Existance of a celestial body big enough for early civilization to be thought of as a second moonA world with a moon orbiting much closer than oursOrbiting one star in a binary system: what are the effects of the second star on the planet?Could a civilization engineer supernovae?Two orbits, Four habitable planets in the goldilocks zone?Which gas giant of the solar system could humanity mine and for what resource?How could a TINY Second Moon minimally affect Earth?Is a 1:1 Earth possible in a binary system?How to determine the population size and spread in a fictional ancient world settlingHorseshoe OrbitsDay/night cycle science help?
Multi tool use
Does .bashrc contain syntax errors?
Naive Monte Carlo, MCMC and their use in Bayesian Theory
In Aliens, how many people were on LV-426 before the Marines arrived?
Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?
Should I use acronyms in dialogues before telling the readers what it stands for in fiction?
How to define limit operations in general topological spaces? Are nets able to do this?
Variable completely messes up echoed string
Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?
Suggestions on how to spend Shaabath (constructively) alone
Violin - Can double stops be played when the strings are not next to each other?
Using Past-Perfect interchangeably with the Past Continuous
Replace four times with sed
Comment Box for Substitution Method of Integrals
Can a medieval gyroplane be built?
Existance of a celestial body big enough for early civilization to be thought of as a second moon
Maths symbols and unicode-math input inside siunitx commands
Do I need to consider instance restrictions when showing a language is in P?
PTIJ What is the inyan of the Konami code in Uncle Moishy's song?
Practical application of matrices and determinants
Pronounciation of the combination "st" in spanish accents
Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions
Turning a hard to access nut?
Hausdorff dimension of the boundary of fibres of Lipschitz maps
Matrix using tikz package
Existance of a celestial body big enough for early civilization to be thought of as a second moon
A world with a moon orbiting much closer than oursOrbiting one star in a binary system: what are the effects of the second star on the planet?Could a civilization engineer supernovae?Two orbits, Four habitable planets in the goldilocks zone?Which gas giant of the solar system could humanity mine and for what resource?How could a TINY Second Moon minimally affect Earth?Is a 1:1 Earth possible in a binary system?How to determine the population size and spread in a fictional ancient world settlingHorseshoe OrbitsDay/night cycle science help?
$begingroup$
Is there a possible scenario in which once a year a celestial body can be seen from the surface of the Earth-like planet for a short period of time?
- With it being big enough for early civilization to consider it a second moon but much smaller than the actual one.
- And occurring each year for one thousand years.
I thought two moons questions are similar enough, but I haven't found a proper answer for myself.
Thank you!
space earth-like
asked 2 hours ago
shootshishootshi
233
New contributor
shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a possible scenario in which once a year a celestial body can be seen from the surface of the Earth-like planet for a short period of time?
- With it being big enough for early civilization to consider it a second moon but much smaller than the actual one.
- And occurring each year for one thousand years.
I thought two moons questions are similar enough, but I haven't found a proper answer for myself.
Thank you!
space earth-like
asked 2 hours ago
shootshishootshi
233
New contributor
shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a possible scenario in which once a year a celestial body can be seen from the surface of the Earth-like planet for a short period of time?
- With it being big enough for early civilization to consider it a second moon but much smaller than the actual one.
- And occurring each year for one thousand years.
I thought two moons questions are similar enough, but I haven't found a proper answer for myself.
Thank you!
space earth-like
asked 2 hours ago
shootshishootshi
233
New contributor
shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Is there a possible scenario in which once a year a celestial body can be seen from the surface of the Earth-like planet for a short period of time?
- With it being big enough for early civilization to consider it a second moon but much smaller than the actual one.
- And occurring each year for one thousand years.
I thought two moons questions are similar enough, but I haven't found a proper answer for myself.
Thank you!
space earth-like
space earth-like
asked 2 hours ago
shootshishootshi
233
New contributor
shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
shootshishootshi
233
New contributor
shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
shootshi
asked 2 hours ago
shootshishootshi
233
New contributor
shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
shootshishootshi
233
asked 2 hours ago
shootshishootshi
233
233
New contributor
shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
shootshi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes. That would be a kind of quasi-satellite.
And Earth already has a small one - it's called Cruithne. At perigee, a larger Cruithne might well be visible, always in the same section of the sky.
A larger body would be less stable, but if you only need one thousand years, I think it could work out.
answered 2 hours ago
LSerniLSerni
28.3k24990
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A comet could fill this role. Comets are notoriously bright.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Comet_P1_McNaught02_-_23-01-07.jpg
I like the tail but you could have your celestial body be made of something more solid, equally reflective, but not falling apart and leaving the tail.
Comets also have very elliptical orbits and visit infrequently. In this list of periodic comets, 3200 Phaeton has a period of 1.4 years - very short by comet standards.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3200_Phaethon
So: your second moon is a very bright short period comet. That seems plausible.
answered 10 mins ago
WillkWillk
113k27211472
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
shootshi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141710%2fexistance-of-a-celestial-body-big-enough-for-early-civilization-to-be-thought-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes. That would be a kind of quasi-satellite.
And Earth already has a small one - it's called Cruithne. At perigee, a larger Cruithne might well be visible, always in the same section of the sky.
A larger body would be less stable, but if you only need one thousand years, I think it could work out.
answered 2 hours ago
LSerniLSerni
28.3k24990
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes. That would be a kind of quasi-satellite.
And Earth already has a small one - it's called Cruithne. At perigee, a larger Cruithne might well be visible, always in the same section of the sky.
A larger body would be less stable, but if you only need one thousand years, I think it could work out.
answered 2 hours ago
LSerniLSerni
28.3k24990
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes. That would be a kind of quasi-satellite.
And Earth already has a small one - it's called Cruithne. At perigee, a larger Cruithne might well be visible, always in the same section of the sky.
A larger body would be less stable, but if you only need one thousand years, I think it could work out.
answered 2 hours ago
LSerniLSerni
28.3k24990
$endgroup$
Yes. That would be a kind of quasi-satellite.
And Earth already has a small one - it's called Cruithne. At perigee, a larger Cruithne might well be visible, always in the same section of the sky.
A larger body would be less stable, but if you only need one thousand years, I think it could work out.
answered 2 hours ago
LSerniLSerni
28.3k24990
answered 2 hours ago
LSerniLSerni
28.3k24990
answered 2 hours ago
LSerniLSerni
28.3k24990
answered 2 hours ago
LSerniLSerni
28.3k24990
28.3k24990
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A comet could fill this role. Comets are notoriously bright.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Comet_P1_McNaught02_-_23-01-07.jpg
I like the tail but you could have your celestial body be made of something more solid, equally reflective, but not falling apart and leaving the tail.
Comets also have very elliptical orbits and visit infrequently. In this list of periodic comets, 3200 Phaeton has a period of 1.4 years - very short by comet standards.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3200_Phaethon
So: your second moon is a very bright short period comet. That seems plausible.
answered 10 mins ago
WillkWillk
113k27211472
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A comet could fill this role. Comets are notoriously bright.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Comet_P1_McNaught02_-_23-01-07.jpg
I like the tail but you could have your celestial body be made of something more solid, equally reflective, but not falling apart and leaving the tail.
Comets also have very elliptical orbits and visit infrequently. In this list of periodic comets, 3200 Phaeton has a period of 1.4 years - very short by comet standards.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3200_Phaethon
So: your second moon is a very bright short period comet. That seems plausible.
answered 10 mins ago
WillkWillk
113k27211472
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A comet could fill this role. Comets are notoriously bright.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Comet_P1_McNaught02_-_23-01-07.jpg
I like the tail but you could have your celestial body be made of something more solid, equally reflective, but not falling apart and leaving the tail.
Comets also have very elliptical orbits and visit infrequently. In this list of periodic comets, 3200 Phaeton has a period of 1.4 years - very short by comet standards.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3200_Phaethon
So: your second moon is a very bright short period comet. That seems plausible.
answered 10 mins ago
WillkWillk
113k27211472
$endgroup$
A comet could fill this role. Comets are notoriously bright.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Comet_P1_McNaught02_-_23-01-07.jpg
I like the tail but you could have your celestial body be made of something more solid, equally reflective, but not falling apart and leaving the tail.
Comets also have very elliptical orbits and visit infrequently. In this list of periodic comets, 3200 Phaeton has a period of 1.4 years - very short by comet standards.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3200_Phaethon
So: your second moon is a very bright short period comet. That seems plausible.
answered 10 mins ago
WillkWillk
113k27211472
answered 10 mins ago
WillkWillk
113k27211472
answered 10 mins ago
WillkWillk
113k27211472
answered 10 mins ago
WillkWillk
113k27211472
113k27211472
add a comment |
add a comment |
shootshi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
shootshi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
shootshi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
shootshi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141710%2fexistance-of-a-celestial-body-big-enough-for-early-civilization-to-be-thought-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
PbTPjxXIQzVrQ2ZWqI3,Xa DXllEb0O6ZABsG ciTnq,6 FwFP4BvNMWHi
$begingroup$
Humans considered all celestial bodies to be going around the Earth until a chap named Copernicus (and some of his contemporaries) suggested otherwise. I doubt the size would make a difference or periodicity.
$endgroup$
– StephenG
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. What do you mean by "occurring for 1,000 years"? Do you mean the moon is in the sky, visible and basically the same size, for a 1,000 year period, or that the inhabitants see it once every 1,000 years, like a comet?
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@StephenG true, but not all of them were considered moons.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@JBH thank you :) No, no, I want it to be much smaller to lessen the impact on the system. But what I mean is the ideal scenario for it to be visible once a year, each year, for 1,000 years.
$endgroup$
– shootshi
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Thanks, please edit your question with the clarification. Never depend on people reading through the comments to find clarifications. Cheers!
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago