If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?Is giving one side advantage always equivalent to giving disadvantage to the opponent?What is your chance to win in a contest where you have advantage and your opponent has disadvantage?Does advantage negate disadvantage (for things such as sneak attack)?Adding Precision Strike to an attack with advantageWhen does a hidden opponent that is attacking become visible?If you are grappled by a creature with 10'+ reach, can you make a ranged attack without disadvantage?Fighting in darkness spell. How does it work?When does a hidden opponent that is moving become visible?What issues could arise with this Advantage/Disadvantage Variant?Why is the wording different between Inquisitive and Swashbuckler Rogues' Sneak Attack-related subclass features?

What would happen if the UK refused to take part in EU Parliamentary elections?

voltage of sounds of mp3files

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?

when is out of tune ok?

Using parameter substitution on a Bash array

Can criminal fraud exist without damages?

How does it work when somebody invests in my business?

Generic lambda vs generic function give different behaviour

Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm

Your magic is very sketchy

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing

Mapping a list into a phase plot

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

How was Earth single-handedly capable of creating 3 of the 4 gods of chaos?

If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?

Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races

Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?

Everything Bob says is false. How does he get people to trust him?

Lay out the Carpet

Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?

Greatest common substring

Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?

Minimal reference content

Displaying the order of the columns of a table



If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?


Is giving one side advantage always equivalent to giving disadvantage to the opponent?What is your chance to win in a contest where you have advantage and your opponent has disadvantage?Does advantage negate disadvantage (for things such as sneak attack)?Adding Precision Strike to an attack with advantageWhen does a hidden opponent that is attacking become visible?If you are grappled by a creature with 10'+ reach, can you make a ranged attack without disadvantage?Fighting in darkness spell. How does it work?When does a hidden opponent that is moving become visible?What issues could arise with this Advantage/Disadvantage Variant?Why is the wording different between Inquisitive and Swashbuckler Rogues' Sneak Attack-related subclass features?













2












$begingroup$


Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
    $endgroup$
    – Smart_TJ
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    52 mins ago
















2












$begingroup$


Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
    $endgroup$
    – Smart_TJ
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    52 mins ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Quick and to the point, I'm aware that if you make an attack (which a grapple is) against an opponent you are hidden from you gain advantage, but since a grapple also is a contest roll, does the opponent also roll at disadvantage?







dnd-5e grapple stealth advantage-and-disadvantage






share|improve this question









New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 45 mins ago









V2Blast

25.6k488158




25.6k488158






New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









Gavin DavisGavin Davis

111




111




New contributor




Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Gavin Davis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
    $endgroup$
    – Smart_TJ
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    52 mins ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
    $endgroup$
    – Smart_TJ
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    52 mins ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
$endgroup$
– Smart_TJ
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Where are you getting the idea that it would get disadvantage?
$endgroup$
– Smart_TJ
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
52 mins ago





$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. How are you hiding from a creature that you are in grappling range of?
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
52 mins ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage



The rule for Unseen Attackers states:




When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.




The rules for Grappling state:




Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll




What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.




That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:




The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    No.



    If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):




    When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




    And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):




    When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.




    However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):




    ...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).




    Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.



    Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.



    In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      There's no rule that says you do



      Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.




      When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




      You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...



      Your DM may rule you do



      From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:




      The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.




      This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.



      At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "122"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144002%2fif-you-attempt-to-grapple-an-opponent-that-you-are-hidden-from-do-they-roll-at%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        6












        $begingroup$

        Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage



        The rule for Unseen Attackers states:




        When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.




        The rules for Grappling state:




        Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll




        What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.




        That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:




        The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$

















          6












          $begingroup$

          Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage



          The rule for Unseen Attackers states:




          When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.




          The rules for Grappling state:




          Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll




          What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.




          That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:




          The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















            6












            6








            6





            $begingroup$

            Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage



            The rule for Unseen Attackers states:




            When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.




            The rules for Grappling state:




            Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll




            What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.




            That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:




            The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Unless a DM determines otherwise, you do not get advantage and the opponent does not get disadvantage



            The rule for Unseen Attackers states:




            When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on Attack rolls against it.




            The rules for Grappling state:




            Using at least one free hand, you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an Attack roll




            What this means is that, by making a grapple attempt instead of a melee attack, you do not get advantage nor does your opponent have disadvantage because the rules for Unseen Attackers does not convey any sort of penalty to a creature making ability checks against unseen attackers.




            That said, as Linksassin points out a DM is always free to use the general rule for disadvantage/advantage to impart one or both of these to the grapple participants:




            The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.








            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 44 mins ago









            V2Blast

            25.6k488158




            25.6k488158










            answered 1 hour ago









            RykaraRykara

            4,7011040




            4,7011040























                2












                $begingroup$

                No.



                If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):




                When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):




                When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.




                However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):




                ...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).




                Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.



                Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.



                In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  No.



                  If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):




                  When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                  And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):




                  When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.




                  However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):




                  ...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).




                  Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.



                  Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.



                  In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    No.



                    If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):




                    When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                    And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):




                    When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.




                    However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):




                    ...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).




                    Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.



                    Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.



                    In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    No.



                    If you are hidden from your target when you attack it using the Attack action, you indeed have advantage on an attack roll (see Unseen Attackers and Targets):




                    When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                    And a grapple is indeed a special attack made using the Attack action (see Grappling):




                    When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple.




                    However, grappling doesn't actually involve an attack roll (same section as above):




                    ...you try to seize the target by making a grapple check instead of an attack roll: a Strength (Athletics) check contested by the target's Strength (Athletics) or Dexterity (Acrobatics) check (the target chooses the ability to use).




                    Since it's not an attack roll, you don't have advantage on it due to being hidden.



                    Furthermore, there's nothing in the rules to suggest that being hidden applies advantage or disadvantage to any ability check. The fact that an attack roll made from hiding normally has advantage does not imply that an ability check made from hiding would be made with advantage, nor that it would confer disadvantage on the ability check made by an opponent in a contest.



                    In addition, there is no general rule that if you have advantage in some scenario then your opponent automatically has disadvantage in the reverse scenario. For example, there's no rule to suggest that if you have advantage on an ability check then your opponent has disadvantage. There are some specific rules that work in this way (for example, if you are invisible and your opponent is not then your attacks are at advantage and theirs are at disadvantage), but in such cases the dichotomy is explicitly stated in the rules.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 44 mins ago









                    V2Blast

                    25.6k488158




                    25.6k488158










                    answered 1 hour ago









                    BloodcinderBloodcinder

                    23k382140




                    23k382140





















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        There's no rule that says you do



                        Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.




                        When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                        You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...



                        Your DM may rule you do



                        From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:




                        The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.




                        This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.



                        At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          There's no rule that says you do



                          Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.




                          When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                          You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...



                          Your DM may rule you do



                          From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:




                          The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.




                          This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.



                          At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            There's no rule that says you do



                            Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.




                            When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                            You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...



                            Your DM may rule you do



                            From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:




                            The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.




                            This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.



                            At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            There's no rule that says you do



                            Rykara and Bloodcinder's excellent answers do a good job of explaining that there is no explicit rule that grant advantage or imposes disadvantage when the grappler is unseen.




                            When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




                            You gain advantage on attack rolls, that's it. However...



                            Your DM may rule you do



                            From the general rules on advantage/disadvantage we have the following:




                            The GM can also decide that circumstances influence a roll in one direction or the other and grant advantage or impose disadvantage as a result.




                            This is a final catch-all, DM-knows-best rule that is designed for situations like this where the rules don't quite cover it. Your DM may choose to rule that you have advantage on your check, or the target has disadvantage. I wouldn't suggest applying both as this would be too strong.



                            At my table I rule that the target has disadvantage on their check as they were unprepared for it. This only applies to the initial grapple attempt however and attempts to break free are made as normal. This has never caused an issue (not that it has come up that often) and makes the players feel rewarded for intelligent play.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 1 hour ago









                            linksassinlinksassin

                            8,92212967




                            8,92212967




















                                Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Gavin Davis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144002%2fif-you-attempt-to-grapple-an-opponent-that-you-are-hidden-from-do-they-roll-at%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

                                2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

                                Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?