Find 108 by using 3,4,6 Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Use 2, 0, 1 and 8 to make 109Use 2, 0, 1 and 8 to make 1991984 - take the digits 1,9, 8 and 4 and make 2461984 - take the digits 1,9, 8 and 4 and make 3691984 - take the digits 1,9, 8 and 4 and Hard Challenges!1984 - take the digits 1,9, 8 and 4 and make 123 - Part IIIPalindromic number puzzle - make 505 from 20202Use 0, 5, 7 and 1 to make 89Use 6, 5 and 3 to make 57Using only 1s, make 29 with the minimum number of digits

Disembodied hand growing fangs

How to compare two different files line by line in unix?

Sum letters are not two different

Do Fourier frequencies actually exist in real life in form of "instantaneous frequency"?

Is grep documentation about ignoring case wrong, since it doesn't ignore case in filenames?

NumericArray versus PackedArray in MMA12

Does the Weapon Master feat grant you a fighting style?

How do I use the new nonlinear finite element in Mathematica 12 for this equation?

How to write the following sign?

Time to Settle Down!

How would a mousetrap for use in space work?

Is there any word for a place full of confusion?

How to tell that you are a giant?

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

Does lack of seasonality imply random time series?

Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages?

Should I follow up with an employee I believe overracted to a mistake I made?

Trademark violation for app?

Benefits of using sObject.clone versus creating a new record

How fail-safe is nr as stop bytes?

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

What is the font for "b" letter?

Multiple OR (||) Conditions in If Statement



Find 108 by using 3,4,6



Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Use 2, 0, 1 and 8 to make 109Use 2, 0, 1 and 8 to make 1991984 - take the digits 1,9, 8 and 4 and make 2461984 - take the digits 1,9, 8 and 4 and make 3691984 - take the digits 1,9, 8 and 4 and Hard Challenges!1984 - take the digits 1,9, 8 and 4 and make 123 - Part IIIPalindromic number puzzle - make 505 from 20202Use 0, 5, 7 and 1 to make 89Use 6, 5 and 3 to make 57Using only 1s, make 29 with the minimum number of digits










2












$begingroup$


Assemble a formula using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$ in any order to make 108.



You may use the operations;



  • $x + y$


  • $x - y$


  • $x times y$


  • $x div y$


  • $x!$


  • $sqrtx$


  • $sqrt[leftroot-2uproot2x]y$


  • $x^y$


  • Brackets to clarify order of operations "(",")"

  • Concatenate two or more of the three digits you start with (concatenation of numbers from calculations is not permitted)

as long as all operands are either $3$, $4$ and $6$.



Note that double, triple, etc. factorials (n-druple-factorials) are not allowed though factorials of factorials are fine, such as $((6-3)!)! = 6!$.






mathematics logical-deduction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If I could, I would have done something like $$3times styledisplay: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)4times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    2 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane :)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago















2












$begingroup$


Assemble a formula using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$ in any order to make 108.



You may use the operations;



  • $x + y$


  • $x - y$


  • $x times y$


  • $x div y$


  • $x!$


  • $sqrtx$


  • $sqrt[leftroot-2uproot2x]y$


  • $x^y$


  • Brackets to clarify order of operations "(",")"

  • Concatenate two or more of the three digits you start with (concatenation of numbers from calculations is not permitted)

as long as all operands are either $3$, $4$ and $6$.



Note that double, triple, etc. factorials (n-druple-factorials) are not allowed though factorials of factorials are fine, such as $((6-3)!)! = 6!$.






mathematics logical-deduction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If I could, I would have done something like $$3times styledisplay: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)4times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    2 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane :)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago













2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


Assemble a formula using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$ in any order to make 108.



You may use the operations;



  • $x + y$


  • $x - y$


  • $x times y$


  • $x div y$


  • $x!$


  • $sqrtx$


  • $sqrt[leftroot-2uproot2x]y$


  • $x^y$


  • Brackets to clarify order of operations "(",")"

  • Concatenate two or more of the three digits you start with (concatenation of numbers from calculations is not permitted)

as long as all operands are either $3$, $4$ and $6$.



Note that double, triple, etc. factorials (n-druple-factorials) are not allowed though factorials of factorials are fine, such as $((6-3)!)! = 6!$.






mathematics logical-deduction







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Assemble a formula using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$ in any order to make 108.



You may use the operations;



  • $x + y$


  • $x - y$


  • $x times y$


  • $x div y$


  • $x!$


  • $sqrtx$


  • $sqrt[leftroot-2uproot2x]y$


  • $x^y$


  • Brackets to clarify order of operations "(",")"

  • Concatenate two or more of the three digits you start with (concatenation of numbers from calculations is not permitted)

as long as all operands are either $3$, $4$ and $6$.



Note that double, triple, etc. factorials (n-druple-factorials) are not allowed though factorials of factorials are fine, such as $((6-3)!)! = 6!$.






mathematics logical-deduction




mathematics logical-deduction






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









JonMark Perry

20.8k64199




20.8k64199










asked 2 hours ago









OrayOray

16.2k437157




16.2k437157







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If I could, I would have done something like $$3times styledisplay: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)4times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    2 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane :)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If I could, I would have done something like $$3times styledisplay: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)4times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    2 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago











  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
    $endgroup$
    – Weather Vane
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @WeatherVane :)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    1 hour ago







1




1




$begingroup$
If I could, I would have done something like $$3times styledisplay: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)4times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
$endgroup$
– user477343
2 hours ago





$begingroup$
If I could, I would have done something like $$3times styledisplay: inline-block; transform: rotate(180deg)4times 6=108$$ since the upside down $4$ looks a bit like a $6$.
$endgroup$
– user477343
2 hours ago





2




2




$begingroup$
@user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
@user477343 or even $$3 times 4 times 9 = 108$$ since the upside down $6$ is very much like a $9$.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
1 hour ago













$begingroup$
@WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
$endgroup$
– user477343
1 hour ago





$begingroup$
@WeatherVane Of course! Huh... funny how I saw what was obscure as opposed to what was actually just plain simple xD
$endgroup$
– user477343
1 hour ago





2




2




$begingroup$
@user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@user477343 ah but it took yours to make me think of it.
$endgroup$
– Weather Vane
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@WeatherVane :)
$endgroup$
– user477343
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@WeatherVane :)
$endgroup$
– user477343
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Could this be




$frac6^3sqrt4 = frac2162 = 108$?




@Oray found another one, which might possibly be




$6^sqrt4 times 3 = 6^2 times 3 = 36 times 3 = 108$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, @Oray!!
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago


















4












$begingroup$

I have found this solution




$6 times (4! - 3!) = 6 times (24 - 6) = 6 times 18 = 108$







share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    In high school I used to play a game with my buddies where we tried to make valid arithmetic expressions out of licence plates of passing cars. The rules were pretty much similar except that you couldn't rearrange or duplicate (or omit) any of the digits. In time we got pretty good at it, basically solving any licence plate in under 10 seconds; most under 5. Except for the ones that couldn't be solved, of course.



    Anyways, with your constraints (limitless numbers, can be rearranged, can be combined) there are like a zillion possible solutions.



    Here's the simplest thing I could think of:




    34 + 66 + 4 + 4 = 108




    Here's another one without concatenation:




    (4 + 6) * (4 + 6) + 4 + 4 = 108




    Or maybe:




    (4*6+3)*4 = 108




    I could go on and on, and I haven't even touched on the advanced operators...






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
      $endgroup$
      – Weather Vane
      29 mins ago












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "559"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81947%2ffind-108-by-using-3-4-6%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Could this be




    $frac6^3sqrt4 = frac2162 = 108$?




    @Oray found another one, which might possibly be




    $6^sqrt4 times 3 = 6^2 times 3 = 36 times 3 = 108$.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, @Oray!!
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    Could this be




    $frac6^3sqrt4 = frac2162 = 108$?




    @Oray found another one, which might possibly be




    $6^sqrt4 times 3 = 6^2 times 3 = 36 times 3 = 108$.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, @Oray!!
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Could this be




    $frac6^3sqrt4 = frac2162 = 108$?




    @Oray found another one, which might possibly be




    $6^sqrt4 times 3 = 6^2 times 3 = 36 times 3 = 108$.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Could this be




    $frac6^3sqrt4 = frac2162 = 108$?




    @Oray found another one, which might possibly be




    $6^sqrt4 times 3 = 6^2 times 3 = 36 times 3 = 108$.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 hours ago

























    answered 2 hours ago









    El-GuestEl-Guest

    21.8k35092




    21.8k35092











    • $begingroup$
      good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, @Oray!!
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, @Oray!!
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
      $endgroup$
      – El-Guest
      2 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
      $endgroup$
      – Oray
      2 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    good finding! mine was different but this seems right too :)
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Thank you, @Oray!!
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Thank you, @Oray!!
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Oray: was this second one the one that you found?
    $endgroup$
    – El-Guest
    2 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    no actually :D it was a bit more complicated.
    $endgroup$
    – Oray
    2 hours ago











    4












    $begingroup$

    I have found this solution




    $6 times (4! - 3!) = 6 times (24 - 6) = 6 times 18 = 108$







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      I have found this solution




      $6 times (4! - 3!) = 6 times (24 - 6) = 6 times 18 = 108$







      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        I have found this solution




        $6 times (4! - 3!) = 6 times (24 - 6) = 6 times 18 = 108$







        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        I have found this solution




        $6 times (4! - 3!) = 6 times (24 - 6) = 6 times 18 = 108$








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        Weather VaneWeather Vane

        2,387112




        2,387112





















            0












            $begingroup$

            In high school I used to play a game with my buddies where we tried to make valid arithmetic expressions out of licence plates of passing cars. The rules were pretty much similar except that you couldn't rearrange or duplicate (or omit) any of the digits. In time we got pretty good at it, basically solving any licence plate in under 10 seconds; most under 5. Except for the ones that couldn't be solved, of course.



            Anyways, with your constraints (limitless numbers, can be rearranged, can be combined) there are like a zillion possible solutions.



            Here's the simplest thing I could think of:




            34 + 66 + 4 + 4 = 108




            Here's another one without concatenation:




            (4 + 6) * (4 + 6) + 4 + 4 = 108




            Or maybe:




            (4*6+3)*4 = 108




            I could go on and on, and I haven't even touched on the advanced operators...






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              29 mins ago
















            0












            $begingroup$

            In high school I used to play a game with my buddies where we tried to make valid arithmetic expressions out of licence plates of passing cars. The rules were pretty much similar except that you couldn't rearrange or duplicate (or omit) any of the digits. In time we got pretty good at it, basically solving any licence plate in under 10 seconds; most under 5. Except for the ones that couldn't be solved, of course.



            Anyways, with your constraints (limitless numbers, can be rearranged, can be combined) there are like a zillion possible solutions.



            Here's the simplest thing I could think of:




            34 + 66 + 4 + 4 = 108




            Here's another one without concatenation:




            (4 + 6) * (4 + 6) + 4 + 4 = 108




            Or maybe:




            (4*6+3)*4 = 108




            I could go on and on, and I haven't even touched on the advanced operators...






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              29 mins ago














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            In high school I used to play a game with my buddies where we tried to make valid arithmetic expressions out of licence plates of passing cars. The rules were pretty much similar except that you couldn't rearrange or duplicate (or omit) any of the digits. In time we got pretty good at it, basically solving any licence plate in under 10 seconds; most under 5. Except for the ones that couldn't be solved, of course.



            Anyways, with your constraints (limitless numbers, can be rearranged, can be combined) there are like a zillion possible solutions.



            Here's the simplest thing I could think of:




            34 + 66 + 4 + 4 = 108




            Here's another one without concatenation:




            (4 + 6) * (4 + 6) + 4 + 4 = 108




            Or maybe:




            (4*6+3)*4 = 108




            I could go on and on, and I haven't even touched on the advanced operators...






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            In high school I used to play a game with my buddies where we tried to make valid arithmetic expressions out of licence plates of passing cars. The rules were pretty much similar except that you couldn't rearrange or duplicate (or omit) any of the digits. In time we got pretty good at it, basically solving any licence plate in under 10 seconds; most under 5. Except for the ones that couldn't be solved, of course.



            Anyways, with your constraints (limitless numbers, can be rearranged, can be combined) there are like a zillion possible solutions.



            Here's the simplest thing I could think of:




            34 + 66 + 4 + 4 = 108




            Here's another one without concatenation:




            (4 + 6) * (4 + 6) + 4 + 4 = 108




            Or maybe:




            (4*6+3)*4 = 108




            I could go on and on, and I haven't even touched on the advanced operators...







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 54 mins ago

























            answered 1 hour ago









            Vilx-Vilx-

            1315




            1315











            • $begingroup$
              The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              29 mins ago

















            • $begingroup$
              The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
              $endgroup$
              – Weather Vane
              29 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
            $endgroup$
            – Weather Vane
            29 mins ago





            $begingroup$
            The second answer here is not "using the numbers $3$, $4$ and $6$".
            $endgroup$
            – Weather Vane
            29 mins ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81947%2ffind-108-by-using-3-4-6%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Era Viking Índice Início da Era Viquingue | Cotidiano | Sociedade | Língua | Religião | A arte | As primeiras cidades | As viagens dos viquingues | Viquingues do Oeste e Leste | Fim da Era Viquingue | Fontes históricas | Referências Bibliografia | Ligações externas | Menu de navegação«Sverige då!»«Handel I vikingetid»«O que é Nórdico Antigo»Mito, magia e religião na volsunga saga Um olhar sobre a trajetória mítica do herói sigurd«Bonden var den verklige vikingen»«Vikingatiden»«Vikingatiden»«Vinland»«Guerreiras de Óðinn: As Valkyrjor na Mitologia Viking»1519-9053«Esculpindo símbolos e seres: A arte viking em pedras rúnicas»1679-9313Historia - Tema: VikingarnaAventura e Magia no Mundo das Sagas IslandesasEra Vikinge

            Image
            Era Viking suecodinamarquêsnorueguêsislandêsEscandináviavikingsPaíses Nórdicospré-históriaIdade do FerroIdade MédiaEscandinávianavios viquinguesthrallamantes legítimasagriculturacomérciocomerciantesartesãosHeidibaRibeSigtunapadrescristianizaçãopedras rúnicasnórdico antigocaracteres rúnicoscristianismoassesOdimTorFreirCristoAnsgárioLuís Ipedras rúnicasgravuras rupestresRibeJutlândiaHedebyAlemanhaDinamarcaKaupangNoruegaUppåkraEscâniaBircaVale do MalarSigtunaEscaraVísbianórdicosEscandináviaEuropaÁsiaÁfricaAméricaDinamarcaSuéciadanosFrançaIlhas BritânicasNoruegaIslândiaGroenlândiaAmérica do NorteSuelândiasuíonesGotlândiagotasPaíses BálticosRússiamar NegroMar CáspioImpério BizantinoCalifado AbássidaNovogárdiaQuieveAnatóliavareguesMediterrâneoCruzadasGotl...
            Read more

            Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?

            Image
            Apart from "berlinern", do any other German dialects have a corresponding verb? Horror movie/show or scene where a horse creature opens its mouth really wide and devours a man in a stables I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin How do I construct this japanese bowl? How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily? If I blow insulation everywhere in my attic except the door trap, will heat escape through it? How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts? What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?" Text adventure game code Can a caster that cast Polymorph on themselves stop concentrating at any point even if their Int is low? How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs? Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement? Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it? What is the point of a new v...
            Read more

            What is best way to wire a ceiling receptacle in this situation? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I wire a switch/receptacle combination?Is there some kind of adapter for an old ceiling box?Rewiring a switch controlled receptacle to a ceiling lightOddball wiring for ceiling lightWhat is the purpose of these removable “collars” on ceramic light fixturesHow close can light be to exposed insulation?Convert light fixture to receptacleWill cutting section of 2x4 reduce strengthWiring a ceiling light to a switched receptacleRunning wire in basement with drop ceiling

            Image
            Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript What is the chair depicted in Cesare Maccari's 1889 painting "Cicerone denuncia Catilina"? Lagrange four-squares theorem --- deterministic complexity How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour? Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people? What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思？ How does Belgium enforce obligatory attendance in elections? How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth? What's the point of the test set? Random body shuffle every night—can we still function? Trademark violation for app? Sum letters are not two different How to compare two different files line by line in unix? An adverb for when you're not exaggerating What d...
            Read more