What does the “ep” capability mean?Unable to set capability CAP_SETFCAP by userWhat does this iptable rule mean?Granting service specific capabilitiesWhat does :source % mean?Does every syscall require at most 1 capability on Linux?Better use ACL or Capability to let users start a service?Does a process that have the root user always have all of the capabilities available in Linux?Does macOS and Solaris have “capabilities”?Difference between file capability and process capabilityWhat does the '.' (dot) mean?
Why is it that the natural deduction method can't test for invalidity?
How did Captain America manage to do this?
How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?
Exchange,swap or switch
Can I spend a night at Vancouver then take a flight to my college in Toronto as an international student?
What is Niska's accent?
Fizzy, soft, pop and still drinks
Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?
How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?
Symbolic Multivariate Distribution
Seemingly unused edef prior to an ifx mysteriously affects the outcome of the ifx. Why?
Why other Westeros houses don't use wildfire?
How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?
Why isn't the definition of absolute value applied when squaring a radical containing a variable?
Do I have an "anti-research" personality?
Does a semiconductor follow Ohm's law?
Why do games have consumables?
In order to check if a field is required or not, is the result of isNillable method sufficient?
How would one muzzle a full grown polar bear in the 13th century?
What was the first Intel x86 processor with "Base + Index * Scale + Displacement" addressing mode?
To say I met a person for the first time
How to make a pipeline wait for end-of-file or stop after an error?
What happened to Captain America in Endgame?
Rivers without rain
What does the “ep” capability mean?
Unable to set capability CAP_SETFCAP by userWhat does this iptable rule mean?Granting service specific capabilitiesWhat does :source % mean?Does every syscall require at most 1 capability on Linux?Better use ACL or Capability to let users start a service?Does a process that have the root user always have all of the capabilities available in Linux?Does macOS and Solaris have “capabilities”?Difference between file capability and process capabilityWhat does the '.' (dot) mean?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
root@macine:~# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
What does "ep" mean? What are the capabilities of this binary?
linux capabilities
edited 55 mins ago
muru
38.1k590166
asked 3 hours ago
JamesJames
212
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
root@macine:~# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
What does "ep" mean? What are the capabilities of this binary?
linux capabilities
edited 55 mins ago
muru
38.1k590166
asked 3 hours ago
JamesJames
212
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
capabilities(7)have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.
– mosvy
3 hours ago
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago
add a comment |
root@macine:~# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
What does "ep" mean? What are the capabilities of this binary?
linux capabilities
edited 55 mins ago
muru
38.1k590166
asked 3 hours ago
JamesJames
212
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
root@macine:~# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
What does "ep" mean? What are the capabilities of this binary?
linux capabilities
linux capabilities
edited 55 mins ago
muru
38.1k590166
asked 3 hours ago
JamesJames
212
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 55 mins ago
muru
38.1k590166
asked 3 hours ago
JamesJames
212
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 55 mins ago
muru
38.1k590166
edited 55 mins ago
muru
38.1k590166
edited 55 mins ago
muru
38.1k590166
38.1k590166
asked 3 hours ago
JamesJames
212
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
JamesJames
212
asked 3 hours ago
JamesJames
212
212
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
capabilities(7)have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.
– mosvy
3 hours ago
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2
capabilities(7)have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.
– mosvy
3 hours ago
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago
2
2
capabilities(7) have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.– mosvy
3 hours ago
capabilities(7) have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.– mosvy
3 hours ago
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
That file has ALL the capabilites set in the effective(e) and permitted(p) set.
In the textual representation of capabilities, a leading = is equivalent to all=.
From the cap_to_text(3) manpage:
In the case that the leading operator is
=, and no list of capabilities is provided, the action-list is assumed to refer to all capabilities. For example, the following three clauses are equivalent to each
other (and indicate a completely empty capability set):all=;=;
cap_chown,<every-other-capability>=.
Such a binary can do whatever it pleases, limited only by the capability bounding set, which on a desktop system includes everything (otherwise setuid binaries like su wouldn't work as expected).
Notice that this is only a "gotcha" of the textual representation used by libpcap: in the security.capability extended attribute of the file for which getcap will print /file/path =ep, all the meaningful bits are effectively on; for an empty security.capability, /file/path = (with the = not followed by anything) will be returned instead.
If someone is still not convinced about all that, here is a small experiment:
# cp /bin/ping /tmp/ping # will wipe setuid bits and extented attributes
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
# setcap =ep /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost' # will work because of cap_net_raw
PING localhost(localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.073 ms
^C
# setcap = /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
answered 2 hours ago
mosvymosvy
10.9k11340
add a comment |
The capabilities are put in the permitted set (p), and all permitted capabilities are copied into the effective set (e). There does not seem to be any capabilities in your example (where did you get it from?).
The e is used for legacy programs (possibly most programs at the current time), that is programs that don't know about capabilities, so can not them-selves copy capabilities from permitted to effective.
answered 2 hours ago
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f515881%2fwhat-does-the-ep-capability-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
That file has ALL the capabilites set in the effective(e) and permitted(p) set.
In the textual representation of capabilities, a leading = is equivalent to all=.
From the cap_to_text(3) manpage:
In the case that the leading operator is
=, and no list of capabilities is provided, the action-list is assumed to refer to all capabilities. For example, the following three clauses are equivalent to each
other (and indicate a completely empty capability set):all=;=;
cap_chown,<every-other-capability>=.
Such a binary can do whatever it pleases, limited only by the capability bounding set, which on a desktop system includes everything (otherwise setuid binaries like su wouldn't work as expected).
Notice that this is only a "gotcha" of the textual representation used by libpcap: in the security.capability extended attribute of the file for which getcap will print /file/path =ep, all the meaningful bits are effectively on; for an empty security.capability, /file/path = (with the = not followed by anything) will be returned instead.
If someone is still not convinced about all that, here is a small experiment:
# cp /bin/ping /tmp/ping # will wipe setuid bits and extented attributes
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
# setcap =ep /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost' # will work because of cap_net_raw
PING localhost(localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.073 ms
^C
# setcap = /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
answered 2 hours ago
mosvymosvy
10.9k11340
add a comment |
# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
That file has ALL the capabilites set in the effective(e) and permitted(p) set.
In the textual representation of capabilities, a leading = is equivalent to all=.
From the cap_to_text(3) manpage:
In the case that the leading operator is
=, and no list of capabilities is provided, the action-list is assumed to refer to all capabilities. For example, the following three clauses are equivalent to each
other (and indicate a completely empty capability set):all=;=;
cap_chown,<every-other-capability>=.
Such a binary can do whatever it pleases, limited only by the capability bounding set, which on a desktop system includes everything (otherwise setuid binaries like su wouldn't work as expected).
Notice that this is only a "gotcha" of the textual representation used by libpcap: in the security.capability extended attribute of the file for which getcap will print /file/path =ep, all the meaningful bits are effectively on; for an empty security.capability, /file/path = (with the = not followed by anything) will be returned instead.
If someone is still not convinced about all that, here is a small experiment:
# cp /bin/ping /tmp/ping # will wipe setuid bits and extented attributes
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
# setcap =ep /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost' # will work because of cap_net_raw
PING localhost(localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.073 ms
^C
# setcap = /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
answered 2 hours ago
mosvymosvy
10.9k11340
add a comment |
# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
That file has ALL the capabilites set in the effective(e) and permitted(p) set.
In the textual representation of capabilities, a leading = is equivalent to all=.
From the cap_to_text(3) manpage:
In the case that the leading operator is
=, and no list of capabilities is provided, the action-list is assumed to refer to all capabilities. For example, the following three clauses are equivalent to each
other (and indicate a completely empty capability set):all=;=;
cap_chown,<every-other-capability>=.
Such a binary can do whatever it pleases, limited only by the capability bounding set, which on a desktop system includes everything (otherwise setuid binaries like su wouldn't work as expected).
Notice that this is only a "gotcha" of the textual representation used by libpcap: in the security.capability extended attribute of the file for which getcap will print /file/path =ep, all the meaningful bits are effectively on; for an empty security.capability, /file/path = (with the = not followed by anything) will be returned instead.
If someone is still not convinced about all that, here is a small experiment:
# cp /bin/ping /tmp/ping # will wipe setuid bits and extented attributes
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
# setcap =ep /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost' # will work because of cap_net_raw
PING localhost(localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.073 ms
^C
# setcap = /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
answered 2 hours ago
mosvymosvy
10.9k11340
# getcap ./some_bin
./some_bin =ep
That file has ALL the capabilites set in the effective(e) and permitted(p) set.
In the textual representation of capabilities, a leading = is equivalent to all=.
From the cap_to_text(3) manpage:
In the case that the leading operator is
=, and no list of capabilities is provided, the action-list is assumed to refer to all capabilities. For example, the following three clauses are equivalent to each
other (and indicate a completely empty capability set):all=;=;
cap_chown,<every-other-capability>=.
Such a binary can do whatever it pleases, limited only by the capability bounding set, which on a desktop system includes everything (otherwise setuid binaries like su wouldn't work as expected).
Notice that this is only a "gotcha" of the textual representation used by libpcap: in the security.capability extended attribute of the file for which getcap will print /file/path =ep, all the meaningful bits are effectively on; for an empty security.capability, /file/path = (with the = not followed by anything) will be returned instead.
If someone is still not convinced about all that, here is a small experiment:
# cp /bin/ping /tmp/ping # will wipe setuid bits and extented attributes
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
# setcap =ep /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost' # will work because of cap_net_raw
PING localhost(localhost (::1)) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from localhost (::1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.073 ms
^C
# setcap = /tmp/ping
# su user -c '/tmp/ping localhost'
ping: socket: Operation not permitted
answered 2 hours ago
mosvymosvy
10.9k11340
edited 31 mins ago
answered 2 hours ago
mosvymosvy
10.9k11340
answered 2 hours ago
mosvymosvy
10.9k11340
answered 2 hours ago
mosvymosvy
10.9k11340
10.9k11340
add a comment |
add a comment |
The capabilities are put in the permitted set (p), and all permitted capabilities are copied into the effective set (e). There does not seem to be any capabilities in your example (where did you get it from?).
The e is used for legacy programs (possibly most programs at the current time), that is programs that don't know about capabilities, so can not them-selves copy capabilities from permitted to effective.
answered 2 hours ago
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
add a comment |
The capabilities are put in the permitted set (p), and all permitted capabilities are copied into the effective set (e). There does not seem to be any capabilities in your example (where did you get it from?).
The e is used for legacy programs (possibly most programs at the current time), that is programs that don't know about capabilities, so can not them-selves copy capabilities from permitted to effective.
answered 2 hours ago
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
add a comment |
The capabilities are put in the permitted set (p), and all permitted capabilities are copied into the effective set (e). There does not seem to be any capabilities in your example (where did you get it from?).
The e is used for legacy programs (possibly most programs at the current time), that is programs that don't know about capabilities, so can not them-selves copy capabilities from permitted to effective.
answered 2 hours ago
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
The capabilities are put in the permitted set (p), and all permitted capabilities are copied into the effective set (e). There does not seem to be any capabilities in your example (where did you get it from?).
The e is used for legacy programs (possibly most programs at the current time), that is programs that don't know about capabilities, so can not them-selves copy capabilities from permitted to effective.
answered 2 hours ago
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
answered 2 hours ago
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
answered 2 hours ago
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
answered 2 hours ago
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.7k52663
12.7k52663
add a comment |
add a comment |
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
James is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f515881%2fwhat-does-the-ep-capability-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
capabilities(7)have nothing to do with selinux. That file has all possible capabilities set.– mosvy
3 hours ago
vulp3cula.gitbook.io/hackers-grimoire/post-exploitation/…
– Jesse_b
2 hours ago