Derivative softwares copyrigths from a more generic software Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?As a Developer how should my contract be worded to protect against hackingCan software legally collect information on it's users without disclosing that it is doing so?What happens when a contract agreement ends?Is it legal to lend out your computer with licensed software installed on it?Limitations of software development & scrapingSoftware License For Proprietary Software Open Only For Licensee Modification and Security Review?Who can claim copyrights on Machine Learning models?Tools of the trade, software implicationsCan creative element owners claim copyright on Machine Learning models or its output?software copyright : implementing the same class structure but for different specific clients and purpose
Multi tool use
How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?
If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?
Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?
Seeking colloquialism for “just because”
Is the Standard Deduction better than Itemized when both are the same amount?
How to tell that you are a giant?
Book where humans were engineered with genes from animal species to survive hostile planets
Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?
Why are Kinder Surprise Eggs illegal in the USA?
In predicate logic, does existential quantification (∃) include universal quantification (∀), i.e. can 'some' imply 'all'?
Why did the rest of the Eastern Bloc not invade Yugoslavia?
Is pollution the main cause of Notre Dame Cathedral's deterioration?
Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters
Why is "Consequences inflicted." not a sentence?
Resolving to minmaj7
Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems
Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?
Generate an RGB colour grid
Can I cast Passwall to drop an enemy into a 20-foot pit?
Why didn't this character "real die" when they blew their stack out in Altered Carbon?
How can I (re)show post-installation notes?
Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?
Single word antonym of "flightless"
How to bypass password on Windows XP account?
Derivative softwares copyrigths from a more generic software
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?As a Developer how should my contract be worded to protect against hackingCan software legally collect information on it's users without disclosing that it is doing so?What happens when a contract agreement ends?Is it legal to lend out your computer with licensed software installed on it?Limitations of software development & scrapingSoftware License For Proprietary Software Open Only For Licensee Modification and Security Review?Who can claim copyrights on Machine Learning models?Tools of the trade, software implicationsCan creative element owners claim copyright on Machine Learning models or its output?software copyright : implementing the same class structure but for different specific clients and purpose
Imagine consultancy C has a generic software for analyzing data S.
Now C has a client C1 and from the software S it derives a software S1 to analyzed some specific data for C1. The overall dependency may be the same but the overall structure and purpose is specific to the need of client C1 which owns the IP (copyrights) over S1. Again, C has another client C2 and again they do something specific to analyze the data of that company C2 with software S2. C2 owns the IP (copyrights) over S2. Since both these softwares S1, S2 are derivative work of S is there any infringements betweeen C1 and C2?
copyright united-kingdom intellectual-property contract software
asked Oct 18 '18 at 15:46
bbbbbb
1083
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 12 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
Imagine consultancy C has a generic software for analyzing data S.
Now C has a client C1 and from the software S it derives a software S1 to analyzed some specific data for C1. The overall dependency may be the same but the overall structure and purpose is specific to the need of client C1 which owns the IP (copyrights) over S1. Again, C has another client C2 and again they do something specific to analyze the data of that company C2 with software S2. C2 owns the IP (copyrights) over S2. Since both these softwares S1, S2 are derivative work of S is there any infringements betweeen C1 and C2?
copyright united-kingdom intellectual-property contract software
asked Oct 18 '18 at 15:46
bbbbbb
1083
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 12 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
Imagine consultancy C has a generic software for analyzing data S.
Now C has a client C1 and from the software S it derives a software S1 to analyzed some specific data for C1. The overall dependency may be the same but the overall structure and purpose is specific to the need of client C1 which owns the IP (copyrights) over S1. Again, C has another client C2 and again they do something specific to analyze the data of that company C2 with software S2. C2 owns the IP (copyrights) over S2. Since both these softwares S1, S2 are derivative work of S is there any infringements betweeen C1 and C2?
copyright united-kingdom intellectual-property contract software
asked Oct 18 '18 at 15:46
bbbbbb
1083
Imagine consultancy C has a generic software for analyzing data S.
Now C has a client C1 and from the software S it derives a software S1 to analyzed some specific data for C1. The overall dependency may be the same but the overall structure and purpose is specific to the need of client C1 which owns the IP (copyrights) over S1. Again, C has another client C2 and again they do something specific to analyze the data of that company C2 with software S2. C2 owns the IP (copyrights) over S2. Since both these softwares S1, S2 are derivative work of S is there any infringements betweeen C1 and C2?
copyright united-kingdom intellectual-property contract software
copyright united-kingdom intellectual-property contract software
asked Oct 18 '18 at 15:46
bbbbbb
1083
asked Oct 18 '18 at 15:46
bbbbbb
1083
asked Oct 18 '18 at 15:46
bbbbbb
1083
asked Oct 18 '18 at 15:46
bbbbbb
1083
asked Oct 18 '18 at 15:46
bbbbbb
1083
1083
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 12 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 12 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If the copyright to S is owned by the consultancy C, and both S1 and S2 are derivative works of S, but not of each other, then C has the right to sell S1 to C1 and S2 to C2, and there is no infringement. However C should probably notify both C1 and C2 "The software created for you is a derivative work based on generic software created by C. C retains the copyright on this base software." That way neither C1 nor C2 will be mislead into thinking that they own the rights to S. I don't know if such notification is mandatory, but I would think it good practice at least.
answered Oct 18 '18 at 18:17
David SiegelDavid Siegel
17.1k3665
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32727%2fderivative-softwares-copyrigths-from-a-more-generic-software%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If the copyright to S is owned by the consultancy C, and both S1 and S2 are derivative works of S, but not of each other, then C has the right to sell S1 to C1 and S2 to C2, and there is no infringement. However C should probably notify both C1 and C2 "The software created for you is a derivative work based on generic software created by C. C retains the copyright on this base software." That way neither C1 nor C2 will be mislead into thinking that they own the rights to S. I don't know if such notification is mandatory, but I would think it good practice at least.
answered Oct 18 '18 at 18:17
David SiegelDavid Siegel
17.1k3665
add a comment |
If the copyright to S is owned by the consultancy C, and both S1 and S2 are derivative works of S, but not of each other, then C has the right to sell S1 to C1 and S2 to C2, and there is no infringement. However C should probably notify both C1 and C2 "The software created for you is a derivative work based on generic software created by C. C retains the copyright on this base software." That way neither C1 nor C2 will be mislead into thinking that they own the rights to S. I don't know if such notification is mandatory, but I would think it good practice at least.
answered Oct 18 '18 at 18:17
David SiegelDavid Siegel
17.1k3665
add a comment |
If the copyright to S is owned by the consultancy C, and both S1 and S2 are derivative works of S, but not of each other, then C has the right to sell S1 to C1 and S2 to C2, and there is no infringement. However C should probably notify both C1 and C2 "The software created for you is a derivative work based on generic software created by C. C retains the copyright on this base software." That way neither C1 nor C2 will be mislead into thinking that they own the rights to S. I don't know if such notification is mandatory, but I would think it good practice at least.
answered Oct 18 '18 at 18:17
David SiegelDavid Siegel
17.1k3665
If the copyright to S is owned by the consultancy C, and both S1 and S2 are derivative works of S, but not of each other, then C has the right to sell S1 to C1 and S2 to C2, and there is no infringement. However C should probably notify both C1 and C2 "The software created for you is a derivative work based on generic software created by C. C retains the copyright on this base software." That way neither C1 nor C2 will be mislead into thinking that they own the rights to S. I don't know if such notification is mandatory, but I would think it good practice at least.
answered Oct 18 '18 at 18:17
David SiegelDavid Siegel
17.1k3665
answered Oct 18 '18 at 18:17
David SiegelDavid Siegel
17.1k3665
answered Oct 18 '18 at 18:17
David SiegelDavid Siegel
17.1k3665
answered Oct 18 '18 at 18:17
David SiegelDavid Siegel
17.1k3665
17.1k3665
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32727%2fderivative-softwares-copyrigths-from-a-more-generic-software%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
x o,kdpVny,QOB1A,bGMZkoA3WytA7Qd,J,e,mSpZ7kbk zF B
