Who is eating data? Xargs?2019 Community Moderator ElectionXargs and rm with a *What's wrong with this xargs command?Piping nothing to xargsxargs -r0 vs xargs -0Format output of xargsxargs line too longechoing basename under xargs?Combining bash % with xargs %xargs -I optionBenefits of using xargs

Algorithm to convert a fixed-length string to the smallest possible collision-free representation?

Do Bugbears' arms literally get longer when it's their turn?

Could you please stop shuffling the deck and play already?

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god exists

Is there an elementary proof that there are infinitely many primes that are *not* completely split in an abelian extension?

PTIJ: Why can't I eat anything?

Why does Captain Marvel assume the people on this planet know this?

Can't find the Shader/UVs tab

MTG: Can I kill an opponent in response to lethal activated abilities, and not take the damage?

BitNot does not flip bits in the way I expected

A three room house but a three headED dog

Is there a window switcher for GNOME that shows the actual window?

Low budget alien movie about the Earth being cooked

Why the color red for the Republican Party

Why would a jet engine that runs at temps excess of 2000°C burn when it crashes?

Do f-stop and exposure time perfectly cancel?

PTIJ: How can I halachically kill a vampire?

Solving "Resistance between two nodes on a grid" problem in Mathematica

Why does the negative sign arise in this thermodynamic relation?

Make a transparent 448*448 image

Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?

They call me Inspector Morse

Why don't MCU characters ever seem to have language issues?

Space in array system equations



Who is eating data? Xargs?



2019 Community Moderator ElectionXargs and rm with a *What's wrong with this xargs command?Piping nothing to xargsxargs -r0 vs xargs -0Format output of xargsxargs line too longechoing basename under xargs?Combining bash % with xargs %xargs -I optionBenefits of using xargs










2















I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    12 hours ago











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    11 hours ago















2















I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    12 hours ago











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    11 hours ago













2












2








2








I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.










share|improve this question














I am trying to parse a recursive directory of PHP files using the built in PHP linter, which works like this:



$ php -l good.php
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


We can see that files which pass linting output a line containing No syntax errors and those which fail linting output a line containing Errors parsing.



I see that I have 12147 PHP files recursively in the current directory, however the PHP linter is only outputting seven lines:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | wc -l
12147

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l | wc -l
7


As there were only 7 files parsed by PHP, I can use my head with ls to find some files which have not been parsed:



$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 ls -l | head
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1927 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1076 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/autoload.php
-rw-rw-r-- 1 dotan dotan 25620 Mar 12 12:29 ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 2493 Jan 13 10:13 ./bootstrap/paths.php
-rwxrwxr-x 1 dotan dotan 20008 Mar 12 12:30 ./config/app.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3304 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/auth.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1819 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cache.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 3751 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel-addons.social.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 6849 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/cartalyst.sentinel.php
-rw-r--r-- 1 dotan dotan 1020 Jan 13 10:13 ./config/compile.php
xargs: ls: terminated by signal 13

$ find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 php -l
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/paths.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/watson/validating/src/ValidatingTrait.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/giggsey/libphonenumber-for-php/src/libphonenumber/data/PhoneNumberMetadata_SI.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/php-vcr/php-vcr/src/VCR/Event/BeforePlaybackEvent.php
No syntax errors detected in ./vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Support/Facades/Blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./resources/views/emails/appointment/updated/body.blade.php
No syntax errors detected in ./app/WL/Modules/Location/Commands/RemoveClientLocationCommand.php


Yet, when I try to parse one of those files I see that it does produce the expected output (either passing or failing parsing):



$ php -l ./bootstrap/cache/services.php
No syntax errors detected in ./bootstrap/cache/services.php


I've checked that neither passing nor failing linting is printing the expected lines to stderr:



$ php -l good.php | grep rr
No syntax errors detected in good.php

$ php -l bad.php | grep rr
PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ''foo'' (T_CONSTANT_ENCAPSED_STRING), expecting ')' in bad.php on line 3
Errors parsing bad.php


What should I check now? My end goal is to lint all the files, then grep for Error parsing to fix those issues.







bash shell php xargs debugging






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 12 hours ago









dotancohendotancohen

6,423195996




6,423195996







  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    12 hours ago











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    11 hours ago












  • 1





    Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

    – Haxiel
    12 hours ago











  • @Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

    – dotancohen
    11 hours ago







1




1





Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

– Haxiel
12 hours ago





Can the php -l command take multiple arguments with the syntax php -l file1 file2 file3? xargs would be passing the results of find in batches.

– Haxiel
12 hours ago













@Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

– dotancohen
11 hours ago





@Haxiel: Thank you, in fact xargs was batching. Learn something every day!

– dotancohen
11 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7














To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer























  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    11 hours ago










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505880%2fwho-is-eating-data-xargs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7














To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer























  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    11 hours ago















7














To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer























  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    11 hours ago













7












7








7







To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l





share|improve this answer













To see whether xargs makes a difference, run the command lines that it runs. Here are a couple of ways to see exactly what it runs, while not risking changing what it runs:



  • Write a script called php in a temporary directory and put it at the beginning of $PATH. In this script, log the arguments (and optionally run the real php afterwards).

  • Run the whole command line under a logging mechanism such as strace.

You will find that the command is something like



php -l ./bootstrap/app.php ./bootstrap/autoload.php ./bootstrap/cache/services.php …


The next step is to investigate what this command does.



I'm not familiar with php but I guess it only treats the first file name as a PHP script name, and that in lint mode it simply ignores all subsequent arguments. So you need to run php -l once for each script, 12147 times in total, instead of using xargs's grouping behavior.



The easiest way to do that is



find . -name *.php -exec php -l ;


but this command will always return 0 even if some invocations of php return a nonzero status. While find mostly doesn't need xargs in the 21st century, a benefit of xargs is that it returns a nonzero status if any invocation of the command returns a nonzero status. So run xargs, but tell it to only process one file at a time with the -n option.



find . -name *.php -print0 | xargs -0 -n 1 php -l






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 12 hours ago









GillesGilles

542k12810961615




542k12810961615












  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    11 hours ago

















  • As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

    – dotancohen
    11 hours ago
















As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

– dotancohen
11 hours ago





As usual, you've hit the nail right on the head. xargs was batching the arguments, and the -n 1 flag was the right solution. In fact I was using -exec to continue working while this question was being resolved, but I prefer xargs as I feel it is a more flexible solution. Thank you.

– dotancohen
11 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f505880%2fwho-is-eating-data-xargs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?