“Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.” – Why is there no article before “passengers”? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Contributor's Guide to English Language LearnersArticle Confusion Again! Why is there an 'a' instead of a 'the'?Can “the + noun” be a general reference?appendicitis is inflammation of the appendix — why is there no definite article in front of “inflammation”?Should I use “a” or “the” to designate the particular one I'm going to talk about?Why is there no article in the sentence “Then came number”?Definite article in “Police were able to find out where the father lived from _THE_ information the child provided”British colonies or the British colonies?“The Jesus who said” - why is there a definite article before the proper name “Jesus”?particularizing attribute with indefinite articleWhy is “Reports” in the sentence below without the article “The”?

Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5?

Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?

xkeyval -- read keys from file

Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions

Is it OK if I do not take the receipt in Germany?

Does the Pact of the Blade warlock feature allow me to customize the properties of the pact weapon I create?

lm and glm function in R

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

Like totally amazing interchangeable sister outfit accessory swapping or whatever

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?

Can stored/leased 737s be used to substitute for grounded MAXs?

How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?

Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?

What combination of kingdom cards makes for the fewest number of turns to end the game?

Short story about an alien named Ushtu(?) coming from a future Earth, when ours was destroyed by a nuclear explosion

Coin Game with infinite paradox

Is my guitar’s action too high?

How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?

false 'Security alert' from Google - every login generates mails from 'no-reply@accounts.google.com'

Can a Wizard take the Magic Initiate feat and select spells from the Wizard list?

Can the van der Waals coefficients be negative in the van der Waals equation for real gases?

tabularx column has extra padding at right?

Can I take recommendation from someone I met at a conference?



“Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.” – Why is there no article before “passengers”?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Contributor's Guide to English Language LearnersArticle Confusion Again! Why is there an 'a' instead of a 'the'?Can “the + noun” be a general reference?appendicitis is inflammation of the appendix — why is there no definite article in front of “inflammation”?Should I use “a” or “the” to designate the particular one I'm going to talk about?Why is there no article in the sentence “Then came number”?Definite article in “Police were able to find out where the father lived from _THE_ information the child provided”British colonies or the British colonies?“The Jesus who said” - why is there a definite article before the proper name “Jesus”?particularizing attribute with indefinite articleWhy is “Reports” in the sentence below without the article “The”?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.










share|improve this question




























    1















    After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



    P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.










    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1








      After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



      P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.










      share|improve this question














      After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



      P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.







      articles






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      ZakZak

      6371311




      6371311




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






          share|improve this answer






























            2














            The sentence




            Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




            is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




            After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




            Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




            After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




            Now the implication is otherwise.



            When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "481"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206580%2fsince-the-train-was-delayed-for-more-than-an-hour-passengers-were-given-a-full%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2














              It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






              share|improve this answer



























                2














                It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






                share|improve this answer

























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






                  share|improve this answer













                  It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  anoukanouk

                  1,763414




                  1,763414























                      2














                      The sentence




                      Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                      is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                      After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                      Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                      After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                      Now the implication is otherwise.



                      When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        2














                        The sentence




                        Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                        is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                        After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                        Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                        After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                        Now the implication is otherwise.



                        When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          2












                          2








                          2







                          The sentence




                          Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                          is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                          Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                          Now the implication is otherwise.



                          When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






                          share|improve this answer













                          The sentence




                          Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                          is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                          Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                          Now the implication is otherwise.



                          When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 57 mins ago









                          David SiegelDavid Siegel

                          2,984316




                          2,984316



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206580%2fsince-the-train-was-delayed-for-more-than-an-hour-passengers-were-given-a-full%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Era Viking Índice Início da Era Viquingue | Cotidiano | Sociedade | Língua | Religião | A arte | As primeiras cidades | As viagens dos viquingues | Viquingues do Oeste e Leste | Fim da Era Viquingue | Fontes históricas | Referências Bibliografia | Ligações externas | Menu de navegação«Sverige då!»«Handel I vikingetid»«O que é Nórdico Antigo»Mito, magia e religião na volsunga saga Um olhar sobre a trajetória mítica do herói sigurd«Bonden var den verklige vikingen»«Vikingatiden»«Vikingatiden»«Vinland»«Guerreiras de Óðinn: As Valkyrjor na Mitologia Viking»1519-9053«Esculpindo símbolos e seres: A arte viking em pedras rúnicas»1679-9313Historia - Tema: VikingarnaAventura e Magia no Mundo das Sagas IslandesasEra Vikinge

                              What's the metal clinking sound at the end of credits in Avengers: Endgame?What makes Thanos so strong in Avengers: Endgame?Who is the character that appears at the end of Endgame?What happens to Mjolnir (Thor's hammer) at the end of Endgame?The People's Ages in Avengers: EndgameWhat did Nebula do in Avengers: Endgame?Messing with time in the Avengers: Endgame climaxAvengers: Endgame timelineWhat are the time-travel rules in Avengers Endgame?Why use this song in Avengers: Endgame Opening Logo Sequence?Peggy's age in Avengers Endgame

                              Are there legal definitions of ethnicities/races? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Legal definitions in the United StatesAre there truly legal limits on US interest rates?Are gender identity and sexual orientation federally protected?Why is there an apparent legal bias against digital services?What limits are there to the powers of individual judges in the United States legal system?Are women only scholarships legal under Irish / EU law?Is the term “race” defined by Public Law enacted by Congress of the United StatesIs there a legal definition of race in the US?Neighbors are spying for landlord on Renters is it legal?Are Protected Classes Bi-directional?