A case of the snifflesCheckerboard Infection100 Prisoners' Names in BoxesThe First Interplanetary Arithmetic SummitFarm dimensionsMysterious Murder Mystery 5Ernie and the Pirates of the CaribbeanCan the policeman actually catch the thief, instead of shooting?The Cucumber ParadoxEspionage at the Chinese RestaurantErnie and the Case of the Singing SistersA man is trapped in a cage and wants to escape but doesn't, even when given the keys. Why?

Revoked SSL certificate

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

What's that red-plus icon near a text?

Operational amplifier as comparator at high frequency

Theorems that impeded progress

RSA: Danger of using p to create q

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?

Two films in a tank, only one comes out with a development error – why?

Linear Path Optimization with Two Dependent Variables

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?

dbcc cleantable batch size explanation

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

Why is Minecraft giving an OpenGL error?

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

Convert two switches to a dual stack, and add outlet - possible here?

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

Filter any system log file by date or date range



A case of the sniffles


Checkerboard Infection100 Prisoners' Names in BoxesThe First Interplanetary Arithmetic SummitFarm dimensionsMysterious Murder Mystery 5Ernie and the Pirates of the CaribbeanCan the policeman actually catch the thief, instead of shooting?The Cucumber ParadoxEspionage at the Chinese RestaurantErnie and the Case of the Singing SistersA man is trapped in a cage and wants to escape but doesn't, even when given the keys. Why?













6












$begingroup$


The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    1 hour ago















6












$begingroup$


The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    1 hour ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)







mathematics situation






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









postmortespostmortes

508212




508212







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    1 hour ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    1 hour ago







2




2




$begingroup$
"no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
"no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
$endgroup$
– postmortes
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
$endgroup$
– postmortes
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
$endgroup$
– postmortes
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
$endgroup$
– postmortes
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Same second question.
$endgroup$
– noedne
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Same second question.
$endgroup$
– noedne
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81449%2fa-case-of-the-sniffles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago















4












$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 2 hours ago









hexominohexomino

45.8k4140219




45.8k4140219











  • $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    2 hours ago















$begingroup$
Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
$endgroup$
– postmortes
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
$endgroup$
– postmortes
2 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81449%2fa-case-of-the-sniffles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?

Shenzhen Football Club Índice Elenco atual | Títulos | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegaçãoGooglenotíciaslivrosacadêmicoeditar«"Elenco"»Site oficialexpandindo-oeee

When We Were Young (canção de Adele) Índice Antecedentes e lançamento | Faixas e formatos | Performances e covers | Desempenho nas tabelas musicais | Créditos | Histórico de lançamento | Referências Menu de navegação«Best albums of 2015»«Adele - When We Were Young (Radio Date: 22-01-2016)»«When We Were Young - Single by Adele»«Adele: Inside Her Private Life and Triumphant Return»«adele interview: world exclusive first interview in three years»«Tobias Jesso Jr: since Adele tweeted his song, he's even bigger than his dad»«Adele interviews Tobias Jesso Jr: 'I think that a couple of the ideas we had could be rap songs'»«Adele on Her Return: 'I Was So Frightened That No One Cared'»«Tobias Jesso Jr. on working with Adele: 'I was as nervous as shit'»«How Ariel Rechtshaid Pushed Adele To Her Limit»«Adele Previews 'When We Were Young' on '60 Minutes' Teaser, Tops Trending 140»«Adele Performs New '25' Ballad, "When We Were Young" Live: Watch»«Which '25' Song Should Be Adele's Next Single?»«Adele's 'When We Were Young' Confirmed As Second Single From '25'»«Adele's new single artwork for 'When We Were Young' is perfectly adorable»«Adele at the BBC review: honest, funny and spectacular – Celebrity News News»«'Saturday Night Live': Adele Sings 'Hello' and 'When We Were Young'»«'Adele: Live in New York City' NBC Special – Set List Revealed!»«Adele Closes Out the 2016 Brit Awards With 'When We Were Young'»«What Is The Adele Live Tour Set List? There's No Way She'd Leave Out These 8 Songs»«See Demi Lovato's Soaring Cover of Adele's 'When We Were Young'»«'The Voice': 5 Best Moments From Week 1 Blind Auditions»«Adele – When We Were Young (Media Control Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Entertainment Monitoring Africa)»«Adele – When We Were Young (ARIA Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ö3 Austria Top 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 50)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Canadian Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Tracklisten)»«Adele – When We Were Young (The Official Charts Company)»«Adele – Hello (IFPI Slovenská Republika)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Productores de Música de España)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Billboard Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Adult Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Adult Contemporary Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Dance Club Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Rock Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (IFPI Finlândia)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Syndicat National de l'Éditon Phonographique)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Magyar Hanglemezkiadók Szövetsége)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Irish Recorded Music Association)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Mexico Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (VG-lista)»«Adele – When We Were Young (NZ Top 40 Singles)»«Adele – When We Were Young (MegaCharts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Związek Producentów Audio Video)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Indie Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Sverigetopplistan)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Schweizer Hitparade)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Music Canada – Gold/Platinum – When We Were Young»«NZ Top 40 Singles Chart»«Certified Awards»e