Were any external disk drives stacked vertically?Where can I find an external 8-inch floppy disk drive?Only “Drive A:” detected with two floppy disk drivesWhy did the Atari 8-bit computers make beeping noises while accessing the disk and cassette drives?Why were floppy drives not any faster?Disk drive long storage, with or without disk inside?Were external floppy drives for Atari ST and Amiga inter-compatible?Why do hard drives not use larger platter sizes anymore?What is the danger involved in trying to write already closed file with Commodore 1541 disk drive?Purpose of two disk drives on the Osborne 1Wider tower cases

How to model explosives?

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?

Blender 2.8 I can't see vertices, edges or faces in edit mode

Where does SFDX store details about scratch orgs?

Alternative to sending password over mail?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

Facing a paradox: Earnshaw's theorem in one dimension

How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

Is "remove commented out code" correct English?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

table going outside the page

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

How do I find out when a node was added to an availability group?

Twin primes whose sum is a cube

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

Assassin's bullet with mercury

What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?

Why is the ratio of two extensive quantities always intensive?

How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Would Slavery Reparations be considered Bills of Attainder and hence Illegal?

I would say: "You are another teacher", but she is a woman and I am a man



Were any external disk drives stacked vertically?


Where can I find an external 8-inch floppy disk drive?Only “Drive A:” detected with two floppy disk drivesWhy did the Atari 8-bit computers make beeping noises while accessing the disk and cassette drives?Why were floppy drives not any faster?Disk drive long storage, with or without disk inside?Were external floppy drives for Atari ST and Amiga inter-compatible?Why do hard drives not use larger platter sizes anymore?What is the danger involved in trying to write already closed file with Commodore 1541 disk drive?Purpose of two disk drives on the Osborne 1Wider tower cases













1















There was a time when floppy disk drives were big, expensive devices that in many cases, instead of being components of a computer, would be separate machines connected by a cable, in some cases with their own CPU. A well-known example was the Commodore 1541, which had a similar CPU to the Commodore 64.



I personally only ever had one external drive, but when you look at photographs of setups with two drives (very desirable if you could afford it), they are always side-by-side, taking up an awful lot of desk space. Even the CBM 4040 dual drive, places the drives side-by-side in a single very wide case.



It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall, the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically. Maybe this would result in each drive picking up heat and vibration from the other one, but if this was tolerable when they were stacked vertically in a PC tower case, why not for external drives?



Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically? If not, why not?










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

    – Raffzahn
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    @Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

    – tofro
    1 hour ago












  • @Raffzahn I asked whether external disk drives were in fact ever stacked vertically (historical fact), and if not, why not - the intent of that part was whether there was some technical reason why not. As it turns out, the answer is yes, there were lots of vertically stacked disk drives, so it resolves to a matter of historical fact, not opinion at all.

    – rwallace
    1 hour ago











  • @rwallace The fault in your argumentation is assuming that an external case is anything but a case - no difference here, thus no base to differentiate. A case is a case is a case.

    – Raffzahn
    57 mins ago
















1















There was a time when floppy disk drives were big, expensive devices that in many cases, instead of being components of a computer, would be separate machines connected by a cable, in some cases with their own CPU. A well-known example was the Commodore 1541, which had a similar CPU to the Commodore 64.



I personally only ever had one external drive, but when you look at photographs of setups with two drives (very desirable if you could afford it), they are always side-by-side, taking up an awful lot of desk space. Even the CBM 4040 dual drive, places the drives side-by-side in a single very wide case.



It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall, the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically. Maybe this would result in each drive picking up heat and vibration from the other one, but if this was tolerable when they were stacked vertically in a PC tower case, why not for external drives?



Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically? If not, why not?










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

    – Raffzahn
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    @Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

    – tofro
    1 hour ago












  • @Raffzahn I asked whether external disk drives were in fact ever stacked vertically (historical fact), and if not, why not - the intent of that part was whether there was some technical reason why not. As it turns out, the answer is yes, there were lots of vertically stacked disk drives, so it resolves to a matter of historical fact, not opinion at all.

    – rwallace
    1 hour ago











  • @rwallace The fault in your argumentation is assuming that an external case is anything but a case - no difference here, thus no base to differentiate. A case is a case is a case.

    – Raffzahn
    57 mins ago














1












1








1








There was a time when floppy disk drives were big, expensive devices that in many cases, instead of being components of a computer, would be separate machines connected by a cable, in some cases with their own CPU. A well-known example was the Commodore 1541, which had a similar CPU to the Commodore 64.



I personally only ever had one external drive, but when you look at photographs of setups with two drives (very desirable if you could afford it), they are always side-by-side, taking up an awful lot of desk space. Even the CBM 4040 dual drive, places the drives side-by-side in a single very wide case.



It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall, the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically. Maybe this would result in each drive picking up heat and vibration from the other one, but if this was tolerable when they were stacked vertically in a PC tower case, why not for external drives?



Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically? If not, why not?










share|improve this question














There was a time when floppy disk drives were big, expensive devices that in many cases, instead of being components of a computer, would be separate machines connected by a cable, in some cases with their own CPU. A well-known example was the Commodore 1541, which had a similar CPU to the Commodore 64.



I personally only ever had one external drive, but when you look at photographs of setups with two drives (very desirable if you could afford it), they are always side-by-side, taking up an awful lot of desk space. Even the CBM 4040 dual drive, places the drives side-by-side in a single very wide case.



It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall, the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically. Maybe this would result in each drive picking up heat and vibration from the other one, but if this was tolerable when they were stacked vertically in a PC tower case, why not for external drives?



Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically? If not, why not?







hardware floppy-disk disk-drive






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









rwallacerwallace

10.5k453156




10.5k453156







  • 1





    Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

    – Raffzahn
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    @Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

    – tofro
    1 hour ago












  • @Raffzahn I asked whether external disk drives were in fact ever stacked vertically (historical fact), and if not, why not - the intent of that part was whether there was some technical reason why not. As it turns out, the answer is yes, there were lots of vertically stacked disk drives, so it resolves to a matter of historical fact, not opinion at all.

    – rwallace
    1 hour ago











  • @rwallace The fault in your argumentation is assuming that an external case is anything but a case - no difference here, thus no base to differentiate. A case is a case is a case.

    – Raffzahn
    57 mins ago













  • 1





    Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

    – Raffzahn
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    @Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

    – tofro
    1 hour ago












  • @Raffzahn I asked whether external disk drives were in fact ever stacked vertically (historical fact), and if not, why not - the intent of that part was whether there was some technical reason why not. As it turns out, the answer is yes, there were lots of vertically stacked disk drives, so it resolves to a matter of historical fact, not opinion at all.

    – rwallace
    1 hour ago











  • @rwallace The fault in your argumentation is assuming that an external case is anything but a case - no difference here, thus no base to differentiate. A case is a case is a case.

    – Raffzahn
    57 mins ago








1




1





Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

– Raffzahn
2 hours ago





Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

– Raffzahn
2 hours ago




2




2





@Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

– tofro
1 hour ago






@Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

– tofro
1 hour ago














@Raffzahn I asked whether external disk drives were in fact ever stacked vertically (historical fact), and if not, why not - the intent of that part was whether there was some technical reason why not. As it turns out, the answer is yes, there were lots of vertically stacked disk drives, so it resolves to a matter of historical fact, not opinion at all.

– rwallace
1 hour ago





@Raffzahn I asked whether external disk drives were in fact ever stacked vertically (historical fact), and if not, why not - the intent of that part was whether there was some technical reason why not. As it turns out, the answer is yes, there were lots of vertically stacked disk drives, so it resolves to a matter of historical fact, not opinion at all.

– rwallace
1 hour ago













@rwallace The fault in your argumentation is assuming that an external case is anything but a case - no difference here, thus no base to differentiate. A case is a case is a case.

– Raffzahn
57 mins ago






@rwallace The fault in your argumentation is assuming that an external case is anything but a case - no difference here, thus no base to differentiate. A case is a case is a case.

– Raffzahn
57 mins ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3














  1. I don't think your claim that never happened is generally true

  2. It makes a lot of sense to put drives side by side when you want to place the drive set between computer and CRT (like many Apple users did). That wouldn't work well with stacks.

  3. Especially twin 3 1/2" drives were very often sold as vertical stacks. But some vendors also did the same with the larger drive sets

  4. If you look at earlier drives, 2 x 5 1/4 full-height drives stacked on top of the other really would be awkward to handle (but, see here) - that simply looks clunky.

Other than that, I don't see a technical reason why you wouldn't want to stack drives on top of the others. The frames of 5 1/4 drives are mostly aluminium castings, so stable enough to stack, and heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives.



German Wikipedia seems to know how to stack Commodore 4040 drives as well. You simply need to have enough of them ;)






share|improve this answer
































    3














    Yes; this was standard procedure for at least the BBC Micro:



    enter image description here



    Including for third-party drives:



    enter image description here



    Presumably because two drives arranged that way were only just taller than the machine itself:



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer























    • To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

      – Kaz
      56 mins ago











    • Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

      – Kaz
      53 mins ago


















    2















    It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall,




    To me they are taller than wide. After all, that's as well the orientation IBM did put the very first drive, so anything else is plain wrong, isn't it :))




    the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically.




    That's pure opinion and up to the designer how he imagines a drive to look best or fit best. The drives itself work in any orientation with any angle equally well.




    It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices




    As said before, they are not, they work in any orientation. At least as long as we talk about the technology. If at all, any orientation can come from ball bearing involved. Except, for simple low speed application next to any standard bearing will offer the needed support strength - if that drive has one at all.




    Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically?




    It has been used in any kombination you may thing of.



    • Horizontal side by side like in a DEC RX01/02 - as that will need less HE in a rack

    enter image description here



    • Horizontal above each other like the Atari 815

    enter image description here



    • Vertical side by side like IBM's 6330 8" drive

    enter image description here



    • Vertical above each other (Again DEC computers)

    (Still looking for the right picture)



    • Or even both like with a Heathkit H17 case where two dives were mounted horizontal side by side, but when a third drive got added they where turned vertical to fit the case.

    enter image description hereenter image description here



    • Heck, they where even Computers mouting them both way at the same time:

    enter image description here



    • And then there was the DEC RX-50 dual drive, used in PCs to be placed either as desktop or tower, whatever fits the desk.

    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer
































      1














      In the TRS-80 Model I and Model II ecosystems, floppy drives normally had the disk oriented vertically. This made the drives "tall rather than wide", and placing multiple drives side-by-side worked well.



      In the Model III, two horizontal drives were stacked vertically in the main housing, to the right of the CRT (and above the numeric keypad).






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "648"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9569%2fwere-any-external-disk-drives-stacked-vertically%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3














        1. I don't think your claim that never happened is generally true

        2. It makes a lot of sense to put drives side by side when you want to place the drive set between computer and CRT (like many Apple users did). That wouldn't work well with stacks.

        3. Especially twin 3 1/2" drives were very often sold as vertical stacks. But some vendors also did the same with the larger drive sets

        4. If you look at earlier drives, 2 x 5 1/4 full-height drives stacked on top of the other really would be awkward to handle (but, see here) - that simply looks clunky.

        Other than that, I don't see a technical reason why you wouldn't want to stack drives on top of the others. The frames of 5 1/4 drives are mostly aluminium castings, so stable enough to stack, and heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives.



        German Wikipedia seems to know how to stack Commodore 4040 drives as well. You simply need to have enough of them ;)






        share|improve this answer





























          3














          1. I don't think your claim that never happened is generally true

          2. It makes a lot of sense to put drives side by side when you want to place the drive set between computer and CRT (like many Apple users did). That wouldn't work well with stacks.

          3. Especially twin 3 1/2" drives were very often sold as vertical stacks. But some vendors also did the same with the larger drive sets

          4. If you look at earlier drives, 2 x 5 1/4 full-height drives stacked on top of the other really would be awkward to handle (but, see here) - that simply looks clunky.

          Other than that, I don't see a technical reason why you wouldn't want to stack drives on top of the others. The frames of 5 1/4 drives are mostly aluminium castings, so stable enough to stack, and heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives.



          German Wikipedia seems to know how to stack Commodore 4040 drives as well. You simply need to have enough of them ;)






          share|improve this answer



























            3












            3








            3







            1. I don't think your claim that never happened is generally true

            2. It makes a lot of sense to put drives side by side when you want to place the drive set between computer and CRT (like many Apple users did). That wouldn't work well with stacks.

            3. Especially twin 3 1/2" drives were very often sold as vertical stacks. But some vendors also did the same with the larger drive sets

            4. If you look at earlier drives, 2 x 5 1/4 full-height drives stacked on top of the other really would be awkward to handle (but, see here) - that simply looks clunky.

            Other than that, I don't see a technical reason why you wouldn't want to stack drives on top of the others. The frames of 5 1/4 drives are mostly aluminium castings, so stable enough to stack, and heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives.



            German Wikipedia seems to know how to stack Commodore 4040 drives as well. You simply need to have enough of them ;)






            share|improve this answer















            1. I don't think your claim that never happened is generally true

            2. It makes a lot of sense to put drives side by side when you want to place the drive set between computer and CRT (like many Apple users did). That wouldn't work well with stacks.

            3. Especially twin 3 1/2" drives were very often sold as vertical stacks. But some vendors also did the same with the larger drive sets

            4. If you look at earlier drives, 2 x 5 1/4 full-height drives stacked on top of the other really would be awkward to handle (but, see here) - that simply looks clunky.

            Other than that, I don't see a technical reason why you wouldn't want to stack drives on top of the others. The frames of 5 1/4 drives are mostly aluminium castings, so stable enough to stack, and heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives.



            German Wikipedia seems to know how to stack Commodore 4040 drives as well. You simply need to have enough of them ;)







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 4 hours ago

























            answered 4 hours ago









            tofrotofro

            16.3k33392




            16.3k33392





















                3














                Yes; this was standard procedure for at least the BBC Micro:



                enter image description here



                Including for third-party drives:



                enter image description here



                Presumably because two drives arranged that way were only just taller than the machine itself:



                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer























                • To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

                  – Kaz
                  56 mins ago











                • Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

                  – Kaz
                  53 mins ago















                3














                Yes; this was standard procedure for at least the BBC Micro:



                enter image description here



                Including for third-party drives:



                enter image description here



                Presumably because two drives arranged that way were only just taller than the machine itself:



                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer























                • To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

                  – Kaz
                  56 mins ago











                • Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

                  – Kaz
                  53 mins ago













                3












                3








                3







                Yes; this was standard procedure for at least the BBC Micro:



                enter image description here



                Including for third-party drives:



                enter image description here



                Presumably because two drives arranged that way were only just taller than the machine itself:



                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer













                Yes; this was standard procedure for at least the BBC Micro:



                enter image description here



                Including for third-party drives:



                enter image description here



                Presumably because two drives arranged that way were only just taller than the machine itself:



                enter image description here







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 hours ago









                TommyTommy

                15.9k14677




                15.9k14677












                • To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

                  – Kaz
                  56 mins ago











                • Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

                  – Kaz
                  53 mins ago

















                • To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

                  – Kaz
                  56 mins ago











                • Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

                  – Kaz
                  53 mins ago
















                To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

                – Kaz
                56 mins ago





                To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

                – Kaz
                56 mins ago













                Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

                – Kaz
                53 mins ago





                Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

                – Kaz
                53 mins ago











                2















                It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall,




                To me they are taller than wide. After all, that's as well the orientation IBM did put the very first drive, so anything else is plain wrong, isn't it :))




                the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically.




                That's pure opinion and up to the designer how he imagines a drive to look best or fit best. The drives itself work in any orientation with any angle equally well.




                It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices




                As said before, they are not, they work in any orientation. At least as long as we talk about the technology. If at all, any orientation can come from ball bearing involved. Except, for simple low speed application next to any standard bearing will offer the needed support strength - if that drive has one at all.




                Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically?




                It has been used in any kombination you may thing of.



                • Horizontal side by side like in a DEC RX01/02 - as that will need less HE in a rack

                enter image description here



                • Horizontal above each other like the Atari 815

                enter image description here



                • Vertical side by side like IBM's 6330 8" drive

                enter image description here



                • Vertical above each other (Again DEC computers)

                (Still looking for the right picture)



                • Or even both like with a Heathkit H17 case where two dives were mounted horizontal side by side, but when a third drive got added they where turned vertical to fit the case.

                enter image description hereenter image description here



                • Heck, they where even Computers mouting them both way at the same time:

                enter image description here



                • And then there was the DEC RX-50 dual drive, used in PCs to be placed either as desktop or tower, whatever fits the desk.

                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer





























                  2















                  It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall,




                  To me they are taller than wide. After all, that's as well the orientation IBM did put the very first drive, so anything else is plain wrong, isn't it :))




                  the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically.




                  That's pure opinion and up to the designer how he imagines a drive to look best or fit best. The drives itself work in any orientation with any angle equally well.




                  It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices




                  As said before, they are not, they work in any orientation. At least as long as we talk about the technology. If at all, any orientation can come from ball bearing involved. Except, for simple low speed application next to any standard bearing will offer the needed support strength - if that drive has one at all.




                  Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically?




                  It has been used in any kombination you may thing of.



                  • Horizontal side by side like in a DEC RX01/02 - as that will need less HE in a rack

                  enter image description here



                  • Horizontal above each other like the Atari 815

                  enter image description here



                  • Vertical side by side like IBM's 6330 8" drive

                  enter image description here



                  • Vertical above each other (Again DEC computers)

                  (Still looking for the right picture)



                  • Or even both like with a Heathkit H17 case where two dives were mounted horizontal side by side, but when a third drive got added they where turned vertical to fit the case.

                  enter image description hereenter image description here



                  • Heck, they where even Computers mouting them both way at the same time:

                  enter image description here



                  • And then there was the DEC RX-50 dual drive, used in PCs to be placed either as desktop or tower, whatever fits the desk.

                  enter image description here






                  share|improve this answer



























                    2












                    2








                    2








                    It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall,




                    To me they are taller than wide. After all, that's as well the orientation IBM did put the very first drive, so anything else is plain wrong, isn't it :))




                    the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically.




                    That's pure opinion and up to the designer how he imagines a drive to look best or fit best. The drives itself work in any orientation with any angle equally well.




                    It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices




                    As said before, they are not, they work in any orientation. At least as long as we talk about the technology. If at all, any orientation can come from ball bearing involved. Except, for simple low speed application next to any standard bearing will offer the needed support strength - if that drive has one at all.




                    Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically?




                    It has been used in any kombination you may thing of.



                    • Horizontal side by side like in a DEC RX01/02 - as that will need less HE in a rack

                    enter image description here



                    • Horizontal above each other like the Atari 815

                    enter image description here



                    • Vertical side by side like IBM's 6330 8" drive

                    enter image description here



                    • Vertical above each other (Again DEC computers)

                    (Still looking for the right picture)



                    • Or even both like with a Heathkit H17 case where two dives were mounted horizontal side by side, but when a third drive got added they where turned vertical to fit the case.

                    enter image description hereenter image description here



                    • Heck, they where even Computers mouting them both way at the same time:

                    enter image description here



                    • And then there was the DEC RX-50 dual drive, used in PCs to be placed either as desktop or tower, whatever fits the desk.

                    enter image description here






                    share|improve this answer
















                    It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall,




                    To me they are taller than wide. After all, that's as well the orientation IBM did put the very first drive, so anything else is plain wrong, isn't it :))




                    the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically.




                    That's pure opinion and up to the designer how he imagines a drive to look best or fit best. The drives itself work in any orientation with any angle equally well.




                    It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices




                    As said before, they are not, they work in any orientation. At least as long as we talk about the technology. If at all, any orientation can come from ball bearing involved. Except, for simple low speed application next to any standard bearing will offer the needed support strength - if that drive has one at all.




                    Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically?




                    It has been used in any kombination you may thing of.



                    • Horizontal side by side like in a DEC RX01/02 - as that will need less HE in a rack

                    enter image description here



                    • Horizontal above each other like the Atari 815

                    enter image description here



                    • Vertical side by side like IBM's 6330 8" drive

                    enter image description here



                    • Vertical above each other (Again DEC computers)

                    (Still looking for the right picture)



                    • Or even both like with a Heathkit H17 case where two dives were mounted horizontal side by side, but when a third drive got added they where turned vertical to fit the case.

                    enter image description hereenter image description here



                    • Heck, they where even Computers mouting them both way at the same time:

                    enter image description here



                    • And then there was the DEC RX-50 dual drive, used in PCs to be placed either as desktop or tower, whatever fits the desk.

                    enter image description here







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 1 hour ago

























                    answered 1 hour ago









                    RaffzahnRaffzahn

                    55.1k6136223




                    55.1k6136223





















                        1














                        In the TRS-80 Model I and Model II ecosystems, floppy drives normally had the disk oriented vertically. This made the drives "tall rather than wide", and placing multiple drives side-by-side worked well.



                        In the Model III, two horizontal drives were stacked vertically in the main housing, to the right of the CRT (and above the numeric keypad).






                        share|improve this answer



























                          1














                          In the TRS-80 Model I and Model II ecosystems, floppy drives normally had the disk oriented vertically. This made the drives "tall rather than wide", and placing multiple drives side-by-side worked well.



                          In the Model III, two horizontal drives were stacked vertically in the main housing, to the right of the CRT (and above the numeric keypad).






                          share|improve this answer

























                            1












                            1








                            1







                            In the TRS-80 Model I and Model II ecosystems, floppy drives normally had the disk oriented vertically. This made the drives "tall rather than wide", and placing multiple drives side-by-side worked well.



                            In the Model III, two horizontal drives were stacked vertically in the main housing, to the right of the CRT (and above the numeric keypad).






                            share|improve this answer













                            In the TRS-80 Model I and Model II ecosystems, floppy drives normally had the disk oriented vertically. This made the drives "tall rather than wide", and placing multiple drives side-by-side worked well.



                            In the Model III, two horizontal drives were stacked vertically in the main housing, to the right of the CRT (and above the numeric keypad).







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 2 hours ago









                            jeffBjeffB

                            68828




                            68828



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9569%2fwere-any-external-disk-drives-stacked-vertically%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Era Viking Índice Início da Era Viquingue | Cotidiano | Sociedade | Língua | Religião | A arte | As primeiras cidades | As viagens dos viquingues | Viquingues do Oeste e Leste | Fim da Era Viquingue | Fontes históricas | Referências Bibliografia | Ligações externas | Menu de navegação«Sverige då!»«Handel I vikingetid»«O que é Nórdico Antigo»Mito, magia e religião na volsunga saga Um olhar sobre a trajetória mítica do herói sigurd«Bonden var den verklige vikingen»«Vikingatiden»«Vikingatiden»«Vinland»«Guerreiras de Óðinn: As Valkyrjor na Mitologia Viking»1519-9053«Esculpindo símbolos e seres: A arte viking em pedras rúnicas»1679-9313Historia - Tema: VikingarnaAventura e Magia no Mundo das Sagas IslandesasEra Vikinge

                                What's the metal clinking sound at the end of credits in Avengers: Endgame?What makes Thanos so strong in Avengers: Endgame?Who is the character that appears at the end of Endgame?What happens to Mjolnir (Thor's hammer) at the end of Endgame?The People's Ages in Avengers: EndgameWhat did Nebula do in Avengers: Endgame?Messing with time in the Avengers: Endgame climaxAvengers: Endgame timelineWhat are the time-travel rules in Avengers Endgame?Why use this song in Avengers: Endgame Opening Logo Sequence?Peggy's age in Avengers Endgame

                                Are there legal definitions of ethnicities/races? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Legal definitions in the United StatesAre there truly legal limits on US interest rates?Are gender identity and sexual orientation federally protected?Why is there an apparent legal bias against digital services?What limits are there to the powers of individual judges in the United States legal system?Are women only scholarships legal under Irish / EU law?Is the term “race” defined by Public Law enacted by Congress of the United StatesIs there a legal definition of race in the US?Neighbors are spying for landlord on Renters is it legal?Are Protected Classes Bi-directional?