Compiling and throwing simple dynamic exceptions at runtime for JVM Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Named string interpolationCompiling and throwing simple dynamic excepitons at runtimeSimple factory pattern in scala (attempting to restrict use of new)Instrumentation tool using the ASM tree APIThrowing exceptions when validation failsUndo format when format disappearsImplementation of stackThrowing exceptions if there is not exactly one box retrievedGeneric Builder in Java needs annotation supportDeserializing a customly formatted stringCompiling and throwing simple dynamic excepitons at runtimeGetting single element or throwing one of two exceptions
How is an IPA symbol that lacks a name (e.g. ɲ) called?
Can a Knight grant Knighthood to another?
Can I take recommendation from someone I met at a conference?
What kind of capacitor is this in the image?
Short story about an alien named Ushtu(?) coming from a future Earth, when ours was destroyed by a nuclear explosion
Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public?
What helicopter has the most rotor blades?
Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?
What is the evidence that custom checks in Northern Ireland are going to result in violence?
Does the Pact of the Blade warlock feature allow me to customize the properties of the pact weapon I create?
Is there a verb for listening stealthily?
Alternative to "rest in peace" (RIP)
Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?
Why these surprising proportionalities of integrals involving odd zeta values?
Are bags of holding fireproof?
How to renew schengen visas
A German immigrant ancestor has a "Registration Affidavit of Alien Enemy" on file. What does that mean exactly?
Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?
What combination of kingdom cards makes for the fewest number of turns to end the game?
tikz: drawing arrow
Import keychain to clean macOS install?
Is Bran literally the world's memory?
Who can become a wight?
Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5?
Compiling and throwing simple dynamic exceptions at runtime for JVM
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Named string interpolationCompiling and throwing simple dynamic excepitons at runtimeSimple factory pattern in scala (attempting to restrict use of new)Instrumentation tool using the ASM tree APIThrowing exceptions when validation failsUndo format when format disappearsImplementation of stackThrowing exceptions if there is not exactly one box retrievedGeneric Builder in Java needs annotation supportDeserializing a customly formatted stringCompiling and throwing simple dynamic excepitons at runtimeGetting single element or throwing one of two exceptions
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I've been using my Dynamic Exception with C# for quite some time already and it saved me a lot of time. This means, I don't have to create a new exception class for each and every case. I wanted to have the same functionality on Android and in kotlin/java so I can do this:
fun main()
throw dynamicException("My", "Hallo exception!") // throws MyException
The DynamicException.kt file contains most of the code where the dynamicException function first initializes the source-code for the new exception by formatting a String then it uses the JavaCompiler to build the class and call the appropriate construtor. Either with or without the inner exception.
import java.io.File
import java.lang.reflect.Constructor
import java.net.URI
import java.net.URL
import java.net.URLClassLoader
import java.util.*
import javax.tools.DiagnosticCollector
import javax.tools.JavaFileObject
import javax.tools.SimpleJavaFileObject
import javax.tools.ToolProvider
fun dynamicException(name: String, message: String, inner: Throwable? = null): java.lang.Exception
val javaCompiler = ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler()
val diagnosticCollector = DiagnosticCollector<JavaFileObject>()
val values = TreeMap<String, String>(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER)
values["name"] = name
var sourceCode = SourceCodeJavaFileObject(
"com.he-dev.$nameException",
dynamicExceptionSourceCode.smartFormat(values)
)
javaCompiler.getTask(
null,
null,
diagnosticCollector,
null,
null,
arrayListOf(sourceCode)
).call()
val classLoader = URLClassLoader.newInstance(arrayOf<URL>(File("").toURI().toURL()))
var getCtor: () -> Constructor<out Any> =
val cls = Class.forName("$nameException", true, classLoader)
val ctor = if (inner == null)
cls.getConstructor(String::class.java)
else
cls.getConstructor(String::class.java, Throwable::class.java)
ctor.makeAccessible()
return if (inner == null)
getCtor().newInstance(message) as java.lang.Exception
else
getCtor().newInstance(message, inner) as java.lang.Exception
fun Constructor<out Any>.makeAccessible(): Constructor<out Any>
this.isAccessible = true
return this
val dynamicExceptionSourceCode: String = """
public class NameException extends java.lang.Exception
public NameException(java.lang.String message)
super(message);
public NameException(java.lang.String message, java.lang.Throwable inner)
super(message, inner);
""".trimIndent()
class SourceCodeJavaFileObject : SimpleJavaFileObject
private val sourceCode: CharSequence
constructor(className: String, sourceCode: CharSequence) :
super(
URI.create("string:///" + className.replace('.', '/') + JavaFileObject.Kind.SOURCE.extension),
JavaFileObject.Kind.SOURCE
)
this.sourceCode = sourceCode
override fun getCharContent(ignoreEncodingErrors: Boolean): CharSequence
return sourceCode
The string formatting is done with a string extension that can replace patterns. I based it on my C# formatter. However, it's simpler because it doesn't not support value formatting.
import java.util.*
fun String.smartFormat(values: TreeMap<String, String>): String
val regex = Regex("""(?<name>[a-z][a-z0-9_.-]*)""", RegexOption.IGNORE_CASE)
return regex.replace(this)
var key = it.groups["name"]?.value
if (values.containsKey(key)) values[key]!! else it.value
Is there anything that can be simplified or made even cleaner?
Disclaimer: Please let's not make it about whether this utility is a good or bad practice. I've used it many projects already and it stands the test of being super-helpful and super-efficient. I can discuss it on Software Engineering if you'd like to know more but here I'm only interested in improving the code.
java exception kotlin compiler
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I've been using my Dynamic Exception with C# for quite some time already and it saved me a lot of time. This means, I don't have to create a new exception class for each and every case. I wanted to have the same functionality on Android and in kotlin/java so I can do this:
fun main()
throw dynamicException("My", "Hallo exception!") // throws MyException
The DynamicException.kt file contains most of the code where the dynamicException function first initializes the source-code for the new exception by formatting a String then it uses the JavaCompiler to build the class and call the appropriate construtor. Either with or without the inner exception.
import java.io.File
import java.lang.reflect.Constructor
import java.net.URI
import java.net.URL
import java.net.URLClassLoader
import java.util.*
import javax.tools.DiagnosticCollector
import javax.tools.JavaFileObject
import javax.tools.SimpleJavaFileObject
import javax.tools.ToolProvider
fun dynamicException(name: String, message: String, inner: Throwable? = null): java.lang.Exception
val javaCompiler = ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler()
val diagnosticCollector = DiagnosticCollector<JavaFileObject>()
val values = TreeMap<String, String>(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER)
values["name"] = name
var sourceCode = SourceCodeJavaFileObject(
"com.he-dev.$nameException",
dynamicExceptionSourceCode.smartFormat(values)
)
javaCompiler.getTask(
null,
null,
diagnosticCollector,
null,
null,
arrayListOf(sourceCode)
).call()
val classLoader = URLClassLoader.newInstance(arrayOf<URL>(File("").toURI().toURL()))
var getCtor: () -> Constructor<out Any> =
val cls = Class.forName("$nameException", true, classLoader)
val ctor = if (inner == null)
cls.getConstructor(String::class.java)
else
cls.getConstructor(String::class.java, Throwable::class.java)
ctor.makeAccessible()
return if (inner == null)
getCtor().newInstance(message) as java.lang.Exception
else
getCtor().newInstance(message, inner) as java.lang.Exception
fun Constructor<out Any>.makeAccessible(): Constructor<out Any>
this.isAccessible = true
return this
val dynamicExceptionSourceCode: String = """
public class NameException extends java.lang.Exception
public NameException(java.lang.String message)
super(message);
public NameException(java.lang.String message, java.lang.Throwable inner)
super(message, inner);
""".trimIndent()
class SourceCodeJavaFileObject : SimpleJavaFileObject
private val sourceCode: CharSequence
constructor(className: String, sourceCode: CharSequence) :
super(
URI.create("string:///" + className.replace('.', '/') + JavaFileObject.Kind.SOURCE.extension),
JavaFileObject.Kind.SOURCE
)
this.sourceCode = sourceCode
override fun getCharContent(ignoreEncodingErrors: Boolean): CharSequence
return sourceCode
The string formatting is done with a string extension that can replace patterns. I based it on my C# formatter. However, it's simpler because it doesn't not support value formatting.
import java.util.*
fun String.smartFormat(values: TreeMap<String, String>): String
val regex = Regex("""(?<name>[a-z][a-z0-9_.-]*)""", RegexOption.IGNORE_CASE)
return regex.replace(this)
var key = it.groups["name"]?.value
if (values.containsKey(key)) values[key]!! else it.value
Is there anything that can be simplified or made even cleaner?
Disclaimer: Please let's not make it about whether this utility is a good or bad practice. I've used it many projects already and it stands the test of being super-helpful and super-efficient. I can discuss it on Software Engineering if you'd like to know more but here I'm only interested in improving the code.
java exception kotlin compiler
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Given how easy and compact it is to create classes in Kotlin, I don't see the point for why you would want to do this. It will be completely impossible to catch those exceptions for example.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg true, it's easy but still, you have to write them. With this, you just throw exceptions... and catching them... mhmmm... I never knew why one would want to this ;-] It's for information purposes and for easier debugging, 99.99% there is nothing one can do about an exception but log it and break or repeat the operation so I see no value in catching anything butException.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg for example currently in one of myC#projects I would usually have to create four exceptions, one for each of the common http-methods when I would like to throw exceptions likeGetMethodNotSupportedor some less helpful generic one asMethodNotSupported. I find it's more helpful and much more efficient to simply doDynamicException.Create($"ExtractMethodName(memberName)}NotSupported", ...)instead.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
That's exactly what the message is for. You don't need to have one kind of exception for every possible method name that can be missing, just have one generic class forMethodNotSupportedand use an appropriate message on it for all the details that you need to indicate what went wrong and how to reproduce it.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
If you don't want to catch specific exceptions, identified by their type, why would you want to introduce different exception types? Different messages will do the job of producing useful log entries. Your approach of invoking the compiler at runtime seems like a very complex solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.
$endgroup$
– Ralf Kleberhoff
4 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I've been using my Dynamic Exception with C# for quite some time already and it saved me a lot of time. This means, I don't have to create a new exception class for each and every case. I wanted to have the same functionality on Android and in kotlin/java so I can do this:
fun main()
throw dynamicException("My", "Hallo exception!") // throws MyException
The DynamicException.kt file contains most of the code where the dynamicException function first initializes the source-code for the new exception by formatting a String then it uses the JavaCompiler to build the class and call the appropriate construtor. Either with or without the inner exception.
import java.io.File
import java.lang.reflect.Constructor
import java.net.URI
import java.net.URL
import java.net.URLClassLoader
import java.util.*
import javax.tools.DiagnosticCollector
import javax.tools.JavaFileObject
import javax.tools.SimpleJavaFileObject
import javax.tools.ToolProvider
fun dynamicException(name: String, message: String, inner: Throwable? = null): java.lang.Exception
val javaCompiler = ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler()
val diagnosticCollector = DiagnosticCollector<JavaFileObject>()
val values = TreeMap<String, String>(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER)
values["name"] = name
var sourceCode = SourceCodeJavaFileObject(
"com.he-dev.$nameException",
dynamicExceptionSourceCode.smartFormat(values)
)
javaCompiler.getTask(
null,
null,
diagnosticCollector,
null,
null,
arrayListOf(sourceCode)
).call()
val classLoader = URLClassLoader.newInstance(arrayOf<URL>(File("").toURI().toURL()))
var getCtor: () -> Constructor<out Any> =
val cls = Class.forName("$nameException", true, classLoader)
val ctor = if (inner == null)
cls.getConstructor(String::class.java)
else
cls.getConstructor(String::class.java, Throwable::class.java)
ctor.makeAccessible()
return if (inner == null)
getCtor().newInstance(message) as java.lang.Exception
else
getCtor().newInstance(message, inner) as java.lang.Exception
fun Constructor<out Any>.makeAccessible(): Constructor<out Any>
this.isAccessible = true
return this
val dynamicExceptionSourceCode: String = """
public class NameException extends java.lang.Exception
public NameException(java.lang.String message)
super(message);
public NameException(java.lang.String message, java.lang.Throwable inner)
super(message, inner);
""".trimIndent()
class SourceCodeJavaFileObject : SimpleJavaFileObject
private val sourceCode: CharSequence
constructor(className: String, sourceCode: CharSequence) :
super(
URI.create("string:///" + className.replace('.', '/') + JavaFileObject.Kind.SOURCE.extension),
JavaFileObject.Kind.SOURCE
)
this.sourceCode = sourceCode
override fun getCharContent(ignoreEncodingErrors: Boolean): CharSequence
return sourceCode
The string formatting is done with a string extension that can replace patterns. I based it on my C# formatter. However, it's simpler because it doesn't not support value formatting.
import java.util.*
fun String.smartFormat(values: TreeMap<String, String>): String
val regex = Regex("""(?<name>[a-z][a-z0-9_.-]*)""", RegexOption.IGNORE_CASE)
return regex.replace(this)
var key = it.groups["name"]?.value
if (values.containsKey(key)) values[key]!! else it.value
Is there anything that can be simplified or made even cleaner?
Disclaimer: Please let's not make it about whether this utility is a good or bad practice. I've used it many projects already and it stands the test of being super-helpful and super-efficient. I can discuss it on Software Engineering if you'd like to know more but here I'm only interested in improving the code.
java exception kotlin compiler
$endgroup$
I've been using my Dynamic Exception with C# for quite some time already and it saved me a lot of time. This means, I don't have to create a new exception class for each and every case. I wanted to have the same functionality on Android and in kotlin/java so I can do this:
fun main()
throw dynamicException("My", "Hallo exception!") // throws MyException
The DynamicException.kt file contains most of the code where the dynamicException function first initializes the source-code for the new exception by formatting a String then it uses the JavaCompiler to build the class and call the appropriate construtor. Either with or without the inner exception.
import java.io.File
import java.lang.reflect.Constructor
import java.net.URI
import java.net.URL
import java.net.URLClassLoader
import java.util.*
import javax.tools.DiagnosticCollector
import javax.tools.JavaFileObject
import javax.tools.SimpleJavaFileObject
import javax.tools.ToolProvider
fun dynamicException(name: String, message: String, inner: Throwable? = null): java.lang.Exception
val javaCompiler = ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler()
val diagnosticCollector = DiagnosticCollector<JavaFileObject>()
val values = TreeMap<String, String>(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER)
values["name"] = name
var sourceCode = SourceCodeJavaFileObject(
"com.he-dev.$nameException",
dynamicExceptionSourceCode.smartFormat(values)
)
javaCompiler.getTask(
null,
null,
diagnosticCollector,
null,
null,
arrayListOf(sourceCode)
).call()
val classLoader = URLClassLoader.newInstance(arrayOf<URL>(File("").toURI().toURL()))
var getCtor: () -> Constructor<out Any> =
val cls = Class.forName("$nameException", true, classLoader)
val ctor = if (inner == null)
cls.getConstructor(String::class.java)
else
cls.getConstructor(String::class.java, Throwable::class.java)
ctor.makeAccessible()
return if (inner == null)
getCtor().newInstance(message) as java.lang.Exception
else
getCtor().newInstance(message, inner) as java.lang.Exception
fun Constructor<out Any>.makeAccessible(): Constructor<out Any>
this.isAccessible = true
return this
val dynamicExceptionSourceCode: String = """
public class NameException extends java.lang.Exception
public NameException(java.lang.String message)
super(message);
public NameException(java.lang.String message, java.lang.Throwable inner)
super(message, inner);
""".trimIndent()
class SourceCodeJavaFileObject : SimpleJavaFileObject
private val sourceCode: CharSequence
constructor(className: String, sourceCode: CharSequence) :
super(
URI.create("string:///" + className.replace('.', '/') + JavaFileObject.Kind.SOURCE.extension),
JavaFileObject.Kind.SOURCE
)
this.sourceCode = sourceCode
override fun getCharContent(ignoreEncodingErrors: Boolean): CharSequence
return sourceCode
The string formatting is done with a string extension that can replace patterns. I based it on my C# formatter. However, it's simpler because it doesn't not support value formatting.
import java.util.*
fun String.smartFormat(values: TreeMap<String, String>): String
val regex = Regex("""(?<name>[a-z][a-z0-9_.-]*)""", RegexOption.IGNORE_CASE)
return regex.replace(this)
var key = it.groups["name"]?.value
if (values.containsKey(key)) values[key]!! else it.value
Is there anything that can be simplified or made even cleaner?
Disclaimer: Please let's not make it about whether this utility is a good or bad practice. I've used it many projects already and it stands the test of being super-helpful and super-efficient. I can discuss it on Software Engineering if you'd like to know more but here I'm only interested in improving the code.
java exception kotlin compiler
java exception kotlin compiler
edited 20 mins ago
Eric Duminil
2,1311613
2,1311613
asked 8 hours ago
t3chb0tt3chb0t
35.4k754127
35.4k754127
$begingroup$
Given how easy and compact it is to create classes in Kotlin, I don't see the point for why you would want to do this. It will be completely impossible to catch those exceptions for example.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg true, it's easy but still, you have to write them. With this, you just throw exceptions... and catching them... mhmmm... I never knew why one would want to this ;-] It's for information purposes and for easier debugging, 99.99% there is nothing one can do about an exception but log it and break or repeat the operation so I see no value in catching anything butException.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg for example currently in one of myC#projects I would usually have to create four exceptions, one for each of the common http-methods when I would like to throw exceptions likeGetMethodNotSupportedor some less helpful generic one asMethodNotSupported. I find it's more helpful and much more efficient to simply doDynamicException.Create($"ExtractMethodName(memberName)}NotSupported", ...)instead.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
That's exactly what the message is for. You don't need to have one kind of exception for every possible method name that can be missing, just have one generic class forMethodNotSupportedand use an appropriate message on it for all the details that you need to indicate what went wrong and how to reproduce it.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
If you don't want to catch specific exceptions, identified by their type, why would you want to introduce different exception types? Different messages will do the job of producing useful log entries. Your approach of invoking the compiler at runtime seems like a very complex solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.
$endgroup$
– Ralf Kleberhoff
4 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Given how easy and compact it is to create classes in Kotlin, I don't see the point for why you would want to do this. It will be completely impossible to catch those exceptions for example.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg true, it's easy but still, you have to write them. With this, you just throw exceptions... and catching them... mhmmm... I never knew why one would want to this ;-] It's for information purposes and for easier debugging, 99.99% there is nothing one can do about an exception but log it and break or repeat the operation so I see no value in catching anything butException.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg for example currently in one of myC#projects I would usually have to create four exceptions, one for each of the common http-methods when I would like to throw exceptions likeGetMethodNotSupportedor some less helpful generic one asMethodNotSupported. I find it's more helpful and much more efficient to simply doDynamicException.Create($"ExtractMethodName(memberName)}NotSupported", ...)instead.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
That's exactly what the message is for. You don't need to have one kind of exception for every possible method name that can be missing, just have one generic class forMethodNotSupportedand use an appropriate message on it for all the details that you need to indicate what went wrong and how to reproduce it.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
If you don't want to catch specific exceptions, identified by their type, why would you want to introduce different exception types? Different messages will do the job of producing useful log entries. Your approach of invoking the compiler at runtime seems like a very complex solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.
$endgroup$
– Ralf Kleberhoff
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
Given how easy and compact it is to create classes in Kotlin, I don't see the point for why you would want to do this. It will be completely impossible to catch those exceptions for example.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Given how easy and compact it is to create classes in Kotlin, I don't see the point for why you would want to do this. It will be completely impossible to catch those exceptions for example.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg true, it's easy but still, you have to write them. With this, you just throw exceptions... and catching them... mhmmm... I never knew why one would want to this ;-] It's for information purposes and for easier debugging, 99.99% there is nothing one can do about an exception but log it and break or repeat the operation so I see no value in catching anything but
Exception.$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg true, it's easy but still, you have to write them. With this, you just throw exceptions... and catching them... mhmmm... I never knew why one would want to this ;-] It's for information purposes and for easier debugging, 99.99% there is nothing one can do about an exception but log it and break or repeat the operation so I see no value in catching anything but
Exception.$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg for example currently in one of my
C# projects I would usually have to create four exceptions, one for each of the common http-methods when I would like to throw exceptions like GetMethodNotSupported or some less helpful generic one as MethodNotSupported. I find it's more helpful and much more efficient to simply do DynamicException.Create($"ExtractMethodName(memberName)}NotSupported", ...) instead.$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg for example currently in one of my
C# projects I would usually have to create four exceptions, one for each of the common http-methods when I would like to throw exceptions like GetMethodNotSupported or some less helpful generic one as MethodNotSupported. I find it's more helpful and much more efficient to simply do DynamicException.Create($"ExtractMethodName(memberName)}NotSupported", ...) instead.$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
That's exactly what the message is for. You don't need to have one kind of exception for every possible method name that can be missing, just have one generic class for
MethodNotSupported and use an appropriate message on it for all the details that you need to indicate what went wrong and how to reproduce it.$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's exactly what the message is for. You don't need to have one kind of exception for every possible method name that can be missing, just have one generic class for
MethodNotSupported and use an appropriate message on it for all the details that you need to indicate what went wrong and how to reproduce it.$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
4 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
If you don't want to catch specific exceptions, identified by their type, why would you want to introduce different exception types? Different messages will do the job of producing useful log entries. Your approach of invoking the compiler at runtime seems like a very complex solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.
$endgroup$
– Ralf Kleberhoff
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you don't want to catch specific exceptions, identified by their type, why would you want to introduce different exception types? Different messages will do the job of producing useful log entries. Your approach of invoking the compiler at runtime seems like a very complex solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.
$endgroup$
– Ralf Kleberhoff
4 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is there anything that can be simplified or made even cleaner?
Yes, don't invoke the Java compiler at runtime.
From your examples in a comment:
DynamicException.Create($"ExtractMethodName(memberName)}NotSupported", ...)
From an example on your earlier post (in C#)
throw ("SettingNotFoundException", $"Setting fullName.ToString().QuoteWith("'") not found.").ToDynamicException())
public BackgroundImageNotFoundException(string fileName) : base($"Where is the 'fileName' image?")
Replace these with:
throw new MethodNotSupported(extractMethodName(memberName))throw new UnsupportedOperationError(extractMethodName(memberName))throw new IllegalStateException("Setting '" + fullName + "' not found")throw new FileNotFoundException(fileName)
If you look at the subclasses of Java's Exception or RuntimeException (many of which also has a Kotlin version) you can probably find an already existing exception that does what you need, and you just need to add a message to it.
In a chat message related to your C# post you wrote:
In order to be able to track down a bug you need two pieces of information: The name of the exception and a message. With a generic exception I could just throw an Exception but the name of the exception should already be strong enough to tell what caused it, the message is just a hint.
You should already know what happend by not even reading the message.
I completely disagree with this. The message is not just a hint. To understand fully what happened and how to reproduce it you need to read the message.
As an extra bonus, here's how you define exceptions easily in Kotlin, and the approach I would recommend:
class MyException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class SomeOtherException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class UsefulException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class AnotherUsefulException(message: String) : Exception(message)
Please note that all this can be defined in the same file.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Disclaimer: This answer was written 10 seconds before the question was edited and a disclaimer was added. Either way, I still stand by this answer and I believe that your current approach is not good practice and adds unnecessary complexity.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'll give you a +1 because I always do it as a gesture of appriciation for every replay but I still don't agree with this and I stand to the usefullness of my solution.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Setting isAccessible to true
You seem to be always settings isAccessible to true. This is only needed if you are accessing methods outside their "access modifier", for example if you are trying to access a private method from another class.
Since you are only calling public methods (on public classes), this is not required.
Support for javax.tools is not for all android versions
You are using packages from javax.tools, this is not available on every android version, see the following SO question: NoClassDefFoundException when using javax.tools package, make sure to properly test on the oldest android version you are targetting.
To avoid these packages, manually define a class using byte arrays, and load that instead of the output of the compilation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217885%2fcompiling-and-throwing-simple-dynamic-exceptions-at-runtime-for-jvm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is there anything that can be simplified or made even cleaner?
Yes, don't invoke the Java compiler at runtime.
From your examples in a comment:
DynamicException.Create($"ExtractMethodName(memberName)}NotSupported", ...)
From an example on your earlier post (in C#)
throw ("SettingNotFoundException", $"Setting fullName.ToString().QuoteWith("'") not found.").ToDynamicException())
public BackgroundImageNotFoundException(string fileName) : base($"Where is the 'fileName' image?")
Replace these with:
throw new MethodNotSupported(extractMethodName(memberName))throw new UnsupportedOperationError(extractMethodName(memberName))throw new IllegalStateException("Setting '" + fullName + "' not found")throw new FileNotFoundException(fileName)
If you look at the subclasses of Java's Exception or RuntimeException (many of which also has a Kotlin version) you can probably find an already existing exception that does what you need, and you just need to add a message to it.
In a chat message related to your C# post you wrote:
In order to be able to track down a bug you need two pieces of information: The name of the exception and a message. With a generic exception I could just throw an Exception but the name of the exception should already be strong enough to tell what caused it, the message is just a hint.
You should already know what happend by not even reading the message.
I completely disagree with this. The message is not just a hint. To understand fully what happened and how to reproduce it you need to read the message.
As an extra bonus, here's how you define exceptions easily in Kotlin, and the approach I would recommend:
class MyException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class SomeOtherException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class UsefulException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class AnotherUsefulException(message: String) : Exception(message)
Please note that all this can be defined in the same file.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Disclaimer: This answer was written 10 seconds before the question was edited and a disclaimer was added. Either way, I still stand by this answer and I believe that your current approach is not good practice and adds unnecessary complexity.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'll give you a +1 because I always do it as a gesture of appriciation for every replay but I still don't agree with this and I stand to the usefullness of my solution.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there anything that can be simplified or made even cleaner?
Yes, don't invoke the Java compiler at runtime.
From your examples in a comment:
DynamicException.Create($"ExtractMethodName(memberName)}NotSupported", ...)
From an example on your earlier post (in C#)
throw ("SettingNotFoundException", $"Setting fullName.ToString().QuoteWith("'") not found.").ToDynamicException())
public BackgroundImageNotFoundException(string fileName) : base($"Where is the 'fileName' image?")
Replace these with:
throw new MethodNotSupported(extractMethodName(memberName))throw new UnsupportedOperationError(extractMethodName(memberName))throw new IllegalStateException("Setting '" + fullName + "' not found")throw new FileNotFoundException(fileName)
If you look at the subclasses of Java's Exception or RuntimeException (many of which also has a Kotlin version) you can probably find an already existing exception that does what you need, and you just need to add a message to it.
In a chat message related to your C# post you wrote:
In order to be able to track down a bug you need two pieces of information: The name of the exception and a message. With a generic exception I could just throw an Exception but the name of the exception should already be strong enough to tell what caused it, the message is just a hint.
You should already know what happend by not even reading the message.
I completely disagree with this. The message is not just a hint. To understand fully what happened and how to reproduce it you need to read the message.
As an extra bonus, here's how you define exceptions easily in Kotlin, and the approach I would recommend:
class MyException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class SomeOtherException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class UsefulException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class AnotherUsefulException(message: String) : Exception(message)
Please note that all this can be defined in the same file.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Disclaimer: This answer was written 10 seconds before the question was edited and a disclaimer was added. Either way, I still stand by this answer and I believe that your current approach is not good practice and adds unnecessary complexity.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'll give you a +1 because I always do it as a gesture of appriciation for every replay but I still don't agree with this and I stand to the usefullness of my solution.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there anything that can be simplified or made even cleaner?
Yes, don't invoke the Java compiler at runtime.
From your examples in a comment:
DynamicException.Create($"ExtractMethodName(memberName)}NotSupported", ...)
From an example on your earlier post (in C#)
throw ("SettingNotFoundException", $"Setting fullName.ToString().QuoteWith("'") not found.").ToDynamicException())
public BackgroundImageNotFoundException(string fileName) : base($"Where is the 'fileName' image?")
Replace these with:
throw new MethodNotSupported(extractMethodName(memberName))throw new UnsupportedOperationError(extractMethodName(memberName))throw new IllegalStateException("Setting '" + fullName + "' not found")throw new FileNotFoundException(fileName)
If you look at the subclasses of Java's Exception or RuntimeException (many of which also has a Kotlin version) you can probably find an already existing exception that does what you need, and you just need to add a message to it.
In a chat message related to your C# post you wrote:
In order to be able to track down a bug you need two pieces of information: The name of the exception and a message. With a generic exception I could just throw an Exception but the name of the exception should already be strong enough to tell what caused it, the message is just a hint.
You should already know what happend by not even reading the message.
I completely disagree with this. The message is not just a hint. To understand fully what happened and how to reproduce it you need to read the message.
As an extra bonus, here's how you define exceptions easily in Kotlin, and the approach I would recommend:
class MyException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class SomeOtherException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class UsefulException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class AnotherUsefulException(message: String) : Exception(message)
Please note that all this can be defined in the same file.
$endgroup$
Is there anything that can be simplified or made even cleaner?
Yes, don't invoke the Java compiler at runtime.
From your examples in a comment:
DynamicException.Create($"ExtractMethodName(memberName)}NotSupported", ...)
From an example on your earlier post (in C#)
throw ("SettingNotFoundException", $"Setting fullName.ToString().QuoteWith("'") not found.").ToDynamicException())
public BackgroundImageNotFoundException(string fileName) : base($"Where is the 'fileName' image?")
Replace these with:
throw new MethodNotSupported(extractMethodName(memberName))throw new UnsupportedOperationError(extractMethodName(memberName))throw new IllegalStateException("Setting '" + fullName + "' not found")throw new FileNotFoundException(fileName)
If you look at the subclasses of Java's Exception or RuntimeException (many of which also has a Kotlin version) you can probably find an already existing exception that does what you need, and you just need to add a message to it.
In a chat message related to your C# post you wrote:
In order to be able to track down a bug you need two pieces of information: The name of the exception and a message. With a generic exception I could just throw an Exception but the name of the exception should already be strong enough to tell what caused it, the message is just a hint.
You should already know what happend by not even reading the message.
I completely disagree with this. The message is not just a hint. To understand fully what happened and how to reproduce it you need to read the message.
As an extra bonus, here's how you define exceptions easily in Kotlin, and the approach I would recommend:
class MyException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class SomeOtherException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class UsefulException(message: String) : Exception(message)
class AnotherUsefulException(message: String) : Exception(message)
Please note that all this can be defined in the same file.
edited 29 mins ago
answered 3 hours ago
Simon Forsberg♦Simon Forsberg
48.9k7130287
48.9k7130287
1
$begingroup$
Disclaimer: This answer was written 10 seconds before the question was edited and a disclaimer was added. Either way, I still stand by this answer and I believe that your current approach is not good practice and adds unnecessary complexity.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'll give you a +1 because I always do it as a gesture of appriciation for every replay but I still don't agree with this and I stand to the usefullness of my solution.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Disclaimer: This answer was written 10 seconds before the question was edited and a disclaimer was added. Either way, I still stand by this answer and I believe that your current approach is not good practice and adds unnecessary complexity.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'll give you a +1 because I always do it as a gesture of appriciation for every replay but I still don't agree with this and I stand to the usefullness of my solution.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Disclaimer: This answer was written 10 seconds before the question was edited and a disclaimer was added. Either way, I still stand by this answer and I believe that your current approach is not good practice and adds unnecessary complexity.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Disclaimer: This answer was written 10 seconds before the question was edited and a disclaimer was added. Either way, I still stand by this answer and I believe that your current approach is not good practice and adds unnecessary complexity.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'll give you a +1 because I always do it as a gesture of appriciation for every replay but I still don't agree with this and I stand to the usefullness of my solution.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'll give you a +1 because I always do it as a gesture of appriciation for every replay but I still don't agree with this and I stand to the usefullness of my solution.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Setting isAccessible to true
You seem to be always settings isAccessible to true. This is only needed if you are accessing methods outside their "access modifier", for example if you are trying to access a private method from another class.
Since you are only calling public methods (on public classes), this is not required.
Support for javax.tools is not for all android versions
You are using packages from javax.tools, this is not available on every android version, see the following SO question: NoClassDefFoundException when using javax.tools package, make sure to properly test on the oldest android version you are targetting.
To avoid these packages, manually define a class using byte arrays, and load that instead of the output of the compilation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Setting isAccessible to true
You seem to be always settings isAccessible to true. This is only needed if you are accessing methods outside their "access modifier", for example if you are trying to access a private method from another class.
Since you are only calling public methods (on public classes), this is not required.
Support for javax.tools is not for all android versions
You are using packages from javax.tools, this is not available on every android version, see the following SO question: NoClassDefFoundException when using javax.tools package, make sure to properly test on the oldest android version you are targetting.
To avoid these packages, manually define a class using byte arrays, and load that instead of the output of the compilation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Setting isAccessible to true
You seem to be always settings isAccessible to true. This is only needed if you are accessing methods outside their "access modifier", for example if you are trying to access a private method from another class.
Since you are only calling public methods (on public classes), this is not required.
Support for javax.tools is not for all android versions
You are using packages from javax.tools, this is not available on every android version, see the following SO question: NoClassDefFoundException when using javax.tools package, make sure to properly test on the oldest android version you are targetting.
To avoid these packages, manually define a class using byte arrays, and load that instead of the output of the compilation
$endgroup$
Setting isAccessible to true
You seem to be always settings isAccessible to true. This is only needed if you are accessing methods outside their "access modifier", for example if you are trying to access a private method from another class.
Since you are only calling public methods (on public classes), this is not required.
Support for javax.tools is not for all android versions
You are using packages from javax.tools, this is not available on every android version, see the following SO question: NoClassDefFoundException when using javax.tools package, make sure to properly test on the oldest android version you are targetting.
To avoid these packages, manually define a class using byte arrays, and load that instead of the output of the compilation
answered 12 mins ago
FerrybigFerrybig
1,202614
1,202614
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217885%2fcompiling-and-throwing-simple-dynamic-exceptions-at-runtime-for-jvm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Given how easy and compact it is to create classes in Kotlin, I don't see the point for why you would want to do this. It will be completely impossible to catch those exceptions for example.
$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg true, it's easy but still, you have to write them. With this, you just throw exceptions... and catching them... mhmmm... I never knew why one would want to this ;-] It's for information purposes and for easier debugging, 99.99% there is nothing one can do about an exception but log it and break or repeat the operation so I see no value in catching anything but
Exception.$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@SimonForsberg for example currently in one of my
C#projects I would usually have to create four exceptions, one for each of the common http-methods when I would like to throw exceptions likeGetMethodNotSupportedor some less helpful generic one asMethodNotSupported. I find it's more helpful and much more efficient to simply doDynamicException.Create($"ExtractMethodName(memberName)}NotSupported", ...)instead.$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
7 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
That's exactly what the message is for. You don't need to have one kind of exception for every possible method name that can be missing, just have one generic class for
MethodNotSupportedand use an appropriate message on it for all the details that you need to indicate what went wrong and how to reproduce it.$endgroup$
– Simon Forsberg♦
4 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
If you don't want to catch specific exceptions, identified by their type, why would you want to introduce different exception types? Different messages will do the job of producing useful log entries. Your approach of invoking the compiler at runtime seems like a very complex solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.
$endgroup$
– Ralf Kleberhoff
4 hours ago