A question on the ultrafilter numberSurjective Maps onto $aleph$-numbersMaximal chains in a quasi-order of linear order typesIs there a modification of Martin's Axiom which admits non-measurable sets of size less than continuum?What sort of large cardinal can continuum be?Is there a locally compact, $omega_1$-compact, not $sigma$-countably compact space of size $aleph_1$?Is there nontrivial structure to forcing axioms?The minimum cardinality of an almost disjoint reaping familyThe “strong” measure numberTranslates of measure zero setThe Parovichenko cardinal, is it equal to $maxaleph_2,mathfrak p$?

A question on the ultrafilter number


Surjective Maps onto $aleph$-numbersMaximal chains in a quasi-order of linear order typesIs there a modification of Martin's Axiom which admits non-measurable sets of size less than continuum?What sort of large cardinal can continuum be?Is there a locally compact, $omega_1$-compact, not $sigma$-countably compact space of size $aleph_1$?Is there nontrivial structure to forcing axioms?The minimum cardinality of an almost disjoint reaping familyThe “strong” measure numberTranslates of measure zero setThe Parovichenko cardinal, is it equal to $maxaleph_2,mathfrak p$?













5












$begingroup$


Let $mathfraku$ denote the ultrafilter number, which is defined to be the minimum cardinality of a subset of $mathcalP(mathbb N)$ which is a base for a nonprincipal ultrafilter on $mathbbN$. Clearly $aleph_1leq frakuleq 2^aleph_0$, so it is only interesting to study $fraku$ under the negation of CH. Kunen proved that it is consistent that CH fails and that $fraku=aleph_1$. Martin's axiom implies that $fraku=2^aleph_0$.



Is it consistent that $aleph_1<fraku<2^aleph_0$? If so, can I please have a reference?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    Let $mathfraku$ denote the ultrafilter number, which is defined to be the minimum cardinality of a subset of $mathcalP(mathbb N)$ which is a base for a nonprincipal ultrafilter on $mathbbN$. Clearly $aleph_1leq frakuleq 2^aleph_0$, so it is only interesting to study $fraku$ under the negation of CH. Kunen proved that it is consistent that CH fails and that $fraku=aleph_1$. Martin's axiom implies that $fraku=2^aleph_0$.



    Is it consistent that $aleph_1<fraku<2^aleph_0$? If so, can I please have a reference?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      Let $mathfraku$ denote the ultrafilter number, which is defined to be the minimum cardinality of a subset of $mathcalP(mathbb N)$ which is a base for a nonprincipal ultrafilter on $mathbbN$. Clearly $aleph_1leq frakuleq 2^aleph_0$, so it is only interesting to study $fraku$ under the negation of CH. Kunen proved that it is consistent that CH fails and that $fraku=aleph_1$. Martin's axiom implies that $fraku=2^aleph_0$.



      Is it consistent that $aleph_1<fraku<2^aleph_0$? If so, can I please have a reference?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $mathfraku$ denote the ultrafilter number, which is defined to be the minimum cardinality of a subset of $mathcalP(mathbb N)$ which is a base for a nonprincipal ultrafilter on $mathbbN$. Clearly $aleph_1leq frakuleq 2^aleph_0$, so it is only interesting to study $fraku$ under the negation of CH. Kunen proved that it is consistent that CH fails and that $fraku=aleph_1$. Martin's axiom implies that $fraku=2^aleph_0$.



      Is it consistent that $aleph_1<fraku<2^aleph_0$? If so, can I please have a reference?







      set-theory lo.logic






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 9 hours ago









      IsaacIsaac

      534




      534




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          10












          $begingroup$

          The answer to your question is yes. In fact, one can force to make $mathfrak u$ equal to any prescribed uncountable regular cardinal while making the cardinal of the continuum equal to any larger prescribed uncountable regular cardinal. This is proved in and old paper by Shelah and me:



          Blass, Andreas(1-PAS); Shelah, Saharon(1-RTG)
          Ultrafilters with small generating sets.
          Israel J. Math. 65 (1989), no. 3, 259–271.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Andreas.
            $endgroup$
            – Isaac
            6 hours ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325297%2fa-question-on-the-ultrafilter-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          10












          $begingroup$

          The answer to your question is yes. In fact, one can force to make $mathfrak u$ equal to any prescribed uncountable regular cardinal while making the cardinal of the continuum equal to any larger prescribed uncountable regular cardinal. This is proved in and old paper by Shelah and me:



          Blass, Andreas(1-PAS); Shelah, Saharon(1-RTG)
          Ultrafilters with small generating sets.
          Israel J. Math. 65 (1989), no. 3, 259–271.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Andreas.
            $endgroup$
            – Isaac
            6 hours ago















          10












          $begingroup$

          The answer to your question is yes. In fact, one can force to make $mathfrak u$ equal to any prescribed uncountable regular cardinal while making the cardinal of the continuum equal to any larger prescribed uncountable regular cardinal. This is proved in and old paper by Shelah and me:



          Blass, Andreas(1-PAS); Shelah, Saharon(1-RTG)
          Ultrafilters with small generating sets.
          Israel J. Math. 65 (1989), no. 3, 259–271.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Andreas.
            $endgroup$
            – Isaac
            6 hours ago













          10












          10








          10





          $begingroup$

          The answer to your question is yes. In fact, one can force to make $mathfrak u$ equal to any prescribed uncountable regular cardinal while making the cardinal of the continuum equal to any larger prescribed uncountable regular cardinal. This is proved in and old paper by Shelah and me:



          Blass, Andreas(1-PAS); Shelah, Saharon(1-RTG)
          Ultrafilters with small generating sets.
          Israel J. Math. 65 (1989), no. 3, 259–271.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The answer to your question is yes. In fact, one can force to make $mathfrak u$ equal to any prescribed uncountable regular cardinal while making the cardinal of the continuum equal to any larger prescribed uncountable regular cardinal. This is proved in and old paper by Shelah and me:



          Blass, Andreas(1-PAS); Shelah, Saharon(1-RTG)
          Ultrafilters with small generating sets.
          Israel J. Math. 65 (1989), no. 3, 259–271.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          Andreas BlassAndreas Blass

          58k7138225




          58k7138225











          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Andreas.
            $endgroup$
            – Isaac
            6 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks Andreas.
            $endgroup$
            – Isaac
            6 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Thanks Andreas.
          $endgroup$
          – Isaac
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Thanks Andreas.
          $endgroup$
          – Isaac
          6 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325297%2fa-question-on-the-ultrafilter-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

          2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

          Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?