Is there a measurement for the vocal speed of a song?How should I control my voice while rapping?What is Tempo (Speed): Moderate 4What is the term for a song without a tempo?How to calculate the tempo of a song in numbers and find the Italian terms?Is there a tradeoff between vocal flexibility and safety?What is the vocal technique for Adrien's (Northlane) Low Scream?How to turn a vocal song into sheet musicWhat is the term for multiple simultaneous vocal lines?How long does a sound take that corresponds to a note at a certain tempo? What notations / conventions do influence it in detail?Converting Vocal Line into Guitar - Speed, Dynamics

What is difference between behavior and behaviour

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

Where in the Bible does the greeting ("Dominus Vobiscum") used at Mass come from?

Modify casing of marked letters

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

Trouble understanding overseas colleagues

MaTeX, font size, and PlotLegends

Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

Cynical novel that describes an America ruled by the media, arms manufacturers, and ethnic figureheads

Your magic is very sketchy

How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?

Valid Badminton Score?

Mapping a list into a phase plot

Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?

Why are on-board computers allowed to change controls without notifying the pilots?

Is there a measurement for the vocal speed of a song?

Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle

Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?

Is it correct to write "is not focus on"?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users



Is there a measurement for the vocal speed of a song?


How should I control my voice while rapping?What is Tempo (Speed): Moderate 4What is the term for a song without a tempo?How to calculate the tempo of a song in numbers and find the Italian terms?Is there a tradeoff between vocal flexibility and safety?What is the vocal technique for Adrien's (Northlane) Low Scream?How to turn a vocal song into sheet musicWhat is the term for multiple simultaneous vocal lines?How long does a sound take that corresponds to a note at a certain tempo? What notations / conventions do influence it in detail?Converting Vocal Line into Guitar - Speed, Dynamics













2















I'm trying to find a way to measure the speed of a song from the perspective of singing/rapping. So far all I can find is BPM (beats per minute), however there are at least 2 issues with that:



  • The BPM number depends on which beats are counted, quite often a website will report twice the BPM that I measure by myself.

  • The BPM is not always related to the vocal speed. For example, "Thoughts Of A Dying Atheist" by Muse has 179 BPM but the singing part is quite slow, while "Break Ya Neck" by Busta Rhymes has only 83 BPM, but a... neck-breaking rapping speed.

Is there a more accurate measurement for the vocal speed? I'm thinking something along the lines of (continuous) syllables per minute, excluding the instrumental parts.










share|improve this question







New contributor




aditsu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • part 1) perhaps you are miscounting beats. part 2) vocal speed does not have bpm

    – Doktor Mayhem
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoktorMayhem 1) perhaps I am, perhaps the person who published the number on the website is; 2) that's my point, how to measure it?

    – aditsu
    7 hours ago











  • By the way, sometimes different websites show different numbers for the same song (usually one is double the other, but not always)

    – aditsu
    7 hours ago











  • Syllables/second? Words/min? Notes/second?

    – user45266
    6 hours ago















2















I'm trying to find a way to measure the speed of a song from the perspective of singing/rapping. So far all I can find is BPM (beats per minute), however there are at least 2 issues with that:



  • The BPM number depends on which beats are counted, quite often a website will report twice the BPM that I measure by myself.

  • The BPM is not always related to the vocal speed. For example, "Thoughts Of A Dying Atheist" by Muse has 179 BPM but the singing part is quite slow, while "Break Ya Neck" by Busta Rhymes has only 83 BPM, but a... neck-breaking rapping speed.

Is there a more accurate measurement for the vocal speed? I'm thinking something along the lines of (continuous) syllables per minute, excluding the instrumental parts.










share|improve this question







New contributor




aditsu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • part 1) perhaps you are miscounting beats. part 2) vocal speed does not have bpm

    – Doktor Mayhem
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoktorMayhem 1) perhaps I am, perhaps the person who published the number on the website is; 2) that's my point, how to measure it?

    – aditsu
    7 hours ago











  • By the way, sometimes different websites show different numbers for the same song (usually one is double the other, but not always)

    – aditsu
    7 hours ago











  • Syllables/second? Words/min? Notes/second?

    – user45266
    6 hours ago













2












2








2








I'm trying to find a way to measure the speed of a song from the perspective of singing/rapping. So far all I can find is BPM (beats per minute), however there are at least 2 issues with that:



  • The BPM number depends on which beats are counted, quite often a website will report twice the BPM that I measure by myself.

  • The BPM is not always related to the vocal speed. For example, "Thoughts Of A Dying Atheist" by Muse has 179 BPM but the singing part is quite slow, while "Break Ya Neck" by Busta Rhymes has only 83 BPM, but a... neck-breaking rapping speed.

Is there a more accurate measurement for the vocal speed? I'm thinking something along the lines of (continuous) syllables per minute, excluding the instrumental parts.










share|improve this question







New contributor




aditsu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I'm trying to find a way to measure the speed of a song from the perspective of singing/rapping. So far all I can find is BPM (beats per minute), however there are at least 2 issues with that:



  • The BPM number depends on which beats are counted, quite often a website will report twice the BPM that I measure by myself.

  • The BPM is not always related to the vocal speed. For example, "Thoughts Of A Dying Atheist" by Muse has 179 BPM but the singing part is quite slow, while "Break Ya Neck" by Busta Rhymes has only 83 BPM, but a... neck-breaking rapping speed.

Is there a more accurate measurement for the vocal speed? I'm thinking something along the lines of (continuous) syllables per minute, excluding the instrumental parts.







voice tempo






share|improve this question







New contributor




aditsu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




aditsu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




aditsu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









aditsuaditsu

1142




1142




New contributor




aditsu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





aditsu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






aditsu is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • part 1) perhaps you are miscounting beats. part 2) vocal speed does not have bpm

    – Doktor Mayhem
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoktorMayhem 1) perhaps I am, perhaps the person who published the number on the website is; 2) that's my point, how to measure it?

    – aditsu
    7 hours ago











  • By the way, sometimes different websites show different numbers for the same song (usually one is double the other, but not always)

    – aditsu
    7 hours ago











  • Syllables/second? Words/min? Notes/second?

    – user45266
    6 hours ago

















  • part 1) perhaps you are miscounting beats. part 2) vocal speed does not have bpm

    – Doktor Mayhem
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @DoktorMayhem 1) perhaps I am, perhaps the person who published the number on the website is; 2) that's my point, how to measure it?

    – aditsu
    7 hours ago











  • By the way, sometimes different websites show different numbers for the same song (usually one is double the other, but not always)

    – aditsu
    7 hours ago











  • Syllables/second? Words/min? Notes/second?

    – user45266
    6 hours ago
















part 1) perhaps you are miscounting beats. part 2) vocal speed does not have bpm

– Doktor Mayhem
7 hours ago





part 1) perhaps you are miscounting beats. part 2) vocal speed does not have bpm

– Doktor Mayhem
7 hours ago




1




1





@DoktorMayhem 1) perhaps I am, perhaps the person who published the number on the website is; 2) that's my point, how to measure it?

– aditsu
7 hours ago





@DoktorMayhem 1) perhaps I am, perhaps the person who published the number on the website is; 2) that's my point, how to measure it?

– aditsu
7 hours ago













By the way, sometimes different websites show different numbers for the same song (usually one is double the other, but not always)

– aditsu
7 hours ago





By the way, sometimes different websites show different numbers for the same song (usually one is double the other, but not always)

– aditsu
7 hours ago













Syllables/second? Words/min? Notes/second?

– user45266
6 hours ago





Syllables/second? Words/min? Notes/second?

– user45266
6 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5














There is the concept (not specific to music) of Speech Tempo. As you will see from the article, there is some degree of discussion about how this should be measured - for example, words per minute, syllables per second, or sounds per second. One could imagine even deeper levels of granularity - such as the inclusion of changes in pitch or timbre as sound 'features'.



Within rap music, it's common to measure rap performances in terms of syllables per second - such performances have been noted in the Guinness book of Records.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Interesting, it's hard to decide how to split things up, and the wide variety of singing styles makes that even trickier. I'm thinking about the ending of "Don't Cry" by Guns N' Roses for example, first the "Don't you ever cry-y-yy-i-i" then the famous endless "toniiiiiii...."

    – aditsu
    33 mins ago






  • 1





    I think syllables per second (or minute) can be a good reference though, for most songs. I wish it was more common to measure that too, not just the BPM.

    – aditsu
    26 mins ago











  • @aditsu -- the musical phrases played instruments frequently pass by more quickly than the BPM would indicate, i.e. as streams of eighth notes, sixteenth notes, or whatever. Voice is really just another musical instrument, and the same thing happens with the phrasing of lyrics. Why doesn't musical notation suffice for you? BPM only indicates something about the pulse of the music; staff notation shows you more about how the music is phrased. Yet nobody counts the equivalent of syllables per second for saxophone solos....

    – David Bowling
    18 mins ago


















2














I humbly propose "maximum notes/second": Take the fastest part of the song and calculate the number of notes in that amount of time. If you have a passage that is super-fast in one part but really slow in another, it's way more important to know that you need to be able to rap/sing/play at that fastest part's speed to play the whole song. Compare the intro of Eminem's "Rap God" to the fast part. Obviously, to tackle that song, one needs to be able to rap as fast as the fastest part, not just the average of the whole song.



Disclaimer: No one uses this, because I made it up. I think it's way more useful than average notes/second.






share|improve this answer























  • That's a good point, and could make it easier to measure. I think the average is also relevant, and the fastest part should probably have a minimum length (e.g. at least 5 seconds).

    – aditsu
    1 hour ago


















0














I don't think there's a useful single value that you can use to summarise a song like this. Instead, it's probably most useful to consider a combination of the BPM, the length of rhythmic subdivisions, and distribution of rhythms. For example, Break Ya Neck has a BPM of 166*, and semiquaver/quaver (16th note/8th note) rhythms sustained over the period of several bars. In comparison Thoughts Of A Dying Atheist is 179 BPM but the rhythms are mainly a mixture of crotchets (quarter notes) and longer notes, with no consecutive passages of 8th notes.



*I know you said 83 in your question but I think 166 is more accurate. When/why BPM values can vary by a factor of two would be a good topic for another question!






share|improve this answer























  • Funny, I actually looked it up, and multiple sources said 83, and my own count also confirmed that. But I also see how it can be counted as 166. Anyway, I hope you get my main point: some songs have lower BPM but faster lyrics/vocals.

    – aditsu
    15 mins ago










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






aditsu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81981%2fis-there-a-measurement-for-the-vocal-speed-of-a-song%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














There is the concept (not specific to music) of Speech Tempo. As you will see from the article, there is some degree of discussion about how this should be measured - for example, words per minute, syllables per second, or sounds per second. One could imagine even deeper levels of granularity - such as the inclusion of changes in pitch or timbre as sound 'features'.



Within rap music, it's common to measure rap performances in terms of syllables per second - such performances have been noted in the Guinness book of Records.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Interesting, it's hard to decide how to split things up, and the wide variety of singing styles makes that even trickier. I'm thinking about the ending of "Don't Cry" by Guns N' Roses for example, first the "Don't you ever cry-y-yy-i-i" then the famous endless "toniiiiiii...."

    – aditsu
    33 mins ago






  • 1





    I think syllables per second (or minute) can be a good reference though, for most songs. I wish it was more common to measure that too, not just the BPM.

    – aditsu
    26 mins ago











  • @aditsu -- the musical phrases played instruments frequently pass by more quickly than the BPM would indicate, i.e. as streams of eighth notes, sixteenth notes, or whatever. Voice is really just another musical instrument, and the same thing happens with the phrasing of lyrics. Why doesn't musical notation suffice for you? BPM only indicates something about the pulse of the music; staff notation shows you more about how the music is phrased. Yet nobody counts the equivalent of syllables per second for saxophone solos....

    – David Bowling
    18 mins ago















5














There is the concept (not specific to music) of Speech Tempo. As you will see from the article, there is some degree of discussion about how this should be measured - for example, words per minute, syllables per second, or sounds per second. One could imagine even deeper levels of granularity - such as the inclusion of changes in pitch or timbre as sound 'features'.



Within rap music, it's common to measure rap performances in terms of syllables per second - such performances have been noted in the Guinness book of Records.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Interesting, it's hard to decide how to split things up, and the wide variety of singing styles makes that even trickier. I'm thinking about the ending of "Don't Cry" by Guns N' Roses for example, first the "Don't you ever cry-y-yy-i-i" then the famous endless "toniiiiiii...."

    – aditsu
    33 mins ago






  • 1





    I think syllables per second (or minute) can be a good reference though, for most songs. I wish it was more common to measure that too, not just the BPM.

    – aditsu
    26 mins ago











  • @aditsu -- the musical phrases played instruments frequently pass by more quickly than the BPM would indicate, i.e. as streams of eighth notes, sixteenth notes, or whatever. Voice is really just another musical instrument, and the same thing happens with the phrasing of lyrics. Why doesn't musical notation suffice for you? BPM only indicates something about the pulse of the music; staff notation shows you more about how the music is phrased. Yet nobody counts the equivalent of syllables per second for saxophone solos....

    – David Bowling
    18 mins ago













5












5








5







There is the concept (not specific to music) of Speech Tempo. As you will see from the article, there is some degree of discussion about how this should be measured - for example, words per minute, syllables per second, or sounds per second. One could imagine even deeper levels of granularity - such as the inclusion of changes in pitch or timbre as sound 'features'.



Within rap music, it's common to measure rap performances in terms of syllables per second - such performances have been noted in the Guinness book of Records.






share|improve this answer













There is the concept (not specific to music) of Speech Tempo. As you will see from the article, there is some degree of discussion about how this should be measured - for example, words per minute, syllables per second, or sounds per second. One could imagine even deeper levels of granularity - such as the inclusion of changes in pitch or timbre as sound 'features'.



Within rap music, it's common to measure rap performances in terms of syllables per second - such performances have been noted in the Guinness book of Records.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









topo mortotopo morto

26.6k246105




26.6k246105







  • 1





    Interesting, it's hard to decide how to split things up, and the wide variety of singing styles makes that even trickier. I'm thinking about the ending of "Don't Cry" by Guns N' Roses for example, first the "Don't you ever cry-y-yy-i-i" then the famous endless "toniiiiiii...."

    – aditsu
    33 mins ago






  • 1





    I think syllables per second (or minute) can be a good reference though, for most songs. I wish it was more common to measure that too, not just the BPM.

    – aditsu
    26 mins ago











  • @aditsu -- the musical phrases played instruments frequently pass by more quickly than the BPM would indicate, i.e. as streams of eighth notes, sixteenth notes, or whatever. Voice is really just another musical instrument, and the same thing happens with the phrasing of lyrics. Why doesn't musical notation suffice for you? BPM only indicates something about the pulse of the music; staff notation shows you more about how the music is phrased. Yet nobody counts the equivalent of syllables per second for saxophone solos....

    – David Bowling
    18 mins ago












  • 1





    Interesting, it's hard to decide how to split things up, and the wide variety of singing styles makes that even trickier. I'm thinking about the ending of "Don't Cry" by Guns N' Roses for example, first the "Don't you ever cry-y-yy-i-i" then the famous endless "toniiiiiii...."

    – aditsu
    33 mins ago






  • 1





    I think syllables per second (or minute) can be a good reference though, for most songs. I wish it was more common to measure that too, not just the BPM.

    – aditsu
    26 mins ago











  • @aditsu -- the musical phrases played instruments frequently pass by more quickly than the BPM would indicate, i.e. as streams of eighth notes, sixteenth notes, or whatever. Voice is really just another musical instrument, and the same thing happens with the phrasing of lyrics. Why doesn't musical notation suffice for you? BPM only indicates something about the pulse of the music; staff notation shows you more about how the music is phrased. Yet nobody counts the equivalent of syllables per second for saxophone solos....

    – David Bowling
    18 mins ago







1




1





Interesting, it's hard to decide how to split things up, and the wide variety of singing styles makes that even trickier. I'm thinking about the ending of "Don't Cry" by Guns N' Roses for example, first the "Don't you ever cry-y-yy-i-i" then the famous endless "toniiiiiii...."

– aditsu
33 mins ago





Interesting, it's hard to decide how to split things up, and the wide variety of singing styles makes that even trickier. I'm thinking about the ending of "Don't Cry" by Guns N' Roses for example, first the "Don't you ever cry-y-yy-i-i" then the famous endless "toniiiiiii...."

– aditsu
33 mins ago




1




1





I think syllables per second (or minute) can be a good reference though, for most songs. I wish it was more common to measure that too, not just the BPM.

– aditsu
26 mins ago





I think syllables per second (or minute) can be a good reference though, for most songs. I wish it was more common to measure that too, not just the BPM.

– aditsu
26 mins ago













@aditsu -- the musical phrases played instruments frequently pass by more quickly than the BPM would indicate, i.e. as streams of eighth notes, sixteenth notes, or whatever. Voice is really just another musical instrument, and the same thing happens with the phrasing of lyrics. Why doesn't musical notation suffice for you? BPM only indicates something about the pulse of the music; staff notation shows you more about how the music is phrased. Yet nobody counts the equivalent of syllables per second for saxophone solos....

– David Bowling
18 mins ago





@aditsu -- the musical phrases played instruments frequently pass by more quickly than the BPM would indicate, i.e. as streams of eighth notes, sixteenth notes, or whatever. Voice is really just another musical instrument, and the same thing happens with the phrasing of lyrics. Why doesn't musical notation suffice for you? BPM only indicates something about the pulse of the music; staff notation shows you more about how the music is phrased. Yet nobody counts the equivalent of syllables per second for saxophone solos....

– David Bowling
18 mins ago











2














I humbly propose "maximum notes/second": Take the fastest part of the song and calculate the number of notes in that amount of time. If you have a passage that is super-fast in one part but really slow in another, it's way more important to know that you need to be able to rap/sing/play at that fastest part's speed to play the whole song. Compare the intro of Eminem's "Rap God" to the fast part. Obviously, to tackle that song, one needs to be able to rap as fast as the fastest part, not just the average of the whole song.



Disclaimer: No one uses this, because I made it up. I think it's way more useful than average notes/second.






share|improve this answer























  • That's a good point, and could make it easier to measure. I think the average is also relevant, and the fastest part should probably have a minimum length (e.g. at least 5 seconds).

    – aditsu
    1 hour ago















2














I humbly propose "maximum notes/second": Take the fastest part of the song and calculate the number of notes in that amount of time. If you have a passage that is super-fast in one part but really slow in another, it's way more important to know that you need to be able to rap/sing/play at that fastest part's speed to play the whole song. Compare the intro of Eminem's "Rap God" to the fast part. Obviously, to tackle that song, one needs to be able to rap as fast as the fastest part, not just the average of the whole song.



Disclaimer: No one uses this, because I made it up. I think it's way more useful than average notes/second.






share|improve this answer























  • That's a good point, and could make it easier to measure. I think the average is also relevant, and the fastest part should probably have a minimum length (e.g. at least 5 seconds).

    – aditsu
    1 hour ago













2












2








2







I humbly propose "maximum notes/second": Take the fastest part of the song and calculate the number of notes in that amount of time. If you have a passage that is super-fast in one part but really slow in another, it's way more important to know that you need to be able to rap/sing/play at that fastest part's speed to play the whole song. Compare the intro of Eminem's "Rap God" to the fast part. Obviously, to tackle that song, one needs to be able to rap as fast as the fastest part, not just the average of the whole song.



Disclaimer: No one uses this, because I made it up. I think it's way more useful than average notes/second.






share|improve this answer













I humbly propose "maximum notes/second": Take the fastest part of the song and calculate the number of notes in that amount of time. If you have a passage that is super-fast in one part but really slow in another, it's way more important to know that you need to be able to rap/sing/play at that fastest part's speed to play the whole song. Compare the intro of Eminem's "Rap God" to the fast part. Obviously, to tackle that song, one needs to be able to rap as fast as the fastest part, not just the average of the whole song.



Disclaimer: No one uses this, because I made it up. I think it's way more useful than average notes/second.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









user45266user45266

3,5951734




3,5951734












  • That's a good point, and could make it easier to measure. I think the average is also relevant, and the fastest part should probably have a minimum length (e.g. at least 5 seconds).

    – aditsu
    1 hour ago

















  • That's a good point, and could make it easier to measure. I think the average is also relevant, and the fastest part should probably have a minimum length (e.g. at least 5 seconds).

    – aditsu
    1 hour ago
















That's a good point, and could make it easier to measure. I think the average is also relevant, and the fastest part should probably have a minimum length (e.g. at least 5 seconds).

– aditsu
1 hour ago





That's a good point, and could make it easier to measure. I think the average is also relevant, and the fastest part should probably have a minimum length (e.g. at least 5 seconds).

– aditsu
1 hour ago











0














I don't think there's a useful single value that you can use to summarise a song like this. Instead, it's probably most useful to consider a combination of the BPM, the length of rhythmic subdivisions, and distribution of rhythms. For example, Break Ya Neck has a BPM of 166*, and semiquaver/quaver (16th note/8th note) rhythms sustained over the period of several bars. In comparison Thoughts Of A Dying Atheist is 179 BPM but the rhythms are mainly a mixture of crotchets (quarter notes) and longer notes, with no consecutive passages of 8th notes.



*I know you said 83 in your question but I think 166 is more accurate. When/why BPM values can vary by a factor of two would be a good topic for another question!






share|improve this answer























  • Funny, I actually looked it up, and multiple sources said 83, and my own count also confirmed that. But I also see how it can be counted as 166. Anyway, I hope you get my main point: some songs have lower BPM but faster lyrics/vocals.

    – aditsu
    15 mins ago















0














I don't think there's a useful single value that you can use to summarise a song like this. Instead, it's probably most useful to consider a combination of the BPM, the length of rhythmic subdivisions, and distribution of rhythms. For example, Break Ya Neck has a BPM of 166*, and semiquaver/quaver (16th note/8th note) rhythms sustained over the period of several bars. In comparison Thoughts Of A Dying Atheist is 179 BPM but the rhythms are mainly a mixture of crotchets (quarter notes) and longer notes, with no consecutive passages of 8th notes.



*I know you said 83 in your question but I think 166 is more accurate. When/why BPM values can vary by a factor of two would be a good topic for another question!






share|improve this answer























  • Funny, I actually looked it up, and multiple sources said 83, and my own count also confirmed that. But I also see how it can be counted as 166. Anyway, I hope you get my main point: some songs have lower BPM but faster lyrics/vocals.

    – aditsu
    15 mins ago













0












0








0







I don't think there's a useful single value that you can use to summarise a song like this. Instead, it's probably most useful to consider a combination of the BPM, the length of rhythmic subdivisions, and distribution of rhythms. For example, Break Ya Neck has a BPM of 166*, and semiquaver/quaver (16th note/8th note) rhythms sustained over the period of several bars. In comparison Thoughts Of A Dying Atheist is 179 BPM but the rhythms are mainly a mixture of crotchets (quarter notes) and longer notes, with no consecutive passages of 8th notes.



*I know you said 83 in your question but I think 166 is more accurate. When/why BPM values can vary by a factor of two would be a good topic for another question!






share|improve this answer













I don't think there's a useful single value that you can use to summarise a song like this. Instead, it's probably most useful to consider a combination of the BPM, the length of rhythmic subdivisions, and distribution of rhythms. For example, Break Ya Neck has a BPM of 166*, and semiquaver/quaver (16th note/8th note) rhythms sustained over the period of several bars. In comparison Thoughts Of A Dying Atheist is 179 BPM but the rhythms are mainly a mixture of crotchets (quarter notes) and longer notes, with no consecutive passages of 8th notes.



*I know you said 83 in your question but I think 166 is more accurate. When/why BPM values can vary by a factor of two would be a good topic for another question!







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









rlmsrlms

3461315




3461315












  • Funny, I actually looked it up, and multiple sources said 83, and my own count also confirmed that. But I also see how it can be counted as 166. Anyway, I hope you get my main point: some songs have lower BPM but faster lyrics/vocals.

    – aditsu
    15 mins ago

















  • Funny, I actually looked it up, and multiple sources said 83, and my own count also confirmed that. But I also see how it can be counted as 166. Anyway, I hope you get my main point: some songs have lower BPM but faster lyrics/vocals.

    – aditsu
    15 mins ago
















Funny, I actually looked it up, and multiple sources said 83, and my own count also confirmed that. But I also see how it can be counted as 166. Anyway, I hope you get my main point: some songs have lower BPM but faster lyrics/vocals.

– aditsu
15 mins ago





Funny, I actually looked it up, and multiple sources said 83, and my own count also confirmed that. But I also see how it can be counted as 166. Anyway, I hope you get my main point: some songs have lower BPM but faster lyrics/vocals.

– aditsu
15 mins ago










aditsu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















aditsu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












aditsu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











aditsu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81981%2fis-there-a-measurement-for-the-vocal-speed-of-a-song%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?