What Intellectual Property rights apply to the output of a machine learning algorithm? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Intellectual Property Rights for Digital Artwork and an Artist in the United StatesIntellectual Property of a bankrupt companyIntellectual property at employee hackathon?Who owns the Intellectual Property of this Device?Distributing machine learning models (e.g., word embeddings) based on non-sharable datasetsIntellectual Property of Stack Exchange postsAbout Beyonce's song intellectual property rightsHow can “intellectual property rights” prevent the publication of fire safety information?Signing over intellectual property rights in OntarioCan creative element owners claim copyright on Machine Learning models or its output?

Do warforged have souls?

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?

Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?

Presidential Pardon

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Make it rain characters

Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate

Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary

Can the DM override racial traits?

What's the point in a preamp?

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

Intergalactic human space ship encounters another ship, character gets shunted off beyond known universe, reality starts collapsing

Huge performance difference of the command find with and without using %M option to show permissions

How did the crowd guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

How to determine omitted units in a publication

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Simulating Exploding Dice

What happens to a Warlock's expended Spell Slots when they gain a Level?



What Intellectual Property rights apply to the output of a machine learning algorithm?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Intellectual Property Rights for Digital Artwork and an Artist in the United StatesIntellectual Property of a bankrupt companyIntellectual property at employee hackathon?Who owns the Intellectual Property of this Device?Distributing machine learning models (e.g., word embeddings) based on non-sharable datasetsIntellectual Property of Stack Exchange postsAbout Beyonce's song intellectual property rightsHow can “intellectual property rights” prevent the publication of fire safety information?Signing over intellectual property rights in OntarioCan creative element owners claim copyright on Machine Learning models or its output?










2















Doing some research for an entrepreneurship class. We are building an email classifier for a logistics company to automate part of their customer service process. We are having some discussion on how to properly license this technology, and whether it should be hosted on the cloud or on their internal servers.



Specifically, my questions are:



1) Who actually owns the rights to the trained machine learning classifier output by the machine learning algorithm?



2) Since the company itself owns the data, can they claim rights to the output?



3) If the service is hosted on their servers, is there any way to protect against them hacking the classifier and re-deploying it themselves?










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Depends a lot on how the transaction is structured contractually.

    – ohwilleke
    Oct 15 '18 at 18:37















2















Doing some research for an entrepreneurship class. We are building an email classifier for a logistics company to automate part of their customer service process. We are having some discussion on how to properly license this technology, and whether it should be hosted on the cloud or on their internal servers.



Specifically, my questions are:



1) Who actually owns the rights to the trained machine learning classifier output by the machine learning algorithm?



2) Since the company itself owns the data, can they claim rights to the output?



3) If the service is hosted on their servers, is there any way to protect against them hacking the classifier and re-deploying it themselves?










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Depends a lot on how the transaction is structured contractually.

    – ohwilleke
    Oct 15 '18 at 18:37













2












2








2








Doing some research for an entrepreneurship class. We are building an email classifier for a logistics company to automate part of their customer service process. We are having some discussion on how to properly license this technology, and whether it should be hosted on the cloud or on their internal servers.



Specifically, my questions are:



1) Who actually owns the rights to the trained machine learning classifier output by the machine learning algorithm?



2) Since the company itself owns the data, can they claim rights to the output?



3) If the service is hosted on their servers, is there any way to protect against them hacking the classifier and re-deploying it themselves?










share|improve this question














Doing some research for an entrepreneurship class. We are building an email classifier for a logistics company to automate part of their customer service process. We are having some discussion on how to properly license this technology, and whether it should be hosted on the cloud or on their internal servers.



Specifically, my questions are:



1) Who actually owns the rights to the trained machine learning classifier output by the machine learning algorithm?



2) Since the company itself owns the data, can they claim rights to the output?



3) If the service is hosted on their servers, is there any way to protect against them hacking the classifier and re-deploying it themselves?







intellectual-property data-ownership






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 30 '17 at 10:02









Vincent MunosVincent Munos

112




112





bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 13 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.














  • Depends a lot on how the transaction is structured contractually.

    – ohwilleke
    Oct 15 '18 at 18:37

















  • Depends a lot on how the transaction is structured contractually.

    – ohwilleke
    Oct 15 '18 at 18:37
















Depends a lot on how the transaction is structured contractually.

– ohwilleke
Oct 15 '18 at 18:37





Depends a lot on how the transaction is structured contractually.

– ohwilleke
Oct 15 '18 at 18:37










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














Your title asks the right question first. Before discussing who owns Intellectual Property rights, we should first establish which rights that would be.



There are a few different types of Intellectual Property. Chiefly, those are patents, design patents, trademarks, and copyright. We can quickly dismiss patents and design patents - they exist only after registration, and you would know about that.



It's also clear that the model itself is not a trademark. You may invent a trademark for the model and do business using that trademark, but that trademark would only name the model.



Finally, there's copyright. That requires creative activity at least. But is the ML model the result of creative activity, or is the model created by a mathematical procedure (Stochastic Gradient Descent)? This is not obvious. You probably have some input in pre-selecting the data, but it's likely that the training algorithm had the final decision in weighing all inputs. Reasonable people may have different opinions here. My personal view is that the process is almost fully automated, and therefore not creative.






share|improve this answer























  • Could it be a "trade secret"?

    – D M
    Mar 18 '18 at 19:01











  • @DM: That's possible. The challenges would be to define the extent of that trade secret, and the owner of the secret. But if argued contractually and up front that it is a trade secret, owned by the students, then this logistics company would have a problem denying that later. Note that a trade secret does not protect against independent re-discovery.

    – MSalters
    Mar 18 '18 at 20:49











  • to be precise - "patent" encompasses "design patent"; patents are not "registered" they are applied for and it is possible that the application is not visible to the public until a patent is granted and issued. That is usually years after the application is filed, so, no you would not necessarily know that patent rights were in the process of being claimed. The creativity requirement for a copyrighted work is a very minimal requirement.

    – George White
    Nov 13 '18 at 20:44


















0














The Wikipedia article on Threshold of Originality has a section on stuff that machines produce, and it appears that, at least in the US, this would probably not be original enough to be copyrightable. Consult a local lawyer of the appropriate specialty if you want a more definite answer. The only other category of IP that's applicable would be trade secrets, and for that to apply you'd have to keep control of the output and not show it to others.



In the US, anyway, data usually belongs to whoever gathered it, but owning data doesn't mean owning something generated from it.



I assume that there's a generic engine and that the classifier output is what's important here. If it's not copyrightable, then there's nothing stopping anyone with access to it from copying, using, or redistributing it. If you show it to the company without an NDA in place, it won't be a trade secret. If you want to make a profit from it, consider charging for it up front.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "617"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24467%2fwhat-intellectual-property-rights-apply-to-the-output-of-a-machine-learning-algo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Your title asks the right question first. Before discussing who owns Intellectual Property rights, we should first establish which rights that would be.



    There are a few different types of Intellectual Property. Chiefly, those are patents, design patents, trademarks, and copyright. We can quickly dismiss patents and design patents - they exist only after registration, and you would know about that.



    It's also clear that the model itself is not a trademark. You may invent a trademark for the model and do business using that trademark, but that trademark would only name the model.



    Finally, there's copyright. That requires creative activity at least. But is the ML model the result of creative activity, or is the model created by a mathematical procedure (Stochastic Gradient Descent)? This is not obvious. You probably have some input in pre-selecting the data, but it's likely that the training algorithm had the final decision in weighing all inputs. Reasonable people may have different opinions here. My personal view is that the process is almost fully automated, and therefore not creative.






    share|improve this answer























    • Could it be a "trade secret"?

      – D M
      Mar 18 '18 at 19:01











    • @DM: That's possible. The challenges would be to define the extent of that trade secret, and the owner of the secret. But if argued contractually and up front that it is a trade secret, owned by the students, then this logistics company would have a problem denying that later. Note that a trade secret does not protect against independent re-discovery.

      – MSalters
      Mar 18 '18 at 20:49











    • to be precise - "patent" encompasses "design patent"; patents are not "registered" they are applied for and it is possible that the application is not visible to the public until a patent is granted and issued. That is usually years after the application is filed, so, no you would not necessarily know that patent rights were in the process of being claimed. The creativity requirement for a copyrighted work is a very minimal requirement.

      – George White
      Nov 13 '18 at 20:44















    0














    Your title asks the right question first. Before discussing who owns Intellectual Property rights, we should first establish which rights that would be.



    There are a few different types of Intellectual Property. Chiefly, those are patents, design patents, trademarks, and copyright. We can quickly dismiss patents and design patents - they exist only after registration, and you would know about that.



    It's also clear that the model itself is not a trademark. You may invent a trademark for the model and do business using that trademark, but that trademark would only name the model.



    Finally, there's copyright. That requires creative activity at least. But is the ML model the result of creative activity, or is the model created by a mathematical procedure (Stochastic Gradient Descent)? This is not obvious. You probably have some input in pre-selecting the data, but it's likely that the training algorithm had the final decision in weighing all inputs. Reasonable people may have different opinions here. My personal view is that the process is almost fully automated, and therefore not creative.






    share|improve this answer























    • Could it be a "trade secret"?

      – D M
      Mar 18 '18 at 19:01











    • @DM: That's possible. The challenges would be to define the extent of that trade secret, and the owner of the secret. But if argued contractually and up front that it is a trade secret, owned by the students, then this logistics company would have a problem denying that later. Note that a trade secret does not protect against independent re-discovery.

      – MSalters
      Mar 18 '18 at 20:49











    • to be precise - "patent" encompasses "design patent"; patents are not "registered" they are applied for and it is possible that the application is not visible to the public until a patent is granted and issued. That is usually years after the application is filed, so, no you would not necessarily know that patent rights were in the process of being claimed. The creativity requirement for a copyrighted work is a very minimal requirement.

      – George White
      Nov 13 '18 at 20:44













    0












    0








    0







    Your title asks the right question first. Before discussing who owns Intellectual Property rights, we should first establish which rights that would be.



    There are a few different types of Intellectual Property. Chiefly, those are patents, design patents, trademarks, and copyright. We can quickly dismiss patents and design patents - they exist only after registration, and you would know about that.



    It's also clear that the model itself is not a trademark. You may invent a trademark for the model and do business using that trademark, but that trademark would only name the model.



    Finally, there's copyright. That requires creative activity at least. But is the ML model the result of creative activity, or is the model created by a mathematical procedure (Stochastic Gradient Descent)? This is not obvious. You probably have some input in pre-selecting the data, but it's likely that the training algorithm had the final decision in weighing all inputs. Reasonable people may have different opinions here. My personal view is that the process is almost fully automated, and therefore not creative.






    share|improve this answer













    Your title asks the right question first. Before discussing who owns Intellectual Property rights, we should first establish which rights that would be.



    There are a few different types of Intellectual Property. Chiefly, those are patents, design patents, trademarks, and copyright. We can quickly dismiss patents and design patents - they exist only after registration, and you would know about that.



    It's also clear that the model itself is not a trademark. You may invent a trademark for the model and do business using that trademark, but that trademark would only name the model.



    Finally, there's copyright. That requires creative activity at least. But is the ML model the result of creative activity, or is the model created by a mathematical procedure (Stochastic Gradient Descent)? This is not obvious. You probably have some input in pre-selecting the data, but it's likely that the training algorithm had the final decision in weighing all inputs. Reasonable people may have different opinions here. My personal view is that the process is almost fully automated, and therefore not creative.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jan 17 '18 at 15:38









    MSaltersMSalters

    2,08069




    2,08069












    • Could it be a "trade secret"?

      – D M
      Mar 18 '18 at 19:01











    • @DM: That's possible. The challenges would be to define the extent of that trade secret, and the owner of the secret. But if argued contractually and up front that it is a trade secret, owned by the students, then this logistics company would have a problem denying that later. Note that a trade secret does not protect against independent re-discovery.

      – MSalters
      Mar 18 '18 at 20:49











    • to be precise - "patent" encompasses "design patent"; patents are not "registered" they are applied for and it is possible that the application is not visible to the public until a patent is granted and issued. That is usually years after the application is filed, so, no you would not necessarily know that patent rights were in the process of being claimed. The creativity requirement for a copyrighted work is a very minimal requirement.

      – George White
      Nov 13 '18 at 20:44

















    • Could it be a "trade secret"?

      – D M
      Mar 18 '18 at 19:01











    • @DM: That's possible. The challenges would be to define the extent of that trade secret, and the owner of the secret. But if argued contractually and up front that it is a trade secret, owned by the students, then this logistics company would have a problem denying that later. Note that a trade secret does not protect against independent re-discovery.

      – MSalters
      Mar 18 '18 at 20:49











    • to be precise - "patent" encompasses "design patent"; patents are not "registered" they are applied for and it is possible that the application is not visible to the public until a patent is granted and issued. That is usually years after the application is filed, so, no you would not necessarily know that patent rights were in the process of being claimed. The creativity requirement for a copyrighted work is a very minimal requirement.

      – George White
      Nov 13 '18 at 20:44
















    Could it be a "trade secret"?

    – D M
    Mar 18 '18 at 19:01





    Could it be a "trade secret"?

    – D M
    Mar 18 '18 at 19:01













    @DM: That's possible. The challenges would be to define the extent of that trade secret, and the owner of the secret. But if argued contractually and up front that it is a trade secret, owned by the students, then this logistics company would have a problem denying that later. Note that a trade secret does not protect against independent re-discovery.

    – MSalters
    Mar 18 '18 at 20:49





    @DM: That's possible. The challenges would be to define the extent of that trade secret, and the owner of the secret. But if argued contractually and up front that it is a trade secret, owned by the students, then this logistics company would have a problem denying that later. Note that a trade secret does not protect against independent re-discovery.

    – MSalters
    Mar 18 '18 at 20:49













    to be precise - "patent" encompasses "design patent"; patents are not "registered" they are applied for and it is possible that the application is not visible to the public until a patent is granted and issued. That is usually years after the application is filed, so, no you would not necessarily know that patent rights were in the process of being claimed. The creativity requirement for a copyrighted work is a very minimal requirement.

    – George White
    Nov 13 '18 at 20:44





    to be precise - "patent" encompasses "design patent"; patents are not "registered" they are applied for and it is possible that the application is not visible to the public until a patent is granted and issued. That is usually years after the application is filed, so, no you would not necessarily know that patent rights were in the process of being claimed. The creativity requirement for a copyrighted work is a very minimal requirement.

    – George White
    Nov 13 '18 at 20:44











    0














    The Wikipedia article on Threshold of Originality has a section on stuff that machines produce, and it appears that, at least in the US, this would probably not be original enough to be copyrightable. Consult a local lawyer of the appropriate specialty if you want a more definite answer. The only other category of IP that's applicable would be trade secrets, and for that to apply you'd have to keep control of the output and not show it to others.



    In the US, anyway, data usually belongs to whoever gathered it, but owning data doesn't mean owning something generated from it.



    I assume that there's a generic engine and that the classifier output is what's important here. If it's not copyrightable, then there's nothing stopping anyone with access to it from copying, using, or redistributing it. If you show it to the company without an NDA in place, it won't be a trade secret. If you want to make a profit from it, consider charging for it up front.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      The Wikipedia article on Threshold of Originality has a section on stuff that machines produce, and it appears that, at least in the US, this would probably not be original enough to be copyrightable. Consult a local lawyer of the appropriate specialty if you want a more definite answer. The only other category of IP that's applicable would be trade secrets, and for that to apply you'd have to keep control of the output and not show it to others.



      In the US, anyway, data usually belongs to whoever gathered it, but owning data doesn't mean owning something generated from it.



      I assume that there's a generic engine and that the classifier output is what's important here. If it's not copyrightable, then there's nothing stopping anyone with access to it from copying, using, or redistributing it. If you show it to the company without an NDA in place, it won't be a trade secret. If you want to make a profit from it, consider charging for it up front.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        The Wikipedia article on Threshold of Originality has a section on stuff that machines produce, and it appears that, at least in the US, this would probably not be original enough to be copyrightable. Consult a local lawyer of the appropriate specialty if you want a more definite answer. The only other category of IP that's applicable would be trade secrets, and for that to apply you'd have to keep control of the output and not show it to others.



        In the US, anyway, data usually belongs to whoever gathered it, but owning data doesn't mean owning something generated from it.



        I assume that there's a generic engine and that the classifier output is what's important here. If it's not copyrightable, then there's nothing stopping anyone with access to it from copying, using, or redistributing it. If you show it to the company without an NDA in place, it won't be a trade secret. If you want to make a profit from it, consider charging for it up front.






        share|improve this answer













        The Wikipedia article on Threshold of Originality has a section on stuff that machines produce, and it appears that, at least in the US, this would probably not be original enough to be copyrightable. Consult a local lawyer of the appropriate specialty if you want a more definite answer. The only other category of IP that's applicable would be trade secrets, and for that to apply you'd have to keep control of the output and not show it to others.



        In the US, anyway, data usually belongs to whoever gathered it, but owning data doesn't mean owning something generated from it.



        I assume that there's a generic engine and that the classifier output is what's important here. If it's not copyrightable, then there's nothing stopping anyone with access to it from copying, using, or redistributing it. If you show it to the company without an NDA in place, it won't be a trade secret. If you want to make a profit from it, consider charging for it up front.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 13 '18 at 21:18









        David ThornleyDavid Thornley

        9824




        9824



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24467%2fwhat-intellectual-property-rights-apply-to-the-output-of-a-machine-learning-algo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?

            Shenzhen Football Club Índice Elenco atual | Títulos | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegaçãoGooglenotíciaslivrosacadêmicoeditar«"Elenco"»Site oficialexpandindo-oeee

            When We Were Young (canção de Adele) Índice Antecedentes e lançamento | Faixas e formatos | Performances e covers | Desempenho nas tabelas musicais | Créditos | Histórico de lançamento | Referências Menu de navegação«Best albums of 2015»«Adele - When We Were Young (Radio Date: 22-01-2016)»«When We Were Young - Single by Adele»«Adele: Inside Her Private Life and Triumphant Return»«adele interview: world exclusive first interview in three years»«Tobias Jesso Jr: since Adele tweeted his song, he's even bigger than his dad»«Adele interviews Tobias Jesso Jr: 'I think that a couple of the ideas we had could be rap songs'»«Adele on Her Return: 'I Was So Frightened That No One Cared'»«Tobias Jesso Jr. on working with Adele: 'I was as nervous as shit'»«How Ariel Rechtshaid Pushed Adele To Her Limit»«Adele Previews 'When We Were Young' on '60 Minutes' Teaser, Tops Trending 140»«Adele Performs New '25' Ballad, "When We Were Young" Live: Watch»«Which '25' Song Should Be Adele's Next Single?»«Adele's 'When We Were Young' Confirmed As Second Single From '25'»«Adele's new single artwork for 'When We Were Young' is perfectly adorable»«Adele at the BBC review: honest, funny and spectacular – Celebrity News News»«'Saturday Night Live': Adele Sings 'Hello' and 'When We Were Young'»«'Adele: Live in New York City' NBC Special – Set List Revealed!»«Adele Closes Out the 2016 Brit Awards With 'When We Were Young'»«What Is The Adele Live Tour Set List? There's No Way She'd Leave Out These 8 Songs»«See Demi Lovato's Soaring Cover of Adele's 'When We Were Young'»«'The Voice': 5 Best Moments From Week 1 Blind Auditions»«Adele – When We Were Young (Media Control Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Entertainment Monitoring Africa)»«Adele – When We Were Young (ARIA Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ö3 Austria Top 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 50)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Canadian Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Tracklisten)»«Adele – When We Were Young (The Official Charts Company)»«Adele – Hello (IFPI Slovenská Republika)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Productores de Música de España)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Billboard Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Adult Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Adult Contemporary Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Dance Club Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Rock Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (IFPI Finlândia)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Syndicat National de l'Éditon Phonographique)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Magyar Hanglemezkiadók Szövetsége)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Irish Recorded Music Association)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Mexico Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (VG-lista)»«Adele – When We Were Young (NZ Top 40 Singles)»«Adele – When We Were Young (MegaCharts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Związek Producentów Audio Video)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Indie Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Sverigetopplistan)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Schweizer Hitparade)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Music Canada – Gold/Platinum – When We Were Young»«NZ Top 40 Singles Chart»«Certified Awards»e