Is this homebrew Wind Wave spell balanced?Is Thunderwave centered on the caster?Spell Area of Effect RangeDoes forced movement, as in Thunderwave, necessarily break a grapple?Does Thunderwave's push effect knock away incoming spells/projectiles?Is this homebrew sword of wind control based on “Grasscutter” overpowered?Is this Library-encounter balanced?Stampede: How does this custom spell compare to Cloudkill, another 5th level spell?Is there a reason this homebrew spell wouldn't work with the Attack action?Is this homebrew Spiritual Shield spell balanced?Is this homebrew Elementalist Fighter class balanced?
What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?
A Paper Record is What I Hamper
Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?
Implications of cigar-shaped bodies having rings?
Partitioning the Reals into two Locally Uncountable, Dense Sets
How to not starve gigantic beasts
Providing evidence of Consent of Parents for Marriage by minor in England in early 1800s?
Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?
What term is being referred to with "reflected-sound-of-underground-spirits"?
Aliens crash on Earth and go into stasis to wait for technology to fix their ship
Apply MapThread to all but one variable
Minor Revision with suggestion of an alternative proof by reviewer
Pre-plastic human skin alternative
How to limit Drive Letters Windows assigns to new removable USB drives
Does Gita support doctrine of eternal samsara?
A Note on N!
Re-entry to Germany after vacation using blue card
How to have a sharp product image?
Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?
Mistake in years of experience in resume?
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
What is causing the white spot to appear in some of my pictures
"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?
Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?
Is this homebrew Wind Wave spell balanced?
Is Thunderwave centered on the caster?Spell Area of Effect RangeDoes forced movement, as in Thunderwave, necessarily break a grapple?Does Thunderwave's push effect knock away incoming spells/projectiles?Is this homebrew sword of wind control based on “Grasscutter” overpowered?Is this Library-encounter balanced?Stampede: How does this custom spell compare to Cloudkill, another 5th level spell?Is there a reason this homebrew spell wouldn't work with the Attack action?Is this homebrew Spiritual Shield spell balanced?Is this homebrew Elementalist Fighter class balanced?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Is this homebrew spell balanced?
Wind Wave
1st-level evocation
Casting Time: 1 action
Range: Self (15-foot cone)
Components: V, S
Duration: Instantaneous
A wave of powerful air sweeps out from you. Each creature in a 15-foot cone originating from you must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 2d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away from you if a creature fails the save by 5 or more they are knocked prone.
On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn't pushed.
In addition, unsecured objects that are completely within the area of effect are automatically pushed 10 feet away from you by the spell's effect.
At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d8 for each slot level above 1st.
dnd-5e spells homebrew balance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is this homebrew spell balanced?
Wind Wave
1st-level evocation
Casting Time: 1 action
Range: Self (15-foot cone)
Components: V, S
Duration: Instantaneous
A wave of powerful air sweeps out from you. Each creature in a 15-foot cone originating from you must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 2d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away from you if a creature fails the save by 5 or more they are knocked prone.
On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn't pushed.
In addition, unsecured objects that are completely within the area of effect are automatically pushed 10 feet away from you by the spell's effect.
At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d8 for each slot level above 1st.
dnd-5e spells homebrew balance
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is this homebrew spell balanced?
Wind Wave
1st-level evocation
Casting Time: 1 action
Range: Self (15-foot cone)
Components: V, S
Duration: Instantaneous
A wave of powerful air sweeps out from you. Each creature in a 15-foot cone originating from you must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 2d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away from you if a creature fails the save by 5 or more they are knocked prone.
On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn't pushed.
In addition, unsecured objects that are completely within the area of effect are automatically pushed 10 feet away from you by the spell's effect.
At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d8 for each slot level above 1st.
dnd-5e spells homebrew balance
$endgroup$
Is this homebrew spell balanced?
Wind Wave
1st-level evocation
Casting Time: 1 action
Range: Self (15-foot cone)
Components: V, S
Duration: Instantaneous
A wave of powerful air sweeps out from you. Each creature in a 15-foot cone originating from you must make a Strength saving throw. On a failed save, a creature takes 2d8 bludgeoning damage and is pushed 10 feet away from you if a creature fails the save by 5 or more they are knocked prone.
On a successful save, the creature takes half as much damage and isn't pushed.
In addition, unsecured objects that are completely within the area of effect are automatically pushed 10 feet away from you by the spell's effect.
At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd level or higher, the damage increases by 1d8 for each slot level above 1st.
dnd-5e spells homebrew balance
dnd-5e spells homebrew balance
edited 3 hours ago
V2Blast
28.1k5101171
28.1k5101171
asked 3 hours ago
Josiah RigganJosiah Riggan
1,064124
1,064124
1
$begingroup$
What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Pretty darn close!
First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.
The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."
I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.
The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.
The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.
This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.
The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146976%2fis-this-homebrew-wind-wave-spell-balanced%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Pretty darn close!
First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.
The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."
I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pretty darn close!
First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.
The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."
I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pretty darn close!
First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.
The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."
I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!
$endgroup$
Pretty darn close!
First of all, I like this spell. It's a nice combination of damage, battlefield control, and defense. It also is mechanically similar to two existing first level spells: Thunderwave and Burning Hands. And in most ways, it's analogous to them in power and effectiveness.
The one issue I see a potential problem with is the ability to knock multiple enemies prone. If you pull this off and several of your allies have turns before your enemies, you're guaranteeing advantage on melee attacks. That's a bit powerful for a first level spell that also does damage, especially considering the fact that some very common low level enemies that group together (e.g. goblins, kobolds) tend to have abysmal strength scores. Add this to the fact that neither Thunderwave nor Burning Hands create analogous status effects, and you've got a spell that's got a bit too much "bang for your buck."
I'd suggest that the "prone" element be given as part of the upcasting. Specifically, if this spell is cast with a 3rd level spell slot or higher, then creatures that fail the saving throw are also knocked prone (in addition to the increase in damage). At that point, I think this spell will be ready to go!
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
GandalfmeansmeGandalfmeansme
24.6k589143
24.6k589143
$begingroup$
I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
I think the prone effect is even more powerful when considering that the most appealing targets for this spell are flying creatures (which tend to have low strength scores) since going prone may also cause them to take falling damage.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.
The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.
The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.
This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.
The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.
The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.
The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.
This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.
The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.
The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.
The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.
This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.
The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.
$endgroup$
This is imbalanced, by the simple virtue of being an objectively better version of thunderwave.
The saving throw targets Strength rather than Constitution, a much rarer saving throw.
The damage type is magical bludgeoning, which almost nothing is resistant to, as opposed to thunder, which is still one of the more rarely resisted energy types, but nowhere close to as rarely resisted as magical bludgeoning.
This has the additional effect of knocking prone creatures who fail their save by 5 or more.
The only difference that isn't definitively superior to thunderwave is that the range is a 15-foot cone rather than a 15-foot cube. This has benefits and drawbacks, and would normally make this an interesting alternative to thunderwave, but with everything else this spell has going for it there's no reason to ever use thunderwave.
answered 1 hour ago
MinimanMiniman
115k29525715
115k29525715
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146976%2fis-this-homebrew-wind-wave-spell-balanced%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
What is the spell level, casting time, components, and duration? (I assume the range is "Self (15-foot cone)".) Oh, and I guess the school of magic too, in terms of its interactions with class features - and what classes' spell lists would it be on?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
3 hours ago