To what extent can a person use Wizards of the Coast's D&D monster information?Can an author of an app use logos that belong to auto manufacturers?What is the rationale behind fair use exemptions?What is the extent of copyright laws? (UnderMartian)Can I use the word “Saga” in a video game name?What information can I ask as the owner of a website to the clients of site?Replica of the product - what can I do, What can notTo what extent can one claim copyright over a sound?What information about a person are private and what are public?To what extent does an artwork copyright protect against real life 3D replicas of objects in a video game?Is it allowed to “copy” a video game concept?
I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine
How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?
Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?
Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free
"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it
Theorems that impeded progress
What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)
How to write a macro that is braces sensitive?
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
How do I create uniquely male characters?
Can divisibility rules for digits be generalized to sum of digits
Test whether all array elements are factors of a number
Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?
Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?
Modeling an IPv4 Address
Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?
Adding span tags within wp_list_pages list items
Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)
Has the BBC provided arguments for saying Brexit being cancelled is unlikely?
Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
What's the output of a record cartridge playing an out-of-speed record
Arthur Somervell: 1000 Exercises - Meaning of this notation
Minkowski space
To what extent can a person use Wizards of the Coast's D&D monster information?
Can an author of an app use logos that belong to auto manufacturers?What is the rationale behind fair use exemptions?What is the extent of copyright laws? (UnderMartian)Can I use the word “Saga” in a video game name?What information can I ask as the owner of a website to the clients of site?Replica of the product - what can I do, What can notTo what extent can one claim copyright over a sound?What information about a person are private and what are public?To what extent does an artwork copyright protect against real life 3D replicas of objects in a video game?Is it allowed to “copy” a video game concept?
I am creating some software that, at the moment, uses parts of the same format of summarizing creatures as the published works of Wizards of the Coast. Specifically the 2nd edition of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (AD&D 2nd edition).
For reference, this is what I'm talking about:
What I'm including
What theirs look like (if linking to this isn't allowed here I apologize)
From what I understand from the research I have done this does not fall under copyright, though despite the research I still have a hard time understanding it all. Where I get slightly more confused is trademarks and what some refer to as "product identity" however I haven't been able to find much information on the latter.
I don't understand how and what is protected outside the illustrations and perhaps the physical descriptions/explanations of the creatures. From my understanding of copyright and trademark the name and what I could refer to as the "recipe" (the list of attributes) of the creature can't be protected.
So what exactly is protected here and how, if at all, am I allowed to use parts of what is protected to stay kosher.
copyright trademark intellectual-property
asked Jul 19 '17 at 3:34
PinkPenguinPinkPenguin
1114
add a comment |
I am creating some software that, at the moment, uses parts of the same format of summarizing creatures as the published works of Wizards of the Coast. Specifically the 2nd edition of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (AD&D 2nd edition).
For reference, this is what I'm talking about:
What I'm including
What theirs look like (if linking to this isn't allowed here I apologize)
From what I understand from the research I have done this does not fall under copyright, though despite the research I still have a hard time understanding it all. Where I get slightly more confused is trademarks and what some refer to as "product identity" however I haven't been able to find much information on the latter.
I don't understand how and what is protected outside the illustrations and perhaps the physical descriptions/explanations of the creatures. From my understanding of copyright and trademark the name and what I could refer to as the "recipe" (the list of attributes) of the creature can't be protected.
So what exactly is protected here and how, if at all, am I allowed to use parts of what is protected to stay kosher.
copyright trademark intellectual-property
asked Jul 19 '17 at 3:34
PinkPenguinPinkPenguin
1114
add a comment |
I am creating some software that, at the moment, uses parts of the same format of summarizing creatures as the published works of Wizards of the Coast. Specifically the 2nd edition of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (AD&D 2nd edition).
For reference, this is what I'm talking about:
What I'm including
What theirs look like (if linking to this isn't allowed here I apologize)
From what I understand from the research I have done this does not fall under copyright, though despite the research I still have a hard time understanding it all. Where I get slightly more confused is trademarks and what some refer to as "product identity" however I haven't been able to find much information on the latter.
I don't understand how and what is protected outside the illustrations and perhaps the physical descriptions/explanations of the creatures. From my understanding of copyright and trademark the name and what I could refer to as the "recipe" (the list of attributes) of the creature can't be protected.
So what exactly is protected here and how, if at all, am I allowed to use parts of what is protected to stay kosher.
copyright trademark intellectual-property
asked Jul 19 '17 at 3:34
PinkPenguinPinkPenguin
1114
I am creating some software that, at the moment, uses parts of the same format of summarizing creatures as the published works of Wizards of the Coast. Specifically the 2nd edition of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (AD&D 2nd edition).
For reference, this is what I'm talking about:
What I'm including
What theirs look like (if linking to this isn't allowed here I apologize)
From what I understand from the research I have done this does not fall under copyright, though despite the research I still have a hard time understanding it all. Where I get slightly more confused is trademarks and what some refer to as "product identity" however I haven't been able to find much information on the latter.
I don't understand how and what is protected outside the illustrations and perhaps the physical descriptions/explanations of the creatures. From my understanding of copyright and trademark the name and what I could refer to as the "recipe" (the list of attributes) of the creature can't be protected.
So what exactly is protected here and how, if at all, am I allowed to use parts of what is protected to stay kosher.
copyright trademark intellectual-property
copyright trademark intellectual-property
asked Jul 19 '17 at 3:34
PinkPenguinPinkPenguin
1114
asked Jul 19 '17 at 3:34
PinkPenguinPinkPenguin
1114
edited Jul 19 '17 at 21:29
PinkPenguin
asked Jul 19 '17 at 3:34
PinkPenguinPinkPenguin
1114
asked Jul 19 '17 at 3:34
PinkPenguinPinkPenguin
1114
asked Jul 19 '17 at 3:34
PinkPenguinPinkPenguin
1114
1114
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Firstly, all content written by Wizards of the Coast (such as descriptions and stats) are owned by them.
However, Wizards of the Coast has released the Open Game License (OGL), which allows content creators to use the rules of dungeons and dragons, and incorporate copyrighted material into their own works.
Specifically, they are allowed to use the contents of the D&D System Reference Document freely and D&D rules freely. The SRD contains monster information so would indeed permit someone to write an app intended for use with D&D monsters.
But you may not use any of the D&D media in your work. So pictures of monsters are not allowed.
Here is an article from the WotC website which briefly describes what you can and cannot do with the OGL.
But it is necessary to look at the OGL itself, which can be found here
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:18
Shazamo MorebucksShazamo Morebucks
3,0721827
As was mentioned in another answer and what I forgot to include in my question is that the layout I use is that of a much older version of D&D (Advanced Dungeons and Dragons 2nd Edition) which doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere on their site or anywhere else I have looked. I will edit my question to include this information.
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 21:27
add a comment |
From my understanding of copyright and trademark the name and what I could refer to as the "recipe" (the list of attributes) of the creature can't be protected.
Well, your understanding is wrong.
WotC have produced a copyright work which includes the words, the order of the words, the layout of the words etc. you have created a derivative work and this is not allowed. While it is true that facts are not subject to copyright, the game statistics of a made-up creature are not facts.
Now, WotC have issued licences for their 3rd, 4th and 5th editions of the D&D game where the material references the licence. Your link is to 2nd edition material which is not and never has been licenced.
The only way that you are permitted to do what you want is if it is fair use. If you intend this software for personal use it probably is, if you intend public distribution it probably isn't.
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:26
Dale MDale M
56.2k23579
If I were to release the program without including any monsters would that be alright then? That is the user would be able to themselves create that content but the order and type of creature facts would be the same still. In essence, does WotC have rights to the order and layout of that specific list if it is not describing one of their creatures?
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 12:22
The attributes of a monster are not facts but ideas. They are absolutely not copyrightable.
– stwlam
Jul 14 '18 at 18:17
add a comment |
Since you are not talking about specific content but rather the manner of presentation or perhaps the idea of reducing a mythological creature to an attribute set, this would be subject to patent, not copyright. WOTC does not appear to have patented this process. Further, if they had then the patent would have likely expired by now. https://patents.justia.com/assignee/wizards-of-the-coast-inc
answered 17 mins ago
James J. WhiteJames J. White
11
New contributor
James J. White is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f21292%2fto-what-extent-can-a-person-use-wizards-of-the-coasts-dd-monster-information%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Firstly, all content written by Wizards of the Coast (such as descriptions and stats) are owned by them.
However, Wizards of the Coast has released the Open Game License (OGL), which allows content creators to use the rules of dungeons and dragons, and incorporate copyrighted material into their own works.
Specifically, they are allowed to use the contents of the D&D System Reference Document freely and D&D rules freely. The SRD contains monster information so would indeed permit someone to write an app intended for use with D&D monsters.
But you may not use any of the D&D media in your work. So pictures of monsters are not allowed.
Here is an article from the WotC website which briefly describes what you can and cannot do with the OGL.
But it is necessary to look at the OGL itself, which can be found here
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:18
Shazamo MorebucksShazamo Morebucks
3,0721827
As was mentioned in another answer and what I forgot to include in my question is that the layout I use is that of a much older version of D&D (Advanced Dungeons and Dragons 2nd Edition) which doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere on their site or anywhere else I have looked. I will edit my question to include this information.
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 21:27
add a comment |
Firstly, all content written by Wizards of the Coast (such as descriptions and stats) are owned by them.
However, Wizards of the Coast has released the Open Game License (OGL), which allows content creators to use the rules of dungeons and dragons, and incorporate copyrighted material into their own works.
Specifically, they are allowed to use the contents of the D&D System Reference Document freely and D&D rules freely. The SRD contains monster information so would indeed permit someone to write an app intended for use with D&D monsters.
But you may not use any of the D&D media in your work. So pictures of monsters are not allowed.
Here is an article from the WotC website which briefly describes what you can and cannot do with the OGL.
But it is necessary to look at the OGL itself, which can be found here
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:18
Shazamo MorebucksShazamo Morebucks
3,0721827
As was mentioned in another answer and what I forgot to include in my question is that the layout I use is that of a much older version of D&D (Advanced Dungeons and Dragons 2nd Edition) which doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere on their site or anywhere else I have looked. I will edit my question to include this information.
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 21:27
add a comment |
Firstly, all content written by Wizards of the Coast (such as descriptions and stats) are owned by them.
However, Wizards of the Coast has released the Open Game License (OGL), which allows content creators to use the rules of dungeons and dragons, and incorporate copyrighted material into their own works.
Specifically, they are allowed to use the contents of the D&D System Reference Document freely and D&D rules freely. The SRD contains monster information so would indeed permit someone to write an app intended for use with D&D monsters.
But you may not use any of the D&D media in your work. So pictures of monsters are not allowed.
Here is an article from the WotC website which briefly describes what you can and cannot do with the OGL.
But it is necessary to look at the OGL itself, which can be found here
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:18
Shazamo MorebucksShazamo Morebucks
3,0721827
Firstly, all content written by Wizards of the Coast (such as descriptions and stats) are owned by them.
However, Wizards of the Coast has released the Open Game License (OGL), which allows content creators to use the rules of dungeons and dragons, and incorporate copyrighted material into their own works.
Specifically, they are allowed to use the contents of the D&D System Reference Document freely and D&D rules freely. The SRD contains monster information so would indeed permit someone to write an app intended for use with D&D monsters.
But you may not use any of the D&D media in your work. So pictures of monsters are not allowed.
Here is an article from the WotC website which briefly describes what you can and cannot do with the OGL.
But it is necessary to look at the OGL itself, which can be found here
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:18
Shazamo MorebucksShazamo Morebucks
3,0721827
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:18
Shazamo MorebucksShazamo Morebucks
3,0721827
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:18
Shazamo MorebucksShazamo Morebucks
3,0721827
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:18
Shazamo MorebucksShazamo Morebucks
3,0721827
3,0721827
As was mentioned in another answer and what I forgot to include in my question is that the layout I use is that of a much older version of D&D (Advanced Dungeons and Dragons 2nd Edition) which doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere on their site or anywhere else I have looked. I will edit my question to include this information.
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 21:27
add a comment |
As was mentioned in another answer and what I forgot to include in my question is that the layout I use is that of a much older version of D&D (Advanced Dungeons and Dragons 2nd Edition) which doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere on their site or anywhere else I have looked. I will edit my question to include this information.
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 21:27
As was mentioned in another answer and what I forgot to include in my question is that the layout I use is that of a much older version of D&D (Advanced Dungeons and Dragons 2nd Edition) which doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere on their site or anywhere else I have looked. I will edit my question to include this information.
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 21:27
As was mentioned in another answer and what I forgot to include in my question is that the layout I use is that of a much older version of D&D (Advanced Dungeons and Dragons 2nd Edition) which doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere on their site or anywhere else I have looked. I will edit my question to include this information.
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 21:27
add a comment |
From my understanding of copyright and trademark the name and what I could refer to as the "recipe" (the list of attributes) of the creature can't be protected.
Well, your understanding is wrong.
WotC have produced a copyright work which includes the words, the order of the words, the layout of the words etc. you have created a derivative work and this is not allowed. While it is true that facts are not subject to copyright, the game statistics of a made-up creature are not facts.
Now, WotC have issued licences for their 3rd, 4th and 5th editions of the D&D game where the material references the licence. Your link is to 2nd edition material which is not and never has been licenced.
The only way that you are permitted to do what you want is if it is fair use. If you intend this software for personal use it probably is, if you intend public distribution it probably isn't.
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:26
Dale MDale M
56.2k23579
If I were to release the program without including any monsters would that be alright then? That is the user would be able to themselves create that content but the order and type of creature facts would be the same still. In essence, does WotC have rights to the order and layout of that specific list if it is not describing one of their creatures?
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 12:22
The attributes of a monster are not facts but ideas. They are absolutely not copyrightable.
– stwlam
Jul 14 '18 at 18:17
add a comment |
From my understanding of copyright and trademark the name and what I could refer to as the "recipe" (the list of attributes) of the creature can't be protected.
Well, your understanding is wrong.
WotC have produced a copyright work which includes the words, the order of the words, the layout of the words etc. you have created a derivative work and this is not allowed. While it is true that facts are not subject to copyright, the game statistics of a made-up creature are not facts.
Now, WotC have issued licences for their 3rd, 4th and 5th editions of the D&D game where the material references the licence. Your link is to 2nd edition material which is not and never has been licenced.
The only way that you are permitted to do what you want is if it is fair use. If you intend this software for personal use it probably is, if you intend public distribution it probably isn't.
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:26
Dale MDale M
56.2k23579
If I were to release the program without including any monsters would that be alright then? That is the user would be able to themselves create that content but the order and type of creature facts would be the same still. In essence, does WotC have rights to the order and layout of that specific list if it is not describing one of their creatures?
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 12:22
The attributes of a monster are not facts but ideas. They are absolutely not copyrightable.
– stwlam
Jul 14 '18 at 18:17
add a comment |
From my understanding of copyright and trademark the name and what I could refer to as the "recipe" (the list of attributes) of the creature can't be protected.
Well, your understanding is wrong.
WotC have produced a copyright work which includes the words, the order of the words, the layout of the words etc. you have created a derivative work and this is not allowed. While it is true that facts are not subject to copyright, the game statistics of a made-up creature are not facts.
Now, WotC have issued licences for their 3rd, 4th and 5th editions of the D&D game where the material references the licence. Your link is to 2nd edition material which is not and never has been licenced.
The only way that you are permitted to do what you want is if it is fair use. If you intend this software for personal use it probably is, if you intend public distribution it probably isn't.
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:26
Dale MDale M
56.2k23579
From my understanding of copyright and trademark the name and what I could refer to as the "recipe" (the list of attributes) of the creature can't be protected.
Well, your understanding is wrong.
WotC have produced a copyright work which includes the words, the order of the words, the layout of the words etc. you have created a derivative work and this is not allowed. While it is true that facts are not subject to copyright, the game statistics of a made-up creature are not facts.
Now, WotC have issued licences for their 3rd, 4th and 5th editions of the D&D game where the material references the licence. Your link is to 2nd edition material which is not and never has been licenced.
The only way that you are permitted to do what you want is if it is fair use. If you intend this software for personal use it probably is, if you intend public distribution it probably isn't.
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:26
Dale MDale M
56.2k23579
edited Jul 19 '17 at 9:53
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:26
Dale MDale M
56.2k23579
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:26
Dale MDale M
56.2k23579
answered Jul 19 '17 at 8:26
Dale MDale M
56.2k23579
56.2k23579
If I were to release the program without including any monsters would that be alright then? That is the user would be able to themselves create that content but the order and type of creature facts would be the same still. In essence, does WotC have rights to the order and layout of that specific list if it is not describing one of their creatures?
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 12:22
The attributes of a monster are not facts but ideas. They are absolutely not copyrightable.
– stwlam
Jul 14 '18 at 18:17
add a comment |
If I were to release the program without including any monsters would that be alright then? That is the user would be able to themselves create that content but the order and type of creature facts would be the same still. In essence, does WotC have rights to the order and layout of that specific list if it is not describing one of their creatures?
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 12:22
The attributes of a monster are not facts but ideas. They are absolutely not copyrightable.
– stwlam
Jul 14 '18 at 18:17
If I were to release the program without including any monsters would that be alright then? That is the user would be able to themselves create that content but the order and type of creature facts would be the same still. In essence, does WotC have rights to the order and layout of that specific list if it is not describing one of their creatures?
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 12:22
If I were to release the program without including any monsters would that be alright then? That is the user would be able to themselves create that content but the order and type of creature facts would be the same still. In essence, does WotC have rights to the order and layout of that specific list if it is not describing one of their creatures?
– PinkPenguin
Jul 19 '17 at 12:22
The attributes of a monster are not facts but ideas. They are absolutely not copyrightable.
– stwlam
Jul 14 '18 at 18:17
The attributes of a monster are not facts but ideas. They are absolutely not copyrightable.
– stwlam
Jul 14 '18 at 18:17
add a comment |
Since you are not talking about specific content but rather the manner of presentation or perhaps the idea of reducing a mythological creature to an attribute set, this would be subject to patent, not copyright. WOTC does not appear to have patented this process. Further, if they had then the patent would have likely expired by now. https://patents.justia.com/assignee/wizards-of-the-coast-inc
answered 17 mins ago
James J. WhiteJames J. White
11
New contributor
James J. White is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Since you are not talking about specific content but rather the manner of presentation or perhaps the idea of reducing a mythological creature to an attribute set, this would be subject to patent, not copyright. WOTC does not appear to have patented this process. Further, if they had then the patent would have likely expired by now. https://patents.justia.com/assignee/wizards-of-the-coast-inc
answered 17 mins ago
James J. WhiteJames J. White
11
New contributor
James J. White is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Since you are not talking about specific content but rather the manner of presentation or perhaps the idea of reducing a mythological creature to an attribute set, this would be subject to patent, not copyright. WOTC does not appear to have patented this process. Further, if they had then the patent would have likely expired by now. https://patents.justia.com/assignee/wizards-of-the-coast-inc
answered 17 mins ago
James J. WhiteJames J. White
11
New contributor
James J. White is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Since you are not talking about specific content but rather the manner of presentation or perhaps the idea of reducing a mythological creature to an attribute set, this would be subject to patent, not copyright. WOTC does not appear to have patented this process. Further, if they had then the patent would have likely expired by now. https://patents.justia.com/assignee/wizards-of-the-coast-inc
answered 17 mins ago
James J. WhiteJames J. White
11
New contributor
James J. White is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 17 mins ago
James J. WhiteJames J. White
11
New contributor
James J. White is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 17 mins ago
James J. WhiteJames J. White
11
answered 17 mins ago
James J. WhiteJames J. White
11
11
New contributor
James J. White is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
James J. White is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
James J. White is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f21292%2fto-what-extent-can-a-person-use-wizards-of-the-coasts-dd-monster-information%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
