MTG: Can I kill an opponent in response to lethal activated abilities, and not take the damage?Can a well-timed Twisted Image kill a player using Tree of Redemption?Would Guttersnipe plus a cyphered card result in an infinite loop of damage?Llawanor Elves Trampled on desert Oasis. Act of God or Force of Nature?Does priority matter in Magic?Dealing Damage to Creature soulbonded to Deadeye NavigatorMultiple Replacement Effects for “Next Time”Stopping a CounterSpell with Aurelia's Fury it's possible?What is the process for determining if an infinite loop will be a draw?Can I play a card for its miracle cost in this situation?A complicated interaction with Sakashima's Student

What are some noteworthy "mic-drop" moments in math?

Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?

Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?

Aliens englobed the Solar System: will we notice?

What do you call the air that rushes into your car in the highway?

Latest web browser compatible with Windows 98

Force user to remove USB token

How could our ancestors have domesticated a solitary predator?

A question on the ultrafilter number

How to pass a string to a command that expects a file?

Good allowance savings plan?

Why would a jet engine that runs at temps excess of 2000°C burn when it crashes?

Could a cubesat be propelled to the moon?

Can't find the Shader/UVs tab

How are such low op-amp input currents possible?

Space in array system equations

Accountant/ lawyer will not return my call

How strictly should I take "Candidates must be local"?

Why would one plane in this picture not have gear down yet?

What to do when during a meeting client people start to fight (even physically) with each others?

Why the color red for the Republican Party

Best approach to update all entries in a list that is paginated?

Finding algorithms of QGIS commands?

Does a Catoblepas statblock appear in an official D&D 5e product?



MTG: Can I kill an opponent in response to lethal activated abilities, and not take the damage?


Can a well-timed Twisted Image kill a player using Tree of Redemption?Would Guttersnipe plus a cyphered card result in an infinite loop of damage?Llawanor Elves Trampled on desert Oasis. Act of God or Force of Nature?Does priority matter in Magic?Dealing Damage to Creature soulbonded to Deadeye NavigatorMultiple Replacement Effects for “Next Time”Stopping a CounterSpell with Aurelia's Fury it's possible?What is the process for determining if an infinite loop will be a draw?Can I play a card for its miracle cost in this situation?A complicated interaction with Sakashima's Student













1















Here's the situation.



Life totals: Not relevant



Player 1: Activates Borborygmos Enraged (Discard a land card: Deal 3 damage to any target) enough times for lethal, aims damage at Player 2. Passes priority.



Player 2: In response, uses Mirage Mirror's activated ability to copy Borborygmos Enraged, no responses. Activates the ability for lethal themselves, aims all damage at Player 1, no responses.



Player 1 dies.



Does Player 2 still live, or do the triggers persist after Player 1 loses the game?










share|improve this question







New contributor




EthanK is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    1















    Here's the situation.



    Life totals: Not relevant



    Player 1: Activates Borborygmos Enraged (Discard a land card: Deal 3 damage to any target) enough times for lethal, aims damage at Player 2. Passes priority.



    Player 2: In response, uses Mirage Mirror's activated ability to copy Borborygmos Enraged, no responses. Activates the ability for lethal themselves, aims all damage at Player 1, no responses.



    Player 1 dies.



    Does Player 2 still live, or do the triggers persist after Player 1 loses the game?










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    EthanK is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      1












      1








      1








      Here's the situation.



      Life totals: Not relevant



      Player 1: Activates Borborygmos Enraged (Discard a land card: Deal 3 damage to any target) enough times for lethal, aims damage at Player 2. Passes priority.



      Player 2: In response, uses Mirage Mirror's activated ability to copy Borborygmos Enraged, no responses. Activates the ability for lethal themselves, aims all damage at Player 1, no responses.



      Player 1 dies.



      Does Player 2 still live, or do the triggers persist after Player 1 loses the game?










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      EthanK is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Here's the situation.



      Life totals: Not relevant



      Player 1: Activates Borborygmos Enraged (Discard a land card: Deal 3 damage to any target) enough times for lethal, aims damage at Player 2. Passes priority.



      Player 2: In response, uses Mirage Mirror's activated ability to copy Borborygmos Enraged, no responses. Activates the ability for lethal themselves, aims all damage at Player 1, no responses.



      Player 1 dies.



      Does Player 2 still live, or do the triggers persist after Player 1 loses the game?







      magic-the-gathering






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      EthanK is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      EthanK is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      EthanK is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 7 hours ago









      EthanKEthanK

      83




      83




      New contributor




      EthanK is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      EthanK is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      EthanK is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          You will win; in a 2-player game, a player leaving the game for any reason means the remaining player wins immediately and the game is over, no matter the game state. In multiplayer, once a player has left the game, all cards they own and all non-card objects they control on the stack leave the game with him.




          104.2a A player still in the game wins the game if that player's opponents have all left the game. This happens immediately and overrides all effects that would preclude that player from winning the game.



          104.5. If a player loses the game, that player leaves the game. [..]




          Additional rules for multiplayer, when one player leaves the game but the game still continues:




          800.4a When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game and any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end. Then, if that player controlled any objects on the stack not represented by cards, those objects cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time they left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who's still in the game.







          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "147"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            EthanK is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45492%2fmtg-can-i-kill-an-opponent-in-response-to-lethal-activated-abilities-and-not-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            You will win; in a 2-player game, a player leaving the game for any reason means the remaining player wins immediately and the game is over, no matter the game state. In multiplayer, once a player has left the game, all cards they own and all non-card objects they control on the stack leave the game with him.




            104.2a A player still in the game wins the game if that player's opponents have all left the game. This happens immediately and overrides all effects that would preclude that player from winning the game.



            104.5. If a player loses the game, that player leaves the game. [..]




            Additional rules for multiplayer, when one player leaves the game but the game still continues:




            800.4a When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game and any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end. Then, if that player controlled any objects on the stack not represented by cards, those objects cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time they left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who's still in the game.







            share|improve this answer



























              5














              You will win; in a 2-player game, a player leaving the game for any reason means the remaining player wins immediately and the game is over, no matter the game state. In multiplayer, once a player has left the game, all cards they own and all non-card objects they control on the stack leave the game with him.




              104.2a A player still in the game wins the game if that player's opponents have all left the game. This happens immediately and overrides all effects that would preclude that player from winning the game.



              104.5. If a player loses the game, that player leaves the game. [..]




              Additional rules for multiplayer, when one player leaves the game but the game still continues:




              800.4a When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game and any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end. Then, if that player controlled any objects on the stack not represented by cards, those objects cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time they left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who's still in the game.







              share|improve this answer

























                5












                5








                5







                You will win; in a 2-player game, a player leaving the game for any reason means the remaining player wins immediately and the game is over, no matter the game state. In multiplayer, once a player has left the game, all cards they own and all non-card objects they control on the stack leave the game with him.




                104.2a A player still in the game wins the game if that player's opponents have all left the game. This happens immediately and overrides all effects that would preclude that player from winning the game.



                104.5. If a player loses the game, that player leaves the game. [..]




                Additional rules for multiplayer, when one player leaves the game but the game still continues:




                800.4a When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game and any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end. Then, if that player controlled any objects on the stack not represented by cards, those objects cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time they left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who's still in the game.







                share|improve this answer













                You will win; in a 2-player game, a player leaving the game for any reason means the remaining player wins immediately and the game is over, no matter the game state. In multiplayer, once a player has left the game, all cards they own and all non-card objects they control on the stack leave the game with him.




                104.2a A player still in the game wins the game if that player's opponents have all left the game. This happens immediately and overrides all effects that would preclude that player from winning the game.



                104.5. If a player loses the game, that player leaves the game. [..]




                Additional rules for multiplayer, when one player leaves the game but the game still continues:




                800.4a When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game and any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end. Then, if that player controlled any objects on the stack not represented by cards, those objects cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time they left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who's still in the game.








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 6 hours ago









                HackworthHackworth

                27.7k274126




                27.7k274126




















                    EthanK is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    EthanK is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    EthanK is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    EthanK is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Board & Card Games Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45492%2fmtg-can-i-kill-an-opponent-in-response-to-lethal-activated-abilities-and-not-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

                    2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

                    Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?