Must Apache 2.0, MIT and GPLv3 be attributed in a distributed binary?Using images from MIT licensed softwareIngesting source files from other open source project into mineDo I need to include the full text of the MIT license in the UI of my app?Mention of open source license in productMIT License for patented softwareQ about consequences of a software license amendment regarding patents: Facebook's open-source “react”Is taking influence from an Apache licensed software copyright infringment?Private license and Apache License Version 2.0 in one commercial product?Can I use my own Open Source code in commercial software I'm writing?Removing Developer Name From Software

Multi tool use
How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?
Important Resources for Dark Age Civilizations?
What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?
Modeling an IP Address
Maximum likelihood parameters deviate from posterior distributions
How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?
Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Uncaught TypeError: 'set' on proxy: trap returned falsish for property Name
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
Can a monk's single staff be considered dual wielded, as per the Dual Wielder feat?
expand `ifthenelse` immediately
Decision tree nodes overlapping with Tikz
"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it
How to regain access to running applications after accidentally zapping X.org?
Does detail obscure or enhance action?
Why doesn't a class having private constructor prevent inheriting from this class? How to control which classes can inherit from a certain base?
Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?
Roll the carpet
Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?
How to determine what difficulty is right for the game?
Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?
How to format long polynomial?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Must Apache 2.0, MIT and GPLv3 be attributed in a distributed binary?
Using images from MIT licensed softwareIngesting source files from other open source project into mineDo I need to include the full text of the MIT license in the UI of my app?Mention of open source license in productMIT License for patented softwareQ about consequences of a software license amendment regarding patents: Facebook's open-source “react”Is taking influence from an Apache licensed software copyright infringment?Private license and Apache License Version 2.0 in one commercial product?Can I use my own Open Source code in commercial software I'm writing?Removing Developer Name From Software
I need help interpreting the following 3 licenses in regards to distributing binaries (software/application not just the source code).
- MIT https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
- Apache 2.0 https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0
- GPLv3 https://opensource.org/licenses/GPL-3.0
MIT license
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
What exactly is the software here? The source code is obvious because that is where the copyright notice would be and it clearly cannot be touched. But does it also have to be added to the user interface and displayed to the end users of the finished software?
Apache 2.0 says
4.1 You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
I interpret 4.1 as you must include the license but not the copyright notice?
4.3 You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and
I interpret 4.3 as you must include the copyright notice in the Source only. Not necessarily in the distributed Work like with the license in 4.1.
Which of these 3 if any, requires a copyright notice to be available in the user interface to the end user?
NOTE: I am asking because I need to pick a license for my project. I will of course attribute any library that I use. But I would like to force others to do the same which is why I am asking.
open-source-software
add a comment |
I need help interpreting the following 3 licenses in regards to distributing binaries (software/application not just the source code).
- MIT https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
- Apache 2.0 https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0
- GPLv3 https://opensource.org/licenses/GPL-3.0
MIT license
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
What exactly is the software here? The source code is obvious because that is where the copyright notice would be and it clearly cannot be touched. But does it also have to be added to the user interface and displayed to the end users of the finished software?
Apache 2.0 says
4.1 You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
I interpret 4.1 as you must include the license but not the copyright notice?
4.3 You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and
I interpret 4.3 as you must include the copyright notice in the Source only. Not necessarily in the distributed Work like with the license in 4.1.
Which of these 3 if any, requires a copyright notice to be available in the user interface to the end user?
NOTE: I am asking because I need to pick a license for my project. I will of course attribute any library that I use. But I would like to force others to do the same which is why I am asking.
open-source-software
add a comment |
I need help interpreting the following 3 licenses in regards to distributing binaries (software/application not just the source code).
- MIT https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
- Apache 2.0 https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0
- GPLv3 https://opensource.org/licenses/GPL-3.0
MIT license
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
What exactly is the software here? The source code is obvious because that is where the copyright notice would be and it clearly cannot be touched. But does it also have to be added to the user interface and displayed to the end users of the finished software?
Apache 2.0 says
4.1 You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
I interpret 4.1 as you must include the license but not the copyright notice?
4.3 You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and
I interpret 4.3 as you must include the copyright notice in the Source only. Not necessarily in the distributed Work like with the license in 4.1.
Which of these 3 if any, requires a copyright notice to be available in the user interface to the end user?
NOTE: I am asking because I need to pick a license for my project. I will of course attribute any library that I use. But I would like to force others to do the same which is why I am asking.
open-source-software
I need help interpreting the following 3 licenses in regards to distributing binaries (software/application not just the source code).
- MIT https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
- Apache 2.0 https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0
- GPLv3 https://opensource.org/licenses/GPL-3.0
MIT license
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
What exactly is the software here? The source code is obvious because that is where the copyright notice would be and it clearly cannot be touched. But does it also have to be added to the user interface and displayed to the end users of the finished software?
Apache 2.0 says
4.1 You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
I interpret 4.1 as you must include the license but not the copyright notice?
4.3 You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and
I interpret 4.3 as you must include the copyright notice in the Source only. Not necessarily in the distributed Work like with the license in 4.1.
Which of these 3 if any, requires a copyright notice to be available in the user interface to the end user?
NOTE: I am asking because I need to pick a license for my project. I will of course attribute any library that I use. But I would like to force others to do the same which is why I am asking.
open-source-software
open-source-software
asked 6 mins ago
J.A.PJ.A.P
1085
1085
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38849%2fmust-apache-2-0-mit-and-gplv3-be-attributed-in-a-distributed-binary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38849%2fmust-apache-2-0-mit-and-gplv3-be-attributed-in-a-distributed-binary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6Xx1dqyy,f,u,jira0 r63 4daRvBu8a