What is the legality of “reverse grafitti”?What is the legal take on the trolley problem?Writing exam questions on docs.google.com, Legality?Legality of “secret sexual relations”Is it legal to reverse-engineer structures on PlanetMinecraft?Legality of space colonizationThe N. word and reverse discriminationWhat is the legality of implementing an unrevealed killswitch in software?What is the legality of a business announcing the use of upcoming profits for political advocacy?Legality surrounding impersonating a Federal EmployeeCan I pay someone outside the US to reverse engineer software against the license?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?

Anime with legendary swords made from talismans and a man who could change them with a shattered body

"Oh no!" in Latin

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

Overlapping circles covering polygon

Telemetry for feature health

When and why was runway 07/25 at Kai Tak removed?

Should I assume I have passed probation?

Would this string work as string?

Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping a dual land?

What is the meaning of "You've never met a graph you didn't like?"

How many people need to be born every 8 years to sustain population?

Why would five hundred and five be same as one?

Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?

Check if object is null and return null

Proving an identity involving cross products and coplanar vectors

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

Isometric embedding of a genus g surface

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

Deciphering cause of death?

Personal or impersonal in a technical resume

Why does the Persian emissary display a string of crowned skulls?

What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?



What is the legality of “reverse grafitti”?


What is the legal take on the trolley problem?Writing exam questions on docs.google.com, Legality?Legality of “secret sexual relations”Is it legal to reverse-engineer structures on PlanetMinecraft?Legality of space colonizationThe N. word and reverse discriminationWhat is the legality of implementing an unrevealed killswitch in software?What is the legality of a business announcing the use of upcoming profits for political advocacy?Legality surrounding impersonating a Federal EmployeeCan I pay someone outside the US to reverse engineer software against the license?













5















I recently discovered several videos on YouTube talking about a new form of public art called Reverse Grafitti, the idea being that instead of adding paint to a wall, you form an image by selectively cleaning it. This creates a temporary form that will fade naturally within a short (few months) timeframe.



Here is a video demonstrating the idea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ut96pkYUOiM



Now I know that in most places, grafitti is illegal. However, here are my questions:



  1. Is "Reverse Grafitti" considered Grafitti? and

  2. Have any similar ideas been brought before a court? What was the result?









share|improve this question
























  • By "cleaning", you do mean that in the everyday sense of the word, right? As opposed to the removal of paint, which would be much more accurately described by the term reverse graffiti, and would be destruction of property.

    – Nij
    Jan 11 '17 at 9:56






  • 2





    @Nij Yes, he means cleaning - from the video it looks like they stencil an area and then waterblast that area to reveal a clean surface. No destruction of property is involved. Its a novel concept.

    – davidgo
    Jan 11 '17 at 21:46






  • 1





    In some cases, that's destruction of the historical patina and possible damage to masonry and concrete. But mostly, you're still creating an image or lettering on a surface that is not authorized by the owner (public or private); the image or lettering is the defacement. The graffiti is the message, and has little to do with the medium it's on or if paint is added or patina removed.

    – BlueDogRanch
    Jan 11 '17 at 22:42















5















I recently discovered several videos on YouTube talking about a new form of public art called Reverse Grafitti, the idea being that instead of adding paint to a wall, you form an image by selectively cleaning it. This creates a temporary form that will fade naturally within a short (few months) timeframe.



Here is a video demonstrating the idea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ut96pkYUOiM



Now I know that in most places, grafitti is illegal. However, here are my questions:



  1. Is "Reverse Grafitti" considered Grafitti? and

  2. Have any similar ideas been brought before a court? What was the result?









share|improve this question
























  • By "cleaning", you do mean that in the everyday sense of the word, right? As opposed to the removal of paint, which would be much more accurately described by the term reverse graffiti, and would be destruction of property.

    – Nij
    Jan 11 '17 at 9:56






  • 2





    @Nij Yes, he means cleaning - from the video it looks like they stencil an area and then waterblast that area to reveal a clean surface. No destruction of property is involved. Its a novel concept.

    – davidgo
    Jan 11 '17 at 21:46






  • 1





    In some cases, that's destruction of the historical patina and possible damage to masonry and concrete. But mostly, you're still creating an image or lettering on a surface that is not authorized by the owner (public or private); the image or lettering is the defacement. The graffiti is the message, and has little to do with the medium it's on or if paint is added or patina removed.

    – BlueDogRanch
    Jan 11 '17 at 22:42













5












5








5








I recently discovered several videos on YouTube talking about a new form of public art called Reverse Grafitti, the idea being that instead of adding paint to a wall, you form an image by selectively cleaning it. This creates a temporary form that will fade naturally within a short (few months) timeframe.



Here is a video demonstrating the idea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ut96pkYUOiM



Now I know that in most places, grafitti is illegal. However, here are my questions:



  1. Is "Reverse Grafitti" considered Grafitti? and

  2. Have any similar ideas been brought before a court? What was the result?









share|improve this question
















I recently discovered several videos on YouTube talking about a new form of public art called Reverse Grafitti, the idea being that instead of adding paint to a wall, you form an image by selectively cleaning it. This creates a temporary form that will fade naturally within a short (few months) timeframe.



Here is a video demonstrating the idea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ut96pkYUOiM



Now I know that in most places, grafitti is illegal. However, here are my questions:



  1. Is "Reverse Grafitti" considered Grafitti? and

  2. Have any similar ideas been brought before a court? What was the result?






united-states criminal-law






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 12 '17 at 15:41









BlueDogRanch

10.3k21838




10.3k21838










asked Jan 11 '17 at 7:25









TyzoidTyzoid

1205




1205












  • By "cleaning", you do mean that in the everyday sense of the word, right? As opposed to the removal of paint, which would be much more accurately described by the term reverse graffiti, and would be destruction of property.

    – Nij
    Jan 11 '17 at 9:56






  • 2





    @Nij Yes, he means cleaning - from the video it looks like they stencil an area and then waterblast that area to reveal a clean surface. No destruction of property is involved. Its a novel concept.

    – davidgo
    Jan 11 '17 at 21:46






  • 1





    In some cases, that's destruction of the historical patina and possible damage to masonry and concrete. But mostly, you're still creating an image or lettering on a surface that is not authorized by the owner (public or private); the image or lettering is the defacement. The graffiti is the message, and has little to do with the medium it's on or if paint is added or patina removed.

    – BlueDogRanch
    Jan 11 '17 at 22:42

















  • By "cleaning", you do mean that in the everyday sense of the word, right? As opposed to the removal of paint, which would be much more accurately described by the term reverse graffiti, and would be destruction of property.

    – Nij
    Jan 11 '17 at 9:56






  • 2





    @Nij Yes, he means cleaning - from the video it looks like they stencil an area and then waterblast that area to reveal a clean surface. No destruction of property is involved. Its a novel concept.

    – davidgo
    Jan 11 '17 at 21:46






  • 1





    In some cases, that's destruction of the historical patina and possible damage to masonry and concrete. But mostly, you're still creating an image or lettering on a surface that is not authorized by the owner (public or private); the image or lettering is the defacement. The graffiti is the message, and has little to do with the medium it's on or if paint is added or patina removed.

    – BlueDogRanch
    Jan 11 '17 at 22:42
















By "cleaning", you do mean that in the everyday sense of the word, right? As opposed to the removal of paint, which would be much more accurately described by the term reverse graffiti, and would be destruction of property.

– Nij
Jan 11 '17 at 9:56





By "cleaning", you do mean that in the everyday sense of the word, right? As opposed to the removal of paint, which would be much more accurately described by the term reverse graffiti, and would be destruction of property.

– Nij
Jan 11 '17 at 9:56




2




2





@Nij Yes, he means cleaning - from the video it looks like they stencil an area and then waterblast that area to reveal a clean surface. No destruction of property is involved. Its a novel concept.

– davidgo
Jan 11 '17 at 21:46





@Nij Yes, he means cleaning - from the video it looks like they stencil an area and then waterblast that area to reveal a clean surface. No destruction of property is involved. Its a novel concept.

– davidgo
Jan 11 '17 at 21:46




1




1





In some cases, that's destruction of the historical patina and possible damage to masonry and concrete. But mostly, you're still creating an image or lettering on a surface that is not authorized by the owner (public or private); the image or lettering is the defacement. The graffiti is the message, and has little to do with the medium it's on or if paint is added or patina removed.

– BlueDogRanch
Jan 11 '17 at 22:42





In some cases, that's destruction of the historical patina and possible damage to masonry and concrete. But mostly, you're still creating an image or lettering on a surface that is not authorized by the owner (public or private); the image or lettering is the defacement. The graffiti is the message, and has little to do with the medium it's on or if paint is added or patina removed.

– BlueDogRanch
Jan 11 '17 at 22:42










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














I don't know of any legal reason to care whether people consider reverse graffiti to be graffiti, since graffiti is not itself a legal concept. The act when done without permission is, however, trespassing, which is against the law. Painting a building is legal, if done with permission; painting a building in a pattern is legal, if done with permission. Strangely enough, cleaning a building without permission, whether entirely of selectively in a pattern, is illegal.



There are in fact specific laws about defacing property, so the illegality of the act does not rely solely on trespass laws. The NYC law is here, the California law is here, and there are many similar laws. In Washington, illegality arises from a more general prohibition against causing physical damage, which is defined here, and boils down to "costs money to fix". These laws are not limited to "applying opaque material to a surface".






share|improve this answer
































    0














    From what the video shows, you'd still be vandalizing property. However, there may be different laws about it from city to city, so you might still be able to do reverse graffiti without being charged. If your state does NOT have any laws governing it, you might be better off just assuming that you shouldn't do it.



    I don't believe any of these ideas were actually brought before a court, but it's sort of a given that the minute someone starts doing it, there WILL be a case.



    This will depend on the state or city, but you may be able to ask your city council (if applicable) about it, but it most likely would only be legal on city property if a law were to get passed.






    share|improve this answer























    • You really should base your answer in legal aspects for this site. There will be different laws according to jurisdiction. But exactly how is reverse graffiti vandalism? Are you sure there are no legal cases? Why could it possibly "only be legal on city property"?

      – BlueDogRanch
      Jan 12 '17 at 2:34



















    0














    ok, so, subquestion:



    after some verbal anti-semitism in my town, i got a little rash and drew a(ok, two) star of david on my car in the dirt. til i found something suitable. anyway, today after i got home, i realized someone had rubbed it out and replaced it with a cross. i realize this is almost silly to pursue, but there may be surveillance footage, and, well, id love to help a jew hater get to know the law.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    amannamedme is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.



















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "617"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16339%2fwhat-is-the-legality-of-reverse-grafitti%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      I don't know of any legal reason to care whether people consider reverse graffiti to be graffiti, since graffiti is not itself a legal concept. The act when done without permission is, however, trespassing, which is against the law. Painting a building is legal, if done with permission; painting a building in a pattern is legal, if done with permission. Strangely enough, cleaning a building without permission, whether entirely of selectively in a pattern, is illegal.



      There are in fact specific laws about defacing property, so the illegality of the act does not rely solely on trespass laws. The NYC law is here, the California law is here, and there are many similar laws. In Washington, illegality arises from a more general prohibition against causing physical damage, which is defined here, and boils down to "costs money to fix". These laws are not limited to "applying opaque material to a surface".






      share|improve this answer





























        4














        I don't know of any legal reason to care whether people consider reverse graffiti to be graffiti, since graffiti is not itself a legal concept. The act when done without permission is, however, trespassing, which is against the law. Painting a building is legal, if done with permission; painting a building in a pattern is legal, if done with permission. Strangely enough, cleaning a building without permission, whether entirely of selectively in a pattern, is illegal.



        There are in fact specific laws about defacing property, so the illegality of the act does not rely solely on trespass laws. The NYC law is here, the California law is here, and there are many similar laws. In Washington, illegality arises from a more general prohibition against causing physical damage, which is defined here, and boils down to "costs money to fix". These laws are not limited to "applying opaque material to a surface".






        share|improve this answer



























          4












          4








          4







          I don't know of any legal reason to care whether people consider reverse graffiti to be graffiti, since graffiti is not itself a legal concept. The act when done without permission is, however, trespassing, which is against the law. Painting a building is legal, if done with permission; painting a building in a pattern is legal, if done with permission. Strangely enough, cleaning a building without permission, whether entirely of selectively in a pattern, is illegal.



          There are in fact specific laws about defacing property, so the illegality of the act does not rely solely on trespass laws. The NYC law is here, the California law is here, and there are many similar laws. In Washington, illegality arises from a more general prohibition against causing physical damage, which is defined here, and boils down to "costs money to fix". These laws are not limited to "applying opaque material to a surface".






          share|improve this answer















          I don't know of any legal reason to care whether people consider reverse graffiti to be graffiti, since graffiti is not itself a legal concept. The act when done without permission is, however, trespassing, which is against the law. Painting a building is legal, if done with permission; painting a building in a pattern is legal, if done with permission. Strangely enough, cleaning a building without permission, whether entirely of selectively in a pattern, is illegal.



          There are in fact specific laws about defacing property, so the illegality of the act does not rely solely on trespass laws. The NYC law is here, the California law is here, and there are many similar laws. In Washington, illegality arises from a more general prohibition against causing physical damage, which is defined here, and boils down to "costs money to fix". These laws are not limited to "applying opaque material to a surface".







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jan 12 '17 at 20:00









          feetwet♦

          14.8k94295




          14.8k94295










          answered Jan 12 '17 at 2:51









          user6726user6726

          60.9k455106




          60.9k455106





















              0














              From what the video shows, you'd still be vandalizing property. However, there may be different laws about it from city to city, so you might still be able to do reverse graffiti without being charged. If your state does NOT have any laws governing it, you might be better off just assuming that you shouldn't do it.



              I don't believe any of these ideas were actually brought before a court, but it's sort of a given that the minute someone starts doing it, there WILL be a case.



              This will depend on the state or city, but you may be able to ask your city council (if applicable) about it, but it most likely would only be legal on city property if a law were to get passed.






              share|improve this answer























              • You really should base your answer in legal aspects for this site. There will be different laws according to jurisdiction. But exactly how is reverse graffiti vandalism? Are you sure there are no legal cases? Why could it possibly "only be legal on city property"?

                – BlueDogRanch
                Jan 12 '17 at 2:34
















              0














              From what the video shows, you'd still be vandalizing property. However, there may be different laws about it from city to city, so you might still be able to do reverse graffiti without being charged. If your state does NOT have any laws governing it, you might be better off just assuming that you shouldn't do it.



              I don't believe any of these ideas were actually brought before a court, but it's sort of a given that the minute someone starts doing it, there WILL be a case.



              This will depend on the state or city, but you may be able to ask your city council (if applicable) about it, but it most likely would only be legal on city property if a law were to get passed.






              share|improve this answer























              • You really should base your answer in legal aspects for this site. There will be different laws according to jurisdiction. But exactly how is reverse graffiti vandalism? Are you sure there are no legal cases? Why could it possibly "only be legal on city property"?

                – BlueDogRanch
                Jan 12 '17 at 2:34














              0












              0








              0







              From what the video shows, you'd still be vandalizing property. However, there may be different laws about it from city to city, so you might still be able to do reverse graffiti without being charged. If your state does NOT have any laws governing it, you might be better off just assuming that you shouldn't do it.



              I don't believe any of these ideas were actually brought before a court, but it's sort of a given that the minute someone starts doing it, there WILL be a case.



              This will depend on the state or city, but you may be able to ask your city council (if applicable) about it, but it most likely would only be legal on city property if a law were to get passed.






              share|improve this answer













              From what the video shows, you'd still be vandalizing property. However, there may be different laws about it from city to city, so you might still be able to do reverse graffiti without being charged. If your state does NOT have any laws governing it, you might be better off just assuming that you shouldn't do it.



              I don't believe any of these ideas were actually brought before a court, but it's sort of a given that the minute someone starts doing it, there WILL be a case.



              This will depend on the state or city, but you may be able to ask your city council (if applicable) about it, but it most likely would only be legal on city property if a law were to get passed.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Jan 12 '17 at 2:13









              Powerman25Powerman25

              212




              212












              • You really should base your answer in legal aspects for this site. There will be different laws according to jurisdiction. But exactly how is reverse graffiti vandalism? Are you sure there are no legal cases? Why could it possibly "only be legal on city property"?

                – BlueDogRanch
                Jan 12 '17 at 2:34


















              • You really should base your answer in legal aspects for this site. There will be different laws according to jurisdiction. But exactly how is reverse graffiti vandalism? Are you sure there are no legal cases? Why could it possibly "only be legal on city property"?

                – BlueDogRanch
                Jan 12 '17 at 2:34

















              You really should base your answer in legal aspects for this site. There will be different laws according to jurisdiction. But exactly how is reverse graffiti vandalism? Are you sure there are no legal cases? Why could it possibly "only be legal on city property"?

              – BlueDogRanch
              Jan 12 '17 at 2:34






              You really should base your answer in legal aspects for this site. There will be different laws according to jurisdiction. But exactly how is reverse graffiti vandalism? Are you sure there are no legal cases? Why could it possibly "only be legal on city property"?

              – BlueDogRanch
              Jan 12 '17 at 2:34












              0














              ok, so, subquestion:



              after some verbal anti-semitism in my town, i got a little rash and drew a(ok, two) star of david on my car in the dirt. til i found something suitable. anyway, today after i got home, i realized someone had rubbed it out and replaced it with a cross. i realize this is almost silly to pursue, but there may be surveillance footage, and, well, id love to help a jew hater get to know the law.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              amannamedme is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                0














                ok, so, subquestion:



                after some verbal anti-semitism in my town, i got a little rash and drew a(ok, two) star of david on my car in the dirt. til i found something suitable. anyway, today after i got home, i realized someone had rubbed it out and replaced it with a cross. i realize this is almost silly to pursue, but there may be surveillance footage, and, well, id love to help a jew hater get to know the law.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                amannamedme is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                  0












                  0








                  0







                  ok, so, subquestion:



                  after some verbal anti-semitism in my town, i got a little rash and drew a(ok, two) star of david on my car in the dirt. til i found something suitable. anyway, today after i got home, i realized someone had rubbed it out and replaced it with a cross. i realize this is almost silly to pursue, but there may be surveillance footage, and, well, id love to help a jew hater get to know the law.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  amannamedme is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  ok, so, subquestion:



                  after some verbal anti-semitism in my town, i got a little rash and drew a(ok, two) star of david on my car in the dirt. til i found something suitable. anyway, today after i got home, i realized someone had rubbed it out and replaced it with a cross. i realize this is almost silly to pursue, but there may be surveillance footage, and, well, id love to help a jew hater get to know the law.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  amannamedme is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  amannamedme is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 17 mins ago









                  amannamedmeamannamedme

                  1




                  1




                  New contributor




                  amannamedme is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  amannamedme is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  amannamedme is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f16339%2fwhat-is-the-legality-of-reverse-grafitti%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?

                      Shenzhen Football Club Índice Elenco atual | Títulos | Referências Ligações externas | Menu de navegaçãoGooglenotíciaslivrosacadêmicoeditar«"Elenco"»Site oficialexpandindo-oeee

                      When We Were Young (canção de Adele) Índice Antecedentes e lançamento | Faixas e formatos | Performances e covers | Desempenho nas tabelas musicais | Créditos | Histórico de lançamento | Referências Menu de navegação«Best albums of 2015»«Adele - When We Were Young (Radio Date: 22-01-2016)»«When We Were Young - Single by Adele»«Adele: Inside Her Private Life and Triumphant Return»«adele interview: world exclusive first interview in three years»«Tobias Jesso Jr: since Adele tweeted his song, he's even bigger than his dad»«Adele interviews Tobias Jesso Jr: 'I think that a couple of the ideas we had could be rap songs'»«Adele on Her Return: 'I Was So Frightened That No One Cared'»«Tobias Jesso Jr. on working with Adele: 'I was as nervous as shit'»«How Ariel Rechtshaid Pushed Adele To Her Limit»«Adele Previews 'When We Were Young' on '60 Minutes' Teaser, Tops Trending 140»«Adele Performs New '25' Ballad, "When We Were Young" Live: Watch»«Which '25' Song Should Be Adele's Next Single?»«Adele's 'When We Were Young' Confirmed As Second Single From '25'»«Adele's new single artwork for 'When We Were Young' is perfectly adorable»«Adele at the BBC review: honest, funny and spectacular – Celebrity News News»«'Saturday Night Live': Adele Sings 'Hello' and 'When We Were Young'»«'Adele: Live in New York City' NBC Special – Set List Revealed!»«Adele Closes Out the 2016 Brit Awards With 'When We Were Young'»«What Is The Adele Live Tour Set List? There's No Way She'd Leave Out These 8 Songs»«See Demi Lovato's Soaring Cover of Adele's 'When We Were Young'»«'The Voice': 5 Best Moments From Week 1 Blind Auditions»«Adele – When We Were Young (Media Control Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Entertainment Monitoring Africa)»«Adele – When We Were Young (ARIA Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ö3 Austria Top 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 50)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Ultratop 40)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Canadian Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Tracklisten)»«Adele – When We Were Young (The Official Charts Company)»«Adele – Hello (IFPI Slovenská Republika)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Productores de Música de España)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Billboard Hot 100)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Adult Pop Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Adult Contemporary Charts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Hot Dance Club Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Rock Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (IFPI Finlândia)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Syndicat National de l'Éditon Phonographique)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Magyar Hanglemezkiadók Szövetsége)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Irish Recorded Music Association)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Mexico Airplay)»«Adele – When We Were Young (VG-lista)»«Adele – When We Were Young (NZ Top 40 Singles)»«Adele – When We Were Young (MegaCharts)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Związek Producentów Audio Video)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Indie Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (UK Singles Chart)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Sverigetopplistan)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Schweizer Hitparade)»«Adele – When We Were Young (Portugal Digital Songs)»«Music Canada – Gold/Platinum – When We Were Young»«NZ Top 40 Singles Chart»«Certified Awards»e