Alignment of six matricesWhy does aligning equations not work here?Multiple matrix equations, alignmentMultiple alignmentAlignment with bracketsWhy align environement does not work with “extract ”package?Align matrices problemAlignment and line breaking in alignment environmentAllow page breaks in a gather environment with a nested alignEquation Alignment with Hierarchical Left AlignmentLong series alignmentMultiple = alignmentMultiline equation with matrices
Determining multivariate least squares with constraint
Cumulative Sum using Java 8 stream API
Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?
Quoting Keynes in a lecture
What happens if a creature's ETB would bounce Thalia, Heretic Cathar?
Review your own paper in Mathematics
Proving a complicated language is not a CFL
What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?
Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping a dual land?
If A is dense in Q, then it must be dense in R.
Anime with legendary swords made from talismans and a man who could change them with a shattered body
Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?
Distinction between 地平線 【ちへいせん】 and 水平線 【すいへいせん】
Why the "ls" command is showing the permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?
How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?
PTIJ: does fasting on Ta'anis Esther give us reward as if we celebrated 2 Purims? (similar to Yom Kippur)
Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?
El Dorado Word Puzzle II: Videogame Edition
Make a border of symbols in Gimp
Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?
Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?
How to preserve electronics (computers, iPads and phones) for hundreds of years
Why is the principal energy of an electron lower for excited electrons in a higher energy state?
Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks
Alignment of six matrices
Why does aligning equations not work here?Multiple matrix equations, alignmentMultiple alignmentAlignment with bracketsWhy align environement does not work with “extract ”package?Align matrices problemAlignment and line breaking in alignment environmentAllow page breaks in a gather environment with a nested alignEquation Alignment with Hierarchical Left AlignmentLong series alignmentMultiple = alignmentMultiline equation with matrices
I'm currently facing a problem with the align
environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align
environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
Note: I'm aware that most of the are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm currently facing a problem with the align
environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align
environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
Note: I'm aware that most of the are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm currently facing a problem with the align
environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align
environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
Note: I'm aware that most of the are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
New contributor
I'm currently facing a problem with the align
environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align
environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
Note: I'm aware that most of the are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
align
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
Bernard
173k776205
173k776205
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
Marius JaegerMarius Jaeger
254
254
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I just moved the &
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
2 hours ago
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&
) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
1 hour ago
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
48 mins ago
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
43 mins ago
Yes. My question was whether you are sure about the sign and you responded "but what about them?" and I told you why I find the choice of signs odd. Of course, strictly speaking there is no need to fix it, and if someone asks you to typesetE=mc^5
you could also do that. Really, this was just a comment saying that I would add different signs such that[I_i,J_j]=(universal constant) varepsilon_ijk I_k
. Will remove my comments.
– marmot
37 mins ago
|
show 3 more comments
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
usepackagetabstackengine
setstacktabbedgap1ex
begindocument
fixTABwidthT
beginalign*
I _ 1 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
,&&
I _ 2 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
, &&
I _ 3 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
, \
J _ 1 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&&
J _ 2 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&&
J _ 3 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
.
endalign*
enddocument
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480550%2falignment-of-six-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I just moved the &
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
2 hours ago
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&
) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
1 hour ago
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
48 mins ago
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
43 mins ago
Yes. My question was whether you are sure about the sign and you responded "but what about them?" and I told you why I find the choice of signs odd. Of course, strictly speaking there is no need to fix it, and if someone asks you to typesetE=mc^5
you could also do that. Really, this was just a comment saying that I would add different signs such that[I_i,J_j]=(universal constant) varepsilon_ijk I_k
. Will remove my comments.
– marmot
37 mins ago
|
show 3 more comments
I just moved the &
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
2 hours ago
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&
) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
1 hour ago
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
48 mins ago
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
43 mins ago
Yes. My question was whether you are sure about the sign and you responded "but what about them?" and I told you why I find the choice of signs odd. Of course, strictly speaking there is no need to fix it, and if someone asks you to typesetE=mc^5
you could also do that. Really, this was just a comment saying that I would add different signs such that[I_i,J_j]=(universal constant) varepsilon_ijk I_k
. Will remove my comments.
– marmot
37 mins ago
|
show 3 more comments
I just moved the &
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
I just moved the &
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
answered 2 hours ago
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
495k4111391887
495k4111391887
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
2 hours ago
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&
) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
1 hour ago
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
48 mins ago
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
43 mins ago
Yes. My question was whether you are sure about the sign and you responded "but what about them?" and I told you why I find the choice of signs odd. Of course, strictly speaking there is no need to fix it, and if someone asks you to typesetE=mc^5
you could also do that. Really, this was just a comment saying that I would add different signs such that[I_i,J_j]=(universal constant) varepsilon_ijk I_k
. Will remove my comments.
– marmot
37 mins ago
|
show 3 more comments
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
2 hours ago
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&
) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
1 hour ago
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
48 mins ago
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
43 mins ago
Yes. My question was whether you are sure about the sign and you responded "but what about them?" and I told you why I find the choice of signs odd. Of course, strictly speaking there is no need to fix it, and if someone asks you to typesetE=mc^5
you could also do that. Really, this was just a comment saying that I would add different signs such that[I_i,J_j]=(universal constant) varepsilon_ijk I_k
. Will remove my comments.
– marmot
37 mins ago
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
2 hours ago
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
2 hours ago
1
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the
&
) but what about them?– David Carlisle
1 hour ago
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the
&
) but what about them?– David Carlisle
1 hour ago
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
48 mins ago
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
48 mins ago
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
43 mins ago
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
43 mins ago
Yes. My question was whether you are sure about the sign and you responded "but what about them?" and I told you why I find the choice of signs odd. Of course, strictly speaking there is no need to fix it, and if someone asks you to typeset
E=mc^5
you could also do that. Really, this was just a comment saying that I would add different signs such that [I_i,J_j]=(universal constant) varepsilon_ijk I_k
. Will remove my comments.– marmot
37 mins ago
Yes. My question was whether you are sure about the sign and you responded "but what about them?" and I told you why I find the choice of signs odd. Of course, strictly speaking there is no need to fix it, and if someone asks you to typeset
E=mc^5
you could also do that. Really, this was just a comment saying that I would add different signs such that [I_i,J_j]=(universal constant) varepsilon_ijk I_k
. Will remove my comments.– marmot
37 mins ago
|
show 3 more comments
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
usepackagetabstackengine
setstacktabbedgap1ex
begindocument
fixTABwidthT
beginalign*
I _ 1 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
,&&
I _ 2 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
, &&
I _ 3 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
, \
J _ 1 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&&
J _ 2 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&&
J _ 3 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
.
endalign*
enddocument
add a comment |
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
usepackagetabstackengine
setstacktabbedgap1ex
begindocument
fixTABwidthT
beginalign*
I _ 1 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
,&&
I _ 2 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
, &&
I _ 3 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
, \
J _ 1 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&&
J _ 2 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&&
J _ 3 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
.
endalign*
enddocument
add a comment |
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
usepackagetabstackengine
setstacktabbedgap1ex
begindocument
fixTABwidthT
beginalign*
I _ 1 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
,&&
I _ 2 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
, &&
I _ 3 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
, \
J _ 1 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&&
J _ 2 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&&
J _ 3 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
.
endalign*
enddocument
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
usepackagetabstackengine
setstacktabbedgap1ex
begindocument
fixTABwidthT
beginalign*
I _ 1 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
,&&
I _ 2 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
, &&
I _ 3 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
, \
J _ 1 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&&
J _ 2 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&&
J _ 3 =
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
.
endalign*
enddocument
answered 1 hour ago
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
158k9204411
158k9204411
add a comment |
add a comment |
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480550%2falignment-of-six-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown