Non-trivial topology where only open sets are closedExhaustion of open sets by closed setsNatural non-trivial topology on $mathbb R$ such that there are more than $2^mathbb N$ open setswhy use open interval rather than closed interval as open sets for real line topologyClosed sets in Noetherian topologyIn the finite complement topology on $mathbbR$, is the subset $ x $ closed?Closed sets in the lower limit topology.Are closed sets in topology?For which topologies are the concepts of open and closed “interchangeable”?How to determine which sets are open in a topology?Inclusion of open sets in closed sets of Zariski topology

What does 高層ビルに何車線もの道路。mean?

PTIJ: Who should I vote for? (21st Knesset Edition)

About the actual radiative impact of greenhouse gas emission over time

Bacteria contamination inside a thermos bottle

Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?

What exactly is this small puffer fish doing and how did it manage to accomplish such a feat?

Most cost effective thermostat setting: consistent temperature vs. lowest temperature possible

Counting models satisfying a boolean formula

How could an airship be repaired midflight?

Custom alignment for GeoMarkers

Are Roman Catholic priests ever addressed as pastor

Instead of a Universal Basic Income program, why not implement a "Universal Basic Needs" program?

Why Choose Less Effective Armour Types?

Why does overlay work only on the first tcolorbox?

If I am holding an item before I cast Blink, will it move with me through the Ethereal Plane?

How to make healing in an exploration game interesting

How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

Meme-controlled people

What is the relationship between relativity and the Doppler effect?

Why did it take so long to abandon sail after steamships were demonstrated?

Non-trivial topology where only open sets are closed

Describing a chess game in a novel

Happy pi day, everyone!



Non-trivial topology where only open sets are closed


Exhaustion of open sets by closed setsNatural non-trivial topology on $mathbb R$ such that there are more than $2^mathbb N$ open setswhy use open interval rather than closed interval as open sets for real line topologyClosed sets in Noetherian topologyIn the finite complement topology on $mathbbR$, is the subset $ x $ closed?Closed sets in the lower limit topology.Are closed sets in topology?For which topologies are the concepts of open and closed “interchangeable”?How to determine which sets are open in a topology?Inclusion of open sets in closed sets of Zariski topology













1












$begingroup$


For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non trival topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has non finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    1 hour ago















1












$begingroup$


For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non trival topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has non finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    1 hour ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non trival topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has non finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




For example, on $mathbbR$ there exists trivial topology which contains only $mathbbR$ and $emptyset$ and in that topology all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open.



Question. Does there exist non trivial topology on $mathbbR$ for which all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? Further, given some general set $X$ whose number of elements is finite, could we always construct non trival topology where all open sets are closed and all closed sets are open? What if $X$ has non finite number of elements?



I hope my question is not meaningless.



Thank you for any help.







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









J. W. Tanner

3,2801320




3,2801320










asked 1 hour ago









ThomThom

341111




341111







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    1 hour ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
    $endgroup$
    – parsiad
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
    $endgroup$
    – William Elliot
    1 hour ago







2




2




$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
The trivial topology on a set $X$ is $emptyset, X$. The discrete topology on a set $X$ is $2^X$. Both have the property that you are looking for, though I am not sure if you are using the term "trivial" here in reference to the trivial topology or just to mean "simple".
$endgroup$
– parsiad
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
(1) The discrete topology, where all subsets are open and closed. (2) Given any partition $X_i_iin Iof $X$, take as a topology the colleciton of all sets that are unions of elements of the partition; the complements are also unions of elements of the partition. This works for any set, regardless of cardinality, and any partition, regarless of size of the partition or of its constituent sets.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Related to your question are door spaces and extremally disconnected spaces.
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
    $$
    varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
    $$

    You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
      $endgroup$
      – Arturo Magidin
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
      $endgroup$
      – Thom
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
      $endgroup$
      – Arturo Magidin
      53 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
      $endgroup$
      – Thom
      45 mins ago










    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151030%2fnon-trivial-topology-where-only-open-sets-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



    Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



    Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



    Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



    Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



    We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



      Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



      Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



      Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



      Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



      We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



        Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



        Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



        Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



        Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



        We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The topologies with this property are precisely the ones that are derived from partitions of the underlying set $X$.



        Specifically, let $mathcalP=X_i_iin I$ be a partition of $X$, and let $tau$ be the collection of sets of the form $cup_iin I_0X_i$ for $I_0subseteq I$. Then $tau$ is a topology: the empty set corresponds to $I_0=varnothing$, the set $X$ to $I_0=I$; the union of such sets corresponds to the family indexed by the union of indices, and the intersection to the intersection of the indices. Moreover, the complement of the set corresponding to $I_0$ is the set corresponding to $I-I_0$. Thus, $tau$ has the desired property.



        Now let $tau$ be any topology on $X$ with the desired property. Define an equivalence relation on $X$ by letting $xsim y$ if and only if for every $Ain tau$, $xin A$ if and only if $yin A$. Trivially, this is an equivalence relation, and so induces a partition on $X$. I claim that $tau$ is in fact, the topology induced by this partition as above.



        Indeed, if $Ain tau$, then $A=cup_xin A[x]$, where $[x]$ is the equivalence class of $x$. Trivially $A$ is contained in the right hand side, and if $yin[x]$, then since $xin A$ then $yin A$, so we have equality.



        Now, conversely, let $xin X$ and look at $[x]$. I claim that $X-[x]$ lies in $tau$. So see this, let $zin X-[x]$. Then since $znotin [x]$, there exists an open set $A_zin tau$ such that $zin A_z$ but $xnotin A_z$ (and hence, $[x]cap A_z=varnothing$). Now, $cup_znotin[x]A_z$ is an open set, contains every element of $X-[x]$, and intersects $[x]$ trivially because each element in the union does. That is, this open set is $A-[x]$; but since the complement of every open set is open, and $A-[x]$ is open, then $[x]$ is open. Thus, $[x]intau$.



        We have then proven that every element of the partition induced by $sim$ is open, and that every open set is a union of such elements of the partition. That is, the open sets are precisely the unions of elements of the partition $X/sim$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 45 mins ago









        Arturo MagidinArturo Magidin

        265k34590918




        265k34590918





















            3












            $begingroup$

            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              53 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              45 mins ago















            3












            $begingroup$

            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              53 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              45 mins ago













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            You can manufacture examples like this pretty easily. Let $A$ be any subset of $mathbbR$. Put a topology on $mathbbR$ with the following open sets:
            $$
            varnothing, A, mathbbR-A, mathbbR.
            $$

            You can easily check that this always gives a topology, and a subset of $mathbbR$ is open if and only if it is closed. This construction generalizes to any set $X$: there's nothing special about $mathbbR$ here.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            RandallRandall

            10.6k11431




            10.6k11431











            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              53 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              45 mins ago
















            • $begingroup$
              More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
              $endgroup$
              – Arturo Magidin
              53 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
              $endgroup$
              – Thom
              45 mins ago















            $begingroup$
            More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            More generally, take any partition and take unions of elements of the partition. This example is what you get from the partition $A,mathbbR-A$.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Let us denote with X set of all topologies which satisfy property in the question on $mathbbR$. Can every topology in $X$ be made with some partitions?
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            53 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            @Thom: Yes. I’ll write it up.
            $endgroup$
            – Arturo Magidin
            53 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            45 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            @ArturoMagidin Fascinating. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Thom
            45 mins ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3151030%2fnon-trivial-topology-where-only-open-sets-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

            2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

            Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?