Problem of parity - Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments…What am I getting for Christmas? Secret Santa and Graph theoryReturn of the lost ant 3DVariation of the opaque forest problem (a.k.a farmyard problem)A closed path is made up of 11 line segments. Can one line, not containing a vertex of the path, intersect each of its segments?Connecting $1997$ points in the plane- what am I missing?How many paths are there from point P to point Q if each step has to go closer to point Q.A problem involving divisibility , parity and extremely clever thinkingHow to go out from a circular forest if we are lost? Not the straight line?Does finding the line of tightest packing in a packing problem help?Cover the plane with closed disks
Writing rule stating superpower from different root cause is bad writing
Finding angle with pure Geometry.
Theorems that impeded progress
What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?
Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation
LaTeX closing $ signs makes cursor jump
What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?
What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?
Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?
Modeling an IPv4 Address
How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?
Test if tikzmark exists on same page
What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Adding span tags within wp_list_pages list items
Risk of getting Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in the United States?
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
Mathematical cryptic clues
Is it important to consider tone, melody, and musical form while writing a song?
Do VLANs within a subnet need to have their own subnet for router on a stick?
Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance
How old can references or sources in a thesis be?
Python: next in for loop
"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it
Problem of parity - Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments…
What am I getting for Christmas? Secret Santa and Graph theoryReturn of the lost ant 3DVariation of the opaque forest problem (a.k.a farmyard problem)A closed path is made up of 11 line segments. Can one line, not containing a vertex of the path, intersect each of its segments?Connecting $1997$ points in the plane- what am I missing?How many paths are there from point P to point Q if each step has to go closer to point Q.A problem involving divisibility , parity and extremely clever thinkingHow to go out from a circular forest if we are lost? Not the straight line?Does finding the line of tightest packing in a packing problem help?Cover the plane with closed disks
$begingroup$
Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments, each of which intersects exactly one of the other segments?
recreational-mathematics parity
New contributor
Luiz Farias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments, each of which intersects exactly one of the other segments?
recreational-mathematics parity
New contributor
Luiz Farias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments, each of which intersects exactly one of the other segments?
recreational-mathematics parity
New contributor
Luiz Farias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Can we draw a closed path made up of 20 line segments, each of which intersects exactly one of the other segments?
recreational-mathematics parity
recreational-mathematics parity
New contributor
Luiz Farias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Luiz Farias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Luiz Farias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7ad6/a7ad6e88779d9d1ff74059878be36c56c52e216d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7ad6/a7ad6e88779d9d1ff74059878be36c56c52e216d" alt=""
Luiz FariasLuiz Farias
111
111
New contributor
Luiz Farias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Luiz Farias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Luiz Farias is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
David G. Stork's example with $18$ points and edges can easily be changed into an example with $10$ points and edges based on a pentagon inside another pentagon with alternating links. So take two of those $10$ solutions, one inside the other, and then join them appropriately to get something like this with $20$ points and edges.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
29 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I assume there can be no crossings at vertices or corners.)
Here is one solution for $18$ (and @Henry, below, generalizes to $20$):
Since each segment is crossed by exactly one other segment, we can think of the problem as having 10 Xs that have to be linked without crossing.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can certainly do it if your drawing is on a torus: draw a decagon that goes "through the hole"; then draw a zigzag (like the one in your picture) that crosses each edge of the decagon once. The two ends of the zigzag will end up on opposite "sides" of the original decagon, but can be joined "around the back". By converting the situation to one involving a "square donut" (akin to this one) you can probably do this all with straight lines, although that may be easier if the cross-section is a pentagon rather than a square...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
2 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Luiz Farias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177522%2fproblem-of-parity-can-we-draw-a-closed-path-made-up-of-20-line-segments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
David G. Stork's example with $18$ points and edges can easily be changed into an example with $10$ points and edges based on a pentagon inside another pentagon with alternating links. So take two of those $10$ solutions, one inside the other, and then join them appropriately to get something like this with $20$ points and edges.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
29 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
David G. Stork's example with $18$ points and edges can easily be changed into an example with $10$ points and edges based on a pentagon inside another pentagon with alternating links. So take two of those $10$ solutions, one inside the other, and then join them appropriately to get something like this with $20$ points and edges.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
29 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
David G. Stork's example with $18$ points and edges can easily be changed into an example with $10$ points and edges based on a pentagon inside another pentagon with alternating links. So take two of those $10$ solutions, one inside the other, and then join them appropriately to get something like this with $20$ points and edges.
$endgroup$
David G. Stork's example with $18$ points and edges can easily be changed into an example with $10$ points and edges based on a pentagon inside another pentagon with alternating links. So take two of those $10$ solutions, one inside the other, and then join them appropriately to get something like this with $20$ points and edges.
edited 29 mins ago
answered 35 mins ago
HenryHenry
101k482170
101k482170
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
29 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
18 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
29 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
18 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
29 mins ago
$begingroup$
Interesting that it has to "reverse direction"; I wonder if there's a winding-number argument to show something like this must be true...but I'm too groggy to work one out.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
29 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
18 mins ago
$begingroup$
Bravo! (+1).... the key seems to be reversing chirality.
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
18 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I assume there can be no crossings at vertices or corners.)
Here is one solution for $18$ (and @Henry, below, generalizes to $20$):
Since each segment is crossed by exactly one other segment, we can think of the problem as having 10 Xs that have to be linked without crossing.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I assume there can be no crossings at vertices or corners.)
Here is one solution for $18$ (and @Henry, below, generalizes to $20$):
Since each segment is crossed by exactly one other segment, we can think of the problem as having 10 Xs that have to be linked without crossing.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(I assume there can be no crossings at vertices or corners.)
Here is one solution for $18$ (and @Henry, below, generalizes to $20$):
Since each segment is crossed by exactly one other segment, we can think of the problem as having 10 Xs that have to be linked without crossing.
$endgroup$
(I assume there can be no crossings at vertices or corners.)
Here is one solution for $18$ (and @Henry, below, generalizes to $20$):
Since each segment is crossed by exactly one other segment, we can think of the problem as having 10 Xs that have to be linked without crossing.
edited 16 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6a67/a6a678b4b957f7c9d9687f479a2d9582509665fe" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6a67/a6a678b4b957f7c9d9687f479a2d9582509665fe" alt=""
David G. StorkDavid G. Stork
12k41735
12k41735
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Indeed - you seem to use $9$ being odd, though $10$ is not
$endgroup$
– Henry
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can certainly do it if your drawing is on a torus: draw a decagon that goes "through the hole"; then draw a zigzag (like the one in your picture) that crosses each edge of the decagon once. The two ends of the zigzag will end up on opposite "sides" of the original decagon, but can be joined "around the back". By converting the situation to one involving a "square donut" (akin to this one) you can probably do this all with straight lines, although that may be easier if the cross-section is a pentagon rather than a square...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
2 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can certainly do it if your drawing is on a torus: draw a decagon that goes "through the hole"; then draw a zigzag (like the one in your picture) that crosses each edge of the decagon once. The two ends of the zigzag will end up on opposite "sides" of the original decagon, but can be joined "around the back". By converting the situation to one involving a "square donut" (akin to this one) you can probably do this all with straight lines, although that may be easier if the cross-section is a pentagon rather than a square...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
2 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can certainly do it if your drawing is on a torus: draw a decagon that goes "through the hole"; then draw a zigzag (like the one in your picture) that crosses each edge of the decagon once. The two ends of the zigzag will end up on opposite "sides" of the original decagon, but can be joined "around the back". By converting the situation to one involving a "square donut" (akin to this one) you can probably do this all with straight lines, although that may be easier if the cross-section is a pentagon rather than a square...
$endgroup$
You can certainly do it if your drawing is on a torus: draw a decagon that goes "through the hole"; then draw a zigzag (like the one in your picture) that crosses each edge of the decagon once. The two ends of the zigzag will end up on opposite "sides" of the original decagon, but can be joined "around the back". By converting the situation to one involving a "square donut" (akin to this one) you can probably do this all with straight lines, although that may be easier if the cross-section is a pentagon rather than a square...
answered 38 mins ago
John HughesJohn Hughes
65.2k24293
65.2k24293
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
2 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
2 mins ago
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
I wonder if your "square donut" will force kinks in lines, thereby breaking the conditions of the problem. Possible... but not certain...
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
11 mins ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
2 mins ago
$begingroup$
You may well be right. Could be that there's a Z/2Z obstruction hiding in here somewhere.
$endgroup$
– John Hughes
2 mins ago
add a comment |
Luiz Farias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Luiz Farias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Luiz Farias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Luiz Farias is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177522%2fproblem-of-parity-can-we-draw-a-closed-path-made-up-of-20-line-segments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown