveat I can think of is to have a firm offer for a specific course rather than just "inviting them to apply" for the lesser position. If possible, personalized mails or phone calls tend to be better received than form letters.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
cag51cag51
18.7k93970
18.7k93970
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128439%2fhow-to-ask-rejected-full-time-candidates-to-apply-to-teach-individual-courses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Just confirming what you apparently already know: this is a somewhat ugly situation... If that's any comfort. That is, your perceptions are not "off"... and, yes, it's an exploitative situation. Sorry...
– paul garrett
2 hours ago