Marital property in NJ: spouse have right to use car?Why do I have to sign a Corrective Warranty Deed for land I had no claim to?Is it legal to let sister-in-law drive my vehicle in another state and have her on my insurance?Are passenger services legally obligated to provide the names of passengers?Non-Legally binding tickets, License plate lookup in Calgary, Alberta, Canada legal?Does the right to privacy extend to property purchases?Car Seat PlacementShared Parenting - How intoxicated does a parent have to be to deny visitation?How can spouse transfer title to car in Oklahoma?Can I pay an ex-relative not to use my family name and make it stickDo the police need probable cause or a search warrant to search a rental car being driven by someone who didnt rent the vehicle?

Books on the History of math research at European universities

Why are on-board computers allowed to change controls without notifying the pilots?

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing

How to interpret the phrase "t’en a fait voir à toi"?

Is there an wasy way to program in Tikz something like the one in the image?

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

word describing multiple paths to the same abstract outcome

A known event to a history junkie

What should I use for Mishna study?

Is the next prime number always the next number divisible by the current prime number, except for any numbers previously divisible by primes?

Can a Bard use an arcane focus?

Superhero words!

Why are all the doors on Ferenginar (the Ferengi home world) far shorter than the average Ferengi?

Invariance of results when scaling explanatory variables in logistic regression, is there a proof?

Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?

Simulating a probability of 1 of 2^N with less than N random bits

What to do when my ideas aren't chosen, when I strongly disagree with the chosen solution?

Are taller landing gear bad for aircraft, particulary large airliners?

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

What (else) happened July 1st 1858 in London?

node command while defining a coordinate in TikZ

Is there any significance to the Valyrian Stone vault door of Qarth?

Perfect riffle shuffles

Can a malicious addon access internet history and such in chrome/firefox?



Marital property in NJ: spouse have right to use car?


Why do I have to sign a Corrective Warranty Deed for land I had no claim to?Is it legal to let sister-in-law drive my vehicle in another state and have her on my insurance?Are passenger services legally obligated to provide the names of passengers?Non-Legally binding tickets, License plate lookup in Calgary, Alberta, Canada legal?Does the right to privacy extend to property purchases?Car Seat PlacementShared Parenting - How intoxicated does a parent have to be to deny visitation?How can spouse transfer title to car in Oklahoma?Can I pay an ex-relative not to use my family name and make it stickDo the police need probable cause or a search warrant to search a rental car being driven by someone who didnt rent the vehicle?













4















The question is simple, but the situation is anything but. The bare bones info: my friend's son is a new driver who just had a minor, but scary, brush with the law. There is an extra car in this family, as my friend's husband kept his existing car when he purchased a newer one.



Hoping to get her son's attention, my friend would like to store his somewhat sporty car at another location, while her son would drive her own 15 year-old car, and she would use her husband's older car. This way the stored car would be an incentive toward some improvement and responsible behavior on her son's part, before it would be his to use again.



My friend's husband is refusing to "allow" her to use the car, as his way of forcing his own idea that the sporty car should be sold as a punishment. Does my friend have a right to the car as marital property, even though it's in the husband's name only?



They've been married 25yrs, so everything mentioned here has been acquired during the marriage, and, if it matters, she is the primary earner, but did not pay for the car.



I'm not intending this as a discussion of parenting, and no one is talking divorce or any other legal action, I would simply like to know whether the car is jointly owned (and hers to use) under NJ law, even though his name is the only one on the title.



I hope this is an ok question for this site.
Thanks much!










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 2 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 2





    Is the question "Is titled property in the name of one spouse a joint asset" or "Does New Jersey consider all marital assets to be jointly held"? Is this a legal question or a relationship and parenting question?

    – Jason Aller
    Dec 30 '15 at 5:15











  • @JasonAller Hi, thanks for your reply. To be honest I'm not sure I see the difference between the two possibilities you list (though there of course is one, or you wouldn't be asking), and would appreciate an answer to both, or either, as it applies. As I said in my question, this isn't about relationships or parenting, but I thought the circumstances might be of use in determining the legal standing of the people/property.

    – SuzyD
    Dec 30 '15 at 5:29







  • 1





    Wouldn't any principle that lets her use the car also let the husband deny the son use of her car? Does the son own the sports car or is it owned by one or both of the parents? Does the wife presently have a key (and thus implied granted permission to use) to the car in question?

    – user662852
    Dec 31 '15 at 18:15






  • 1





    @user662852 Hi, good questions, indeed. The son's car is in the name of both parents (though the husband now wants his name off the title), and I do not believe my friend has keys to her husband's older car, or has had need to use it in the past. Though I may be mistaken on that. It sounds like having the keys would be the determining factor, though? Interesting point you make about the husband being able to deny use of my friend's car -- that's a wrinkle that hadn't occurred to me. Thanks for taking the time to reply!

    – SuzyD
    Dec 31 '15 at 22:04















4















The question is simple, but the situation is anything but. The bare bones info: my friend's son is a new driver who just had a minor, but scary, brush with the law. There is an extra car in this family, as my friend's husband kept his existing car when he purchased a newer one.



Hoping to get her son's attention, my friend would like to store his somewhat sporty car at another location, while her son would drive her own 15 year-old car, and she would use her husband's older car. This way the stored car would be an incentive toward some improvement and responsible behavior on her son's part, before it would be his to use again.



My friend's husband is refusing to "allow" her to use the car, as his way of forcing his own idea that the sporty car should be sold as a punishment. Does my friend have a right to the car as marital property, even though it's in the husband's name only?



They've been married 25yrs, so everything mentioned here has been acquired during the marriage, and, if it matters, she is the primary earner, but did not pay for the car.



I'm not intending this as a discussion of parenting, and no one is talking divorce or any other legal action, I would simply like to know whether the car is jointly owned (and hers to use) under NJ law, even though his name is the only one on the title.



I hope this is an ok question for this site.
Thanks much!










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 2 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 2





    Is the question "Is titled property in the name of one spouse a joint asset" or "Does New Jersey consider all marital assets to be jointly held"? Is this a legal question or a relationship and parenting question?

    – Jason Aller
    Dec 30 '15 at 5:15











  • @JasonAller Hi, thanks for your reply. To be honest I'm not sure I see the difference between the two possibilities you list (though there of course is one, or you wouldn't be asking), and would appreciate an answer to both, or either, as it applies. As I said in my question, this isn't about relationships or parenting, but I thought the circumstances might be of use in determining the legal standing of the people/property.

    – SuzyD
    Dec 30 '15 at 5:29







  • 1





    Wouldn't any principle that lets her use the car also let the husband deny the son use of her car? Does the son own the sports car or is it owned by one or both of the parents? Does the wife presently have a key (and thus implied granted permission to use) to the car in question?

    – user662852
    Dec 31 '15 at 18:15






  • 1





    @user662852 Hi, good questions, indeed. The son's car is in the name of both parents (though the husband now wants his name off the title), and I do not believe my friend has keys to her husband's older car, or has had need to use it in the past. Though I may be mistaken on that. It sounds like having the keys would be the determining factor, though? Interesting point you make about the husband being able to deny use of my friend's car -- that's a wrinkle that hadn't occurred to me. Thanks for taking the time to reply!

    – SuzyD
    Dec 31 '15 at 22:04













4












4








4








The question is simple, but the situation is anything but. The bare bones info: my friend's son is a new driver who just had a minor, but scary, brush with the law. There is an extra car in this family, as my friend's husband kept his existing car when he purchased a newer one.



Hoping to get her son's attention, my friend would like to store his somewhat sporty car at another location, while her son would drive her own 15 year-old car, and she would use her husband's older car. This way the stored car would be an incentive toward some improvement and responsible behavior on her son's part, before it would be his to use again.



My friend's husband is refusing to "allow" her to use the car, as his way of forcing his own idea that the sporty car should be sold as a punishment. Does my friend have a right to the car as marital property, even though it's in the husband's name only?



They've been married 25yrs, so everything mentioned here has been acquired during the marriage, and, if it matters, she is the primary earner, but did not pay for the car.



I'm not intending this as a discussion of parenting, and no one is talking divorce or any other legal action, I would simply like to know whether the car is jointly owned (and hers to use) under NJ law, even though his name is the only one on the title.



I hope this is an ok question for this site.
Thanks much!










share|improve this question














The question is simple, but the situation is anything but. The bare bones info: my friend's son is a new driver who just had a minor, but scary, brush with the law. There is an extra car in this family, as my friend's husband kept his existing car when he purchased a newer one.



Hoping to get her son's attention, my friend would like to store his somewhat sporty car at another location, while her son would drive her own 15 year-old car, and she would use her husband's older car. This way the stored car would be an incentive toward some improvement and responsible behavior on her son's part, before it would be his to use again.



My friend's husband is refusing to "allow" her to use the car, as his way of forcing his own idea that the sporty car should be sold as a punishment. Does my friend have a right to the car as marital property, even though it's in the husband's name only?



They've been married 25yrs, so everything mentioned here has been acquired during the marriage, and, if it matters, she is the primary earner, but did not pay for the car.



I'm not intending this as a discussion of parenting, and no one is talking divorce or any other legal action, I would simply like to know whether the car is jointly owned (and hers to use) under NJ law, even though his name is the only one on the title.



I hope this is an ok question for this site.
Thanks much!







united-states property new-jersey






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 30 '15 at 3:40









SuzyDSuzyD

211




211





bumped to the homepage by Community 2 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 2 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.









  • 2





    Is the question "Is titled property in the name of one spouse a joint asset" or "Does New Jersey consider all marital assets to be jointly held"? Is this a legal question or a relationship and parenting question?

    – Jason Aller
    Dec 30 '15 at 5:15











  • @JasonAller Hi, thanks for your reply. To be honest I'm not sure I see the difference between the two possibilities you list (though there of course is one, or you wouldn't be asking), and would appreciate an answer to both, or either, as it applies. As I said in my question, this isn't about relationships or parenting, but I thought the circumstances might be of use in determining the legal standing of the people/property.

    – SuzyD
    Dec 30 '15 at 5:29







  • 1





    Wouldn't any principle that lets her use the car also let the husband deny the son use of her car? Does the son own the sports car or is it owned by one or both of the parents? Does the wife presently have a key (and thus implied granted permission to use) to the car in question?

    – user662852
    Dec 31 '15 at 18:15






  • 1





    @user662852 Hi, good questions, indeed. The son's car is in the name of both parents (though the husband now wants his name off the title), and I do not believe my friend has keys to her husband's older car, or has had need to use it in the past. Though I may be mistaken on that. It sounds like having the keys would be the determining factor, though? Interesting point you make about the husband being able to deny use of my friend's car -- that's a wrinkle that hadn't occurred to me. Thanks for taking the time to reply!

    – SuzyD
    Dec 31 '15 at 22:04












  • 2





    Is the question "Is titled property in the name of one spouse a joint asset" or "Does New Jersey consider all marital assets to be jointly held"? Is this a legal question or a relationship and parenting question?

    – Jason Aller
    Dec 30 '15 at 5:15











  • @JasonAller Hi, thanks for your reply. To be honest I'm not sure I see the difference between the two possibilities you list (though there of course is one, or you wouldn't be asking), and would appreciate an answer to both, or either, as it applies. As I said in my question, this isn't about relationships or parenting, but I thought the circumstances might be of use in determining the legal standing of the people/property.

    – SuzyD
    Dec 30 '15 at 5:29







  • 1





    Wouldn't any principle that lets her use the car also let the husband deny the son use of her car? Does the son own the sports car or is it owned by one or both of the parents? Does the wife presently have a key (and thus implied granted permission to use) to the car in question?

    – user662852
    Dec 31 '15 at 18:15






  • 1





    @user662852 Hi, good questions, indeed. The son's car is in the name of both parents (though the husband now wants his name off the title), and I do not believe my friend has keys to her husband's older car, or has had need to use it in the past. Though I may be mistaken on that. It sounds like having the keys would be the determining factor, though? Interesting point you make about the husband being able to deny use of my friend's car -- that's a wrinkle that hadn't occurred to me. Thanks for taking the time to reply!

    – SuzyD
    Dec 31 '15 at 22:04







2




2





Is the question "Is titled property in the name of one spouse a joint asset" or "Does New Jersey consider all marital assets to be jointly held"? Is this a legal question or a relationship and parenting question?

– Jason Aller
Dec 30 '15 at 5:15





Is the question "Is titled property in the name of one spouse a joint asset" or "Does New Jersey consider all marital assets to be jointly held"? Is this a legal question or a relationship and parenting question?

– Jason Aller
Dec 30 '15 at 5:15













@JasonAller Hi, thanks for your reply. To be honest I'm not sure I see the difference between the two possibilities you list (though there of course is one, or you wouldn't be asking), and would appreciate an answer to both, or either, as it applies. As I said in my question, this isn't about relationships or parenting, but I thought the circumstances might be of use in determining the legal standing of the people/property.

– SuzyD
Dec 30 '15 at 5:29






@JasonAller Hi, thanks for your reply. To be honest I'm not sure I see the difference between the two possibilities you list (though there of course is one, or you wouldn't be asking), and would appreciate an answer to both, or either, as it applies. As I said in my question, this isn't about relationships or parenting, but I thought the circumstances might be of use in determining the legal standing of the people/property.

– SuzyD
Dec 30 '15 at 5:29





1




1





Wouldn't any principle that lets her use the car also let the husband deny the son use of her car? Does the son own the sports car or is it owned by one or both of the parents? Does the wife presently have a key (and thus implied granted permission to use) to the car in question?

– user662852
Dec 31 '15 at 18:15





Wouldn't any principle that lets her use the car also let the husband deny the son use of her car? Does the son own the sports car or is it owned by one or both of the parents? Does the wife presently have a key (and thus implied granted permission to use) to the car in question?

– user662852
Dec 31 '15 at 18:15




1




1





@user662852 Hi, good questions, indeed. The son's car is in the name of both parents (though the husband now wants his name off the title), and I do not believe my friend has keys to her husband's older car, or has had need to use it in the past. Though I may be mistaken on that. It sounds like having the keys would be the determining factor, though? Interesting point you make about the husband being able to deny use of my friend's car -- that's a wrinkle that hadn't occurred to me. Thanks for taking the time to reply!

– SuzyD
Dec 31 '15 at 22:04





@user662852 Hi, good questions, indeed. The son's car is in the name of both parents (though the husband now wants his name off the title), and I do not believe my friend has keys to her husband's older car, or has had need to use it in the past. Though I may be mistaken on that. It sounds like having the keys would be the determining factor, though? Interesting point you make about the husband being able to deny use of my friend's car -- that's a wrinkle that hadn't occurred to me. Thanks for taking the time to reply!

– SuzyD
Dec 31 '15 at 22:04










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














New Jersey is not a community property state, but it is an equitable distribution state. This means that in a divorce marital property is divided, not automatically 50-50, but in a way that seems financially fair to the supervising judge, or according to an agreement entered into by both spouses. This also means that the state considers a car bought during the course of the marriage "marital property". There are also special rules for property bought before May 28 1980, which do not seem to apply in the case in the question.



However, "marital property" mostly applies when a marriage ends which the question says is not in view here. NJ does allow for a car to be titled to only one, or to both. A title with both names may read "John Doe OR Mary Doe" or "John Doe AND Mary Doe". In the AND case both spouses must sign to sell or borrow against the car, in the OR case either signature will do. If only one name is on the title, that person must sign to sell or borrow.



If it comes down to a dispute, the person whose name is on the title can decide where it is to be garaged, and who has permission to drive it. If the "sporty" car is in the name of both parents, either could move it to some other location, and either could move it back. Going back and forth could easily get ugly.



If both names are on the 'sporty' car's title with an OR, the husband could sell it without consulting the wife. if there is an AND he would need her to agree.



If the older car is in the husband's name alone, he could deny the wife or the son the right to drive it.



The wife could, of course, buy a different older (used) car and allow the son to use it.



Obviously it would be a good idea if the husband and wife came to a voluntary agreement about all this, but no law requires them to do so.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "617"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6090%2fmarital-property-in-nj-spouse-have-right-to-use-car%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    New Jersey is not a community property state, but it is an equitable distribution state. This means that in a divorce marital property is divided, not automatically 50-50, but in a way that seems financially fair to the supervising judge, or according to an agreement entered into by both spouses. This also means that the state considers a car bought during the course of the marriage "marital property". There are also special rules for property bought before May 28 1980, which do not seem to apply in the case in the question.



    However, "marital property" mostly applies when a marriage ends which the question says is not in view here. NJ does allow for a car to be titled to only one, or to both. A title with both names may read "John Doe OR Mary Doe" or "John Doe AND Mary Doe". In the AND case both spouses must sign to sell or borrow against the car, in the OR case either signature will do. If only one name is on the title, that person must sign to sell or borrow.



    If it comes down to a dispute, the person whose name is on the title can decide where it is to be garaged, and who has permission to drive it. If the "sporty" car is in the name of both parents, either could move it to some other location, and either could move it back. Going back and forth could easily get ugly.



    If both names are on the 'sporty' car's title with an OR, the husband could sell it without consulting the wife. if there is an AND he would need her to agree.



    If the older car is in the husband's name alone, he could deny the wife or the son the right to drive it.



    The wife could, of course, buy a different older (used) car and allow the son to use it.



    Obviously it would be a good idea if the husband and wife came to a voluntary agreement about all this, but no law requires them to do so.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      New Jersey is not a community property state, but it is an equitable distribution state. This means that in a divorce marital property is divided, not automatically 50-50, but in a way that seems financially fair to the supervising judge, or according to an agreement entered into by both spouses. This also means that the state considers a car bought during the course of the marriage "marital property". There are also special rules for property bought before May 28 1980, which do not seem to apply in the case in the question.



      However, "marital property" mostly applies when a marriage ends which the question says is not in view here. NJ does allow for a car to be titled to only one, or to both. A title with both names may read "John Doe OR Mary Doe" or "John Doe AND Mary Doe". In the AND case both spouses must sign to sell or borrow against the car, in the OR case either signature will do. If only one name is on the title, that person must sign to sell or borrow.



      If it comes down to a dispute, the person whose name is on the title can decide where it is to be garaged, and who has permission to drive it. If the "sporty" car is in the name of both parents, either could move it to some other location, and either could move it back. Going back and forth could easily get ugly.



      If both names are on the 'sporty' car's title with an OR, the husband could sell it without consulting the wife. if there is an AND he would need her to agree.



      If the older car is in the husband's name alone, he could deny the wife or the son the right to drive it.



      The wife could, of course, buy a different older (used) car and allow the son to use it.



      Obviously it would be a good idea if the husband and wife came to a voluntary agreement about all this, but no law requires them to do so.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        New Jersey is not a community property state, but it is an equitable distribution state. This means that in a divorce marital property is divided, not automatically 50-50, but in a way that seems financially fair to the supervising judge, or according to an agreement entered into by both spouses. This also means that the state considers a car bought during the course of the marriage "marital property". There are also special rules for property bought before May 28 1980, which do not seem to apply in the case in the question.



        However, "marital property" mostly applies when a marriage ends which the question says is not in view here. NJ does allow for a car to be titled to only one, or to both. A title with both names may read "John Doe OR Mary Doe" or "John Doe AND Mary Doe". In the AND case both spouses must sign to sell or borrow against the car, in the OR case either signature will do. If only one name is on the title, that person must sign to sell or borrow.



        If it comes down to a dispute, the person whose name is on the title can decide where it is to be garaged, and who has permission to drive it. If the "sporty" car is in the name of both parents, either could move it to some other location, and either could move it back. Going back and forth could easily get ugly.



        If both names are on the 'sporty' car's title with an OR, the husband could sell it without consulting the wife. if there is an AND he would need her to agree.



        If the older car is in the husband's name alone, he could deny the wife or the son the right to drive it.



        The wife could, of course, buy a different older (used) car and allow the son to use it.



        Obviously it would be a good idea if the husband and wife came to a voluntary agreement about all this, but no law requires them to do so.






        share|improve this answer













        New Jersey is not a community property state, but it is an equitable distribution state. This means that in a divorce marital property is divided, not automatically 50-50, but in a way that seems financially fair to the supervising judge, or according to an agreement entered into by both spouses. This also means that the state considers a car bought during the course of the marriage "marital property". There are also special rules for property bought before May 28 1980, which do not seem to apply in the case in the question.



        However, "marital property" mostly applies when a marriage ends which the question says is not in view here. NJ does allow for a car to be titled to only one, or to both. A title with both names may read "John Doe OR Mary Doe" or "John Doe AND Mary Doe". In the AND case both spouses must sign to sell or borrow against the car, in the OR case either signature will do. If only one name is on the title, that person must sign to sell or borrow.



        If it comes down to a dispute, the person whose name is on the title can decide where it is to be garaged, and who has permission to drive it. If the "sporty" car is in the name of both parents, either could move it to some other location, and either could move it back. Going back and forth could easily get ugly.



        If both names are on the 'sporty' car's title with an OR, the husband could sell it without consulting the wife. if there is an AND he would need her to agree.



        If the older car is in the husband's name alone, he could deny the wife or the son the right to drive it.



        The wife could, of course, buy a different older (used) car and allow the son to use it.



        Obviously it would be a good idea if the husband and wife came to a voluntary agreement about all this, but no law requires them to do so.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Feb 24 at 1:00









        David SiegelDavid Siegel

        14.4k2956




        14.4k2956



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6090%2fmarital-property-in-nj-spouse-have-right-to-use-car%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Force derivative works to be publicAre there any GPL like licenses for Apple App Store?Do you violate the GPL if you provide source code that cannot be compiled?GPL - is it distribution to use libraries in an appliance loaned to customers?Distributing App for free which uses GPL'ed codeModifications of server software under GPL, with web/CLI interfaceDoes using an AGPLv3-licensed library prevent me from dual-licensing my own source code?Can I publish only select code under GPLv3 from a private project?Is there published precedent regarding the scope of covered work that uses AGPL software?If MIT licensed code links to GPL licensed code what should be the license of the resulting binary program?If I use a public API endpoint that has its source code licensed under AGPL in my app, do I need to disclose my source?

            2013 GY136 Descoberta | Órbita | Referências Menu de navegação«List Of Centaurs and Scattered-Disk Objects»«List of Known Trans-Neptunian Objects»

            Button changing it's text & action. Good or terrible? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are Inchanging text on user mouseoverShould certain functions be “hard to find” for powerusers to discover?Custom liking function - do I need user login?Using different checkbox style for different checkbox behaviorBest Practices: Save and Exit in Software UIInteraction with remote validated formMore efficient UI to progress the user through a complicated process?Designing a popup notice for a gameShould bulk-editing functions be hidden until a table row is selected, or is there a better solution?Is it bad practice to disable (replace) the context menu?